Eric Bellissant

Norepinephrine plus dobutamine versus epinephrine alone for management of septic shock: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND International guidelines for management of septic shock recommend that dopamine or norepinephrine are preferable to epinephrine. However, no large comparative trial has yet been done. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of norepinephrine plus dobutamine (whenever needed) with those of epinephrine alone in septic shock. METHODS This prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blind study was done in 330 patients with septic shock admitted to one of 19 participating intensive care units in France. Participants were assigned to receive epinephrine (n=161) or norepinephrine plus dobutamine (n=169), which were titrated to maintain mean blood pressure at 70 mm Hg or more. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00148278. FINDINGS There were no patients lost to follow-up; one patient withdrew consent after 3 days. At day 28, there were 64 (40%) deaths in the epinephrine group and 58 (34%) deaths in the norepinephrine plus dobutamine group (p=0.31; relative risk 0.86, 95% CI 0.65-1.14). There was no significant difference between the two groups in mortality rates at discharge from intensive care (75 [47%] deaths vs 75 [44%] deaths, p=0.69), at hospital discharge (84 [52%] vs 82 [49%], p=0.51), and by day 90 (84 [52%] vs 85 [50%], p=0.73), time to haemodynamic success (log-rank p=0.67), time to vasopressor withdrawal (log-rank p=0.09), and time course of SOFA score. Rates of serious adverse events were also similar. INTERPRETATION There is no evidence for a difference in efficacy and safety between epinephrine alone and norepinephrine plus dobutamine for the management of septic shock.

Effects of high doses of selenium, as sodium selenite, in septic shock: a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, phase II study

IntroductionSepsis is associated with the generation of oxygen free radicals and (lacking) decreased selenium plasma concentrations. High doses of sodium selenite might reduce inflammation by a direct pro-oxidative effect and may increase antioxidant cell capacities by selenium incorporation into selenoenzymes. We investigated the effects of a continuous administration of high doses of selenium in septic shock patients.MethodsA prospective, multicentre, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study was performed with an intention-to-treat analysis in severe septic shock patients with documented infection. Patients received, for 10 days, selenium as sodium selenite (4,000 μg on the first day, 1,000 μg/day on the nine following days) or matching placebo using continuous intravenous infusion. The primary endpoint was the time to vasopressor therapy withdrawal. The duration of mechanical ventilation, the mortality rates in the intensive care unit, at hospital discharge, and at 7, 14, 28 and 180 days and 1 year after randomization, and adverse events were recorded.ResultsSixty patients were included (placebo, n = 29; selenium, n = 31). The median time to vasopressor therapy withdrawal was 7 days in both groups (95% confidence interval = 5–8 and 6–9 in the placebo and selenium groups, respectively; log-rank, P = 0.713). The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 14 days and 19 days in the placebo and selenium groups, respectively (P = 0.762). Mortality rates did not significantly differ between groups at any time point. Rates of adverse events were similar in the two groups.ConclusionContinuous infusion of selenium as sodium selenite (4,000 μg on the first day, 1,000 μg/day on the nine following days) had no obvious toxicity but did not improve the clinical outcome in septic shock patients. Trial Registration = NCT00207844.

12-h pretreatment with methylprednisolone versus placebo for prevention of postextubation laryngeal oedema: a randomised double-blind trial

BACKGROUND The efficacy of corticosteroids in reducing the incidence of postextubation laryngeal oedema is controversial. We aimed to test our hypothesis that methylprednisolone started 12 h before a planned extubation could prevent postextubation laryngeal oedema. METHODS We did a placebo-controlled, double-blind multicentre trial in 761 adults in intensive-care units. Patients who were ventilated for more than 36 h and underwent a planned extubation received intravenous 20 mg methylprednisolone (n=380) or placebo (381) 12 h before extubation and every 4 h until tube removal. The primary endpoint was occurrence of laryngeal oedema within 24 h of extubation. Laryngeal oedema was clinically diagnosed and deemed serious if tracheal reintubation was needed. Analyses were done on a per protocol and intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00199576. FINDINGS 63 patients could not be assessed, mainly because of self-extubation (n=16) or cancelled extubation (44) between randomisation and planned extubation. 698 patients were analysed (343 in placebo group, 355 in methylprednisolone group). Methylprednisolone significantly reduced the incidence of postextubation laryngeal oedema (11 of 355, 3%vs 76 of 343, 22%, p<0.0001), the global incidence of reintubations (13 of 355, 4%vs 26 of 343, 8%, p=0.02), and the proportion of reintubations secondary to laryngeal oedema (one of 13, 8 %vs 14 of 26, 54%, p=0.005). One patient in each group died after extubation, and atelectasia occurred in one patient given methylprednisolone. INTERPRETATION Methylprednisolone started 12 h before a planned extubation substantially reduced the incidence of postextubation laryngeal oedema and reintubation. Such pretreatment should be considered in adult patients before a planned extubation that follows a tracheal intubation of more than 36 h.

Compartmentalised inducible nitric-oxide synthase activity in septic shock

BACKGROUND Previous experimental studies support a role for inducible nitric-oxide synthase (iNOS) in the pathogenesis of severe sepsis. The aim of the study was to characterise iNOS activity in different tissues in patients with septic shock. METHODS 13 consecutive patients with septic shock caused by cellulitis were enrolled. Skin, muscle, fat, and artery samples were obtained from normal, inflamed, and putrescent areas to measure iNOS activity, and concentrations of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) and interleukin 1beta (IL-1beta). In two patients, iNOS activity was also assessed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) incubated with microorganisms causing the sepsis, or in macrophages isolated from suppurating peritoneal fluid incubated with IL-1beta. FINDINGS Compared with normal and inflamed areas, iNOS activity was increased in putrescent areas for muscle (71-fold [95% CI 20-259] vs normal areas, 69-fold [19-246] vs inflamed areas; p<0.01 for each) and for fat (68-fold [23-199] and 49-fold [18-137], respectively; p<0.01), but not for skin. Compared with normal areas, putrescent areas of arteries showed increased iNOS expression (1280-fold [598-3153]; p<0.01). Compared with normal areas, TNFalpha and IL-1beta were increased in putrescent areas of arteries (223-fold and 41-fold, respectively; p<0.01 for each). PBMCs and tissue macrophages expressed iNOS. Plasma nitrite/nitrate concentrations inversely correlated with mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance. INTERPRETATION In human septic shock we found that iNOS activity is compartmentalised at the very site of infection and parallels expression of TNFalpha and IL-1beta. PBMCs and tissue macrophages can be a cellular source for iNOS.

Reduced‐Dose Tacrolimus with Mycophenolate Mofetil vs. Standard‐Dose Tacrolimus in Liver Transplantation: A Randomized Study

We conducted a multicenter randomized study in liver transplantation to compare standard‐dose tacrolimus to reduced‐dose tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil to reduce the occurrence of tacrolimus side effects. Two primary outcomes (censored criteria) were monitored during 48 weeks post‐transplantation: occurrence of renal dysfunction or arterial hypertension or diabetes (evaluating benefit) and occurrence of acute graft rejection (evaluating risk). Interim analyses were performed every 40 patients to stop the study in the case of increased risk of graft rejection. One hundred and ninety‐five patients (control: 100; experimental: 95) had been included when the study was stopped. Acute graft rejection occurred in 46 (46%) and 28 (30%) patients in control and experimental groups, respectively (HR = 0.59; 95% CI: [0.37–0.94]; p = 0.024). Renal dysfunction or arterial hypertension or diabetes occurred in 80 (80%) and 61 (64%) patients in control and experimental groups, respectively (HR = 0.68; 95% CI: [0.49–0.95]; p = 0.021). Renal dysfunction occurred in 42 (42%) and 23 (24%) patients in control and experimental groups, respectively (HR = 0.49; 95% CI: [0.29–0.81]; p = 0.004). Leucopoenia (p = 0.001), thrombocytopenia (p = 0.017) and diarrhea (p = 0.002) occurred more frequently in the experimental group. Reduced‐dose tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil reduces the occurrence of renal dysfunction and the risk of graft rejection. This immunosuppressive regimen could replace full‐dose tacrolimus in adult liver transplantation.

Effects of epinephrine compared with the combination of dobutamine and norepinephrine on gastric perfusion in septic shock

In septic shock, the alteration of the gut barrier contributes to the development of multiple organ failure. The aim of the study was to compare epinephrine with the combination of dobutamine and norepinephrine on gastric perfusion in patients with septic shock.

Trial of dexamethasone treatment for severe bacterial meningitis in adults

Objective: To evaluate the clinical benefit of early adjunctive dexamethasone therapy for severe bacterial meningitis in adults. Design: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial initiated in emergency or intensive care units in France and Switzerland. Within 3 h after initiation of an aminopenicillin therapy, patients received dexamethasone (10 mg q. i. d.) or placebo for 3 days. The primary end-point was the rate of patients cured without any neurologic sequelae on day 30. Results: Sixty patients were enrolled, predominantly with a severe form since 85 % required ICU stay and 43 % mechanical ventilation. Streptococcus pneumoniae accounted for 31 cases and Neisseria meningitidis for 18 cases. The study had to be stopped prematurely because of a new national recommendation of experts to use third generation cephalosporin and vancomycin as a result of the increasing rate of penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae in France. After the third sequential analysis by the triangular statistical test, the difference of rate of cured patients without any neurologic sequelae was not statistically significant (p = 0.0711) between the dexamethasone group (74.2 %; n = 31) and the placebo group (51.7 %; n = 29). Furthermore, the former group was younger and less sick at inclusion. Conclusion: Bacterial meningitis is still a severe disease in adults, since the overall observed rate of death or severe neurologic sequelae was 26.7 %. The reported data are inconclusive regarding a systematic use of dexamethasone as an adjunctive therapy for bacterial meningitis in adults. Moreover this treatment impairs antibiotic penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) that can lead to therapeutic failure, particularly in areas with high or increasing rates of penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae.

Dopexamine and norepinephrine versus epinephrine on gastric perfusion in patients with septic shock: a randomized study [NCT00134212]

IntroductionMicrocirculatory blood flow, and notably gut perfusion, is important in the development of multiple organ failure in septic shock. We compared the effects of dopexamine and norepinephrine (noradrenaline) with those of epinephrine (adrenaline) on gastric mucosal blood flow (GMBF) in patients with septic shock. The effects of these drugs on oxidative stress were also assessed.MethodsThis was a prospective randomized study performed in a surgical intensive care unit among adults fulfilling usual criteria for septic shock. Systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics, GMBF (laser-Doppler) and malondialdehyde were assessed just before catecholamine infusion (T0), as soon as mean arterial pressure (MAP) reached 70 to 80 mmHg (T1), and 2 hours (T2) and 6 hours (T3) after T1. Drugs were titrated from 0.2 μg kg-1 min-1 with 0.2 μg kg-1 min-1 increments every 3 minutes for epinephrine and norepinephrine, and from 0.5 μg kg-1 min-1 with 0.5 μg kg-1 min-1 increments every 3 minutes for dopexamine.ResultsTwenty-two patients were included (10 receiving epinephrine, 12 receiving dopexamine–norepinephrine). There was no significant difference between groups on MAP at T0, T1, T2, and T3. Heart rate and cardiac output increased significantly more with epinephrine than with dopexamine–norepinephrine, whereas. GMBF increased significantly more with dopexamine–norepinephrine than with epinephrine between T1 and T3 (median values 106, 137, 133, and 165 versus 76, 91, 90, and 125 units of relative flux at T0, T1, T2 and T3, respectively). Malondialdehyde similarly increased in both groups between T1 and T3.ConclusionIn septic shock, at doses that induced the same effect on MAP, dopexamine–norepinephrine enhanced GMBF more than epinephrine did. No difference was observed on oxidative stress.

Hydrocortisone plus Fludrocortisone for Adults with Septic Shock

BACKGROUND Septic shock is characterized by dysregulation of the host response to infection, with circulatory, cellular, and metabolic abnormalities. We hypothesized that therapy with hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone or with drotrecogin alfa (activated), which can modulate the host response, would improve the clinical outcomes of patients with septic shock. METHODS In this multicenter, double‐blind, randomized trial with a 2‐by‐2 factorial design, we evaluated the effect of hydrocortisone‐plus‐fludrocortisone therapy, drotrecogin alfa (activated), the combination of the three drugs, or their respective placebos. The primary outcome was 90‐day all‐cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included mortality at intensive care unit (ICU) discharge and hospital discharge and at day 28 and day 180 and the number of days alive and free of vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, or organ failure. After drotrecogin alfa (activated) was withdrawn from the market, the trial continued with a two‐group parallel design. The analysis compared patients who received hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone with those who did not (placebo group). RESULTS Among the 1241 patients included in the trial, the 90‐day mortality was 43.0% (264 of 614 patients) in the hydrocortisone‐plus‐fludrocortisone group and 49.1% (308 of 627 patients) in the placebo group (P=0.03). The relative risk of death in the hydrocortisone‐plus‐fludrocortisone group was 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 0.99). Mortality was significantly lower in the hydrocortisone‐plus‐fludrocortisone group than in the placebo group at ICU discharge (35.4% vs. 41.0%, P=0.04), hospital discharge (39.0% vs. 45.3%, P=0.02), and day 180 (46.6% vs. 52.5%, P=0.04) but not at day 28 (33.7% and 38.9%, respectively; P=0.06). The number of vasopressor‐free days to day 28 was significantly higher in the hydrocortisone‐plus‐fludrocortisone group than in the placebo group (17 vs. 15 days, P<0.001), as was the number of organ‐failure–free days (14 vs. 12 days, P=0.003). The number of ventilator‐free days was similar in the two groups (11 days in the hydrocortisone‐plus‐fludrocortisone group and 10 in the placebo group, P=0.07). The rate of serious adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups, but hyperglycemia was more common in hydrocortisone‐plus‐fludrocortisone group. CONCLUSIONS In this trial involving patients with septic shock, 90‐day all‐cause mortality was lower among those who received hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone than among those who received placebo. (Funded by Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique 2007 of the French Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; APROCCHSS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00625209.)

Clinical pharmacology, efficacy and safety of atazanavir: a review

Background: Atazanavir (ATV) is a potent and safe protease inhibitor (PI) initially approved in adult HIV-1 infected patients in combination with other antiretroviral drugs with once daily administration. In combination with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and boosted with ritonavir, it has been established as the preferred initial regimen in published guidelines. Objective: This article reviews relevant pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, efficacy and safety data of ATV, administered boosted with ritonavir or unboosted, in comparison with other PIs and/or non-NRTIs, with special focus on recent studies. Methods: Review articles, recent primary literature and scientific meeting reports were analyzed. Results: Compared to most PIs with similar efficacy, the advantages of ATV are a once daily administration with only 100 mg ritonavir when boosted, a good gastrointestinal tolerance with limited diarrhea, a neutral effect on cholesterol and triglycerides, and a favorable resistance profile. However, highly frequent hyperbilirubinemia is observed resulting in some cases in clinical jaundice. Unboosted ATV must be cautiously used because increased resistances have been described. Conclusion: The combination of a similar efficacy, a better tolerance and a low pill burden, as compared to other PIs, makes boosted ATV one of the best options, in combination with NRTIs, in PI-naive HIV-1 infected patients.