Eric Buch

Characterization of the Arrhythmogenic Substrate in Ischemic and Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: Implications for Catheter Ablation of Hemodynamically Unstable Ventricular Tachycardia

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to compare the characteristics and prevalence of late potentials (LP) in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) etiologies and evaluate their value as targets for catheter ablation. BACKGROUND LP are frequently found in post-myocardial infarction scars and are useful ablation targets. The relative prevalence and characteristics of LP in patients with NICM is not well understood. METHODS Thirty-three patients with structural heart disease (NICM, n = 16; ICM, n = 17) referred for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia were studied. Electroanatomic mapping was performed endocardially (n = 33) and epicardially (n = 19). The LP were defined as low voltage electrograms (<1.5 mV) with onset after the QRS interval. Very late potentials (vLP) were defined as electrograms with onset >100 ms after the QRS. RESULTS We sampled an average of 564 +/- 449 points and 726 +/- 483 points in the left ventricle endocardium and epicardium, respectively. Mean total low voltage area in patients with ICM was 101 +/- 55 cm(2) and 56 +/- 33 cm(2), endocardial and epicardial, respectively, compared with NICM of 55 +/- 41 cm(2) and 53 +/- 28 cm(2), respectively. Within the total low voltage area, vLP were observed more frequently in ICM than in NICM in endocardium (4.1% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.0003) and epicardium (4.3% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.035). An LP-targeted ablation strategy was effective in ICM patients (82% nonrecurrence at 12 +/- 10 months of follow-up), whereas NICM patients had less favorable outcomes (50% at 15 +/- 13 months of follow-up). CONCLUSIONS The contribution of scar to the electrophysiological abnormalities targeted for ablation of unstable ventricular tachycardia differs between ICM and NICM. An approach incorporating LP ablation and pace-mapping had limited success in patients with NICM compared with ICM, and alternative ablation strategies should be considered.

Quantitative Analysis of Localized Sources Identified by Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation Mapping in Atrial Fibrillation

Background—New approaches to ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) include focal impulse and rotor modulation (FIRM) mapping, and initial results reported with this technique have been favorable. We sought to independently evaluate the approach by analyzing quantitative characteristics of atrial electrograms used to identify rotors and describe acute procedural outcomes of FIRM-guided ablation. Methods and Results—All FIRM-guided ablation procedures (n=24; 50% paroxysmal) at University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center were included for analysis. During AF, unipolar atrial electrograms collected from a 64-pole basket catheter were used to construct phase maps and identify putative AF sources. These sites were targeted for ablation, in conjunction with pulmonary vein isolation in most patients (n=19; 79%). All patients had rotors identified (mean, 2.3±0.9 per patient; 72% in left atrium). Prespecified acute procedural end point was achieved in 12 of 24 (50%) patients: AF termination (n=1), organization (n=3), or >10% slowing of AF cycle length (n=8). Basket electrodes were within 1 cm of 54% of left atrial surface area, and a mean of 31 electrodes per patient showed interpretable atrial electrograms. Offline analysis revealed no differences between rotor and distant sites in dominant frequency or Shannon entropy. Electroanatomic mapping showed no rotational activation at FIRM-identified rotor sites in 23 of 24 patients (96%). Conclusions—FIRM-identified rotor sites did not exhibit quantitative atrial electrogram characteristics expected from rotors and did not differ quantitatively from surrounding tissue. Catheter ablation at these sites, in conjunction with pulmonary vein isolation, resulted in AF termination or organization in a minority of patients (4/24; 17%). Further validation of this approach is necessary.

Long-term clinical outcomes of focal impulse and rotor modulation for treatment of atrial fibrillation: A multicenter experience

BACKGROUND New approaches to ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) include focal impulse and rotor modulation (FIRM). Studies of this technology with short-term follow-up have shown favorable outcomes. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to characterize the long-term results of FIRM ablation in a cohort of patients treated at 2 academic medical centers. METHODS All FIRM-guided ablation procedures (n = 43) at UCLA Medical Center and Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center performed between January 2012 and October 2013 were included for analysis. During AF, FIRM software constructed phase maps from unipolar atrial electrograms to identify putative AF sources. These sites were targeted for ablation, along with pulmonary vein isolation in 77% of patients. RESULTS AF was paroxysmal in 56%, and 67% had prior AF ablation. All patients had rotors identified (mean 2.6 ± 1.2 per patient, 77% in LA). Prespecified acute procedural end-point was achieved in 47% of patients (n = 20): AF termination in 4, organization in 7, >10% slowing of AF cycle length in 9. Acute complications occurred in 4 patients (9.3%). At 18 ± 7 months of follow-up, 37% were free from documented recurrent AF after a 3-month blanking period; 21% were free from documented atrial tachyarrhythmias and off antiarrhythmic drugs. Multivariate analysis did not reveal any significant predictors of AF recurrence, including pattern of AF, acute procedural success, or prior failed ablation. CONCLUSION Long-term clinical results after FIRM ablation in this cohort of patients showed poor efficacy, different from previously published studies. Randomized studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and clinical utility of this ablation approach for treating AF.

Epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia: An institutional experience of safety and efficacy

BACKGROUND Epicardial ablation has been shown to be a useful adjunct for treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT). OBJECTIVE To report the trends, safety, and efficacy of epicardial mapping and ablation at a single center over an 8-year period. METHODS Patients referred for VT ablation (June 2004 to July 2011) were divided into 3 groups: ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), and idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VA). Patients with scar-mediated VT who underwent combined epicardial and endocardial (epi-endo) mapping and ablation were compared with those who underwent endocardial-only (endo-only) ablation with regard to patient characteristics, acute procedural success, 6- and 12-month clinical outcomes. RESULTS Among 144 patients referred for VT ablation, 95 patients underwent 109 epicardial procedures (94% access rate). Major complications were seen in 8 patients (8.8%) with pericardial bleeding (>80 cm(3)) in 6 cases (6.7%), although no tamponade, surgical intervention, or procedural mortality was seen. Patients with ICM who underwent a combined epi-endo ablation had improved freedom from VT compared with those who underwent endo-only ablation at 12 months (85% vs 56%; P = .03). In patients with NICM, no differences were seen between those who underwent epi-endo ablation and those who underwent endo-only ablation at 12 months (36% vs 33%; P = 1.0). In idiopathic VA, only 2 of 17 patients were successfully ablated from the epicardium. CONCLUSIONS In this large tertiary single-center experience, complication rates are acceptably low and improved clinical outcomes were associated with epi-endo ablation in patients with ICM. Patients with NICM represent a growing referred population, although clinical recurrence remains high despite epicardial ablation. Epicardial ablation has a low yield in idiopathic VA.

Pacemaker and Defibrillator Lead Extraction

Surgically implanted cardiac devices play an important role in the treatment of heart disease. In the 50 years since the first pacemaker was implanted, technology has improved dramatically, and these devices have saved or improved the quality of countless lives. Pacemakers treat slow heart rhythms by increasing the heart rate or by coordinating the hearts contraction for some heart failure patients.1 Implantable cardioverter defibrillators stop dangerous rapid heart rhythms by delivering an electric shock.2 As the range of applications widens, the number of patients with cardiac devices continues to increase. Approximately 400 000 devices are implanted each year in the United States, and there >3 million patients with implanted cardiac devices currently. Occasionally, pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator systems must be removed. The removal of such systems is potentially a high-risk procedure. With the increasing number of implanted devices, removal is required more frequently. To ensure patient safety, the Heart Rhythm Society has published guidelines for safe lead removal or extraction. These guidelines outline the indications for lead extraction, physician qualifications and training, and the tools and techniques used in the procedure.3 One part of the system is the pulse generator, a metal can that contains electric circuits and a battery, usually placed under the skin on the chest wall beneath the collarbone. To replace the battery, the pulse generator must be changed by a simple surgical procedure every 5 to 10 years. The other parts are the wires, or leads, which run between the pulse generator and the heart. In a pacemaker, these leads allow the device to increase the heart rate by delivering small bursts of electric energy to make it beat faster. In a defibrillator, the lead has special coils to allow the device to deliver a high-energy shock and convert dangerous rapid rhythms …

Functional pace-mapping responses for identification of targets for catheter ablation of scar-mediated ventricular tachycardia.

Background— Myocardial scars harbor areas of slow conduction and display abnormal electrograms. Pace-mapping at these sites can generate a 12-lead ECG morphological match to a targeted ventricular tachycardia (VT), and in some instances, multiple exit morphologies can result. At times, this can also result in the initiation of VT, termed pace-mapped induction (PMI). We hypothesized that in patients undergoing catheter ablation of VT, scar substrates with multiple exit sites (MES) identified during pace-mapping have improved freedom from recurrent VT, and PMI of VT predicts successful sites of termination during ablation. Methods and Results— High-density mapping was performed in all subjects to delineate scar (0.5–1.5 mV). Sites with abnormal electrograms were tagged, stimulated (bipolar 10 mA at 2 ms), and targeted for ablation. MES was defined as >1 QRS morphology from a single pacing site. PMI was defined as initiation of VT during pace-mapping (400–600 ms). In a 2-year period, 44 consecutive patients with scar-mediated VT underwent mapping and ablation. MES were observed during pace-mapping in 25 patients (57%). At 9 months, 74% of patients who exhibited MES during pace-mapping had no recurrence of VT compared with 42% of those without MES observed (P=0.024), with an overall freedom from VT of 61%. Thirteen patients (30%) demonstrated PMI, and termination of VT was seen in 95% (18/19) of sites where ablation was performed. Conclusions— During pace-mapping, electrograms that exhibit MES and PMI may be specific for sites critical to reentry. These functional responses hold promise for identifying important sites for catheter ablation of VT.

Impact of local ablation on interconnected channels within ventricular scar: mechanistic implications for substrate modification.

Background— The extent to which channels within scar are interconnected is not known. The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of local ablation of late potentials (LPs) on adjacent and remote areas of slow conduction with simultaneous multipolar mapping. Methods and Results— Analysis was performed on consecutive patients referred for ablation of scar-mediated ventricular tachycardia with double ventricular access. Ablation was performed targeting the earliest of LPs visualized on the multipolar catheter, and the impact on later LPs was recorded. In 21 patients, a multipolar catheter placed within scar visualized spatially distinct LPs. Among 39 radiofrequency applications, ablation at earlier LPs had an effect on neighboring and remote LPs in 31 (80%), with delay in 8 (21%), partial elimination in 9 (23%), and complete elimination in 14 (36%). The mean distance where an ablation impact was detected was 17.6±14.7 mm (range, 2–50 mm). Among all patients, 9.7±7.8 radiofrequency applications were delivered to homogenize the targeted scar region with a mean number of 23±12 LPs targeted. Conclusions— Ablation can eliminate neighboring and remote areas of slow conduction, suggesting that channels within scar are frequently interconnected. This is the first mechanistic demonstration to show that ablation can modify electrical activity in regions of scar outside of the known radius of an radiofrequency lesion. The targeting of relatively earlier LPs can expedite scar homogenization without the need for extensive ablation of all LPs.Background—The extent to which channels within scar are interconnected is not known. The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of local ablation of late potentials (LPs) on adjacent and remote areas of slow conduction with simultaneous multipolar mapping. Methods and Results—Analysis was performed on consecutive patients referred for ablation of scar-mediated ventricular tachycardia with double ventricular access. Ablation was performed targeting the earliest of LPs visualized on the multipolar catheter, and the impact on later LPs was recorded. In 21 patients, a multipolar catheter placed within scar visualized spatially distinct LPs. Among 39 radiofrequency applications, ablation at earlier LPs had an effect on neighboring and remote LPs in 31 (80%), with delay in 8 (21%), partial elimination in 9 (23%), and complete elimination in 14 (36%). The mean distance where an ablation impact was detected was 17.6±14.7 mm (range, 2–50 mm). Among all patients, 9.7±7.8 radiofrequency applications were delivered to homogenize the targeted scar region with a mean number of 23±12 LPs targeted. Conclusions—Ablation can eliminate neighboring and remote areas of slow conduction, suggesting that channels within scar are frequently interconnected. This is the first mechanistic demonstration to show that ablation can modify electrical activity in regions of scar outside of the known radius of an radiofrequency lesion. The targeting of relatively earlier LPs can expedite scar homogenization without the need for extensive ablation of all LPs.

Defibrillation threshold testing fails to show clinical benefit during long-term follow-up of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator implantation

BACKGROUND The utility of defibrillation threshold testing in patients undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation is controversial. Higher defibrillation thresholds have been noted in patients undergoing implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D). Since the risks and potential benefits of testing may be higher in this population, we sought to assess the impact of defibrillation safety margin or vulnerability safety margin testing in CRT-D recipients. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 256 consecutive subjects who underwent CRT-D implantation between January 2003 and December 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Subjects were divided into two groups based on whether (n= 204) or not (n= 52) safety margin testing was performed. Patient characteristics, tachyarrhythmia therapies, procedural results, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Baseline characteristics, including heart failure (HF) severity, were comparable between the groups. Four cases of HF exacerbation (2%), including one leading to one death, were recorded in the tested group immediately post-implantation. No complications were observed in the untested group. After a mean follow-up of 32 ± 20 months, the proportion of appropriate shocks in the two groups was similar (31 vs. 25%, P = 0.49). There were three cases of failed appropriate shocks in the tested group, despite adequate safety margins at implantation, whereas no failed shocks were noted in the untested group. Survival was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION Defibrillation efficacy testing during implant of CRT-D was associated with increased morbidity and did not predict the success of future device therapy or improve survival during long-term follow-up.

Intra-pericardial balloon retraction of the left atrium: A novel method to prevent esophageal injury during catheter ablation

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is a useful treatment option for this common arrhythmia, reducing morbidity compared to drug therapy1. Methods and technology have improved in recent years, and it is has even been offered as first-line therapy in a few experienced centers2. Despite the promise of catheter ablation, a variety of serious complications have been reported, including pulmonary vein stenosis, cardiac perforation, thromboembolism, vascular complications, and phrenic nerve injury. Atrioesophageal fistula, thought to result from thermal injury of the esophagus due to its close apposition to the posterior left atrial (LA) wall3, is a rare but often fatal complication of catheter ablation for AF4. Several methods have been proposed for detecting and avoiding esophageal injury during left atrial catheter ablation, including fluoroscopic contrast visualization of the esophagus during the procedure5, which provides a rough guide but may underestimate the size of the esophagus6. Temperature monitoring also offers a means of detecting intraprocedural esophageal heating so radiofrequency application at that site can be discontinued7, 8. However, only a few active techniques for esophageal protection have been proposed, including mechanical deflection of the esophagus9 and active esophageal cooling10. These have not been widely used during ablation procedures; most experts advise simply limiting energy delivery near the esophagus and monitoring for heating. Our group has previously used an intra-pericardial balloon to protect the phrenic nerve during a catheter ablation procedure11. In the current communication, we demonstrate a novel technique, inflating an intra-pericardial balloon between the left atrium and esophagus to prevent esophageal injury during ablation of the posterior LA wall.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy response is associated with shorter duration of atrial fibrillation.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is commonly associated with heart failure. The benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on atrial remodeling has been demonstrated. However, biventricular pacing did not reduce the global incidence of AF. We evaluated the relationship between CRT response and AF duration.