Eric M. Genden
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Eric M. Genden.
The American Journal of Surgical Pathology | 2005
Margaret Brandwein-Gensler; Miriam S. Teixeira; Carol Ming Lewis; Bryant Lee; Linda Rolnitzky; Johannes J. Hille; Eric M. Genden; Mark L. Urken; Beverly Y. Wang
To analyze the impact of resection margin status and histologic prognosticators on local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS) for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). This study was both retrospective and prospective in design. Cohort 1 refers to the entire group of 292 patients with OSCC. The slides from the earliest resection specimens from Cohort 1 were examined in an exploratory manner for multiple parameters. Cohort 2 refers to a subset of 203 patients, who did not receive any neoadjuvant therapy and had outcome data. Cohort 3 represents a subset of Cohort 2 (n = 168) wherein the histologic resection margin status could be reconfirmed. Cohort 4 refers a subset of 85 patients with tongue/floor of mouth tumors. Margin status was designated as follows: group 1, clearance of ≥5 mm with intraoperative analysis, no need for supplemental margins (n = 46); group 2, initial margins were measured as <5 mm during intraoperative frozen section; supplemental resection margins were negative on final pathology (n = 73); group 3, the final pathology revealed resection margins <5 mm (n = 30); group 4, the final pathology revealed frankly positive resection margins (n = 19). The endpoints of LR and OS were queried with respect to T stage, tumor site, margin status, and numerous histologic variables, by Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Tumor stage (T) was significantly associated with LR (P = 0.028). Kaplan-Meier analysis for stage and for intraoral site was significantly associated with LR for T4 tumors. The increased likelihood of LR was higher for T4 OSCC of the buccal mucosa (75%), sinopalate (50%), and gingiva (100%) compared with mobile tongue (27%), and oropharynx (13%) (P = 0.013). Margin status was not associated with LR or OS (Cohort 3). This was so when all tumors were grouped together and when separate analyses were performed by tumor stage and oral subsite. No significance was demonstrated when margin status was examined for patients with similar treatment (surgery alone or surgery with adjuvant RT). However, the administration of adjuvant RT did significantly increase local disease-free survival (P = 0.0027 and P = 0.001 for T1 and T2 SCC, respectively). On exploratory analyses of histologic parameters, worst pattern of invasion was significantly associated with LR (P = 0.015) and OS (P < 0.001). Perineural invasion involving large nerves (>1 mm) was associated with LR (P = 0.005) and OS (P = 0.039). Limited lymphocytic response was also significantly associated with LR (P = 0.005) and OS (P = 0.001). When used as covariates in a multivariate Cox regression model, worst pattern of invasion, perineural invasion, and lymphocytic response were significant and independent predictors of both LR and OS, even when adjusting for margin status. Thus, these factors were used to generate our risk assessment. Our risk assessment classified patients into low-, intermediate-, or high-risk groups, with respect to LR (P = 0.0004) and OS (P < 0.0001). This classification retained significance when examining patients with uniform treatment. In separate analyses for each risk group, we found that administration of adjuvant radiation therapy is associated with increased local disease-free survival for high-risk patients only (P = 0.0296) but not low-risk or intermediate-risk patients. Resection margin status alone is not an independent predictor of LR and cannot be the sole variable in the decision-making process regarding adjuvant radiation therapy. We suggest that the recommendation for adjuvant radiation therapy be based on, not only traditional factors (inadequate margin, perineural invasion, bone invasion) but also histologic risk assessment. If clinicians want to avoid the debilitation of adjuvant radiation therapy, then a 5-mm margin standard may not be effective in the presence of high-risk score.
European Archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology | 2009
Missak Haigentz; Carl E. Silver; June Corry; Eric M. Genden; Robert P. Takes; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
The role of open surgery for management of laryngeal cancer has been greatly diminished during the past decade. The development of transoral endoscopic laser microsurgery (TLS), improvements in delivery of radiation therapy (RT) and the advent of multimodality protocols, particularly concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) have supplanted the previously standard techniques of open partial laryngectomy for early cancer and total laryngectomy followed by adjuvant RT for advanced cancer. A review of the recent literature revealed virtually no new reports of conventional conservation surgery as initial treatment for early stage glottic and supraglottic cancer. TLS and RT, with or without laser surgery or CCRT, have become the standard initial treatments for T1, T2 and selected T3 laryngeal cancer. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) may have an emerging role in the treatment of early laryngeal cancer. Anterior commissure involvement presents particular difficulties in application of TLS, although no definitive conclusions have been reached with regard to optimal treatment of these lesions. Results of TLS are equivalent to those obtained by conventional conservation surgery, with considerably less morbidity, less hospital time and better postoperative function. Oncologic results of TLS and RT are equivalent for glottic cancer, but with better voice results for RT in patients who require more extensive cordectomy. The preferred treatment for early supraglottic cancer, particularly for bulkier or T3 lesions is TLS, with or without postoperative RT. The Veterans Administration Study published in 1991 established the fact that the response to neoadjuvant CT predicts the response of a tumor to RT. Patients with advanced tumors that responded either partially or completely to CT were treated with RT, and total laryngectomy was reserved for non-responders. This resulted in the ability to preserve the larynx in a significant number of patients with locally advanced laryngeal cancer, while achieving local control and overall survival results equivalent to those achieved with initial total laryngectomy. Following this report, similar “organ preservation” protocols were employed in many centers. By 2003, results of the RTOG 93-11 trial, utilizing CCRT as initial treatment, were published, demonstrating a higher rate of laryngeal preservation with this protocol. Surgery was reserved for treatment failures. This concept changed the paradigm for management of advanced laryngeal cancer, greatly reducing the number of laryngectomies performed. While supracricoid laryngectomy has been employed for selected patients, total laryngectomy is the usual procedure for salvage of failure after non-surgical treatment.
Head and Neck-journal for The Sciences and Specialties of The Head and Neck | 2009
Eric M. Genden; Shaun C. Desai; Chih Kwang Sung
The aim of this prospective study was to determine the technical feasibility, safety, and efficacy of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for a variety of malignant head and neck lesions.
Oral Oncology | 2002
Alfio Ferlito; Alessandra Rinaldo; Kenneth O. Devaney; Ken MacLennan; Jeffrey N. Myers; Guy J. Petruzzelli; Ashok R. Shaha; Eric M. Genden; Jonas T. Johnson; Marcos B. de Carvalho; Eugene N. Myers
It has been established that the presence or absence of cervical node metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a powerful prognostic indicator. This report reviews the evolution of thinking over the past 70 years with regard to the import and detection of cervical nodal metastases which exhibit spread of tumor beyond the confines of the original encompassing nodal capsule. In the process, this discussion touches upon clinical examination, gross and microscopic pathologic examination, and radiographic imaging studies. In particular, the distinction between gross nodal extracapsular spread of tumor and microscopic nodal extracapsular spread of tumor has been drawn in recent reports; this raises the possibility that identification of microscopic breaching of the nodc capsule by tumor might provide clinically significant information which is not provided by the gross observation of an intact lymph node capsule. While it remains to be seen whether microscopic extracapsular spread alone will prove to be an important prognostic factor, it is recommended that selective neck dissection continue to be offered even in those patients with clinically negative necks; further studies should aid in defining the import of microscopic extracapsular tumor spread in patients with positive cervical nodes.
Oral Oncology | 2003
Eric M. Genden; Alfio Ferlito; Patrick J. Bradley; Alessandra Rinaldo; Crispian Scully
While the implementation of multi-modality neoadjuvant therapy for the treatment of head and neck cancer has resulted in an improvement in local regional control, there has been a resultant increase in the reported incidence of distant metastasis. This shift in the pattern of patient treatment failure highlights the importance of identifying patients at high risk of developing metastasis, accurately detecting metastasis, and improving treatment strategies for advanced disease. Currently, metastatic lesions from head and neck primaries portend a poor prognosis; however, molecular biologic techniques offer a promising approach to the diagnosis and treatment of micrometastasis and distant metastatic lesions. The identification of tumor-specific gene mutations and the cell surface antigens may play a key role in the future management of head and neck cancer. The following review outlines just several of the current issues related to the contemporary diagnosis and management of metastatic lesions of the head and neck.
Laryngoscope | 2008
Shaun C. Desai; Chih Kwang Sung; David W. Jang; Eric M. Genden
Objective: To determine the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of coupling transoral robotic technology with the flexible carbon dioxide (CO2) laser for various tumors of the oropharynx and supraglottic larynx.
Laryngoscope | 2014
John R. de Almeida; James K. Byrd; Rebecca Wu; Chaz L. Stucken; Uma Duvvuri; David P. Goldstein; Brett A. Miles; Marita S. Teng; Vishal Gupta; Eric M. Genden
To demonstrate the comparative effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) to intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for early T‐stage oropharyngeal cancer.
Laryngoscope | 2011
Eric M. Genden; Tamar Kotz; Charles C. L. Tong; Claris Smith; Andrew G. Sikora; Marita S. Teng; Stuart H. Packer; William L. Lawson; Johnny Kao
To evaluate the patterns of failure, survival, and functional outcomes for patients treated with transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and compare these results with those from a cohort of patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation (CRT).
Head and Neck-journal for The Sciences and Specialties of The Head and Neck | 2013
Primož Strojan; Alfio Ferlito; Jesus E. Medina; Julia A. Woolgar; Alessandra Rinaldo; K. Thomas Robbins; Johannes J. Fagan; William M. Mendenhall; Vinidh Paleri; Carl E. Silver; Kerry D. Olsen; June Corry; Carlos Suárez; Juan P. Rodrigo; Johannes A. Langendijk; Kenneth O. Devaney; Luiz Paulo Kowalski; Dana M. Hartl; Missak Haigentz; Jochen A. Werner; Phillip K. Pellitteri; Remco de Bree; Gregory T. Wolf; Robert P. Takes; Eric M. Genden; Michael L. Hinni; Vanni Mondin; Ashok R. Shaha; Leon Barnes
In an era of advanced diagnostics, metastasis to cervical lymph nodes from an occult primary tumor is a rare clinical entity and accounts for approximately 3% of head and neck malignancies. Histologically, two thirds of cases are squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), with other tissue types less common in the neck. With modern imaging and tissue examinations, a primary tumor initially undetected on physical examination is revealed in >50% of patients and the site of the index primary can be predicted with a high level of probability. In the present review, the range and limitations of diagnostic procedures are summarized and the optimal diagnostic workup is proposed. Initial preferred diagnostic procedures are a fine‐needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and imaging. This allows directed surgical biopsy (such as tonsillectomy), based on the preliminary findings, and prevents misinterpretation of postsurgical images. When no primary lesion is suggested after imaging and panendoscopy, and for patients without a history of smoking and alcohol abuse, molecular profiling of an FNAB sample for human papillomavirus (HPV) and/or Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is important. Head Neck, 2013
Laryngoscope | 2001
Satish Govindaraj; Michael Cohen; Eric M. Genden; Peter Costantino; Mark L. Urken
Educational Objective At the conclusion of this presentation, the participant should be able to discuss the indications and advantages of using acellular dermis in the prevention of post‐parotidectomy gustatory sweating (Freys Syndrome).