Erik Hebestreit
University of Jena
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Erik Hebestreit.
Optics Express | 2014
Christoph Menzel; Erik Hebestreit; Stefan Mühlig; Carsten Rockstuhl; Sven Burger; Falk Lederer; Thomas Pertsch
Within the past several years a tremendous progress regarding optical nano-antennas could be witnessed. It is one purpose of optical nano-antennas to resonantly enhance light-matter interactions at the nanoscale, e.g. the interaction of an external illumination with molecules. In this specific, but in almost all schemes that take advantage of resonantly enhanced electromagnetic fields in the vicinity of nano-antennas, the precise knowledge of the spectral position of resonances is of paramount importance to fully exploit their beneficial effects. Thus far, however, many nano-antennas were only optimized with respect to their far-field characteristics, i.e. in terms of their scattering or extinction cross sections. Although being an emerging feature in many numerical simulations, it was only recently fully appreciated that there exists a subtle but very important difference in the spectral position of resonances in the near-and the far-field. With the purpose to quantify this shift, Zuloaga et al. suggested a Lorentzian model to estimate the resonance shift. Here, we devise on fully analytical grounds a strategy to predict the resonance in the near-field directly from that in the far-field and disclose that the issue is involved and multifaceted, in general. We outline the limitations of our theory if more sophisticated optical nano-antennas are considered where higher order multipolar contributions and higher order antenna resonances become increasingly important. Both aspects are highlighted by numerically studying relevant nano-antennas.
Review of Scientific Instruments | 2013
Honghua U. Yang; Erik Hebestreit; Erik E. Josberger; Markus B. Raschke
Scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy (s-SNOM) provides few nanometer optical spatial resolution and is compatible with nearly any form of linear and nonlinear optical spectroscopy. We have developed a versatile s-SNOM instrument operating under cryogenic and variable temperature (∼20-500 K) and compatible with high magnetic fields (up to 7 T). The instrument features independent tip and sample scanning and free-space light delivery with an integrated off-axis parabolic mirror for tip-illumination and signal collection with a numerical aperture of N.A. = 0.45. The optics operate from the UV to THz range allowing for continuous wave, broadband, and ultrafast s-SNOM spectroscopy, including different variants of tip-enhanced spectroscopy. We discuss the instrument design, implementation, and demonstrate its performance with mid-infrared Drude response s-SNOM probing of the domain formation associated with the metal-insulator transitions of VO2 (TMIT ≃ 340 K) and V2O3 (TMIT ≃ 150 K). This instrument enables the study of mesoscopic order and domains of competing quantum phases in correlated electron materials over a wide range of controlled electric and magnetic fields, strain, current, and temperature.
Physical Review A | 2017
Martin Frimmer; Karol Luszcz; Sandra Ferreiro; Vijay Jain; Erik Hebestreit; Lukas Novotny
Optically levitated nanoparticles in vacuum are a promising model system to test physics beyond our current understanding of quantum mechanics. Such experimental tests require extreme control over the dephasing of the levitated particles motion. If the nanoparticle carries a finite net charge, it experiences a random Coulomb force due to fluctuating electric fields. This dephasing mechanism can be fully excluded by discharging the levitated particle. Here, we present a simple and reliable technique to control the charge on an optically levitated nanoparticle in vacuum. Our method is based on the generation of charges in an electric discharge and does not require additional optics or mechanics close to the optical trap.
Physical Review Letters | 2014
Ibraheem Al-Naib; Erik Hebestreit; Carsten Rockstuhl; Falk Lederer; Demetrios N. Christodoulides; Tsuneyuki Ozaki; Roberto Morandotti
Physical Review B | 2014
Christoph Menzel; Erik Hebestreit; Rasoul Alaee; Mohammad Albooyeh; Stefan Mühlig; Sven Burger; Carsten Rockstuhl; Constantin R. Simovski; Sergei A. Tretyakov; Falk Lederer; Thomas Pertsch
Physical Review Letters | 2018
René Reimann; Michael Doderer; Erik Hebestreit; Rozenn Diehl; Martin Frimmer; Dominik Windey; Felix Tebbenjohanns; Lukas Novotny
arXiv: Optics | 2018
Rozenn Diehl; Erik Hebestreit; René Reimann; Martin Frimmer; Felix Tebbenjohanns; Lukas Novotny
Physical Review Letters | 2018
Erik Hebestreit; Martin Frimmer; René Reimann; Lukas Novotny
Physical Review A | 2018
Rozenn Diehl; Erik Hebestreit; René Reimann; Felix Tebbenjohanns; Martin Frimmer; Lukas Novotny
Physical Review A | 2018
Erik Hebestreit; René Reimann; Martin Frimmer; Lukas Novotny