Erica Secchettin

Impact of preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: An analysis of 1500 consecutive cases

Implications of preoperative biliary drain on morbidity and mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy are still controversial. The present study aims to assess the impact of preoperative biliary drain on postoperative outcome and to define optimal serum bilirubin cut‐off to recommend biliary drainage in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients ≥ 75 years of age: Are there any differences with other age ranges in oncological and surgical outcomes? Results from a tertiary referral center

AIM To compare surgical and oncological outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in patients ≥ 75 years of age with two younger cohorts of patients. METHODS The prospectively maintained Institutional database of pancreatic resection was queried for patients aged ≥ 75 years (late elderly, LE) submitted to PD for any disease from January 2010 to June 2015. We compared clinical, demographic and pathological features and survival outcomes of LE patients with 2 exact matched cohorts of younger patients [≥ 40 to 64 years of age (adults, A) and ≥ 65 to 74 years of age (young elderly, YE)] submitted to PD, according to selected variables. RESULTS The final LE population, as well as the control groups, were made of 96 subjects. Up to 71% of patients was operated on for a periampullary malignancy and pancreatic cancer (PDAC) accounted for 79% of them. Intraoperative data (estimated blood loss and duration of surgery) did not differ among the groups. The overall complication rate was 65.6%, 61.5% and 58.3% for LE, YE and A patients, respectively, P = NS). Reoperation and cardiovascular complications were significantly more frequent in LE than in YE and A groups (P = 0.003 and P = 0.019, respectively). When considering either all malignancies and PDAC only, the three groups did not differ in survival. Considering all benign diseases, the estimated mean survival was 58 and 78 mo for ≥ and < 75 years of age (YE + A groups), respectively (P = 0.012). CONCLUSION Age is not a contraindication for PD. A careful selection of LE patients allows to obtain good surgical and oncological results.

Screening/surveillance programs for pancreatic cancer in familial high-risk individuals: A systematic review and proportion meta-analysis of screening results

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Screening/surveillance programs for pancreatic cancer (PC) in familial high-risk individuals (FPC-HRI) have been widely reported, but their merits remain unclear. The data reported so far are heterogeneous-especially in terms of screening yield. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of currently available data coming from screening/surveillance programs to evaluate the proportion of screening goal achievement (SGA), overall surgery and unnecessary surgery. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed and the Cochrane Library database from January 2000 to December 2016to identify studies reporting results of screening/surveillance programs including cohorts of FPC-HRI. The main outcome measures were weighted proportion of SGA, overall surgery, and unnecessary surgery among the FPC-HRI cohort, using a random effects model. SGA was defined as any diagnosis of resectable PC, PanIN3, or high-grade dysplasia intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (HGD-IPMN). Unnecessary surgery was defined as any other final pathology. RESULTS In a meta-analysis of 16 studies reporting on 1551 FPC-HRI cases, 30 subjects (1.82%), received a diagnosis of PC, PanIN3 or HGD-IPMNs. The pooled proportion of SGA was 1.4%(95% CI 0.8-2, p < 0.001, I2 = 0%). The pooled proportion of overall surgery was 6%(95% CI 4.1-7.9, p < 0.001, I2 = 60.91%). The pooled proportion of unnecessary surgery was 68.1%(95% CI 59.5-76.7, p < 0.001, I2 = 4.05%); 105 subjects (6.3%) received surgery, and the overall number of diagnoses from non-malignant specimens was 156 (1.5 lesion/subject). CONCLUSIONS The weighted proportion of SGA of screening/surveillance programs published thus far is excellent. However, the probability of receiving surgery during the screening/surveillance program is non-negligible, and unnecessary surgery is a potential negative outcome.

Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved postoperative survival in specific subtypes of invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) of the pancreas: it is time for randomized controlled data

BACKGROUND Very little is known about adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas. The aim was to assess whether adjuvant chemotherapy affects survival. METHODS Retrospective evaluation of invasive IPMNs. Patients treated with surgery alone or followed by adjuvant chemotherapy were compared in terms of survival. RESULTS A total of 102 invasive IPMNs were analyzed. Median follow-up was 72 (5-318) months and 18.6% received adjuvant chemotherapy. Overall, recurrence rate was 40.2%, while 5-year overall survival and disease specific survival (DSS) were 65.3% and 69.4%, respectively. N1 disease (HR5.58, CI95% 2.49-12.51, p < 0.01), tubular type (HR2.35, CI95% 1.71-4.82, p = 0.05) and G3 tumors (HR4.54, CI95% 2.12-15.49, <0.01) were predictors of reduced DSS. Overall, there was no difference in the 5-year DSS comparing patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy to surgery alone (61.8 vs. 69.4%, p = 0.8). Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved DSS only in N1 (5-years-DSS 76 vs. 35.8%, p = 0.01) and tubular carcinomas (5-years-DSS 88.9 vs. 53%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant therapy improves survival only in invasive IPMNs with nodal disease or tubular differentiation. Future trials are needed to improve the level of evidence about adjuvant chemotherapy.

The role of age in pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: Same risk of death but different implications for management

BACKGROUND Current guidelines do not address the role of age in the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas. AIM To evaluate whether clinical features and risk for malignancy are affected by patients age at diagnosis. METHODS In total, 2189 IPMNs, both surgically resected or surveilled, were dichotomized according to a 50-year-old cutoff and compared in terms of pathological features, cumulative risk of developing high-risk stigmata (HRS), overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). RESULTS Patients <50 years had more frequent abdominal pain (38.5 vs. 22.4%; p < 0.01) and acute pancreatitis (20.4 vs. 9.3%; p < 0.01) at presentation. Patients ≥50 years old had more multifocal IPMNs (50 vs. 36.9%; p < 0.01), HRS (8.5% vs. 4.3%; p = 0.04) and invasive IPMNs (26.6% vs. 17.3%; p = 0.03) when resected. Moreover, patients ≥50 years old had a significantly higher cumulative risk of developing HRS over time, and a significantly lower OS, but similar DSS when compared with those <50 years old. CONCLUSIONS IPMNs diagnosed in older patients are more likely to progress to HRS despite the fact that cancer-related death is not affected by age. The follow-up schedule should not be adjusted according to age, but one should take into account that IPMNs in younger individuals have more time to progress toward malignancy.

Importance of main pancreatic duct dilatation in IPMN undergoing surveillance: Main pancreatic duct dilatation in IPMN undergoing surveillance

The association between risk of pancreatic cancer and a dilated main pancreatic duct (MPD) in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is debated. The aim of this study was to assess the role of MPD size in predicting pancreatic cancer in resected IPMNs and those kept under surveillance.

Does the surgical waiting list affect pathological and survival outcome in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND High-volume centers have to deal with long surgical waiting-lists leading to a potential delay in treatment. This study assessed whether a longer time from diagnosis to surgery worsened pathological and survival outcomes in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients treated for resectable PDAC. Difference in size between preoperative CT-scan and specimen, pathological features, the rate of vascular and R1 resections as well as recurrence and survival were analyzed depending on the waiting time using a 30-day cut-off. RESULTS Waiting more than 30 days for surgery was associated with an increase in tumor size on specimen when compared with CT-scan (+3 vs. +1 mm, p = 0.04). T and N status, rate of vascular resection, grading, perineural and lymphovascular infiltration, and R1 rates did not differ between groups, as well as tumor recurrence (48.8% vs. 48.9%, p = 0.5) and survival (31 vs. 29 months, p = 0.7). For PDAC < 20 mm, waiting less than 30 days improved overall survival (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION The duration of the surgical waiting-list did not affect pathological features and survival. Delayed surgery was associated with increased cancer size on the specimen. However, surgery should not be delayed for PDACs < 20 mm as this may negatively affect the prognosis.