Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Erik Folch is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Erik Folch.


Lung Cancer | 2015

Brain metastases in patients with EGFR-mutated or ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancers

Deepa Rangachari; Norihiro Yamaguchi; Paul A. VanderLaan; Erik Folch; Anand Mahadevan; Scott R. Floyd; Erik J. Uhlmann; Eric Wong; Suzanne E. Dahlberg; Mark S. Huberman; Daniel B. Costa

INTRODUCTION Brain metastases (BM) are common in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the baseline incidence and evolution of BM over time in oncogene-driven NSCLCs are seldom reported. In this study, we evaluated the frequency of BM in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged NSCLC. METHODS The presence of BM, clinicopathologic data, and tumor genotype were retrospectively compiled and analyzed from a cohort of 381 patients. RESULTS We identified 86 EGFR-mutated (90.7% with metastatic disease; 85.9% received an EGFR inhibitor) and 23 ALK-rearranged (91.3% with metastatic disease; 85.7% received an ALK inhibitor) NSCLCs. BM were present in 24.4% of EGFR-mutated and 23.8% of ALK-rearranged NSCLCs at the time of diagnosis of advanced disease. This study did not demonstrate a difference in the cumulative incidence of BM over time between the two cohorts (EGFR/ALK cohort competing risk regression [CRR] coefficient of 0.78 [95% CI 0.44-1.39], p=0.41). In still living patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC, 34.2% had BM at 1 year, 38.4% at 2 years, 46.7% at 3 years, 48.7% at 4 years, and 52.9% at 5 years. In still living patients with advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC, 23.8% had BM at 1 year, 45.5% at 2 years, and 58.4% at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS BM are frequent in advanced EGFR-mutated or ALK-rearranged NSCLCs, with an estimated >45% of patients with CNS involvement by three years of survival with the use of targeted therapies. These data point toward the CNS as an important unmet clinical need in the evolving schema for personalized care in NSCLC.


Lung Cancer | 2014

Success and failure rates of tumor genotyping techniques in routine pathological samples with non-small-cell lung cancer

Paul A. VanderLaan; Norihiro Yamaguchi; Erik Folch; David Boucher; Michael S. Kent; Sidhu P. Gangadharan; Adnan Majid; Michael Goldstein; Mark S. Huberman; Olivier Kocher; Daniel B. Costa

INTRODUCTION Identification of some somatic molecular alterations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has become evidence-based practice. The success and failure rate of using commercially available tumor genotyping techniques in routine day-to-day NSCLC pathology samples is not well described. We sought to evaluate the success and failure rate of EGFR mutation, KRAS mutation, and ALK FISH in a cohort of lung cancers subjected to routine clinical tumor genotype. METHODS Clinicopathologic data, tumor genotype success and failure rates were retrospectively compiled and analyzed from 381 patient-tumor samples. RESULTS From these 381 patients with lung cancer, the mean age was 65 years, 61.2% were women, 75.9% were white, 27.8% were never smokers, 73.8% had advanced NSCLC and 86.1% had adenocarcinoma histology. The tumor tissue was obtained from surgical specimens in 48.8%, core needle biopsies in 17.9%, and as cell blocks from aspirates or fluid in 33.3% of cases. Anatomic sites for tissue collection included lung (49.3%), lymph nodes (22.3%), pleura (11.8%), bone (6.0%), brain (6.0%), among others. The overall success rate for EGFR mutation analysis was 94.2%, for KRAS mutation 91.6% and for ALK FISH 91.6%. The highest failure rates were observed when the tissue was obtained from image-guided percutaneous transthoracic core-needle biopsies (31.8%, 27.3%, and 35.3% for EGFR, KRAS, and ALK tests, respectively) and bone specimens (23.1%, 15.4%, and 23.1%, respectively). In specimens obtained from bone, the failure rates were significantly higher for biopsies than resection specimens (40% vs. 0%, p=0.024 for EGFR) and for decalcified compared to non-decalcified samples (60% vs. 5.5%, p=0.021 for EGFR). CONCLUSIONS Tumor genotype techniques are feasible in most samples, outside small image-guided percutaneous transthoracic core-needle biopsies and bone samples from core biopsies with decalcification, and therefore expansion of routine tumor genotype into the care of patients with NSCLC may not require special tissue acquisition or manipulation.


Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 2013

Adequacy of lymph node transbronchial needle aspirates using convex probe endobronchial ultrasound for multiple tumor genotyping techniques in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Erik Folch; Norihiro Yamaguchi; Paul A. VanderLaan; Olivier Kocher; David Boucher; Michael Goldstein; Mark S. Huberman; Michael S. Kent; Sidharta P. Gangadharan; Daniel B. Costa; Adnan Majid

Introduction: Adequate tumor acquisition is essential to identify somatic molecular alterations in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocations. The success and failure rates for tumor genotyping of tissue obtained from fine-needle aspirates of nodal tissue using a convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS) and other diagnostic modalities in routine NSCLC care have not been described. Methods: Clinicopathologic data, tumor genotype success and failure rates were retrospectively compiled and analyzed from 207 patient-tumor samples sent for routine tumor genotype in clinical practice, including 42 patient-tumor samples obtained from hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes using CP-EBUS. Results: The median age of the patients was 65 years, 62.3% were women, 77.8% were white, 26.6% were never smokers, 73.9% had advanced NSCLC, and 84.1% had adenocarcinoma histology. Tumor tissue was obtained from CP-EBUS–derived hilar or mediastinal nodes in 42 cases (20.2% of total). In this latter cohort, the overall success rate for EGFR mutation analysis was 95.2%, for Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutation 90.5%, and for ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization 90.5%. In the complete 207 tumors, the success rate for EGFR was 92.3%, for KRAS 91.8%, and for ALK 89.9%. The failure rates were not significantly different when comparing CP-EBUS–derived nodal tissue versus all other samples or versus surgical biopsies of mediastinal nodes, but were significantly lower than image-guided percutaneous transthoracic core-needle biopsies. Conclusions: The success rate of multiple tumor genomic analyses techniques for EGFR, KRAS, and ALK gene abnormalities using routine lung cancer tissue samples obtained from hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes by means of CP-EBUS exceeds 90%, and this method of tissue acquisition is not inferior to other specimen types. Tumor genotype techniques are feasible in most CP-EBUS–derived samples and therefore further expansion of routine tumor genotype for the care of patients with NSCLC may be possible using targeted sample acquisition through CP-EBUS.


Cancer Cytopathology | 2014

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA): An overview and update for the cytopathologist

Paul A. VanderLaan; Helen H. Wang; Adnan Majid; Erik Folch

Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS‐TBNA) has emerged as a minimally invasive technique for evaluating the mediastinum and staging patients with lung cancer. In the hands of an experienced operator, the procedure is safe and provides excellent sensitivity, specificity, and predictive diagnostic values. In conjunction with endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA), a nearly complete mediastinal evaluation can be performed in a minimally invasive fashion. This strategy results in improved lymph node staging, markedly reduced need for mediastinoscopy, and fewer futile thoracotomies compared with a traditional surgical staging procedure. The procedure is cost effective and provides excellent cytologic specimens that have proven well suited for ancillary testing, such as immunohistochemistry and tumor genotyping. EBUS‐TBNA, initially used as a tool to sample the lymph nodes adjacent to the airway walls, has now become instrumental in sampling lesions in the mediastinum, hilum, and lung parenchyma, where previously more than 1 procedure would have been necessary. Looking forward, expanded use of this procedure is likely to revolutionize the access to cytology‐proven staging and restaging of lung cancer and other thoracic malignancies in a minimally invasive fashion. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2014;122:561–576.


Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | 2008

Airway interventions in the tracheobronchial tree.

Erik Folch; Atul C. Mehta

The field of interventional pulmonary medicine is a relatively new area in pulmonary medicine resulting from the technological advances, as well as the increasing need for palliative and curative treatment modalities for patients with tracheobronchial, parenchymal, and pleural disease. This article reviews the advances in endoscopic techniques aimed to the tracheobronchial tree, including foreign body removal, laser photoresection, electrosurgery, argon-plasma coagulation (APC), photodynamic therapy, cryotherapy, balloon bronchoplasty, stent placement, brachytherapy, bronchial thermoplasty, transtracheal oxygen catheter placement, as well as treatment of airway complications after lung transplantation.


Lung Cancer | 2013

Smoking status and self-reported race affect the frequency of clinically relevant oncogenic alterations in non-small-cell lung cancers at a United States-based academic medical practice

Norihiro Yamaguchi; Paul A. VanderLaan; Erik Folch; David Boucher; Hannah M. Canepa; Michael S. Kent; Sidhu P. Gangadharan; Adnan Majid; Olivier Kocher; Michael Goldstein; Mark S. Huberman; Daniel B. Costa

INTRODUCTION The identification of somatic genomic aberrations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is part of evidence-based practice guidelines for care of patients with NSCLC. We sought to establish the frequency and correlates with these changes in routine patient-tumor sample pairs. METHODS Clinicopathologic data and tumor genotype were retrospectively compiled and analyzed from an overall cohort of 381 patient-tumor samples. RESULTS Of these patients, 75.9% self-reported White race, 13.1% Asian, 6.5% Black, 27.8% were never-smokers, 54.9% former-smokers and 17.3% current-smokers. The frequency of EGFR mutations was 23.9% (86/359), KRAS mutations 34.2% (71/207) and ALK FISH positivity 9.1% (23/252) in tumor samples, and almost all had mutually exclusive results for these oncogenes. In tumors from White, Black and Asian patients, the frequencies of EGFR mutations were 18.4%, 18.2% and 62%, respectively; of ALK FISH positivity 7.81%, 0% and 14.8%, respectively; and of KRAS mutations 41.6%, 20% and 0%. These patterns changed significant with increasing pack-year history of smoking. In White patients, the frequencies of EGFR mutations and ALK FISH positivity decreased with increasing pack-year cohorts; while the frequencies of KRAS mutations increased. Interestingly, in Asian patients the frequencies of EGFR mutations were similar in never smokers and in the cohorts with less than 45pack-year histories of smoking and only decreased in the 45pack-year plus cohort. CONCLUSIONS The frequencies of somatic EGFR, KRAS, and ALK gene abnormalities using routine lung cancer tissue samples from our United States-based academic medical practice reflect the diverse ethnicity (with a higher frequency of EGFR mutations in Asian patients) and smoking patterns (with an inverse correlation between EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement) of our tested population. These results may help other medical practices appreciate the expected results from introduction of routine tumor genotyping techniques into their day-to-day care of NSCLC.


The American Journal of the Medical Sciences | 2003

Infectious Diseases, Non–Zero-Sum Thinking, and the Developing World

Erik Folch; Isabel Hernández; M. Barragán; Carlos Franco-Paredes

&NA; Despite some improvements in the health status of the world during the last few decades, major obstacles remain. Improvements in health outcomes have not been shared equally among countries and poverty is clearly the main reason. Infectious diseases, which remain the major cause of death worldwide, are an incalculable source of human misery and economic loss. In fact, 25% of all deaths and 30% of the global burden of disease are attributed to infectious diseases. Unfortunately, more than 95% of these deaths, most of which are preventable, occur in the developing world, where poverty is widespread. The 3 major infectious disease killers in these countries are HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria. The principles of social justice and health as a human right in the developing world have been advocated as the main justification for health assistance from rich to poor countries. Although we do not disagree with this, we argue that a strategy that emphasizes the shared benefit to rich and poor countries would facilitate this process. We propose that the accomplishment of these challenging tasks should be viewed from the perspective of game theory, where the interests of the parties (in this case rich and poor countries) overlap. As the world becomes increasingly integrated, economic development in resource‐poor countries will increase the opportunities for richer countries to profit from investment in the developing world. Global health has political and international security implications for the developed world, as well. In view of the current health status of the developing world, we are not playing a game but facing a matter of life and death. “When health is absent, wisdom cannot reveal itself, art cannot becomes manifest, strength cannot fight, wealth becomes useless, and intelligence cannot be applied” Herophilus, 325 bce (Physician to Alexander the Great) The purpose of this article is to address the relationship between health, poverty, and development in the context of game theory. We will focus on the link between economic inequalities and health outcomes, exclusively concentrating our analysis on the impact of infectious diseases. Subsequently, we will outline the game, the players, and the potential win‐win outcomes that may potentially result.


Chest | 2017

Interventional Pulmonology Fellowship Accreditation Standards: Executive Summary of the Multisociety Interventional Pulmonology Fellowship Accreditation Committee

John J. Mullon; Kristin M. Burkart; Gerard A. Silvestri; D. Kyle Hogarth; Francisco Almeida; David Berkowitz; George A. Eapen; David Feller-Kopman; Henry E. Fessler; Erik Folch; Colin T. Gillespie; Andrew R. Haas; Shaheen Islam; Carla Lamb; Stephanie M. Levine; Adnan Majid; Fabien Maldonado; Ali I. Musani; Craig A. Piquette; Cynthia Ray; Chakravarthy Reddy; Otis B. Rickman; Michael Simoff; Momen M. Wahidi; Hans J. Lee

&NA; Interventional pulmonology (IP) is a rapidly evolving subspecialty of pulmonary medicine. In the last 10 years, formal IP fellowships have increased substantially in number from five to now > 30. The vast majority of IP fellowship trainees are selected through the National Resident Matching Program, and validated in‐service and certification examinations for IP exist. Practice standards and training guidelines for IP fellowship programs have been published; however, considerable variability in the environment, curriculum, and experience offered by the various fellowship programs remains, and there is currently no formal accreditation process in place to standardize IP fellowship training. Recognizing the need for more uniform training across the various fellowship programs, a multisociety accreditation committee was formed with the intent to establish common accreditation standards for all IP fellowship programs in the United States. This article provides a summary of those standards and can serve as an accreditation template for training programs and their offices of graduate medical education as they move through the accreditation process.


Respiratory Care | 2013

Pulmonary Function and Flow-Volume Loop Patterns in Patients with Tracheobronchomalacia

Adnan Majid; Andres Sosa; Armin Ernst; David Feller-Kopman; Erik Folch; Anup Singh; Sidhu P. Gangadharan

BACKGROUND: Patterns of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and flow-volume loops among patients with clinically important tracheobronchomalacia (TBM) are not well described. Small studies suggest 4 main flow-volume loop morphologies: low maximum forced expiratory flow, biphasic expiratory curve, flow oscillations, and notching. We studied common PFT and flow-volume loop patterns among the largest prospective series of patients to date, undergoing clinical evaluation for symptomatic moderate to severe TBM. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from patients who were referred to our Chest Disease Center from January 2002 to December 2008, with respiratory symptoms that were attributed primarily to TBM. The PFT results of 90 subjects with symptomatic moderate to severe TBM were evaluated. RESULTS: By PFTs, 40 (44.4%) subjects had an obstructive ventilatory defect, 16 (17.8%) had a definite or highly likely restrictive ventilatory defect, 15 (16.7%) had a mixed defect, and 19 (21.1%) were within normal limits. Among 76 subjects with available flow-volume loops, the most frequent finding was low maximum forced expiratory flow, in 62 (81.6%) subjects, followed by biphasic morphology (15, 19.7%), notched expiratory loop (7, 9.2%), and expiratory oscillations (2, 2.6%). The balance of 13 subjects (17.1%) had no distinctive flow-volume loop abnormality. CONCLUSION: PFTs and flow-volume loops are normal in a substantial number of patients with moderate to severe TBM, and should not be used to decide whether TBM is present or clinically important.


Chest | 2013

Validation of an Interventional Pulmonary Examination

Hans J. Lee; David Feller-Kopman; R. Wesley Shepherd; Francisco Almeida; Rabih Bechara; David Berkowitz; Mohit Chawla; Erik Folch; Andrew R. Haas; Colin T. Gillespie; Robert Lee; Adnan Majid; Rajiv Malhotra; Ali I. Musani; Jonathan Puchalski; Daniel H. Sterman; Lonny Yarmus

BACKGROUND Interventional pulmonology (IP) is an emerging subspecialty with a dedicated 12 months of additional training after traditional pulmonary and critical care fellowships with fellowships across the country. A multiple-choice question (MCQ) examination was developed to measure didactic knowledge acquired in IP fellowships. METHODS Interventional pulmonologists from 10 academic centers developed a MCQ-based examination on a proposed curriculum for IP fellowships. The 75 multiple-choice question examination was proctored, time limited (120 min), and computer-based. The examination was administered to IP faculty, IP fellows in their last month of fellowship, graduating pulmonary and critical care fellows in their last month of training, and incoming first-year pulmonary and critical care fellows. RESULTS The mean score for IP faculty was 87% (range, 83%-94%), 74% for IP fellows (range, 61%-81%, SD 5.09, median 76%), 62% for graduating pulmonary and critical care fellows (range 52% to 73%), and 50% for incoming pulmonary/critical care fellows (range, 35%-65%). There was a graduated increase in mean scores with level of IP training. Scores differed significantly across the four groups (P = .001). CONCLUSION A validated MCQ examination can measure IP knowledge. There is a difference in IP knowledge based on IP training exposure.

Collaboration


Dive into the Erik Folch's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Adnan Majid

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sidhu P. Gangadharan

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul A. VanderLaan

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel B. Costa

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gonzalo Labarca

Pontifical Catholic University of Chile

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark S. Huberman

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel Alape

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge