Eric J. Schenkel

Safety and efficacy of desloratadine 5 mg in asthma patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and nasal congestion

BACKGROUND Antihistamines relieve most seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) symptoms, with the exception of nasal congestion, which is often the most troublesome symptom for patients. A nonsedating antihistamine that significantly decreases nasal congestion and improves symptoms of seasonal allergic asthma would be a significant advance in therapy. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the safety and efficacy of desloratadine 5 mg in patients experiencing moderate SAR, nasal congestion, and symptoms of seasonal allergic asthma. METHODS This 4-week, multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind study evaluated desloratadine treatment (5 mg once daily) versus placebo in 331 subjects with SAR and mild seasonal allergic asthma. Subjects evaluated SAR and asthma symptoms twice daily, recording 12-hour reflective and instantaneous severity evaluation scores. The primary efficacy parameter was the difference from baseline in AM/PM reflective total symptom scores. Changes in individual SAR and asthma symptoms were also analyzed. RESULTS Compared with placebo, desloratadine significantly reduced mean AM/PM reflective total symptom scores for SAR, beginning with the first dose (P < 0.001) and continuing throughout days 1 to 15 (-4.90 vs -2.98; P < 0.001) and days 1 to 29 (-5.47 vs -3.73; P < 0.001). Desloratadine significantly decreased AM/PM reflective total asthma symptom scores for days 1 to 15 (P = 0.023) and AM/PM reflective nasal congestion scores over days 1 to 15 and days 1 to 29 (P = 0.006 and P = 0.014, respectively). Desloratadine was safe and well tolerated; adverse events were similar to placebo overall. CONCLUSIONS Desloratadine provided significant relief from the signs and symptoms of SAR, including nasal congestion. In this patient population, symptoms of seasonal allergic asthma also improved.

Once-daily mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler in the treatment of patients with persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND Although inhaled glucocorticoids are recommended for all stages of persistent asthma, compliance with long-term therapy is often poor, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. A simplified, once-daily dosing regimen may foster improved compliance. OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily (AM) administration of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler (MF DPI) 200 microg and 400 microg with placebo in patients with asthma previously maintained only on short-acting inhaled beta-adrenergic receptor agonists. METHODS This was a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. The mean change from baseline to endpoint (last treatment visit) for FEV1 was the primary efficacy variable. RESULTS At endpoint, both doses of MF DPI were significantly more effective than placebo (P < or = .05) in improving FEV1. Based on morning peak expiratory flow rate, once-daily MF DPI 400 microg was more effective than placebo (P < or = .001) at endpoint. Both active treatments also demonstrated improvement at endpoint in asthma symptom scores, physician-evaluated response to therapy and use of rescue medication. Although both MF DPI dosages were efficacious, MF DPI 400 microg provided additional improvement in some measures of pulmonary function (eg, morning PEFR) when these agents were administered once daily in the morning. Both doses of MF DPI were well tolerated and treatment-related adverse events occurred at a similar incidence among the three treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study indicate that once-daily (AM) MF DPI provides a convenient and effective treatment option for patients with mild or moderate persistent asthma.

The effects of triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray on adrenocortical function in children with allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND Suppression of adrenocortical function, a risk associated with oral corticosteroids, is minimized with intranasal corticosteroids. Triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) aqueous nasal spray, at therapeutic doses, has no measurable effect on adrenocortical function in adults with allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE This double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the effect of once-daily TAA aqueous nasal spray (220 or 440 microg) with placebo on adrenocortical function after 6 weeks of treatment in pediatric (children 6 to 12 years of age) patients with allergic rhinitis. The pharmacokinetic profile of TAA was examined after once-daily intranasal administration of TAA aqueous nasal spray 440 microg for 6 weeks. METHODS Eighty children received TAA aqueous nasal spray 220 microg or 440 microg or placebo for 6 weeks. Adrenocortical function was assessed by analyzing plasma cortisol levels before stimulation (0 hour) and at 30 and 60 minutes after a rapid 1-hour intravenous cosyntropin stimulation test performed before treatment and after 6 weeks of treatment. Samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were collected from 19 patients at baseline (0 hour) and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 6 hours after the final dose of study medication. RESULTS After 6 weeks, no significant effects on adrenocortical function were observed at 30 or 60 minutes after cosyntropin stimulation with either dose of TAA aqueous nasal spray. TAA concentrations in plasma showed rapid elimination of the drug, with little or no accumulation. CONCLUSIONS TAA aqueous nasal spray (220 or 440 microg/day) has no measurable effect on adrenocortical function in pediatric patients with allergic rhinitis. Pharmacokinetic parameters after 440 microg/day of TAA aqueous nasal spray indicate a rapid decline of plasma drug levels, with little or no systemic accumulation of study drug.

A dose-ranging study of mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND The efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray (MFNS; Nasonex) 200 microg once daily for the treatment and prophylaxis of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and treatment of perennial rhinitis have been demonstrated in adults. However, the dose response of MFNS in pediatric patients has not yet been characterized. OBJECTIVE This study was conducted to determine the dose-response relationship of 3 different doses of MFNS in a pediatric population. METHODS This was a multicenter, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled study of 679 children 6 to 11 years of age with histories of SAR and documented positive skin test responses. Patients were randomized to one of the following treatment groups for 4 weeks: MFNS 25 microgram once daily, MFNS 100 microgram once daily, MFNS 200 microgram once daily, beclomethasone dipropionate 84 microgram twice daily (168 microgram/day), or placebo. Physician evaluations were performed at days 4, 8, 15, and 29, and patient evaluations were analyzed for days 1 to 15 and 16 to 29. RESULTS The mean reduction from baseline in physician-evaluated total nasal symptom scores at day 8 (the primary efficacy variable) was significantly greater in the MFNS and beclomethasone dipropionate groups than in the placebo group (P </=.02). No significant differences were observed among the 3 MFNS groups. However, as treatment continued, symptoms in patients treated with MFNS 100 or 200 microgram once daily continued to improve, whereas those treated with MFNS 25 microgram once daily demonstrated little further improvement. By day 29, MFNS 100 and 200 microgram once daily both were significantly more effective than MFNS 25 microgram once daily in relieving symptoms of SAR, but MFNS 200 microgram provided no additional benefit over MFNS 100 microgram. All doses of MFNS were well tolerated, and cosyntropin stimulation tests performed before and after treatment found no evidence of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression. CONCLUSION These results indicate that the most appropriate therapeutic dosage of MFNS in the treatment of SAR in children 6 to 11 years of age is 100 microgram once daily. In addition, MFNS at doses up to 200 microgram once daily for 4 weeks was well tolerated and had no detectable effects on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function.

One-Year Trial on Safety and Normal Linear Growth with Flunisolide HFA in Children with Asthma

Flunisolide hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) has efficacy equivalent to that of flunisolide chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) at one third the dose of the CFC formulation, a reduction from 250 pg/puff for flunisolide CFC to 85 pg/puff for flunisolide HFA. Flunisolide HFA delivers a smaller particle size (1.2 pim) in solution, resulting in improved lung deposition as compared with flunisolide CFC (3.8 pm), which is delivered in suspension. An added built-in spacer has reduced oropharyngeal deposition that may result in fewer adverse events and make it easier to use. The objective of this study was to compare the year-long safety of flunisolide HFA (daily dosage 340 pg) with that of CFC beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) (daily dosage 336 pg) and cromolyn sodium (daily dosage 6,400 pg) in children 4-11 years old with mild-to-moderate asthma. The effects of these drugs on linear growth and growth velocity were also compared. The study was a 1-year open-label, parallel-group trial. Changes in physical examinations (including growth), adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiograms, cosyntropin stimulation tests, mouth and throat cultures for Candida albicans, and laboratory findings were analyzed. Patients 4-5 years old received flunisolide HFA only. In total, 235 children were evaluated (152 receiving flunisolide HFA, 39 BDP, and 44 cromolyn). The incidence of adverse events was comparable among treatment groups; most were mild or moderate and considered unrelated to treatment. Among patients 6-11 years old, mean changes from baseline height at week 52 were 6.2 cm for the flunisolide HFA and cromolyn groups and 5.1 cm for the BDP group. Thus growth in children receiving flunisolide HFA was unaffected by 1 year of treatment. Changes from baseline in other parameters, including response to cosyntropin stimulation, were insignificant and similar among the 3 treatment groups. At the dosages studied, and following 1 year of treatment, flunisolide HFA with its small particle size and built-in spacer is safe and well tolerated in children 4-11 years old. There are no adverse effects associated with HFA, including linear growth in children 6-11 years old when compared with BDP and cromolyn sodium.