Erik A. Lippa

MK-507 versus Sezolamide: Comparative Efficacy of Two Topically Active Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors

Topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors MK-507 and sezolamide hydrochloride (previously known as MK-417) were compared in a double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled study in 82 patients with bilateral primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. MK-507 was given every 8 or 12 hours, sezolamide every 8 hours, or placebo every 8 or 12 hours for 4 days. Both drugs lowered intraocular pressure (IOP) substantially. MK-507 was somewhat more active than sezolamide, with a peak mean IOP reduction of 26.2% for MK-507 versus 22.5% for sezolamide, although the difference between the treatments was not statistically significant. These drugs may have potential in the treatment of glaucoma.

The Use of Dorzolamide and Pilocarpine as Adjunctive Therapy to Timolol in Patients with Elevated Intraocular Pressure

PURPOSE To report the results of two studies on the use of dorzolamide as adjunctive therapy to timolol in patients with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). In the larger study, the additive effect of dorzolamide administered twice daily also was compared with 2% pilocarpine. METHODS Both studies were parallel, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled comparisons. In the pilot study, 32 patients received 0.5% timolol twice daily plus either 2% dorzolamide twice daily or placebo twice daily for 8 days. In the Pilocarpine Comparison Study, 261 patients received 0.5% timolol twice daily plus 0.7% dorzolamide twice daily, 2% dorzolamide twice daily, 2% pilocarpine four times daily, or placebo (twice daily or 4 times daily) for 2 weeks. Patients then entered a 6-month extension period and received 0.5% timolol twice daily plus either 0.7% dorzolamide twice daily, 2% dorzolamide twice daily, or 2% pilocarpine four times daily. RESULTS In the pilot study, after 8 days, additional mean percent reductions in IOP for 2% dorzolamide and placebo were 17% and 3% at morning trough and 19% and 2% at peak, respectively. In the Pilocarpine Comparison Study, after 6 months, additional mean percent reductions in IOP (morning trough) were 9%, 13%, and 10% for 0.7% dorzolamide, 2% dorzolamide, and 2% pilocarpine, respectively. Patients receiving 2% pilocarpine had the highest rate of discontinuation due to a clinical adverse experience, and the use of dorzolamide was not associated with systemic side effects commonly observed with the use of oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. CONCLUSION Dorzolamide twice daily was effective and well tolerated by the patients in these studies as adjunctive therapy to timolol. The larger study demonstrated that both concentrations of dorzolamide produce similar IOP-lowering effects to 2% pilocarpine.

Sezolamide: additivity to timolol twice daily

Sezolamide, a potent topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor previously known as MK-417, was studied to determine its ocular hypotensive activity in patients with elevated intraocular pressure while on continuing therapy with topical timolol. This was a three-centre, double-masked, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel study in 36 patients with bilateral primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension on therapy receiving 0.5% timolol twice daily, with a morning intraocular pressure greater than or equal to 22 mmHg in both eyes 2–4 hours following an 8 a.m. dose of timolol. Sezolamide 1.8% or placebo twice daily was added to treatment with timolol on the evening of day 1 and continued for 2 weeks. Twelve-hour diurnal curves were performed before the study on day 1 (timolol alone) and on day 15. Intraocular pressure measurements were also taken on days 2 and 8 at 8 a.m. and 9 a.m. Patients who received timolol and sezolamide showed additional intraocular pressure reductions from day 1 (timolol alone) of 8.0 to 15.5%, which were significant at all times. At hours 1, 2, 4 and 8 the reductions in intraocular pressure observed in the group receiving sezolamide and timolol were significantly greater than those in the group receiving timolol and placebo.

Comparative tolerability of topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor MK-927 and its S-enantiomer MK-417

A single-dose, randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled, five-period cross-over comparative ocular tolerance study was undertaken with the topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor (CAI) MK-927 (1% and 2% concentrations) and its S-enantiomer MK-417 (1 and 1.8% concentrations) in 20 healthy, normal volunteers. Subjects received one drop of placebo (common vehicle) or CAI in each eye on five different days that were separated by washout intervals of 1 week. The incidence of burning increased significantly after treatment with 2% MK-927 (P<0.01) and 1.8% MK-417 (P < 0.05) as compared with placebo. The mean duration of burning following placebo was 16.8 s, somewhat less than that following CAI application (23–37.1 s). The duration of tearing following CAI treatment was also significantly prolonged (P < 0.05). Pupil size was not changed by CAIs. No other side effects were observed. At 3 h after instillation, intraocular pressure (IOP) was found to be decreased following all four CAI treatments, significantly so with 1% and 1.8% MK-417. The reasonable single-dose tolerability of MK-927 and MK-417 in this sensitive normal-volunteer model supports their potential as topical glaucoma medications. This study suggests that MK-417 may possess greater IOP-lowering activity than MK-927 in man.