Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Erik P. Castle is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Erik P. Castle.


The Journal of Urology | 2009

Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons.

Kevin C. Zorn; Gagan Gautam; Arieh L. Shalhav; Ralph V. Clayman; Thomas E. Ahlering; David M. Albala; David I. Lee; Chandru P. Sundaram; Surena F. Matin; Erik P. Castle; Howard N. Winfield; Matthew T. Gettman; Benjamin R. Lee; Raju Thomas; Vipul R. Patel; Raymond J. Leveillee; Carson Wong; Gopal H. Badlani; Koon Ho Rha; Peter Wiklund; Alex Mottrie; Fatih Atug; Ali Riza Kural; Jean V. Joseph

PURPOSE With the exponential growth of robotic urological surgery, particularly with robot assisted radical prostatectomy, guidelines for safe initiation of this technology are a necessity. Currently no standardized credentialing system exists to our knowledge to evaluate surgeon competency and safety with robotic urological surgery performance. Although proctoring is a modality by which such competency can be evaluated, other training tools and guidelines are needed to ensure that the requisite knowledge and technical skills to perform this procedure have been acquired. We evaluated the current status of proctoring and credentialing in other surgical specialties to discuss and recommend its application and implementation specifically for robot assisted radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed the literature on safety and medicolegal implications of proctoring and the safe introduction of surgical procedures to develop recommendations for robot assisted radical prostatectomy proctoring and credentialing. RESULTS Proctoring is an essential mechanism for robot assisted radical prostatectomy institutional credentialing and should be a prerequisite for granting unrestricted privileges on the robot. This should be differentiated from preceptoring, wherein the expert is directly involved in hands-on training. Advanced technology has opened new avenues for long-distance observation through teleproctoring. Although the medicolegal implications of an active surgical intervention by a proctor are not clearly defined, the role as an observer should grant immunity from malpractice liability. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of guidelines and proctoring recommendations is necessary to protect surgeons, proctors, institutions and, above all, the patients who are associated with the institutional introduction of a robot assisted radical prostatectomy program. With no current guidelines we anticipate this article will serve as a catalyst of interorganizational discussion to initiate regulatory oversight of surgeon certification and proctorship.


European Urology | 2010

The Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium

Matthew H. Hayn; Abid Hussain; Ahmed M. Mansour; Paul E. Andrews; Paul Carpentier; Erik P. Castle; Prokar Dasgupta; Peter Rimington; Raju Thomas; Shamim Khan; Adam S. Kibel; Hyung L. Kim; Murugesan Manoharan; Mani Menon; Alex Mottrie; David K. Ornstein; James O. Peabody; Raj S. Pruthi; Joan Palou Redorta; Lee Richstone; Francis Schanne; Hans Stricker; Peter Wiklund; Rameela Chandrasekhar; G. Wilding; Khurshid A. Guru

BACKGROUND Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has evolved as a minimally invasive alternative to open radical cystectomy for patients with invasive bladder cancer. OBJECTIVE We sought to define the learning curve for RARC by evaluating results from a multicenter, contemporary, consecutive series of patients who underwent this procedure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Utilizing the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium database, a prospectively maintained and institutional review board-approved database, we identified 496 patients who underwent RARC by 21 surgeons at 14 institutions from 2003 to 2009. MEASUREMENTS Cut-off points for operative time, lymph node yield (LNY), estimated blood loss (EBL), and margin positivity were identified. Using specifically designed statistical mixed models, we were able to inversely predict the number of patients required for an institution to reach the predetermined cut-off points. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Mean operative time was 386 min, mean EBL was 408 ml, and mean LNY was 18. Overall, 34 of 482 patients (7%) had a positive surgical margin (PSM). Using statistical models, it was estimated that 21 patients were required for operative time to reach 6.5h and 8, 20, and 30 patients were required to reach an LNY of 12, 16, and 20, respectively. For all patients, PSM rates of <5% were achieved after 30 patients. For patients with pathologic stage higher than T2, PSM rates of <15% were achieved after 24 patients. CONCLUSIONS RARC is a challenging procedure but is a technique that is reproducible throughout multiple centers. This report helps to define the learning curve for RARC and demonstrates an acceptable level of proficiency by the 30th case for proxy measures of RARC quality.


European Urology | 2014

Analysis of intracorporeal compared with extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Results from the international robotic cystectomy consortium

Kamran Ahmed; Shahid Khan; Matthew H. Hayn; Piyush K. Agarwal; Ketan K. Badani; M. Derya Balbay; Erik P. Castle; Prokar Dasgupta; Reza Ghavamian; Khurshid A. Guru; Ashok K. Hemal; Brent K. Hollenbeck; Adam S. Kibel; Mani Menon; Alex Mottrie; Kenneth G. Nepple; John Pattaras; James O. Peabody; Vassilis Poulakis; Raj S. Pruthi; Joan Palou Redorta; Koon Ho Rha; Lee Richstone; Matthias Saar; Douglas S. Scherr; S. Siemer; Michael Stoeckle; Eric Wallen; Alon Z. Weizer; Peter Wiklund

BACKGROUND Intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) has the potential benefits of a smaller incision, reduced pain, decreased bowel exposure, and reduced risk of fluid imbalance. OBJECTIVE To compare the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD) and ICUD following robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We reviewed the database of the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium (IRCC) (18 international centers), with 935 patients who had undergone RARC and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) between 2003 and 2011. INTERVENTION All patients within the IRCC underwent RARC and PLND as indicated. The urinary diversion was performed either intracorporeally or extracorporeally. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Demographic data, perioperative outcomes, and complications in patients undergoing ICUD or ECUD were compared. All patients had at least a 90-d follow-up. The Fisher exact test was used to summarize categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank sum test or Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of 935 patients who had RARC and PLND, 167 patients underwent ICUD (ileal conduit: 106; neobladder: 61), and 768 patients had an ECUD (ileal conduit: 570; neobladder: 198). Postoperative complications data were available for 817 patients, with a minimum follow-up of 90 d. There was no difference in age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, or rate of prior abdominal surgery between the groups. The operative time was equivalent (414 min), with the median hospital stay being marginally longer for the ICUD group (9 d vs 8 d, p=0.086). No difference in the reoperation rates at 30 d was noted between the groups. The 90-d complication rate was not significant between the two groups, but a trend favoring ICUD over ECUD was noted (41% vs 49%, p=0.05). Gastrointestinal complications were significantly lower in the ICUD group (p ≤ 0.001). Patients with ICUD were at a lower risk of experiencing a postoperative complication at 90 d (32%) (odds ratio: 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.94; p=0.02). Being a retrospective study was the main limitation. CONCLUSIONS Robot-assisted ICUD can be accomplished safely, with comparable outcomes to open urinary diversion. In this cohort, patients undergoing ICUD had a relatively lower risk of complications.


Journal of The National Comprehensive Cancer Network | 2016

NCCN Guidelines Insights: Prostate Cancer Early Detection, Version 2.2016

Peter R. Carroll; J. Kellogg Parsons; Gerald L. Andriole; Robert R. Bahnson; Erik P. Castle; William J. Catalona; Douglas M. Dahl; John W. Davis; Jonathan I. Epstein; Ruth Etzioni; Thomas A. Farrington; George P. Hemstreet; Mark H. Kawachi; Simon P. Kim; Paul H. Lange; Kevin R. Loughlin; William T. Lowrance; Paul Maroni; James L. Mohler; Todd M. Morgan; Kelvin A. Moses; Robert B. Nadler; Michael A. Poch; Charles D. Scales; Terrence M. Shaneyfelt; Marc C. Smaldone; Geoffrey A. Sonn; Preston Sprenkle; Andrew J. Vickers; Robert W. Wake

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Prostate Cancer Early Detection provide recommendations for prostate cancer screening in healthy men who have elected to participate in an early detection program. The NCCN Guidelines focus on minimizing unnecessary procedures and limiting the detection of indolent disease. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the NCCN Prostate Cancer Early Detection Panels most significant discussions for the 2016 guideline update, which included issues surrounding screening in high-risk populations (ie, African Americans, BRCA1/2 mutation carriers), approaches to refine patient selection for initial and repeat biopsies, and approaches to improve biopsy specificity.


The Journal of Urology | 2010

Surgical Margin Status After Robot Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results From the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium

Nicholas J. Hellenthal; Abid Hussain; Paul E. Andrews; Paul Carpentier; Erik P. Castle; Prokar Dasgupta; Jihad H. Kaouk; Shamim Khan; Adam S. Kibel; Hyung L. Kim; Murugesan Manoharan; Mani Menon; Alex Mottrie; David K. Ornstein; Joan Palou; James O. Peabody; Raj S. Pruthi; Lee Richstone; Francis Schanne; Hans Stricker; Raju Thomas; Peter Wiklund; G. Wilding; Khurshid A. Guru

PURPOSE Positive surgical margins at radical cystectomy confer a poor prognosis. We evaluated the incidence and predictors of positive surgical margins in patients who underwent robot assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium database we identified 513 patients who underwent robot assisted radical cystectomy, as done by a total of 22 surgeons at 15 institutions from 2003 to 2009. After stratification by age group, gender, pathological T stage, nodal status, sequential case number and institutional volume logistic regression was used to correlate variables with the likelihood of a positive surgical margin. RESULTS Of the 513 patients 35 (6.8%) had a positive surgical margin. Increasing 10-year age group, lymph node positivity and higher pathological T stage were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of a positive margin (p = 0.010, <0.001 and p <0.001, respectively). Gender, sequential case number and institutional volume were not significantly associated with margin positivity. The rate of margin positive disease at cystectomy was 1.5% for pT2 or less, 8.8% for pT3 and 39% for pT4 disease. CONCLUSIONS Positive surgical margin rates at robot assisted radical cystectomy for advanced bladder cancer were similar to those in open cystectomy series in a large, multi-institutional, prospective cohort. Sequential case number, a surrogate for the learning curve and institutional volume were not significantly associated with positive margins at robot assisted radical cystectomy.


Urology | 2011

Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy: A complete cost analysis

Aaron D. Martin; Rafael N. Nunez; Erik P. Castle

OBJECTIVES To perform a complete cost analysis comparing robot assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) versus open radical cystectomy (ORC). MATERIAL AND METHODS After institutional review board approval for data collection, we prospectively recorded perioperative outcomes and costs, such as hospital stay, transfusion rate, readmission rate, and medications for consecutive patients undergoing RARC or ORC. Using actual cost data, we developed a cost decision tree model to determine typical perioperative costs for both RARC and ORC. Multivariate sensitivity analysis was performed to elucidate which variables had the greatest impact on overall cost. Breakeven points with ORC were calculated using our model to better evaluate variable influence. In addition to the above modeled analysis, actual patient costs, including complications 30 days from surgery, were also compared for each procedure. RESULTS Our model analysis showed that operative time and length of stay had the greatest impact on perioperative costs. Robotic cystectomy became more expensive than open cystectomy at the following break-even points: operating room (OR) time greater than 361 minutes, length of stay greater than 6.6 days, or robotic OR supply cost exceeding


BJUI | 2008

Bilateral laparoscopic nephrectomy for significantly enlarged polycystic kidneys: a technique to optimize outcome in the largest of specimens

Premal J. Desai; Erik P. Castle; Shane M. Daley; Scott K. Swanson; Robert G. Ferrigni; Mitchell R. Humphreys; Paul E. Andrews

5853. RARC was 16% more expensive when only comparing direct operative costs. Interestingly, actual total patient costs revealed a 38% cost advantage favoring RARC due to increased hospitalization costs for ORC in our cohort. CONCLUSIONS RARC can provide a cost-effective alternative to ORC with operative time and length of stay being the most critical cost determinants. Higher complication rates with ORC make total actual costs much higher than RARC.


Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques | 2012

Multi-Institutional Analysis of Robotic Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Perioperative Outcomes and Complications in 227 Patients

Angela B. Smith; Mathew C. Raynor; Christopher L. Amling; J. Erik Busby; Erik P. Castle; Rodney Davis; Matthew E. Nielsen; Raju Thomas; Eric Wallen; Michael Woods; Raj S. Pruthi

To present our experience with bilateral laparoscopic nephrectomy (BLN) for symptomatic autosomal‐dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), as surgical management of massively enlarged polycystic kidneys can be a daunting task.


BJUI | 2011

Lymphadenectomy at the time of robot‐assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium

Nicholas J. Hellenthal; Abid Hussain; Paul E. Andrews; Paul Carpentier; Erik P. Castle; Prokar Dasgupta; Jihad H. Kaouk; Shamim Khan; Adam S. Kibel; Hyung L. Kim; Murugesan Manoharan; Mani Menon; Alex Mottrie; David K. Ornstein; Joan Palou; James O. Peabody; Raj S. Pruthi; Lee Richstone; Francis Schanne; Hans Stricker; Raju Thomas; Peter Wiklund; G. Wilding; Khurshid A. Guru

PURPOSE Recently, some surgeons have begun to describe single-institution case series with less invasive surgical approaches to bladder cancer such as laparoscopic or robotic-assisted techniques. We report on a multi-institutional, multi-surgeon experience with robotic radical cystectomy with regard to operative and pathologic outcomes and complications to evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of this technique in a large cohort of patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Two hundred twenty-seven patients (178 males and 49 females) underwent a robotic cystectomy and urinary diversion at one of four institutions. Operative outcomes, pathological results, and complications of this combined case series are herein reported. RESULTS Mean age of this cohort was 67.1 years (range, 33-86 years) with a mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 2.7 (range, 2-4). One hundred sixty-eight patients (74%) underwent ileal conduit diversion, 58 (26%) underwent orthotopic ileal neobladder, and 1 patient (<1%) had no diversion (end-stage renal disease). The urinary diversion was performed extracorporeally in 97% cases, with 7 patients (3%) undergoing an intracorporeal diversion. Mean operating room time of all patients was 5.5 hours, and mean surgical blood loss was 256 mL. On surgical pathology, 120 (53%) patients had pT2 or less disease, 35 (15%) had pT3/T4 disease, and 46 (20%) had N+ disease. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 18 (range, 3-52). There was a positive surgical margin in 5 cases--all with pT3-4 disease. Mean time to discharge was 5.5 days (median, 5 days), with 70% of patients discharged on postoperative day 5 or sooner. Sixty-eight patients (30%) experienced complications, with 7% having Clavien grade 3 or higher. On multivariate analysis, decreased age and increased American Society of Anesthesiologists score were predictors of higher Clavien complication score, with younger patients more likely to undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgery. CONCLUSION A multi-institutional experience with robotic radical cystectomy appears to demonstrate acceptable operative and pathologic outcomes, thus helping to validate the previously reported single-institution case series. Ultimately, oncologic follow-up of these patients will remain as the most important measure of therapeutic success.


Urologic Clinics of North America | 2002

The role of soy phytoestrogens in prostate cancer

Erik P. Castle; J. Brantley Thrasher

What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add?

Collaboration


Dive into the Erik P. Castle's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Raj S. Pruthi

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark D. Tyson

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael Woods

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge