Eran Bendavid
Stanford University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Eran Bendavid.
Medical Care | 2007
Joel S. Weissman; Jeffrey M. Rothschild; Eran Bendavid; Peter Sprivulis; E. Francis Cook; R. Scott Evans; Yevgenia Kaganova; Melissa Bender; JoAnn David-Kasdan; Peter J. Haug; James F. Lloyd; Leslie G. Selbovitz; Harvey J. Murff; David W. Bates
Context:Hospitals are under pressure to increase revenue and lower costs, and at the same time, they face dramatic variation in clinical demand. Objective:We sought to determine the relationship between peak hospital workload and rates of adverse events (AEs). Methods:A random sample of 24,676 adult patients discharged from the medical/surgical services at 4 US hospitals (2 urban and 2 suburban teaching hospitals) from October 2000 to September 2001 were screened using administrative data, leaving 6841 cases to be reviewed for the presence of AEs. Daily workload for each hospital was characterized by volume, throughput (admissions and discharges), intensity (aggregate DRG weight), and staffing (patient-to-nurse ratios). For volume, we calculated an “enhanced” occupancy rate that accounted for same-day bed occupancy by more than 1 patient. We used Poisson regressions to predict the likelihood of an AE, with control for workload and individual patient complexity, and the effects of clustering. Results:One urban teaching hospital had enhanced occupancy rates more than 100% for much of the year. At that hospital, admissions and patients per nurse were significantly related to the likelihood of an AE (P < 0.05); occupancy rate, discharges, and DRG-weighted census were significant at P < 0.10. For example, a 0.1% increase in the patient-to-nurse ratio led to a 28% increase in the AE rate. Results at the other 3 hospitals varied and were mainly non significant. Conclusions:Hospitals that operate at or over capacity may experience heightened rates of patient safety events and might consider re-engineering the structures of care to respond better during periods of high stress.
Annals of Internal Medicine | 2012
Jessie L. Juusola; Margaret L. Brandeau; Douglas K Owens; Eran Bendavid
BACKGROUND A recent randomized, controlled trial showed that daily oral preexposure chemoprophylaxis (PrEP) was effective for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men (MSM). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently provided interim guidance for PrEP in MSM at high risk for HIV. Previous studies did not reach a consistent estimate of its cost-effectiveness. OBJECTIVE To estimate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of PrEP in MSM in the United States. DESIGN Dynamic model of HIV transmission and progression combined with a detailed economic analysis. DATA SOURCES Published literature. TARGET POPULATION MSM aged 13 to 64 years in the United States. TIME HORIZON Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE Societal. INTERVENTION PrEP was evaluated in both the general MSM population and in high-risk MSM and was assumed to reduce infection risk by 44% on the basis of clinical trial results. OUTCOME MEASURES New HIV infections, discounted quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS Initiating PrEP in 20% of MSM in the United States would reduce new HIV infections by an estimated 13% and result in a gain of 550,166 QALYs over 20 years at a cost of
Annals of Internal Medicine | 2008
Hau Liu; Dena M. Bravata; Ingram Olkin; Anne L. Friedlander; Vincent Liu; Brian K. Roberts; Eran Bendavid; Olga Saynina; Shelley R. Salpeter; Alan M. Garber; Andrew R. Hoffman
172,091 per QALY gained. Initiating PrEP in a larger proportion of MSM would prevent more infections but at an increasing cost per QALY gained (up to
PLOS ONE | 2013
Clay Bavinger; Eran Bendavid; Katherine Niehaus; Richard A. Olshen; Ingram Olkin; Vandana Sundaram; Nicole Wein; Mark Holodniy; Nanjiang Hou; Douglas K Owens; Manisha Desai
216,480 if all MSM receive PrEP). Preexposure chemoprophylaxis in only high-risk MSM can improve cost-effectiveness. For MSM with an average of 5 partners per year, PrEP costs approximately
JAMA | 2012
Eran Bendavid; Jay Bhattacharya; Grant Miller
50,000 per QALY gained. Providing PrEP to all high-risk MSM for 20 years would cost
JAMA Internal Medicine | 2008
Eran Bendavid; Sean D. Young; David Katzenstein; Ahmed M. Bayoumi; Gillian D Sanders; Douglas K Owens
75 billion more in health care-related costs than the status quo and
Globalization and Health | 2011
Katherine A. Muldoon; Lindsay P. Galway; Maya Nakajima; Steve Kanters; Robert S. Hogg; Eran Bendavid; Edward J Mills
600,000 per HIV infection prevented, compared with incremental costs of
Nature | 2015
Andrew N. Phillips; Amir Shroufi; Lara Vojnov; Jennifer Cohn; Teri Roberts; Tom Ellman; Kimberly Bonner; Christine Rousseau; Geoff P. Garnett; Valentina Cambiano; Fumiyo Nakagawa; Deborah Ford; Loveleen Bansi-Matharu; Alec Miners; Jens D. Lundgren; Jeffrey W. Eaton; Rosalind Parkes-Ratanshi; Zachary Katz; David Maman; Nathan Ford; Marco Vitoria; Meg Doherty; David Dowdy; Brooke E. Nichols; Maurine Murtagh; Meghan Wareham; Kara M. Palamountain; Christine Chakanyuka Musanhu; Wendy Stevens; David Katzenstein
95 billion and
JAMA Internal Medicine | 2010
Eran Bendavid; Margaret L. Brandeau; Robin Wood; Douglas K Owens
2 million per infection prevented for 20% coverage of all MSM. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS PrEP in the general MSM population would cost less than
BMJ | 2010
Tim Kautz; Eran Bendavid; Jay Bhattacharya; Grant Miller
100,000 per QALY gained if the daily cost of antiretroviral drugs for PrEP was less than