Eric V. Vukmanic
University of Louisville
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Eric V. Vukmanic.
The Journal of Pain | 2010
Bradley J. Hall; Jason E. Lally; Eric V. Vukmanic; James E. Armstrong; Jason D. Fell; Daya S. Gupta; Charles H. Hubscher
UNLABELLED Approximately 70% of male rats receiving severe T8 spinal contusions develop allodynia in T5-7 dermatomes (at-level) beginning 2 weeks after injury. In contrast, rats having either complete transections or dorsal hemisections do not develop allodynia at-level after chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). In the present study, incomplete laceration and contusion injuries were made to test for neuroanatomical correlates between areas of white matter damage/sparing at the lesion epicenter and the presence/absence of allodynia. After incomplete laceration lesions and 6 weeks of behavioral testing, histological reconstruction and analysis of the lesion epicenters revealed a significant difference (P < .001) in the amount of ventrolateral funiculus (VLF) asymmetry between rats showing pain-like responses evoked by touch (74.5% +/- 8.4% side-to-side difference in VLF damage) versus those not responding to touch (11.3% +/- 4.4% side-to-side difference in VLF damage). A 5-week mean allodynia score for each rat that incorporates a full range of forces that are all innocuous in intact controls revealed that the degree of hypersensitivity at level is related to the extent of VLF asymmetry after SCI. No other damaged spinal white matter or gray matter area was correlated with sensitivity to touch. Similar findings were obtained for rats receiving T8 contusions, a more clinically relevant injury. These data suggest that different extents of damage/sparing between the 2 sides of VLF probably are a requisite for the development of allodynia after SCI. PERSPECTIVE A side-to-side lesion asymmetry after chronic SCI in a rodent model was found to be highly correlated with the presence and degree of allodynia. Greater insight of key factors contributing to the development and maintenance of chronic neuropathic pain is important for improving quality of life.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2014
Wei Wang; Liang Zhou; Sang Joon Lee; Yongqing Liu; Juan P. Fernandez de Castro; Douglas Emery; Eric V. Vukmanic; Henry J. Kaplan; Douglas C. Dean
PURPOSE We followed cone and rod development in the pig and we correlated development with the potential for cone and rod precursor integration and differentiation following subretinal transplantation. METHODS Rod and cone precursors were identified during development by their position in the outer retina and by immunostaining for markers of differentiation. Embryonic retinal cells from green fluorescent protein (GFP)(+) transgenic pigs at different developmental stages were transplanted into adult retinas and integration and differentiation was followed and quantified by immunostaining for markers of cone and rod differentiation. RESULTS Pig cones and rods are spatially segregated, allowing us to follow rod and cone development in situ. Gestation in the pig is 114 days. By embryonic day (E) 50, postmitotic cone progenitors had formed the outer two rows of the retina. These cone progenitors are marked by expression of Islet1 (ISL1) and Recoverin (RCVRN) (at this embryonic stage, RCVRN exclusively marks these cone precursors). By contrast, postmitotic neural retina leucine zipper (NRL)(+) rod precursors, located interior to the cone precursors, did not appear until E65. At E50, before NRL(+) rod precursors are evident, transplanted cells gave rise almost exclusively to cones. At, E57, transplanted cells gave rise to equal numbers of rods and cones, but by E65, transplanted cells gave rise almost exclusively to rods. Transplantation of cells at E85 or E105, as precursors initiate opsin expression, led to few integrated cells. CONCLUSIONS Consistent with their sequential appearances in embryonic retina, these results demonstrate sequential and surprisingly narrow developmental windows for integration/differentiation of cone and rod precursors following transplantation.
Experimental Eye Research | 2012
Jennifer M. Noel; Juan P. Fernandez de Castro; Paul J. DeMarco; L. M. Franco; Wei Wang; Eric V. Vukmanic; Xiaoyan Peng; Julie H. Sandell; Patrick A. Scott; Henry J. Kaplan; Maureen A. McCall
Our purpose was to find a method to create a large animal model of inducible photoreceptor damage. To this end, we tested in domestic swine the efficacy of two chemical toxins, known to create photoreceptor damage in other species: Iodoacetic Acid (IAA) and Sodium Iodate (NaIO(3)). Intravenous (IV) administration of NaIO(3) up to 90 mg/kg had no effect on retinal function and 110 mg/kg was lethal. IV administration of IAA (5-20 mg/kg) produced concentration-dependent changes in visual function as measured by full-field and multi-focal electroretinograms (ffERG and mfERG), and 30 mg/kg IAA was lethal. The IAA-induced effects measured at two weeks were stable through eight weeks post-injection, the last time point investigated. IAA at 7.5, 10, and 12 mg/kg produce a concentration-dependent reduction in both ffERG b-wave and mfERG N1-P1 amplitudes compared to baseline at all post-injection times. Comparisons of dark- and light-adapted ffERG b-wave amplitudes show a more significant loss of rod relative to cone function. The fundus of swine treated with ≥10 mg/kg IAA was abnormal with thinner retinal vessels and pale optic discs, and we found no evidence of bone spicule formation. Histological evaluations show concentration-dependent outer retinal damage that correlates with functional changes. We conclude that NaIO(3,) is not an effective toxin in swine. In contrast, IAA can be used to create a rapidly inducible, selective, stable and concentration-dependent model of photoreceptor damage in swine retina. Because of these attributes this large animal model of controlled photoreceptor damage should be useful in the investigation of treatments to replace damaged photoreceptors.
Vision Research | 2006
Michael L. Risner; Elizabeth A. Lemerise; Eric V. Vukmanic; Ashley Moore
Documenta Ophthalmologica | 2014
Eric V. Vukmanic; Kate Godwin; pan Shi; Alan Hughes; Paul J. DeMarco
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2017
Qiutang Li; Patrick A. Scott; Eric V. Vukmanic; Lei Xue; Douglas C. Dean; Henry J. Kaplan; Qingxian Lu
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2013
Wei Wang; Zhou Liang; Sang Joon Lee; Yongqing Liu; Juan P. Fernandez de Castro; Douglas Emery; Eric V. Vukmanic; Henry J. Kaplan; Douglas C. Dean
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2011
Juan P. Fernandez de Castro; Jennifer M. Noel; Wei Wang; Eric V. Vukmanic; Paul J. DeMarco; Maureen A. McCall; Douglas C. Dean; Henry J. Kaplan
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2011
Henry J. Kaplan; Wei Wang; Jennifer M. Noel; Eric V. Vukmanic; Juan P. Fernandez de Castro; Paul J. DeMarco; Douglas C. Dean; Maureen A. McCall
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2011
Wei Wang; Juan P. Fernandez de Castro; Eric V. Vukmanic; Jennifer M. Noel; Douglas Emery; Maureen A. McCall; Paul J. DeMarco; Douglas C. Dean; Jason W. Ross; Henry J. Kaplan