Eric Westhof

Genome evolution in yeasts

Identifying the mechanisms of eukaryotic genome evolution by comparative genomics is often complicated by the multiplicity of events that have taken place throughout the history of individual lineages, leaving only distorted and superimposed traces in the genome of each living organism. The hemiascomycete yeasts, with their compact genomes, similar lifestyle and distinct sexual and physiological properties, provide a unique opportunity to explore such mechanisms. We present here the complete, assembled genome sequences of four yeast species, selected to represent a broad evolutionary range within a single eukaryotic phylum, that after analysis proved to be molecularly as diverse as the entire phylum of chordates. A total of approximately 24,200 novel genes were identified, the translation products of which were classified together with Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins into about 4,700 families, forming the basis for interspecific comparisons. Analysis of chromosome maps and genome redundancies reveal that the different yeast lineages have evolved through a marked interplay between several distinct molecular mechanisms, including tandem gene repeat formation, segmental duplication, a massive genome duplication and extensive gene loss.

Modelling of the three-dimensional architecture of group I catalytic introns based on comparative sequence analysis

Alignment of the 87 available sequences of group I self-splicing introns reveals numerous instances of covariation between distant sites. Some of these covariations cannot be ascribed to historical coincidences or the known secondary structure of group I introns, and are, therefore, best explained as reflecting tertiary contacts. With the help of stereochemical modelling, we have taken advantage of these novel interactions to derive a three-dimensional model of the conserved core of group I introns. Two noteworthy features of that model are its extreme compactness and the fact that all of the most evolutionarily conserved residues happen to converge around the two helices that constitute the substrate of the core ribozyme and the site that binds the guanosine cofactor necessary for self-splicing. Specific functional implications are discussed, both with regard to the way the substrate helices are recognized by the core and possible rearrangements of the introns during the self-splicing process. Concerning potential long-range interactions, emphasis is put on the possible recognition of two consecutive purines in the minor groove of a helix by a GAAA or related terminal loop.

Crystallographic refinement of yeast aspartic acid transfer RNA

The structure of yeast transfer RNA aspartic acid has been refined in one crystal form to 3 A resolution using the restrained least-squares method of Hendrickson and Konnert and real-space fitting using the FRODO program of Jones. The final crystallographic discrepancy index R is 23.5% for 4585 reflections with magnitudes twice their standard deviations between 10 and 3 A. With lower occupancies for some residues of the D-loop, the phosphate U1, and the base U33, the R-factor is 22.3%. The adaptation of the restrained least-squares program for nucleic acids and the progress of the refinement are described. The conformations are analysed with respect to stereochemistry and folding of the backbone. The contacts and hydrogen bonds of the secondary structure are compared with those of yeast tRNAPhe. The presence of only four bases in the variable loop, instead of five as in yeast tRNAPhe, leads to a rotation of residue 48 and a lateral movement of residue 46. These two rearrangements induce different environments for [U8 . . . A14] . . . A21 as well as for A9 and G45. Otherwise, all tertiary contacts observed in yeast tRNAPhe are present in yeast tRNAAsp, except for the absence of hydrogen-bonding between G18 of the D-loop and C56 of the T-loop. The presence of anticodon triplet pairing leads to a distribution of temperature factors different from that observed in yeast tRNAPhe with a stabilization of the AC stem-and-loop and a destabilization of the T and D-loops. We are inclined to suggest that the labilization of the interactions between the T and D-loops is a consequence of the interaction of the anticodon triplets of symmetry-related molecules through hydrogen bonding, which mimics the interaction between the anticodon and its cognate codon on the messenger RNA.

Sequence elements outside the hammerhead ribozyme catalytic core enable intracellular activity

The hammerhead ribozyme (HHRz) is a small, naturally occurring ribozyme that site-specifically cleaves RNA and has long been considered a potentially useful tool for gene silencing. The minimal conserved HHRz motif derived from natural sequences consists of three helices that intersect at a highly conserved catalytic core of 11 nucleotides. The presence of this motif is sufficient to support cleavage at high Mg2+ concentrations, but not at the low Mg2+ concentrations characteristic of intracellular environments. Here we demonstrate that natural HHRzs require the presence of additional nonconserved sequence elements outside of the conserved catalytic core to enable intracellular activity. These elements may stabilize the HHRz in a catalytically active conformation via tertiary interactions. HHRzs stabilized by these interactions cleave efficiently at physiological Mg2+ concentrations and are functional in vivo. The proposed role of these tertiary interacting motifs is supported by mutational, functional, structural and molecular modeling analysis of natural HHRzs.

Crystal structure of paromomycin docked into the eubacterial ribosomal decoding A site.

BACKGROUND Aminoglycoside antibiotics interfere with translation in both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria by binding to the tRNA decoding A site of the 16S ribosomal RNA. RESULTS Crystals of complexes between oligoribonucleotides incorporating the sequence of the ribosomal A site of Escherichia coli and the aminoglycoside paromomycin have been solved at 2.5 A resolution. Each RNA fragment contains two A sites inserted between Watson-Crick pairs. The paromomycin molecules interact in an enlarged deep groove created by two bulging and one unpaired adenines. In both sites, hydroxyl and ammonium side chains of the antibiotic form 13 direct hydrogen bonds to bases and backbone atoms of the A site. In the best-defined site, 8 water molecules mediate 12 other hydrogen bonds between the RNA and the antibiotics. Ring I of paromomycin stacks over base G1491 and forms pseudo-Watson-Crick contacts with A1408. Both the hydroxyl group and one ammonium group of ring II form direct and water-mediated hydrogen bonds to the U1495oU1406 pair. The bulging conformation of the two adenines A1492 and A1493 is stabilized by hydrogen bonds between phosphate oxygens and atoms of rings I and II. The hydrophilic sites of the bulging A1492 and A1493 contact the shallow groove of G=C pairs in a symmetrical complex. CONCLUSIONS Water molecules participate in the binding specificity by exploiting the antibiotic hydration shell and the typical RNA water hydration patterns. The observed contacts rationalize the protection, mutation, and resistance data. The crystal packing mimics the intermolecular contacts induced by aminoglycoside binding in the ribosome.

New loop-loop tertiary interactions in self-splicing introns of subgroup IC and ID: a complete 3D model of the Tetrahymena thermophila ribozyme.

BACKGROUND Group I introns self-splice via two consecutive trans-esterification reactions in the presence of guanosine cofactor and magnesium ions. Comparative sequence analysis has established that a catalytic core of about 120 nucleotides is conserved in all known group I introns. This core is generally not sufficient for activity, however, and most self-splicing group I introns require non-conserved peripheral elements to stabilize the complete three-dimensional (3D) structure. The physico-chemical properties of group I introns make them excellent systems for unraveling the structural basis of the RNA-RNA interactions responsible for promoting the self-assembly of complex RNAs. RESULTS We present phylogenetic and experimental evidence for the existence of three additional tertiary base pairings between hairpin loops within peripheral components of subgroup IC1 and ID introns. Each of these new long range interactions, called P13, P14 and P16, involves a terminal loop located in domain 2. Although domains 2 of IC and ID introns share very strong sequence similarity, their terminal loops interact with domains 5 and 9 (subgroup IC1) and domain 6 (subgroup ID). Based on these tertiary contacts, comparative sequence analysis, and published experimental results such as Fe(II)-EDTA protection patterns, we propose 3D models for two entire group I introns, the subgroup IC1 intron in the large ribosomal precursor RNA of Tetrahymena thermophila and the SdCob.1 subgroup ID intron found in the cytochrome b gene of Saccharomyces douglasii. CONCLUSIONS Three-dimensional models of group I introns belonging to four different subgroups are now available. They all emphasize the modular and hierarchical organization of the architecture of group I introns and the widespread use of base-pairings between terminal hairpin loops for stabilizing the folded and active structures of large and complex RNA molecules.

Crystal structures of complexes between aminoglycosides and decoding A site oligonucleotides: role of the number of rings and positive charges in the specific binding leading to miscoding

The crystal structures of six complexes between aminoglycoside antibiotics (neamine, gentamicin C1A, kanamycin A, ribostamycin, lividomycin A and neomycin B) and oligonucleotides containing the decoding A site of bacterial ribosomes are reported at resolutions between 2.2 and 3.0 Å. Although the number of contacts between the RNA and the aminoglycosides varies between 20 and 31, up to eight direct hydrogen bonds between rings I and II of the neamine moiety are conserved in the observed complexes. The puckered sugar ring I is inserted into the A site helix by stacking against G1491 and forms a pseudo base pair with two H-bonds to the Watson–Crick sites of the universally conserved A1408. This central interaction helps to maintain A1492 and A1493 in a bulged-out conformation. All these structures of the minimal A site RNA complexed to various aminoglycosides display crystal packings with intermolecular contacts between the bulging A1492 and A1493 and the shallow/minor groove of Watson–Crick pairs in a neighbouring helix. In one crystal, one empty A site is observed. In two crystals, two aminoglycosides are bound to the same A site with one bound specifically and the other bound in various ways in the deep/major groove at the edge of the A sites.

Structure of Monomeric Yeast and Mammalian Sec61 Complexes Interacting with the Translating Ribosome

Nascent Chains Revealed Detailed analysis of protein translation and translocation across membranes requires the identification and structural analysis of intermediates involved in these processes (see the Perspective by Kampmann and Blobel). Seidelt et al. (p. 1412, published online 29 October) report the visualization by cryo-electron microscopy of a nascent polypeptide chain in the tunnel of the ribosome at 5.8 angstroms. This resolution allows analysis of the conformation and distinct contacts of the nascent chain within the ribosomal tunnel, which suggests a mechanism by which translational stalling is induced by this peptide. Protein translocation across cellular membranes involves the Sec61 protein, a component of a protein-conducting channel. Whether Sec61 acts as a monomer or as an oligomer during protein translocation has been unclear. Becker et al. (p. 1369, published online 29 October) describe active yeast and mammalian ribosome-Sec61 structures that show the Sec61 complex interacting with the ribosome and a nascent secretory protein signal sequence. The analysis unambiguously reveals that the active protein-conducting channel is a single Sec61 copy with its central pore serving as conduit for the nascent polypeptide. A single copy of a protein-conducting channel molecule provides a conduit for polypeptide translocation across membranes. The trimeric Sec61/SecY complex is a protein-conducting channel (PCC) for secretory and membrane proteins. Although Sec complexes can form oligomers, it has been suggested that a single copy may serve as an active PCC. We determined subnanometer-resolution cryo–electron microscopy structures of eukaryotic ribosome-Sec61 complexes. In combination with biochemical data, we found that in both idle and active states, the Sec complex is not oligomeric and interacts mainly via two cytoplasmic loops with the universal ribosomal adaptor site. In the active state, the ribosomal tunnel and a central pore of the monomeric PCC were occupied by the nascent chain, contacting loop 6 of the Sec complex. This provides a structural basis for the activity of a solitary Sec complex in cotranslational protein translocation.

Tools for the automatic identification and classification of RNA base pairs

Three programs have been developed to aid in the classification and visualization of RNA structure. BPViewer provides a web interface for displaying three-dimensional (3D) coordinates of individual base pairs or base pair collections. A web server, RNAview, automatically identifies and classifies the types of base pairs that are formed in nucleic acid structures by various combinations of the three edges, Watson-Crick, Hoogsteen and the Sugar edge. RNAView produces two-dimensional (2D) diagrams of secondary and tertiary structure in either Postscript, VRML or RNAML formats. The application RNAMLview can be used to rearrange various parts of the RNAView 2D diagram to generate a standard representation (like the cloverleaf structure of tRNAs) or any layout desired by the user. A 2D diagram can be rapidly reformatted using RNAMLview since all the parts of RNA (like helices and single strands) are dynamically linked while moving the selected parts. With the base pair annotation and the 2D graphic display, RNA motifs are rapidly identified and classified. A survey has been carried out for 41 unique structures selected from the NDB database. The statistics for the occurrence of each edge and of each of the 12 bp families are given for the combinations of the four bases: A, G, U and C. The program also allows for visualization of the base pair interactions by using a symbolic convention previously proposed for base pairs. The web servers for BPViewer and RNAview are available at http://ndbserver.rutgers.edu/services/. The application RNAMLview can also be downloaded from this site. The 2D diagrams produced by RNAview are available for RNA structures in the Nucleic Acid Database (NDB) at http://ndbserver.rutgers.edu/atlas/.

RNA–RNA interaction is required for the formation of specific bicoid mRNA 3′ UTR–STAUFEN ribonucleoprotein particles

The formation of the anterior pattern of the Drosophila embryo is dependent on the localization of the mRNA of the morphogen Bicoid (bcd) to the anterior pole of the egg cell. Staufen protein (STAU) is required in a late step of the localization to anchor the bcd mRNA in the anterior cytoplasm. We have shown previously that endogenous STAU associates specifically with injected bcd mRNA 3′‐untranslated region (UTR), resulting in the formation of characteristic RNA–protein particles that are transported along microtubules of the mitotic spindles in a directed manner. The regions recognized by STAU in this in vivo assay are predicted to form three stem–loop structures involving large double‐stranded stretches. Here, we show that the STAU interaction requires a double‐stranded conformation of the stems within the RNA localization signal. In addition, base pairing between two single‐stranded loops plays a major role in particle formation. This loop–loop interaction is intermolecular, not intramolecular; thus dimers or multimers of the RNA localization signal must be associated with STAU in these particles. The bcd mRNA 3′ UTR can also dimerize in vitro in the absence of STAU. Thus, in addition to RNA–protein interactions, RNA–RNA interaction might be involved in the formation of ribonucleoprotein particles for transport and localization.