Erik Berk

Endothelial Targeting of High-Affinity Multivalent Polymer Nanocarriers Directed to Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1

Targeting of diagnostic and therapeutic agents to endothelial cells (ECs) provides an avenue to improve treatment of many maladies. For example, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), a constitutive endothelial cell adhesion molecule up-regulated in many diseases, is a good determinant for endothelial targeting of therapeutic enzymes and polymer nanocarriers (PNCs) conjugated with anti-ICAM (anti-ICAM/PNCs). However, intrinsic and extrinsic factors that control targeting of anti-ICAM/PNCs to ECs (e.g., anti-ICAM affinity and PNC valency and flow) have not been defined. In this study we tested in vitro and in vivo parameters of targeting to ECs of anti-ICAM/PNCs consisting of either prototype polystyrene or biodegradable poly(lactic-coglycolic) acid polymers (∼200 nm diameter spheres carrying ∼200 anti-ICAM molecules). Anti-ICAM/PNCs, but not control IgG/PNCs 1) rapidly (t1/2 ∼5 min) and specifically bound to tumor necrosis factor-activated ECs in a dose-dependent manner (Bmax ∼350 PNC/cell) at both static and physiological shear stress conditions and 2) bound to ECs and accumulated in the pulmonary vasculature after i.v. injection in mice. Anti-ICAM/PNCs displayed markedly higher EC affinity versus naked anti-ICAM (Kd ∼80 pM versus ∼8 nM) in cell culture and, probably because of this factor, higher value (185.3 ± 24.2 versus 50.5 ± 1.5% injected dose/g) and selectivity (lung/blood ratio 81.0 ± 10.9 versus 2.1 ± 0.02, in part due to faster blood clearance) of pulmonary targeting. These results 1) show that reformatting monomolecular anti-ICAM into high-affinity multivalent PNCs boosts their vascular immuno-targeting, which withstands physiological hydrodynamics and 2) support potential anti-ICAM/PNCs utility for medical applications.

Effect of flow on endothelial endocytosis of nanocarriers targeted to ICAM-1

Delivery of drugs into the endothelium by nanocarriers targeted to endothelial determinants may improve treatment of vascular maladies. This is the case for intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), a glycoprotein overexpressed on endothelial cells (ECs) in many pathologies. ICAM-1-targeted nanocarriers bind to and are internalized by ECs via a non-classical pathway, CAM-mediated endocytosis. In this work we studied the effects of endothelial adaptation to physiological flow on the endocytosis of model polymer nanocarriers targeted to ICAM-1 (anti-ICAM/NCs, ~180 nm diameter). Culturing established endothelial-like cells (EAhy926 cells) and primary human umbilical vein ECs (HUVECs) under 4 dyn/cm(2) laminar shear stress for 24 h resulted in flow adaptation: cell elongation and formation of actin stress fibers aligned to the flow direction. Fluorescence microscopy showed that flow-adapted cells internalized anti-ICAM/NCs under flow, although at slower rate versus non flow-adapted cells under static incubation (~35% reduction). Uptake was inhibited by amiloride, whereas marginally affected by filipin and cadaverine, implicating that CAM-endocytosis accounts for anti-ICAM/NC uptake under flow. Internalization under flow was more modestly affected by inhibiting protein kinase C, which regulates actin remodeling during CAM-endocytosis. Actin recruitment to stress fibers that maintain the cell shape under flow may delay uptake of anti-ICAM/NCs under this condition by interfering with actin reorganization needed for CAM-endocytosis. Electron microscopy revealed somewhat slow, yet effective endocytosis of anti-ICAM/NCs by pulmonary endothelium after i.v. injection in mice, similar to that of flow-adapted cell cultures: ~40% (30 min) and 80% (3 h) internalization. Similar to cell culture data, uptake was slightly faster in capillaries with lower shear stress. Further, LPS treatment accelerated internalization of anti-ICAM/NCs in mice. Therefore, regulation of endocytosis of ICAM-1-targeted nanocarriers by flow and endothelial status may modulate drug delivery into ECs exposed to different physiological (capillaries vs. arterioles/venules) or pathological (ischemia, inflammation) levels and patterns of blood flow.

Independent Regulation of Chemokine Responsiveness and Cytolytic Function versus CD8+ T Cell Expansion by Dendritic Cells

The ability of cancer vaccines to induce tumor-specific CD8+ T cells in the circulation of cancer patients has been shown to poorly correlate with their clinical effectiveness. In this study, we report that although Ags presented by different types of mature dendritic cells (DCs) are similarly effective in inducing CD8+ T cell expansion, the acquisition of CTL function and peripheral-type chemokine receptors, CCR5 and CXCR3, requires Ag presentation by a select type of DCs. Both “standard” DCs (matured in the presence of PGE2) and type 1-polarized DCs (DC1s) (matured in the presence of IFNs and TLR ligands, which prevent DCs “exhaustion”) are similarly effective in inducing CD8+ T cell expansion and acquisition of CD45RO+IL-7R+IL-15R+ phenotype. However, granzyme B expression, acquisition of CTL activity, and peripheral tissue-type chemokine responsiveness are features exclusively exhibited by CD8+ T cells activated by DC1s. This advantage of DC1s was observed in polyclonally activated naive and memory CD8+ T cells and in blood-isolated melanoma-specific CTL precursors. Our data help to explain the dissociation between the ability of cancer vaccines to induce high numbers of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells in the blood of cancer patients and their ability to promote clinical responses, providing for new strategies of cancer immunotherapy.

Memory CD8+ T Cells Protect Dendritic Cells from CTL Killing

CD8+ T cells have been shown to be capable of either suppressing or promoting immune responses. To reconcile these contrasting regulatory functions, we compared the ability of human effector and memory CD8+ T cells to regulate survival and functions of dendritic cells (DC). We report that, in sharp contrast to the effector cells (CTLs) that kill DCs in a granzyme B- and perforin-dependent mechanism, memory CD8+ T cells enhance the ability of DCs to produce IL-12 and to induce functional Th1 and CTL responses in naive CD4+ and CD8+ T cell populations. Moreover, memory CD8+ T cells that release the DC-activating factor TNF-α before the release of cytotoxic granules induce DC expression of an endogenous granzyme B inhibitor PI-9 and protect DCs from CTL killing with similar efficacy as CD4+ Th cells. The currently identified DC-protective function of memory CD8+ T cells helps to explain the phenomenon of CD8+ T cell memory, reduced dependence of recall responses on CD4+ T cell help, and the importance of delayed administration of booster doses of vaccines for the optimal outcome of immunization.

Progressive loss of anti-HER2 CD4+ T-helper type 1 response in breast tumorigenesis and the potential for immune restoration

Genomic profiling has identified several molecular oncodrivers in breast tumorigenesis. A thorough understanding of endogenous immune responses to these oncodrivers may provide insights into immune interventions for breast cancer (BC). We investigated systemic anti-HER2/neu CD4+ T-helper type-1 (Th1) responses in HER2-driven breast tumorigenesis. A highly significant stepwise Th1 response loss extending from healthy donors (HD), through HER2pos-DCIS, and ultimately to early stage HER2pos-invasive BC patients was detected by IFNγ ELISPOT. The anti-HER2 Th1 deficit was not attributable to host-level T-cell anergy, loss of immune competence, or increase in immunosuppressive phenotypes (Treg/MDSCs), but rather associated with a functional shift in IFNγ:IL-10-producing phenotypes. HER2high, but not HER2low, BC cells expressing IFNγ/TNF-α receptors were susceptible to Th1 cytokine-mediated apoptosis in vitro, which could be significantly rescued by neutralizing IFNγ and TNF-α, suggesting that abrogation of HER2-specific Th1 may reflect a mechanism of immune evasion in HER2-driven tumorigenesis. While largely unaffected by cytotoxic or HER2-targeted (trastuzumab) therapies, depressed Th1 responses in HER2pos-BC patients were significantly restored following HER2-pulsed dendritic cell (DC) vaccinations, suggesting that this Th1 defect is not “fixed” and can be corrected by immunologic interventions. Importantly, preserved anti-HER2 Th1 responses were associated with pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant trastuzumab/chemotherapy, while depressed responses were observed in patients incurring locoregional/systemic recurrence following trastuzumab/chemotherapy. Monitoring anti-HER2 Th1 reactivity following HER2-directed therapies may identify vulnerable subgroups at risk of clinicopathologic failure. In such patients, combinations of existing HER2-targeted therapies with strategies to boost anti-HER2 CD4+ Th1 immunity may decrease the risk of recurrence and thus warrant further investigation.

Rationale for a Multimodality Strategy to Enhance the Efficacy of Dendritic Cell-Based Cancer Immunotherapy.

Dendritic cells (DC), master antigen-presenting cells that orchestrate interactions between the adaptive and innate immune arms, are increasingly utilized in cancer immunotherapy. Despite remarkable progress in our understanding of DC immunobiology, as well as several encouraging clinical applications – such as DC-based sipuleucel-T for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer – clinically effective DC-based immunotherapy as monotherapy for a majority of tumors remains a distant goal. The complex interplay between diverse molecular and immune processes that govern resistance to DC-based vaccination compels a multimodality approach, encompassing a growing arsenal of antitumor agents which target these distinct processes and synergistically enhance DC function. These include antibody-based targeted molecular therapies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, therapies that inhibit immunosuppressive cellular elements, conventional cytotoxic modalities, and immune potentiating adjuvants. It is likely that in the emerging era of “precision” cancer therapeutics, tangible clinical benefits will only be realized with a multifaceted – and personalized – approach combining DC-based vaccination with adjunctive strategies.

Association of Depressed Anti-HER2 T-Helper Type 1 Response With Recurrence in Patients With Completely Treated HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Role for Immune Monitoring

IMPORTANCE There is a paucity of immune signatures identifying patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive invasive breast cancer (IBC) at risk for treatment failure following trastuzumab and chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE To determine whether circulating anti-HER2 CD4-positive (CD4+) T-helper type 1 (Th1) immunity correlates with recurrence in patients with completely treated HER2-positive IBC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Hypothesis-generating exploratory translational analysis at a tertiary care referral center of patients with completely treated HER2-positive IBC with median (interquartile range) follow-up of 44 (31) months. Anti-HER2 Th1 responses were examined using peripheral blood mononuclear cells pulsed with 6 HER2-derived class II-promiscuous peptides via interferon-γ (IFN-γ) enzyme-linked immunospot assay. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES T-helper type 1 response metrics were anti-HER2 responsivity, repertoire (number of reactive peptides), and cumulative response across 6 peptides (spot-forming cells [SFCs]/106 cells). Anti-HER2 Th1 responses in treatment-naive patients (used as an immunologic baseline) were compared with those in patients completing trastuzumab and chemotherapy; in the latter group, analyses were stratified by recurrence status. Recurrence was defined as any locoregional or distant breast event, or both. Cox regression analysis estimated the instantaneous hazard of recurrence (ie, disease-free survival [DFS]) stratified by anti-HER2 Th1 responsivity. RESULTS In 95 women with HER2-positive IBC (median [range] age, 49 [24-85] years; 22 treatment-naive, 73 treated with trastuzumab and chemotherapy), depressed anti-HER2 Th1 responsivity (recurrence, 2 of 25 [8%], vs nonrecurrence, 40 of 48 [83%]; P < .001), mean (SD) repertoire (0.1 [0.1] vs 1.5[0.2]; P < .001), and mean (SD) cumulative response (14.8 [2.0] vs 80.2 [11.0] SFCs/106 cells; P < .001) were observed in patients incurring recurrence (n = 25) compared with patients without recurrence (n = 48). After controlling for confounding, anti-HER2 Th1 responsivity remained independently associated with recurrence (P < .001). This immune disparity was mediated by anti-HER2 CD4+T-bet+IFN-γ+ (Th1)-not CD4+GATA-3+IFN-γ+ (Th2) or CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ (Treg)-phenotypes, and not attributable to immune incompetence. When stratifying trastuzumab plus chemotherapy-treated patients by Th1 responsivity, Th1-nonresponsive patients demonstrated a worse DFS (median, 47 vs 113 months; P < .001) compared with Th1-responsive patients (hazard ratio, 16.9 [95% CI, 3.9-71.4]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Depressed anti-HER2 Th1 response is a novel immune correlate to recurrence in patients with completely treated HER2-positive IBC. These data underscore a role for immune monitoring in patients with HER2-positive IBC to identify vulnerable populations at risk of treatment failure.

Anti-HER2 CD4+ T-helper type 1 response is a novel immune correlate to pathologic response following neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer

IntroductionA progressive loss of circulating anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor-2/neu (HER2) CD4+ T-helper type 1 (Th1) immune responses is observed in HER2pos-invasive breast cancer (IBC) patients relative to healthy controls. Pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy (T + C) is associated with decreased recurrence and improved prognosis. We examined differences in anti-HER2 Th1 responses between pCR and non-pCR patients to identify modifiable immune correlates to pathologic response following neoadjuvant T + C.MethodsAnti-HER2 Th1 responses in 87 HER2pos-IBC patients were examined using peripheral blood mononuclear cells pulsed with 6 HER2-derived class II peptides via IFN-γ ELISPOT. Th1 response metrics were anti-HER2 responsivity, repertoire (number of reactive peptides), and cumulative response across 6 peptides (spot-forming cells [SFC]/106 cells). Anti-HER2 Th1 responses of non-pCR patients (n = 4) receiving adjuvant HER2-pulsed type 1-polarized dendritic cell (DC1) vaccination were analyzed pre- and post-immunization.ResultsDepressed anti-HER2 Th1 responses observed in treatment-naïve HER2pos-IBC patients (n = 22) did not improve globally in T + C-treated HER2pos-IBC patients (n = 65). Compared with adjuvant T + C receipt, neoadjuvant T + C — utilized in 61.5 % — was associated with higher anti-HER2 Th1 repertoire (p = 0.048). While pCR (n = 16) and non-pCR (n = 24) patients did not differ substantially in demographic/clinical characteristics, pCR patients demonstrated dramatically higher anti-HER2 Th1 responsivity (94 % vs. 33 %, p = 0.0002), repertoire (3.3 vs. 0.3 peptides, p < 0.0001), and cumulative response (148.2 vs. 22.4 SFC/106, p < 0.0001) versus non-pCR patients. After controlling for potential confounders, anti-HER2 Th1 responsivity remained independently associated with pathologic response (odds ratio 8.82, p = 0.016). This IFN-γ+ immune disparity was mediated by anti-HER2 CD4+T-bet+IFN-γ+ (i.e., Th1) — not CD4+GATA-3+IFN-γ+ (i.e., Th2) — phenotypes, and not attributable to non-pCR patients’ immune incompetence, host-level T-cell anergy, or increased immunosuppressive populations. In recruited non-pCR patients, anti-HER2 Th1 repertoire (3.7 vs. 0.5, p = 0.014) and cumulative response (192.3 vs. 33.9 SFC/106, p = 0.014) improved significantly following HER2-pulsed DC1 vaccination.ConclusionsAnti-HER2 CD4+ Th1 response is a novel immune correlate to pathologic response following neoadjuvant T + C. In non-pCR patients, depressed Th1 responses are not immunologically “fixed” and can be restored with HER2-directed Th1 immune interventions. In such high-risk patients, combining HER2-targeted therapies with strategies to boost anti-HER2 Th1 immunity may improve outcomes and mitigate recurrence.

Dendritic Cell-Induced Th1 and Th17 Cell Differentiation for Cancer Therapy

The success of cellular immunotherapies against cancer requires the generation of activated CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells. The type of T-cell response generated (e.g., Th1 or Th2) will determine the efficacy of the therapy, and it is generally assumed that a type-1 response is needed for optimal cancer treatment. IL-17 producing T-cells (Th17/Tc17) play an important role in autoimmune diseases, but their function in cancer is more controversial. While some studies have shown a pro-cancerous role for IL-17, other studies have shown an anti-tumor function. The induction of polarized T-cell responses can be regulated by dendritic cells (DCs). DCs are key regulators of the immune system with the ability to affect both innate and adaptive immune responses. These properties have led many researchers to study the use of ex vivo manipulated DCs for the treatment of various diseases, such as cancer and autoimmune diseases. While Th1/Tc1 cells are traditionally used for their potent anti-tumor responses, mounting evidence suggests Th17/Tc17 cells should be utilized by themselves or for the induction of optimal Th1 responses. It is therefore important to understand the factors involved in the induction of both type-1 and type-17 T-cell responses by DCs.

Dendritic cells matured in the presence of TLR ligands overcome the immunosuppressive functions of regulatory T cells.

Toll like receptor (TLR)-stimulated dendritic cells (DCs) are able to overcome the inhibitory activity of regulatory T cells (Tregs) and induce the proliferation of effector T cells. TLR-activated DCs secrete a soluble factor and act directly on Tregs to convert them into interferon γ-secreting TH1-like cells that express the transcription factor T-bet.