Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Erin E. Sparks is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Erin E. Sparks.


Hepatology | 2010

Notch signaling regulates formation of the three-dimensional architecture of intrahepatic bile ducts in mice.

Erin E. Sparks; Kari A. Huppert; Melanie A. Brown; M. Kay Washington; Stacey S. Huppert

Alagille syndrome, a chronic hepatobiliary disease, is characterized by paucity of intrahepatic bile ducts (IHBDs). To determine the impact of Notch signaling specifically on IHBD arborization, we studied the influence of both chronic gain and loss of Notch function on the intact three‐dimensional IHBD structure using a series of mutant mouse models and a resin casting method. Impaired Notch signaling in bipotential hepatoblast progenitor cells (BHPCs) dose‐dependently decreased the density of peripheral IHBDs, whereas activation of Notch1 results in an increased density of peripheral IHBDs. Although Notch2 has a dominant role in IHBD formation, there is also a redundant role for other Notch receptors in determining the density of peripheral IHBDs. Because changes in IHBD density do not appear to be due to changes in cellular proliferation of bile duct progenitors, we suggest that Notch plays a permissive role in cooperation with other factors to influence lineage decisions of BHPCs and sustain peripheral IHBDs. Conclusion: There is a threshold requirement for Notch signaling at multiple steps, including IHBD tubulogenesis and maintenance, during hepatic development that determines the density of three‐dimensional peripheral IHBD architecture. (HEPATOLOGY 2010.)


Nature Reviews Genetics | 2013

Spatiotemporal signalling in plant development.

Erin E. Sparks; Guy Wachsman; Philip N. Benfey

Plants, being sessile organisms, need to respond to changing environments, and as a result they have evolved unique signalling mechanisms that allow rapid communication between different parts of the plant. The signalling mechanisms that direct plant development include long-range effectors, such as phytohormones, and molecules with a local intra-organ range, such as peptides, transcription factors and some small RNAs. In this Review, we highlight recent advances in understanding plant signalling mechanisms and discuss how different classes of signalling networks can integrate with gene regulatory networks and contribute to plant development. In some cases, we also address the evolutionary context of mechanisms and discuss possible links between the lifestyle of plants and selection for different signalling mechanisms.


New Phytologist | 2015

Genes and networks regulating root anatomy and architecture

Guy Wachsman; Erin E. Sparks; Philip N. Benfey

The root is an excellent model for studying developmental processes that underlie plant anatomy and architecture. Its modular structure, the lack of cell movement and relative accessibility to microscopic visualization facilitate research in a number of areas of plant biology. In this review, we describe several examples that demonstrate how cell type-specific developmental mechanisms determine cell fate and the formation of defined tissues with unique characteristics. In the last 10 yr, advances in genome-wide technologies have led to the sequencing of thousands of plant genomes, transcriptomes and proteomes. In parallel with the development of these high-throughput technologies, biologists have had to establish computational, statistical and bioinformatic tools that can deal with the wealth of data generated by them. These resources provide a foundation for posing more complex questions about molecular interactions, and have led to the discovery of new mechanisms that control phenotypic differences. Here we review several recent studies that shed new light on developmental processes, which are involved in establishing root anatomy and architecture. We highlight the power of combining large-scale experiments with classical techniques to uncover new pathways in root development.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2015

MYB36 regulates the transition from proliferation to differentiation in the Arabidopsis root

Louisa M. Liberman; Erin E. Sparks; Miguel A. Moreno-Risueno; Jalean J. Petricka; Philip N. Benfey

Significance The process by which cells differentiate is central to multicellular development and cancer. Dramatic gene expression changes mediate this complex process, which involves the termination of proliferation and the acquisition of distinct cell-specific features. We identified a transcription factor, MYB DOMAIN PROTEIN 36 (MYB36), that regulates this developmental transition in the Arabidopsis thaliana root endodermis. Differentiated endodermis forms a protective waxy barrier called the Casparian strip. We found that MYB36 activates genes involved in Casparian strip formation and represses genes involved in proliferation. Our results suggest that MYB36 is a critical regulator of developmental timing in the root endodermis. Stem cells are defined by their ability to self-renew and produce daughter cells that proliferate and mature. These maturing cells transition from a proliferative state to a terminal state through the process of differentiation. In the Arabidopsis thaliana root the transcription factors SCARECROW and SHORTROOT regulate specification of the bipotent stem cell that gives rise to cortical and endodermal progenitors. Subsequent progenitor proliferation and differentiation generate mature endodermis, marked by the Casparian strip, a cell-wall modification that prevents ion diffusion into and out of the vasculature. We identified a transcription factor, MYB DOMAIN PROTEIN 36 (MYB36), that regulates the transition from proliferation to differentiation in the endodermis. We show that SCARECROW directly activates MYB36 expression, and that MYB36 likely acts in a feed-forward loop to regulate essential Casparian strip formation genes. We show that myb36 mutants have delayed and defective barrier formation as well as extra divisions in the meristem. Our results demonstrate that MYB36 is a critical positive regulator of differentiation and negative regulator of cell proliferation.


Hepatology | 2012

Genetic interactions between hepatocyte nuclear factor-6 and Notch signaling regulate mouse intrahepatic bile duct development in vivo.

Charles Vanderpool; Erin E. Sparks; Kari A. Huppert; Maureen Gannon; Anna L. Means; Stacey S. Huppert

Notch signaling and hepatocyte nuclear factor‐6 (HNF‐6) are two genetic factors known to affect lineage commitment in the bipotential hepatoblast progenitor cell (BHPC) population. A genetic interaction involving Notch signaling and HNF‐6 in mice has been inferred through separate experiments showing that both affect BHPC specification and bile duct morphogenesis. To define the genetic interaction between HNF‐6 and Notch signaling in an in vivo mouse model, we examined the effects of BHPC‐specific loss of HNF‐6 alone and within the background of BHPC‐specific loss of recombination signal binding protein immunoglobulin kappa J (RBP‐J), the common DNA‐binding partner of all Notch receptors. Isolated loss of HNF‐6 in this mouse model fails to demonstrate a phenotypic variance in bile duct development compared to control. However, when HNF‐6 loss is combined with RBP‐J loss, a phenotype consisting of cholestasis, hepatic necrosis, and fibrosis is observed that is more severe than the phenotype seen with Notch signaling loss alone. This phenotype is associated with significant intrahepatic biliary system abnormalities, including an early decrease in biliary epithelial cells, evolving to ductular proliferation and a decrease in the density of communicating peripheral bile duct branches. In this in vivo model, simultaneous loss of both HNF‐6 and RBP‐J results in down‐regulation of both HNF‐1β and Sox9 (sex determining region Y–related HMG box transcription factor 9). Conclusion: HNF‐6 and Notch signaling interact in vivo to control expression of downstream mediators essential to the normal development of the intrahepatic biliary system. This study provides a model to investigate genetic interactions of factors important to intrahepatic bile duct development and their effect on cholestatic liver disease phenotypes. (HEPATOLOGY 2012;55:232–242)


Disease Models & Mechanisms | 2011

Defects in hepatic Notch signaling result in disruption of the communicating intrahepatic bile duct network in mice

Erin E. Sparks; Daniel S. Perrien; Kari A. Huppert; Todd E. Peterson; Stacey S. Huppert

SUMMARY Abnormal Notch signaling in humans results in Alagille syndrome, a pleiotropic disease characterized by a paucity of intrahepatic bile ducts (IHBDs). It is not clear how IHBD paucity develops as a consequence of atypical Notch signaling, whether by a developmental lack of bile duct formation, a post-natal lack of branching and elongation or an inability to maintain formed ducts. Previous studies have focused on the role of Notch in IHBD development, and demonstrated a dosage requirement of Notch signaling for proper IHBD formation. In this study, we use resin casting and X-ray microtomography (microCT) analysis to address the role of Notch signaling in the maintenance of formed IHBDs upon chronic loss or gain of Notch function. Our data show that constitutive expression of the Notch1 intracellular domain in bi-potential hepatoblast progenitor cells (BHPCs) results in increased IHBD branches at post-natal day 60 (P60), which are maintained at P90 and P120. By contrast, loss of Notch signaling via BHPC-specific deletion of RBP-J (RBP KO), the DNA-binding partner for all Notch receptors, results in progressive loss of intact IHBD branches with age. Interestingly, in RBP KO mice, we observed a reduction in bile ducts per portal vein at P60; no further reduction had occurred at P120. Thus, bile duct structures are not lost with age; instead, we propose a model in which BHPC-specific loss of Notch signaling results in an initial developmental defect resulting in fewer bile ducts being formed, and in an acquired post-natal defect in the maintenance of intact IHBD architecture as a result of irresolvable cholestasis. Our studies reveal a previously unappreciated role for Notch signaling in the post-natal maintenance of an intact communicating IHBD structure, and suggest that liver defects observed in Alagille syndrome patients might be more complex than bile duct paucity.


Frontiers in Plant Science | 2017

Morphological Plant Modeling: Unleashing Geometric and Topological Potential within the Plant Sciences

Alexander Bucksch; Acheampong Atta-Boateng; Akomian F. Azihou; Dorjsuren Battogtokh; Aly Baumgartner; Brad M. Binder; Siobhan A. Braybrook; Cynthia C. Chang; Viktoirya Coneva; Thomas J. DeWitt; Alexander G. Fletcher; Malia A. Gehan; Diego Hernan Diaz-Martinez; Lilan Hong; Anjali S. Iyer-Pascuzzi; Laura L. Klein; Samuel Leiboff; Mao Li; Jonathan P. Lynch; Alexis Maizel; Julin N. Maloof; R.J. Cody Markelz; Ciera C. Martinez; Laura A. Miller; Washington Mio; Wojtek Palubicki; Hendrik Poorter; Christophe Pradal; Charles A. Price; Eetu Puttonen

The geometries and topologies of leaves, flowers, roots, shoots, and their arrangements have fascinated plant biologists and mathematicians alike. As such, plant morphology is inherently mathematical in that it describes plant form and architecture with geometrical and topological techniques. Gaining an understanding of how to modify plant morphology, through molecular biology and breeding, aided by a mathematical perspective, is critical to improving agriculture, and the monitoring of ecosystems is vital to modeling a future with fewer natural resources. In this white paper, we begin with an overview in quantifying the form of plants and mathematical models of patterning in plants. We then explore the fundamental challenges that remain unanswered concerning plant morphology, from the barriers preventing the prediction of phenotype from genotype to modeling the movement of leaves in air streams. We end with a discussion concerning the education of plant morphology synthesizing biological and mathematical approaches and ways to facilitate research advances through outreach, cross-disciplinary training, and open science. Unleashing the potential of geometric and topological approaches in the plant sciences promises to transform our understanding of both plants and mathematics.


Developmental Cell | 2016

Establishment of Expression in the SHORTROOT-SCARECROW Transcriptional Cascade through Opposing Activities of Both Activators and Repressors

Erin E. Sparks; Colleen Drapek; Allison Gaudinier; Song Li; Mitra Ansariola; Ning Shen; Jessica H. Hennacy; Jingyuan Zhang; Gina Turco; Jalean J. Petricka; Jessica Foret; Alexander J. Hartemink; Raluca Gordân; Molly Megraw; Siobhan M. Brady; Philip N. Benfey

Tissue-specific gene expression is often thought to arise from spatially restricted transcriptional cascades. However, it is unclear how expression is established at the top of these cascades in the absence of pre-existing specificity. We generated a transcriptional network to explore how transcription factor expression is established in the Arabidopsis thaliana root ground tissue. Regulators of the SHORTROOT-SCARECROW transcriptional cascade were validated in planta. At the top of this cascade, we identified both activators and repressors of SHORTROOT. The aggregate spatial expression of these regulators is not sufficient to predict transcriptional specificity. Instead, modeling, transcriptional reporters, and synthetic promoters support a mechanism whereby expression at the top of the SHORTROOT-SCARECROW cascade is established through opposing activities of activators and repressors.


Frontiers in Plant Science | 2017

Reshaping plant biology: Qualitative and quantitative descriptors for plant morphology

Mathilde Balduzzi; Brad M. Binder; Alexander Bucksch; Cynthia C. Chang; Lilan Hong; Anjali S. Iyer-Pascuzzi; Christophe Pradal; Erin E. Sparks

An emerging challenge in plant biology is to develop qualitative and quantitative measures to describe the appearance of plants through the integration of mathematics and biology. A major hurdle in developing these metrics is finding common terminology across fields. In this review, we define approaches for analyzing plant geometry, topology, and shape, and provide examples for how these terms have been and can be applied to plants. In leaf morphological quantifications both geometry and shape have been used to gain insight into leaf function and evolution. For the analysis of cell growth and expansion, we highlight the utility of geometric descriptors for understanding sepal and hypocotyl development. For branched structures, we describe how topology has been applied to quantify root system architecture to lend insight into root function. Lastly, we discuss the importance of using morphological descriptors in ecology to assess how communities interact, function, and respond within different environments. This review aims to provide a basic description of the mathematical principles underlying morphological quantifications.


Trends in Genetics | 2017

Uncovering Gene Regulatory Networks Controlling Plant Cell Differentiation

Colleen Drapek; Erin E. Sparks; Philip N. Benfey

The development of multicellular organisms relies on the precise regulation of cellular differentiation. As such, there has been significant effort invested to understand the process through which an immature cell undergoes differentiation. In this review, we highlight key discoveries and advances that have contributed to our understanding of the transcriptional networks underlying Arabidopsis root endodermal differentiation. To conclude, we propose perspectives on how advances in molecular biology, microscopy, and nucleotide sequencing will provide the tools to test the biological significance of these gene regulatory networks (GRN).

Collaboration


Dive into the Erin E. Sparks's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stacey S. Huppert

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexander Bucksch

Georgia Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge