Eric M. Cooper

Total Synthesis of a Functional Designer Eukaryotic Chromosome

Designer Chromosome One of the ultimate aims of synthetic biology is to build designer organisms from the ground up. Rapid advances in DNA synthesis has allowed the assembly of complete bacterial genomes. Eukaryotic organisms, with their generally much larger and more complex genomes, present an additional challenge to synthetic biologists. Annaluru et al. (p. 55, published online 27 March) designed a synthetic eukaryotic chromosome based on yeast chromosome III. The designer chromosome, shorn of destabilizing transfer RNA genes and transposons, is ∼14% smaller than its wild-type template and is fully functional with every gene tagged for easy removal. A synthetic version of yeast chromosome III with every gene tagged can substitute for the original. Rapid advances in DNA synthesis techniques have made it possible to engineer viruses, biochemical pathways and assemble bacterial genomes. Here, we report the synthesis of a functional 272,871–base pair designer eukaryotic chromosome, synIII, which is based on the 316,617–base pair native Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome III. Changes to synIII include TAG/TAA stop-codon replacements, deletion of subtelomeric regions, introns, transfer RNAs, transposons, and silent mating loci as well as insertion of loxPsym sites to enable genome scrambling. SynIII is functional in S. cerevisiae. Scrambling of the chromosome in a heterozygous diploid reveals a large increase in a-mater derivatives resulting from loss of the MATα allele on synIII. The complete design and synthesis of synIII establishes S. cerevisiae as the basis for designer eukaryotic genome biology.

K63-specific deubiquitination by two JAMM/MPN+ complexes: BRISC-associated Brcc36 and proteasomal Poh1

An unusual deubiquitinating (DUB) activity exists in HeLa cell extracts that is highly specific for cleaving K63‐linked but not K48‐linked polyubiquitin chains. The activity is insensitive to both N‐ethyl‐maleimide and ubiquitin aldehyde, indicating that it lacks an active site cysteine residue, and gel filtration experiments show that it resides in a high molecular weight (∼600 kDa) complex. Using a biochemical approach, we found that the K63‐specific DUB activity co‐fractionated through seven chromatographic steps with three multisubunit complexes: the 19S (PA700) portion of the 26S proteasome, the COP9 signalosome (CSN) and a novel complex that includes the JAMM/MPN+ domain‐containing protein Brcc36. When we analysed the individual complexes, we found that the activity was intrinsic to PA700 and the Brcc36 isopeptidase complex (BRISC), but that the CSN‐associated activity was due entirely to an interaction with Brcc36. None of the complexes cleave K6, K11, K29, K48 or α‐linked polyubiquitin, but they do cleave K63 linkages within mixed‐linkage chains. Our results suggest that specificity for K63‐linked polyubiquitin is a common property of the JAMM/MPN+ family of DUBs.

Evidence for bidentate substrate binding as the basis for the K48 linkage specificity of otubain 1.

Otubain 1 belongs to the ovarian tumor (OTU) domain class of cysteine protease deubiquitinating enzymes. We show here that human otubain 1 (hOtu1) is highly linkage-specific, cleaving Lys48 (K48)-linked polyubiquitin but not K63-, K29-, K6-, or K11-linked polyubiquitin, or linear alpha-linked polyubiquitin. Cleavage is not limited to either end of a polyubiquitin chain, and both free and substrate-linked polyubiquitin are disassembled. Intriguingly, cleavage of K48-diubiquitin by hOtu1 can be inhibited by diubiquitins of various linkage types, as well as by monoubiquitin. NMR studies and activity assays suggest that both the proximal and distal units of K48-diubiquitin bind to hOtu1. Reaction of Cys23 with ubiquitin-vinylsulfone identified a ubiquitin binding site that is distinct from the active site, which includes Cys91. Occupancy of the active site is needed to enable tight binding to the second site. We propose that distinct binding sites for the ubiquitins on either side of the scissile bond allow hOtu1 to discriminate among different isopeptide linkages in polyubiquitin substrates. Bidentate binding may be a general strategy used to achieve linkage-specific deubiquitination.

Polyubiquitin-sensor proteins reveal localization and linkage-type dependence of cellular ubiquitin signaling

Polyubiquitin chain topology is thought to direct modified substrates to specific fates, but this function-topology relationship is poorly understood, as are the dynamics and subcellular locations of specific polyubiquitin signals. Experimental access to these questions has been limited because linkage-specific inhibitors and in vivo sensors have been unavailable. Here we present a general strategy to track linkage-specific polyubiquitin signals in yeast and mammalian cells, and to probe their functions. We designed several high-affinity Lys63 polyubiquitin–binding proteins and demonstrate their specificity in vitro and in cells. We apply these tools as competitive inhibitors to dissect the polyubiquitin-linkage dependence of NF-κB activation in several cell types, inferring the essential role of Lys63 polyubiquitin for signaling via the IL-1β and TNF-related weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) but not TNF-α receptors. We anticipate live-cell imaging, proteomic and biochemical applications for these tools and extension of the design strategy to other polymeric ubiquitin-like protein modifications.

Specificity of the BRISC Deubiquitinating Enzyme Is Not Due to Selective Binding to Lys63-linked Polyubiquitin

BRISC (Brcc36-containing isopeptidase complex) is a four-subunit deubiquitinating (DUB) enzyme that has a catalytic subunit, called Brcc36, that is a member of the JAMM/MPN+ family of zinc metalloproteases. A notable feature of BRISC is its high specificity for cleaving Lys63-linked polyubiquitin. Here, we show that BRISC selectivity is not due to preferential binding to Lys63-linked polyubiquitin but is instead dictated by how the substrate isopeptide linkage is oriented within the enzyme active site. BRISC possesses a high affinity binding site for the ubiquitin hydrophobic surface patch that accounts for the bulk of the affinity between enzyme and substrate. Although BRISC can interact with either subunit of a diubiquitin conjugate, substrate cleavage occurs only when BRISC is bound to the hydrophobic patch of the distal (i.e. the “S1”) ubiquitin at a ubiquitin-ubiquitin cleavage site. The importance of the Lys63-linked proximal (S1′) ubiquitin was underscored by our finding that BRISC could not cleave the isopeptide bond joining a ubiquitin to a non-ubiquitin substrate. Finally, we also show that Abro1, another BRISC subunit, binds directly to Brcc36 and that the Brcc36-Abro1 heterodimer includes a minimal complex with Lys63-specific DUB activity.

Assembling large DNA segments in yeast.

As described in a different chapter in this volume, the uracil-specific excision reaction (USER) fusion method can be used to assemble multiple small DNA fragments (∼0.75-kb size) into larger 3-kb DNA segments both in vitro and in vivo (in Escherichia coli). However, in order to assemble an entire synthetic yeast genome (Sc2.0 project), we need to be able to assemble these 3-kb pieces into larger DNA segments or chromosome-sized fragments. This assembly into larger DNA segments is carried out in vivo, using homologous recombination in yeast. We have successfully used this approach to assemble a 40-kb chromosome piece in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A lithium acetate (LiOAc) protocol using equimolar amount of overlapping smaller fragments was employed to transform yeast. In this chapter, we describe the assembly of 3-kb fragments with an overlap of one building block (∼750 base pairs) into a 40-kb DNA piece.