Eric Rossman
GlaxoSmithKline
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Eric Rossman.
Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods | 2015
Brian Guth; Alan Y. Chiang; Jennifer Doyle; Michael J. Engwall; Jean-Michel Guillon; Peter Hoffmann; John Koerner; Scott W. Mittelstadt; Sean Ottinger; Jennifer Pierson; Michael K. Pugsley; Eric Rossman; Jacqueline A. Walisser; R. Dustan Sarazan
INTRODUCTION Drug-induced effects on the cardiovascular system remain a major cause of drug attrition. While hemodynamic (blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR)) and electrophysiological methods have been used in testing drug safety for years, animal models for assessing myocardial contractility are used less frequently and their translation to humans has not been established. The goal of these studies was to determine whether assessment of contractility and hemodynamics, when measured across different laboratories using the same protocol, could consistently detect drug-induced changes in the inotropic state of the heart using drugs known to have clinically relevant positive and negative effects on myocardial contractility. METHODS A 4×4 double Latin square design (n=8) design using Beagle dogs was developed. Drugs were administrated orally. Arterial blood pressure, left ventricular pressure (LVP) and the electrocardiogram were assessed. Each of the six laboratories studied at least 2 drugs (one positive inotrope (pimobendan or amrinone) and one negative inotrope) (itraconazole or atenolol) at 3 doses selected to match clinical exposure data and a vehicle control. Animals were instrumented with an ITS telemetry system, DSIs D70-PCTP system or DSIs Physiotel Digital system. Data acquisition and analysis systems were Ponemah, Notocord or EMKA. RESULTS Derived parameters included: diastolic, systolic and mean arterial BP, peak systolic LVP, HR, end-diastolic LVP, and LVdP/dtmax as the primary contractility index. Blood samples were drawn to confirm drug exposures predicted from independent pharmacokinetic studies. Across the laboratories, a consistent change in LVdP/dtmax was captured despite some differences in the absolute values of some of the hemodynamic parameters prior to treatment. DISCUSSION These findings indicate that this experimental model, using the chronically instrumented conscious dog, can accurately and consistently detect changes in cardiac contractility, across multiple sites and instrumentation systems, and that data obtained in this model may also translate to clinical outcomes.
Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods | 2017
Michael K. Pugsley; Brian Guth; Alan Y. Chiang; Jennifer M. Doyle; Michael J. Engwall; Jean-Michel Guillon; Peter Hoffmann; John Koerner; Scott W. Mittelstadt; Jennifer Pierson; Eric Rossman; Dustan R. Sarazan; Stanley T. Parish
INTRODUCTION The importance of drug-induced effects on the inotropic state of the heart is well known. Unlike hemodynamic and cardiac electrophysiological methods, which have been routinely used in drug safety testing for years, the non-clinical assessment of drug effects on myocardial contractility is used less frequently with no established translation to humans. The goal of these studies was to determine whether assessment of alternate measures of cardiac inotropy could detect drug-induced changes in the contractile state of the heart using drugs known to have clinically relevant positive and negative effects on myocardial contractility. This study also evaluated drug-induced effects on lusitropy (relaxation) parameters of the heart. METHODS A double 4×4 Latin square study design using Beagle dogs (n=8) was conducted. Drugs were administrated orally. Arterial blood pressure (BP), left ventricular pressure (LVP) and the electrocardiogram (ECG) were assessed across different laboratories using the same protocol. Each of the six laboratories studied at least 2 drugs (one positive inotrope (pimobendan or amrinone) and one negative inotrope (itraconazole or atenolol) at 3 doses selected to match clinical exposure data and a vehicle control). Animals were instrumented with an ITS telemetry system or DSIs D70-PCTP or PhysioTel™ Digital system. The data acquisition and analysis systems used were Ponemah, Notocord or EMKA. RESULTS The derived inotropic and lusitropic parameters evaluated included peak systolic and end diastolic LVP, LVdP/dtmax, LVdP/dt40, QA interval, LVdP/dtmin and Tau. This study showed that LVdP/dt40 provided essentially identical results to LVdP/dtmax qualifying it as an index to assess drug effects on cardiac contractility. LVdP/dt40 provided an essentially identical assessment to that of LVdP/dtmax. The QA interval did not react sensitively to the drugs tested in this study; however, it did detect large effects and could be useful in early cardiovascular safety studies. The lusitropic parameter, LVdP/dtmin, was modestly decreased, and Tau was increased, by atenolol and itraconazole. At the doses tested, amrinone and pimobendan produced no changes in LVdP/dtmin while Tau was modestly increased. The drugs did not produce effects on BP, HR or the ECG at the doses tested. Blood samples were drawn to confirm drug exposures predicted from independent pharmacokinetic studies. DISCUSSION These findings indicate that this experimental model can accurately and consistently detect changes in cardiac contractility, across multiple sites and instrumentation systems. While LVdP/dt40 produced responses similar to LVdP/dtmax, the QA interval and lusitropic parameters LVdP/dtmin and Tau were not markedly changed at the dose of drugs tested. Further studies with drugs that affect early diastolic relaxation through calcium handling are needed to better evaluate drug-induced changes on lusitropic properties of the heart.
Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods | 2018
Rachael J. Lincoln; Ann M. Williams; Helen L. White; Simon A. Ward; Ali Robinson; Karen A. Cartwright; Deon D. Hildenbrand; Eric Rossman
Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods | 2018
Eric Rossman; Frank Cools; Jason Cordes; Deborah Dhuyvetter; Jennifer Doyle; Gregory S. Friedrichs; Brian Guth; Stanley T. Parish; Michael K. Pugsley; R. Dustan Sarazan
Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods | 2018
XueJun Wu; Jason Payseur; Konuralp Bayrak; Sandra Turner; Anthony Bahinski; Eric Rossman
Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods | 2017
Kate Harris; Eric Rossman; Xiaoping Xu; Peter J. Clements; Ingra Mannhardt; Arne Hansen; Umber Saleem; Thomas Eschenhagen; Maria Hortigon; Victor Zamora Rodriguez; Godfrey L. Smith; Berend van Meer; Leon G.J. Tertoolen; Christine L. Mummery; Marcelo C. Ribeiro; Robert Passier; Tessa de Korte; Marijn Vlaming; Stefan R. Braam; Cathy Vickers; Diogo Mosqueira; Karl S.A. Firth; Ljupcho Prodanov; Vinoj George; Chris Denning
Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods | 2017
Michael K. Pugsley; Brian Guth; Alan Y. Chiang; Jennifer M. Doyle; Michael Engwall; Jean-Michel Guillon; Peter Hoffmann; John Koerner; Scott W. Mittelstadt; Jennifer Pierson; Eric Rossman; Stanley T. Parish; R. Dustan Sarazan
Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods | 2017
Jason Payseur; XueJun Wu; Anthony Bahinski; Eric Rossman
Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods | 2016
Michael K. Pugsley; Brian Guth; Alan Chiang; Jennifer Doyle; Mike Engwall; Jean-Michel Guillon; Peter Hoffmann; John Koerner; Scott W. Mittelstadt; Sean Ottinger; Jennifer Pierson; Eric Rossman; Jacqueline A. Walisser; R. Dustan Sarazan
Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods | 2016
XueJun Wu; Jason Payseur; Dennis Murphy; Eric Rossman