Eric N. van Roon

Leflunomide for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice - Incidence and severity of hepatotoxicity

AbstractObjective: Leflunomide is a novel disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). Because of reports on possible hepatotoxicity and adaptations in the recommendations for monitoring liver function during leflunomide treatment, we conducted a study to evaluate the incidence and severity of hepatotoxicity. Methods: We included consecutive rheumatoid arthritis patients starting treatment with leflunomide in the region of Friesland (The Netherlands) between January 2000 and January 2002. During follow-up patient characteristics, disease characteristics, and clinical and laboratory data on liver functions were registered. Severity of hepatotoxicity was categorised using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, as moderate (grade 2), severe (grade 3) or life threatening (grade 4). Results: One hundred and one patients were followed for a median period of 10 months (range 0.5–12). Grade 2 or 3 elevations in any liver function blood test were recorded in a total of nine patients (8.9%). No grade 4 elevations were recorded. Four patients (4%) showed grade 2–3 aminotransferase elevations. Due to grade 2 hepatotoxicity one patient (1%) was withdrawn from leflunomide treatment, and one patient continued leflunomide at a reduced dose. In eight of nine patients with grade 2–3 liver function blood tests, these elevated liver function tests occurred within 6 months after starting leflunomide. None of the patients with grade 2 or 3 toxicity had a history of hepatic disease, eight patients concomitantly used potential hepatotoxic co-medication. Eight (8%) patients used leflunomide in combination with methotrexate, and one of these patients developed hepatotoxicity. No clinical signs of serious hepatotoxicity were recorded during follow-up. Discussion: In 8.9% of the patients, grade 2 or 3 hepatotoxicity was recorded within the first year after the start of leflunomide therapy based on liver enzyme determinations. In the majority of the patients liver enzyme elevations occurred within the first 6 months of therapy and resolved during continued follow-up. None of the patients showed clinical signs of hepatotoxicity. Conclusion: Under continued monitoring of liver functions hepatotoxicity during leflunomide use does not seem to be a major problem in our population.

Vitamin D reduces eosinophilic airway inflammation in nonatopic asthma

BACKGROUND Low levels of vitamin D are associated with asthma severity, airway remodeling, and exacerbation rate increase, especially in nonatopic asthma. Reduced steroid responsiveness or impaired antimicrobial defense might be underlying mechanisms. OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on eosinophilic and neutrophilic airway inflammation in patients with nonatopic asthma. METHODS In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we investigated the effect of long-acting vitamin D3 (400,000 IU) on sputum neutrophils and eosinophils in 44 patients with nonatopic asthma with neutrophilic (≥53%) and/or eosinophilic (≥3%) airway inflammation. Sputum induction was performed at baseline and after 9 weeks. Other measurements included questionnaires, blood samples, and pulmonary function. RESULTS Treatment with vitamin D did not significantly affect sputum neutrophils or eosinophils compared with treatment with placebo in the total group. Regarding sputum eosinophils, the effect of vitamin D appeared to be dependent on baseline sputum eosinophil levels (interaction P = .015). In patients with eosinophil levels of 26.2% or more (median in patients with sputum eosinophilia, >3%), eosinophils decreased from a median of 41.0% to 11.8% after vitamin D treatment as compared with an increase from 51.8% to 63.3% in patients receiving placebo (P = .034). Vitamin D treatment also resulted in slightly better Asthma Control Questionnaire scores (P = .08). CONCLUSIONS Vitamin D supplementation reduced eosinophilic airway inflammation in patients with nonatopic asthma with severe eosinophilic airway inflammation, but did not affect sputum neutrophils. Also, a small effect on asthma control was observed. These findings suggest that vitamin D might have potential as an add-on treatment option in eosinophilic asthma.

Remission of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Patients After Different Types of Bariatric Surgery: A Population-Based Cohort Study in the United Kingdom.

IMPORTANCE To our knowledge, an observational study on the remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) after different types of bariatric surgery based on data from general practice has not been carried out. OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of different types of bariatric surgery in patients with T2DM on diabetes remission compared with matched control patients, and the effect of the type of bariatric surgery on improvement of glycemic control and related clinical parameters. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective cohort study conducted from May 2013 to May 2014 within the Clinical Practice Research Datalink involving 2978 patients with a record of bariatric surgery (2005-2012) and a body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 35 or greater. We identified 569 patients with T2DM and matched them to 1881 patients with diabetes without bariatric surgery. Data on the use of medication and laboratory results were evaluated. EXPOSURES Bariatric surgery, stratified by type of surgery (gastric banding, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, or other/unknown). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Remission of T2DM (complete discontinuation of glycemic therapy, accompanied with a subsequently recorded hemoglobin A1c level<6.0%). RESULTS Among patients undergoing bariatric surgery, we found a prevalence of 19.1% for T2DM. Per 1000 person-years, 94.5 diabetes mellitus remissions were found in patients who underwent bariatric surgery compared with 4.9 diabetes mellitus remissions in matched control patients. Patients with diabetes who underwent bariatric surgery had an 18-fold increased chance for T2DM remission (adjusted relative rate [RR], 17.8; 95% CI, 11.2-28.4) compared with matched control patients. The greatest effect size was observed for gastric bypass (adjusted RR, 43.1; 95% CI, 19.7-94.5), followed by sleeve gastrectomy (adjusted RR, 16.6; 95% CI, 4.7-58.4) and gastric banding (adjusted RR, 6.9; 95% CI, 3.1-15.2). Body mass index and triglyceride, blood glucose, and hemoglobin A1c levels sharply decreased during the first 2 years after bariatric surgery. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Population-based data show that bariatric surgery strongly increases the chance for remission of T2DM. Gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy have a greater effect than gastric banding. Although the risks and possible adverse effects of surgery should be weighed against its benefits, bariatric surgery and, in particular, gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy may be considered as new treatment options for T2DM.

Treatment with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone is beneficial but toxic in very elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma : a population-based cohort study on treatment, toxicity and outcome

Abstract To assess treatment strategies, toxicity and outcome in very elderly patients (aged ≥ 75 years) diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the rituximab era, an observational population-based cohort study was performed. From 103 patients with a median age of 81 years, data of clinical characteristics, treatment, toxicity and outcome were evaluated. Advanced stage DLBCL was documented in 74 patients. In 80 patients chemotherapy was initiated; 70 patients received rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (R-CHOP). In this group, 39 patients completed all cycles and 30 patients achieved a complete remission. Severe chemotherapy-related toxicity occurred in 69%. Two-year overall survival was 70% for elderly patients who completed chemotherapy, 28% for those treated with incomplete or suboptimal chemotherapy and 21% for those receiving palliative radiotherapy or supportive care. In conclusion, the ability to complete R-CHOP was associated with better overall survival compared to other treatment strategies at the expense of severe treatment-related toxicity.

Comorbidity is an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP : a population-based cohort study

An observational population‐based cohort study was performed to investigate the role of comorbidity on outcome and treatment‐related toxicity in patients with newly diagnosed advanced‐stage diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with R‐CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone). Data for the clinical characteristics of 154 patients (median age 69 years), including Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), treatment, toxicity and outcome were evaluated. Forty‐five percent of the patients had an International Prognistic index ≥3 and 16% had a CCI ≥2. The planned R‐CHOP schedule was completed by 84% and 75% reached complete remission (CR). In those with CCI ≥2, 67% completed treatment with 46% CR. In patients with a CCI <2, overall survival (OS) after 1, 2 and 5 years was 84%, 79% and 65% respectively and it was 64%, 48% and 48% for those with CCI ≥2. Grade III/IV toxicity was documented in 53%, most frequently febrile neutropenia (27%) and infections (23%). In multivariate analysis CCI ≥2 and IPI ≥3 were independent risk indicators for OS and grade III/IV toxicity. In conclusion, comorbidity is an independent risk indicator for worse OS in patients with advanced DLBCL treated with R‐CHOP by interference with intensive treatment schedules and more grade III/IV toxicity. Future studies are warranted to determine the optimal treatment approach in patients with significant comorbidities.

Criteria for drug selection in frail elderly persons

AbstractBackground: Elderly patients with multiple morbidities and polypharmacy are at an increased risk of adverse drug events (ADEs). Appropriate prescribing, preserving the balance between drug effectiveness and safety, and treatment adherence may prevent these ADEs. In this study, we investigated which drug properties, such as effectiveness, safety, clinical experience and convenience, are relevant to the choice of medicine most appropriate for frail elderly patients. Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to develop a set of criteria to assist in the selection of the most appropriate drug within a drug class for the treatment of frail elderly patients. A secondary goal was to test the usefulness of the set of criteria in the prescription of antipsychotics for delirium and behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). Methods: Thirty-one criteria potentially relevant to the choice of appropriate drugs for frail elderly patients were selected on the basis of a literature search in MEDLINE (1966–2008), EMBASE (1947–2008) and the Cochrane Library (1993–2008). This list was reviewed by 46 experts (24 physicians, 22 pharmacists), who scored each item for relevance in clinical practice on a scale from 1 to 10 (where 1 is not important and 10 is very important). By consensus, the authors selected the most relevant criteria for the final set of criteria. The usefulness of the final set of criteria was assessed with regard to the prescription of antipsychotics for delirium and BPSD. Results: The final set of 23 items consisted of 3 items on effectiveness, 14 on safety, including pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic criteria, 3 on clinical experience and 3 on convenience. Assessment using these criteria of the appropriateness of antipsychotics prescribed for delirium and BPSD revealed that certain drugs should be prescribed with caution to patients with Parkinson’s disease and Lewy body dementia. Conclusions: The criteria identified in this study, selected on the basis of a literature review and clinical expert opinion, represent a promising approach for determining the appropriateness of a drug for use in frail elderly individuals relative to alternative drugs for the same indication or from the same class.

An evidence-based assessment of the clinical significance of drug-drug interactions between disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and non-antirheumatic drugs according to rheumatologists and pharmacists

BACKGROUND Clinically relevant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) must be recognized in a timely manner and managed appropriately to prevent adverse drug reactions or therapeutic failure. Because the evidence for most DDIs is based on case reports or poorly documented clinical information, there is a need for better assessment of their clinical relevance. OBJECTIVE This study evaluates the interdisciplinary agreement between rheumatologists and clinical (hospital) pharmacists in assessing the clinical relevance of DDIs with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and non-DMARD medications. METHODS Potential DDIs were identified from the medical literature using MEDLINE and EMBASE for the years 1968-2009. The following search terms were used for the key word, title, and abstract sections of the publications: interaction(s), DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug(s), antirheumatic, rheumatology, rheumatoid arthritis, and the names of the individual DMARDs of interest (abatacept, adalimumab, anakinra, auranofin, aurothioglucose, aurothiomalate, d-penicillamine, etanercept, gold, [hydroxy]-chloroquine, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, IL1-RA, infliximab, leflunomide, methotrexate, rituximab, and sulfasalazine/sulphasalazine). Reference lists of the retrieved publications were searched for further information on potential DDIs. All pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic DDIs between a DMARD and a non-DMARD identified were included in the study, with the exception of evidence regarding DMARD doses higher than used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and interactions with phytotherapeutic or homeopathic preparations. Using a standard information set for each DDI (eg, from product labeling, textbooks, and the medical literature), a group of rheumatologists and a group of clinical pharmacists independently assessed whether the individual drug-DMARD combinations interacted and whether they required immediate intervention. Both groups consisted of 3 members (2 men and 1 woman), aged 40 to 60 years, who had >5 years of clinical experience and were currently involved in clinical practice in large, nonacademic teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. RESULTS Forty potential DDIs with DMARDs were retrieved and assessed by the 2 groups. For 30 (75%) of these, rheumatologists and clinical pharmacists agreed about the requirement for immediate intervention. Specifically, 17 drug combinations (43%) were judged to interact and to require immediate intervention, and 13 combinations (33%) were judged either not to interact or to interact but not to require immediate intervention. For 10 combinations (25%), rheumatologists and clinical pharmacists were not in agreement. Overall, agreement between the groups was good (kappa = 0.80) for judging whether the drug combinations were interactions, and agreement was fair (kappa = 0.39) for judging whether immediate intervention was required. Prospective analysis of the data showed that rheumatologists tended to recommend immediate intervention more often when the adverse reaction to the DDI involved an increased risk of toxicity of the DMARD. In contrast, clinical pharmacists more often advocated immediate intervention when the adverse reaction involved decreased effectiveness of the DMARD. CONCLUSION For a subset of DMARD-drug combinations, rheumatologists and clinical pharmacists differed in their assessments of clinical relevance.

Consensus-Based Evaluation of Clinical Significance and Management of Anticancer Drug Interactions

BACKGROUND Anticancer drug interactions can affect the efficacy and toxicity of anticancer treatment and that of the interacting drugs. However, information on the significance, prevention, and management of these interactions is currently lacking. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical significance of interaction among anticancer agents and comedications and to provide recommendations for the management of clinically significant interactions. METHODS Members of a multidisciplinary expert group of hospital and community pharmacists, medical oncologists, internists, and clinical pharmacologists were selected by their professional organizations, which participated in this consensus project. Literature was extensively searched for any drug interactions with anticancer agents using registration files, reference books, handbooks, and electronic databases. Interactions between anticancer agents were not considered. Interactions were classified by level of best available evidence for the interaction and by severity of the clinical effect, according to a structured assessment procedure. This assessment distinguished 5 levels for the amount and quality of evidence available and 6 severity levels for classification of potential drug-to-drug interactions. RESULTS A total of 88 drug interactions with anticancer agents were identified from 146 combinations of drugs with anticancer agents found in literature. For 58 combinations, there was insufficient evidence of an interaction. Of the identified interactions, 38 were classified as clinically significant, defined as necessitating an alert or intervention, such as dose adaptation, comedication, discontinuation of treatment, or additional monitoring of treatment. Recommendations were made for management of these interactions. CONCLUSION Numerous interactions with anticancer agents are clinically significant and should be considered by pharmacists and doctors in daily oncology practice.

Clinical challenges related to novel oral anticoagulants: Drug-drug interactions and monitoring

The introduction of the novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC), such as the direct Factor Xa-inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban and the thrombin-inhibitor dabigatran, have provided an effective and safe alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in

The potential risk of infections during (prolonged) rituximab therapy in rheumatoid arthritis

Introduction: Biologicals are a fast expanding group of new drugs and rituximab (RTX) is one of them. Long-term efficacy and safety constantly need addressing as little is known about these factors. In rheumatoid arthritis, RTX it is used for active disease that is not responding to other therapies. Since RTX acts by depleting B-cells, concerns regarding the long-term safety of this drug have been raised. Areas covered: This review covers 10 manuscripts on RTX safety in rheumatoid arthritis published between January 2004 and July 2010. Expert opinion: In present literature RTX appears to be safe for up to five courses. In this review, important drawbacks of current research are discussed. Longer follow-up time is needed to make relevant conclusions on RTX safety with regard to infectious complications. Prolonged RTX therapy causes subsequent B-cell depletion. Eventually, plasma cells disappear, causing hypogammaglobulinemias and subsequent problems in immunity. The formation of new plasma cells is halted due to a lack of B-cells. Attention needs to be focused on the status of immunoglobulins and the role this plays in the occurrence of infections. Until a complete, long-term safety profile of RTX is available, it cannot be considered safe with regard to the incidence of infectious complications.