Erika A. Goldstein

Frequency and effect of negative comments ("badmouthing") on medical students' career choices.

BACKGROUND: Some call it “medical bigotry,” and others describe it as the “hidden curriculum,” but, by any name, the superficial and demeaning comments that students hear about particular career choices are thought to play a major role in discouraging the selection of primary care careers. This paper explores the frequency and effect of “badmouthing” on career choice with the hypothesis that it is more frequently heard about primary care disciplines but has relatively little influence on actual career choice. METHOD: In 1993, 129 (79%) of the 163 University of Washington School of Medicine graduates responded to a two-page questionnaire about badmouthing. This information was used to refine the questionnaire. In 1994, 1,447 graduating students from nine medical schools were surveyed with the revised questionnaire. The schools were chosen to represent schools that had high, medium, and low proportions of students going into primary care careers. RESULTS: A total of 1,114 questionnaires were returned, for a response rate of 77%. Badmouthing was heard frequently (76% of the responding students) and often occurred as early as the first and second years of medical school. The students heard badmouthing about their career choices most frequently when they selected surgery (91%) and family medicine (87%) and least frequently when they chose pediatrics (57%), p < .001. The students reported that the influence on career choice was low in general, but 186 students (17% of all respondents) did report altering their choices based on badmouthing. CONCLUSION: Primary care fields and non-primary care fields were equally affected by career changes due to badmouthing. This study indicates that badmouthing, while pervasive across all disciplines and an unattractive aspect of the educational experience, cannot alone account for the low proportion of graduates choosing primary care careers.

Promoting fundamental clinical skills: a competency-based college approach at the University of Washington.

The focus on fundamental clinical skills in undergraduate medical education has declined over the last several decades. Dramatic growth in the number of faculty involved in teaching and increasing clinical and research commitments have contributed to depersonalization and declining individual attention to students. In contrast to the close teaching and mentoring relationship between faculty and students 50 years ago, today’s medical students may interact with hundreds of faculty members without the benefit of a focused program of teaching and evaluating clinical skills to form the core of their four-year curriculum. Bedside teaching has also declined, which may negatively affect clinical skills development. In response to these and other concerns, the University of Washington School of Medicine has created an integrated developmental curriculum that emphasizes bedside teaching and role modeling, focuses on enhancing fundamental clinical skills and professionalism, and implements these goals via a new administrative structure, the College system, which consists of a core of clinical teachers who spend substantial time teaching and mentoring medical students. Each medical student is assigned a faculty mentor within a College for the duration of his or her medical school career. Mentors continuously teach and reflect with students on clinical skills development and professionalism and, during the second year, work intensively with them at the bedside. They also provide an ongoing personal faculty contact. Competency domains and benchmarks define skill areas in which deepening, progressive attention is focused throughout medical school. This educational model places primary focus on the student.

Teaching inpatient communication skills to medical students: an innovative strategy.

At the University of Washington, a group of medical educators defined a set of communication skills, or “benchmarks,” that are expected of second-year medical students conducting history and physical examinations on hospitalized patients. In order to teach the skills listed in the communication benchmarks, an educational strategy was devised that included training sessions for 30 medical teachers and the development of an innovative videotape tool used to train the teachers and their students. The benchmarks were designed in 2003 for the developmental level of the students and were based on key communication concepts and essential elements of medical communication. A set of five short videotaped scenarios was developed that illustrated various segments of a student history and physical examination. Each scenario consisted of an “OK” version of communication and a “better” version of the same scenario. The video scenarios were used in teaching sessions to help students identify effective communication techniques and to stimulate discussion about the communication benchmarks. After the training sessions, teachers and students were surveyed to assess the effectiveness of the educational methods. The majority of students felt that the educational design stimulated discussion and improved their understanding of communication skills. Faculty found the educational design useful and 95% felt that the curriculum and videotape contributed to their own education. The development of communication benchmarks illustrated with short videotaped scenarios contrasting “OK” with “better” communication skills is a useful technique that is transferable to other institutions.

Impact of a Pre-Clinical Clinical Skills Curriculum on Student Performance in Third-Year Clerkships

ABSTRACTBACKGROUNDResearch on the outcomes of pre-clinical curricula for clinical skills development is needed to assess their influence on medical student performance in clerkships.OBJECTIVETo better understand the impact of a clinical-skills curriculum in the pre-clinical setting on student performance.DESIGNWe conducted a non-randomized, retrospective, pre-post review of student performance evaluations from 3rd-year clerkships, before and after implementation of a clinical-skills curriculum, the Colleges (2001–2007).MAIN RESULTSComparisons of clerkship performance data revealed statistically significant differences favoring the post-Colleges group in the Internal Medicine clerkship for 9 of 12 clinical-skills domains, including Technical Communication Skills (p < 0.023, effect size 0.16), Procedural Skills (p < 0.031, effect size 0.17), Communication Skills (p < 0.003, effect size 0.21), Patient Relationships (p < 0.003, effect size 0.21), Professional Relationships (p < 0.021, effect size 0.17), Educational Attitudes (p < 0.001, effect size 0.24), Initiative and Interest (p < 0.032, effect size 0.15), Attendance and Participation (p < 0.007, effect size 0.19), and Dependability (p < 0.008, effect size 0.19). Statistically significant differences were identified favoring the post-Colleges group in technical communication skills for three of six basic clerkships (Internal Medicine, Surgery, and Pediatrics).CONCLUSIONSImplementation of a pre-clinical fundamental skills curriculum appears to be associated with improved clerkship performance in the 3rd year of medical school, particularly in the Internal Medicine clerkship. Similar curricula, focused on teaching clinical skills in small groups at the bedside with personalized mentoring from faculty members, may improve student performance. Continued efforts are needed to understand how to best prepare students for clinical clerkships and how to evaluate outcomes of similar pre-clinical skills programs.

Ready or not? Expectations of faculty and medical students for clinical skills preparation for clerkships

Abstract Background : Preclerkship clinical-skills training has received increasing attention as a foundational preparation for clerkships. Expectations among medical students and faculty regarding the clinical skills and level of skill mastery needed for starting clerkships are unknown. Medical students, faculty teaching in the preclinical setting, and clinical clerkship faculty may have differing expectations of students entering clerkships. If students’ expectations differ from faculty expectations, students may experience anxiety. Alternately, congruent expectations among students and faculty may facilitate integrated and seamless student transitions to clerkships. Aims : To assess the congruence of expectations among preclerkship faculty, clerkship faculty, and medical students for the clinical skills and appropriate level of clinical-skills preparation needed to begin clerkships. Methods : Investigators surveyed preclinical faculty, clerkship faculty, and medical students early in their basic clerkships at a North American medical school that focuses on preclerkship clinical-skills development. Survey questions assessed expectations for the appropriate level of preparation in basic and advanced clinical skills for students entering clerkships. Results : Preclinical faculty and students had higher expectations than clerkship faculty for degree of preparation in most basic skills. Students had higher expectations than both faculty groups for advanced skills preparation. Conclusions : Preclinical faculty, clerkship faculty, and medical students appear to have different expectations of clinical-skills training needed for clerkships. As American medical schools increasingly introduce clinical-skills training prior to clerkships, more attention to alignment, communication, and integration between preclinical and clerkship faculty will be important to establish common curricular agendas and increase integration of student learning. Clarification of skills expectations may also alleviate student anxiety about clerkships and enhance their learning.

Early introduction of clinical skills improves medical student comfort at the start of third-year clerkships.

Background To determine whether introducing clinical skills during the second year of medical school, via a competency-based College system approach, improves comfort level for medical students entering third-year clinical rotations. Method From 2003–2005, two cohorts of third-year medical students at the University of Washington were surveyed on their comfort level in the categories of history taking, physical examination, communication, and patient care. Results The cohort of students exposed to the College system reported a statistically significant greater comfort level in half of the measured areas, and in at least one area within each general category. No area of study showed a statistically significant decline. Conclusion A competency-based College system improves medical student comfort in core clinical skills at the start of the third year curriculum.

“Strong medicine”: Cambodian views of medicine and medical compliance

OBJECTIVE: To identify important determinants of noncompliance among Cambodian refugees.DESIGN: Open-ended interviews.SETTING: University-affiliated ambulatory care clinic in an inner-city hospital.PARTICIPANTS: Thirty adult Cambodian refugees (15 men and 15 women) who were regular utilizers of a refugee clinic.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent of the participants described being noncompliant with at least one of their medications. Four common causes of noncompliance were identified: 1) misunderstanding the intent of the medication; 2) side effects; 3) concern about the effect of medication on “internal strength”; and 4) Cambodian ideas about pharmacokinetics.CONCLUSIONS: Noncompliance was commonly reported by the Cambodian respondents. Noncompliance was both intentional and unintentional; the unintended noncompliance derived from patients’ attempting to comply with therapy according to Cambodian ideas about the body and Western medication. This article suggests clinical approaches to enhance compliance with prescribed regimens among recent Cambodian immigrants and refugees

Lexicon creation to promote faculty development in medical communication

OBJECTIVE Most medical educators have little or no training in teaching and assessing medical communication, and they are not consistent in what they teach. The authors set out to reach consensus in our educational community on a lexicon of communication terms for use in teaching physician-patient communication skills to second-year medical students. METHODS An interdisciplinary medical school physician-patient communication committee assembled 23 important terms and agreed on definitions for each term. Thirty core preclinical faculty representing nine medical specialties reviewed the lexicon. Faculty were surveyed about lexicon definitions, barriers to use, and methods of using during educational encounters. RESULTS All preclinical faculty members agreed on 19 out of 23 definitions and most respondents agreed on the definitions of the remaining four terms. Sixty-nine percent of respondents said they used the terms during their teaching encounters. CONCLUSION Implementing a process to create a shared language around physician-patient communication may help unify and enhance faculty educational efforts. We were able to establish that medical educators can agree on the content of a medical communication lexicon for use with students. The use of defined and consistently used terms in multiple venues may reduce ambiguity, standardize teaching, enhance recognition of communication skills, and promote effective reinforcement and remediation by faculty. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Evidence suggests that most medical educators have little or no training in teaching and assessing medical communication and that they are not consistent in what they teach. Asking a community of faculty to share responsibility for creating a communication lexicon may be an efficient and effective way to educate faculty and unify their educational effort.