Erik W. Martin

Hydrogen bonding and spin density distribution in the QB semiquinone of bacterial reaction centers and comparison with the QA site

In the photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, the primary (Q(A)) and secondary (Q(B)) electron acceptors are both ubiquinone-10, but with very different properties and functions. To investigate the protein environment that imparts these functional differences, we have applied X-band HYSCORE, a 2D pulsed EPR technique, to characterize the exchangeable protons around the semiquinone (SQ) in the Q(A) and Q(B) sites, using samples of (15)N-labeled reaction centers, with the native high spin Fe(2+) exchanged for diamagnetic Zn(2+), prepared in (1)H(2)O and (2)H(2)O solvent. The powder HYSCORE method is first validated against the orientation-selected Q-band ENDOR study of the Q(A) SQ by Flores et al. (Biophys. J.2007, 92, 671-682), with good agreement for two exchangeable protons with anisotropic hyperfine tensor components, T, both in the range 4.6-5.4 MHz. HYSCORE was then applied to the Q(B) SQ where we found proton lines corresponding to T ≈ 5.2, 3.7 MHz and T ≈ 1.9 MHz. Density functional-based quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) calculations, employing a model of the Q(B) site, were used to assign the observed couplings to specific hydrogen bonding interactions with the Q(B) SQ. These calculations allow us to assign the T = 5.2 MHz proton to the His-L190 N(δ)H···O(4) (carbonyl) hydrogen bonding interaction. The T = 3.7 MHz spectral feature most likely results from hydrogen bonding interactions of O1 (carbonyl) with both Gly-L225 peptide NH and Ser-L223 hydroxyl OH, which possess calculated couplings very close to this value. The smaller 1.9 MHz coupling is assigned to a weakly bound peptide NH proton of Ile-L224. The calculations performed with this structural model of the Q(B) site show less asymmetric distribution of unpaired spin density over the SQ than seen for the Q(A) site, consistent with available experimental data for (13)C and (17)O carbonyl hyperfine couplings. The implications of these interactions for Q(B) function and comparisons with the Q(A) site are discussed.

Hydrogen Bonding between the Q(B) Site Ubisemiquinone and Ser-L223 in the Bacterial Reaction Center: A Combined Spectroscopic and Computational Perspective

In the Q(B) site of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides photosynthetic reaction center, the donation of a hydrogen bond from the hydroxyl group of Ser-L223 to the ubisemiquinone formed after the first flash is debatable. In this study, we use a combination of spectroscopy and quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) calculations to comprehensively explore this topic. We show that ENDOR, ESEEM, and HYSCORE spectroscopic differences between mutant L223SA and the wild-type sample (WT) are negligible, indicating only minor perturbations in the ubisemiquinone spin density for the mutant sample. Qualitatively, this suggests that a strong hydrogen bond does not exist in the WT between the Ser-L223 hydroxyl group and the semiquinone O(1) atom, as removal of this hydrogen bond in the mutant should cause a significant redistribution of spin density in the semiquinone. We show quantitatively, using QM/MM calculations, that a WT model in which the Ser-L223 hydroxyl group is rotated to prevent hydrogen bond formation with the O(1) atom of the semiquinone predicts negligible change for the L223SA mutant. This, together with the better agreement between key QM/MM calculated and experimental hyperfine couplings for the non-hydrogen-bonded model, leads us to conclude that no strong hydrogen bond is formed between the Ser-L223 hydroxyl group and the semiquinone O(1) atom after the first flash. The implications of this finding for quinone reduction in photosynthetic reaction centers are discussed.

Hydrogen Bonds between Nitrogen Donors and the Semiquinone in the QB Site of Bacterial Reaction Centers

Photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides have identical ubiquinone-10 molecules functioning as primary (Q(A)) and secondary (Q(B)) electron acceptors. X-band 2D pulsed EPR spectroscopy, called HYSCORE, was applied to study the interaction of the Q(B) site semiquinone with nitrogens from the local protein environment in natural and (15)N uniformly labeled reactions centers. (14)N and (15)N HYSCORE spectra of the Q(B) semiquinone show the interaction with two nitrogens carrying transferred unpaired spin density. Quadrupole coupling constants estimated from (14)N HYSCORE spectra indicate them to be a protonated nitrogen of an imidazole residue and amide nitrogen of a peptide group. (15)N HYSCORE spectra allowed estimation of the isotropic and anisotropic couplings with these nitrogens. From these data, we calculated the unpaired spin density transferred onto 2s and 2p orbitals of nitrogen and analyzed the contribution of different factors to the anisotropic hyperfine tensors. The hyperfine coupling of other protein nitrogens with the semiquinone is weak (<0.1 MHz). These results clearly indicate that the Q(B) semiquinone forms hydrogen bonds with two nitrogens and provide quantitative characteristics of the hyperfine couplings with these nitrogens, which can be used in theoretical modeling of the Q(B) site. On the basis of the quadrupole coupling constant, one nitrogen can only be assigned to N(delta) of His-L190, consistent with all existing structures. However, we cannot specify between two candidates the residue corresponding to the second nitrogen. Further work employing multifrequency spectroscopic approaches or selective isotope labeling would be desirable for unambiguous assignment of this nitrogen.

Relationship of Sequence and Phase Separation in Protein Low-Complexity Regions

Liquid-liquid phase separation seems to play critical roles in the compartmentalization of cells through the formation of biomolecular condensates. Many proteins with low-complexity regions are found in these condensates, and they can undergo phase separation in vitro in response to changes in temperature, pH, and ion concentration. Low-complexity regions are thus likely important players in mediating compartmentalization in response to stress. However, how the phase behavior is encoded in their amino acid composition and patterning is only poorly understood. We discuss here that polymer physics provides a powerful framework for our understanding of the thermodynamics of mixing and demixing and for how the phase behavior is encoded in the primary sequence. We propose to classify low-complexity regions further into subcategories based on their sequence properties and phase behavior. Ongoing research promises to improve our ability to link the primary sequence of low-complexity regions to their phase behavior as well as the emerging miscibility and material properties of the resulting biomolecular condensates, providing mechanistic insight into this fundamental biological process across length scales.

Multiple Phosphorylation Sites in Disordered Regions of Ash1 form a Dynamic Complex with Cdc4

Interactions involving intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are crucial to a wide range of biological signaling and regulatory processes. Many of these interactions are characterized by a disorder-to-order transition upon binding. However, a new class of “fuzzy complexes” have emerged in which the IDP remains largely disordered. Such complexes are characterized by an IDP containing multiple weak binding motifs which individually interact with a binding partner in a dynamic equilibrium. The interaction of phophorylated Ash1, which participates in the regulation of mating type switching in yeast, with its ubiquitin ligase - SCFCdc4 -- is an example of a “fuzzy complex”. This work aims to define the interaction between the region of Ash1 spanning residues 420-500 which contains 10 suboptimal binding motifs for Cdc4, so-called Cdc4 phospho degrons (CPDs) with Cdc4. Ash1 is thought to behave similarly to the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor Sic1, which requires a threshold level of phosphorylation to overcome electrostatic repulsion towards Cdc4. The polyelectrostatic interaction model implies that electrostatic averaging between rapidly exchanging bound states allows Cdc4 to sense the net charge of its disordered binding partner, which is modulated by phosphorylation.In order to probe the interaction and test the polyelectrostatic model, we use NMR spectroscopy, small angle x-ray scattering and fluorescence anisotropy binding experiments. All CPDs contained in Ash1 420-500 engage Cdc4, one at a time. SAXS indicates that the peptide is relatively compact. Fluorescence anisotropy measurements show the affinities of the entire Ash1 420-500 peptide and individual CPD motifs for Cdc4. These preliminary data are suggestive of a “fuzzy complex” and we are in the process of studying the phosphorylation dependence. The dynamic interaction suggests that Ash1 degradation must occur in an all-or-nothing fashion for biological function.