Erin LeBlanc

Effectiveness of Primary Care-Relevant Treatments for Obesity in Adults: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

BACKGROUND Overweight and obesity in adults are common and adversely affect health. PURPOSE To summarize effectiveness and harms of primary care-relevant weight-loss interventions for overweight and obese adults. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO from January 2005 to September 2010; systematic reviews for identifying trials before 2005. STUDY SELECTION Two investigators appraised 6498 abstracts and 648 articles. Clinical trials were included if control groups received minimal interventions. Articles were rated as good, fair, or poor by using design-specific criteria. DATA EXTRACTION One investigator abstracted study characteristics and findings for good- and fair-quality studies; a second checked them. DATA SYNTHESIS Behaviorally based treatment resulted in 3-kg (6.6-lb) greater weight loss in intervention than control participants after 12 to 18 months, with more treatment sessions associated with greater loss. Limited data suggest weight-loss maintenance for 1 year or more. Orlistat plus behavioral intervention resulted in 3-kg (6.6-lb) more weight loss than did placebo after 12 months. Metformin resulted in less weight loss. Data on effects of weight-loss treatment on long-term health outcomes (for example, death and cardiovascular disease) were insufficient. Weight-loss treatment reduced diabetes incidence in participants with prediabetes. Effects on intermediate outcomes (for example, lipids and blood pressure) were mixed and small. Data on serious medication harms were insufficient. Medications commonly caused withdrawals due to gastrointestinal symptoms. LIMITATIONS Few studies reported health outcomes. Behaviorally based treatments were heterogeneous and specific elements were not well-described. Many studies could not be pooled because of insufficient reporting of variance data. Medication trials had high attrition, lacked postdiscontinuation data, and were inadequately powered for rare adverse effects. CONCLUSION Behaviorally based treatments are safe and effective for weight loss and maintenance. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

25-Hydroxyvitamin D levels and cognitive performance and decline in elderly men

Objective: To test the hypothesis that lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels are associated with a greater likelihood of cognitive impairment and risk of cognitive decline. Methods: We measured 25(OH)D and assessed cognitive function using the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) and Trail Making Test Part B (Trails B) in a cohort of 1,604 men enrolled in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study and followed them for an average of 4.6 years for changes in cognitive function. Results: In a model adjusted for age, season, and site, men with lower 25(OH)D levels seemed to have a higher odds of cognitive impairment, but the test for trend did not reach significance (impairment by 3MS: odds ratio [OR] 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81–4.19 for quartile [Q] 1; 1.41, 0.61–3.28 for Q2; and 1.18, 0.50–2.81 for Q3, compared with Q4 [referent group; p trend = 0.12]; and impairment by Trails B: OR 1.66, 95% CI 0.98–2.82 for Q1; 0.96, 0.54–1.69 for Q2; and 1.30, 0.76–2.22 for Q3, compared with Q4 [p trend = 0.12]). Adjustment for age and education further attenuated the relationships. There was a trend for an independent association between lower 25(OH)D levels and odds of cognitive decline by 3MS performance (multivariable OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.89–2.23 for Q1; 1.28, 0.84–1.95 for Q2; and 1.06, 0.70–1.62 for Q3, compared with Q4 [p = 0.10]), but no association with cognitive decline by Trails B. Conclusion: We found little evidence of independent associations between lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and baseline global and executive cognitive function or incident cognitive decline.

The Effects of Serum Testosterone, Estradiol, and Sex Hormone Binding Globulin Levels on Fracture Risk in Older Men

CONTEXT The relationship between sex steroids and fracture is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to examine associations between nonvertebral fracture risk and bioavailable estradiol (bioE2), bioavailable testosterone (bioT), and SHBG. DESIGN This was a case-cohort study. SETTING The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS) was conducted in a prospective U.S. cohort in 5995 community-dwelling men 65 yr old or older. PARTICIPANTS Participants included a subcohort of 1436 randomly chosen white men plus all 446 minorities and all those with incident hip and other nonvertebral fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Baseline testosterone and estradiol were measured by mass spectrometry (MS) and SHBG by RIA. RESULTS Men with the lowest bioE2 (<11.4 pg/ml) or highest SHBG (>59.1 nm) had greater risk of all nonvertebral fractures [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval]: 1.5 (1.2-1.9) and 1.4 (1.1-21.8), respectively]. Men with the lowest bioT (<163.5 ng/dl) had no increased fracture risk after adjustment for bioE2 [adjusted HR 1.16 (0.90-1.49)]. A significant interaction between SHBG and bioT (P = 0.03) resulted in men with low bioT and high SHBG having higher fracture risk [HR 2.1 (1.4-3.2)]. Men with low bioE2, low bioT, and high SHBG were at highest risk [HR 3.4 (2.2-5.3)]. CONCLUSIONS Older men with low bioE2 or high SHBG levels are at increased risk of nonvertebral fracture. When SHBG levels are high, men with low bioT levels have higher risk. The strongest association occurred when all measures were considered in combination.

BMI and fracture risk in older men: The osteoporotic fractures in men study (MrOS)

Low body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for fracture, but little is known about the association between high BMI and fracture risk. We evaluated the association between BMI and fracture in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS), a cohort of 5995 US men 65 years of age and older. Standardized measures included weight, height, and hip bone mineral density (BMD) by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA); medical history; lifestyle; and physical performance. Only 6 men (0.1%) were underweight (<18.5 kg/m2); therefore, men in this category were excluded. Also, 27% of men had normal BMI (18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2), 52% were overweight (25 to 29.9 kg/m2), 18% were obese I (30 to 34.9 kg/m2), and 3% were obese II (35 to 39.9 kg/m2). Overall, nonspine fracture incidence was 16.1 per 1000 person‐years, and hip fracture incidence was 3.1 per 1000 person‐years. In age‐, race‐, and BMD‐adjusted models, compared with normal weight, the hazard ratio (HR) for nonspine fracture was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87–1.25] for overweight, 1.29 (95% CI 1.00–1.67) for obese I, and 1.94 (95% CI 1.25–3.02) for obese II. Associations were weaker and not statistically significant after adjustment for mobility limitations and walking pace (HR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.84–1.23, for overweight; HR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.86–1.46, for obese I, and HR = 1.44, 95% CI 0.90–2.28, for obese II). Obesity is common among older men, and when BMD is held constant, it is associated with an increased risk of fracture. This association is at least partially explained by worse physical function in obese men.

Calcium and vitamin D supplementation and cognitive impairment in the women's health initiative.

To examine the effects of vitamin D and calcium on cognitive outcomes in elderly women.

Calcium Plus Vitamin D Supplementation and the Risk of Nonmelanoma and Melanoma Skin Cancer: Post Hoc Analyses of the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE In light of inverse relationships reported in observational studies of vitamin D intake and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels with risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and melanoma, we evaluated the effects of vitamin D combined with calcium supplementation on skin cancer in a randomized placebo-controlled trial. METHODS Postmenopausal women age 50 to 79 years (N = 36,282) enrolled onto the Womens Health Initiative (WHI) calcium/vitamin D clinical trial were randomly assigned to receive 1,000 mg of elemental calcium plus 400 IU of vitamin D3 (CaD) daily or placebo for a mean follow-up period of 7.0 years. NMSC and melanoma skin cancers were ascertained by annual self-report; melanoma skin cancers underwent physician adjudication. RESULTS Neither incident NMSC nor melanoma rates differed between treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.07) and placebo groups (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.16). In subgroup analyses, women with history of NMSC assigned to CaD had a reduced risk of melanoma versus those receiving placebo (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.90; P(interaction) = .038), which was not observed in women without history of NMSC. CONCLUSION Vitamin D supplementation at a relatively low dose plus calcium did not reduce the overall incidence of NMSC or melanoma. However, in women with history of NMSC, CaD supplementation reduced melanoma risk, suggesting a potential role for calcium and vitamin D supplements in this high-risk group. Results from this post hoc subgroup analysis should be interpreted with caution but warrant additional investigation.

Excess Gestational Weight Gain : Modifying Fetal Macrosomia Risk Associated With Maternal Glucose

OBJECTIVE: To estimate how maternal weight gain and maternal glucose relate to fetal macrosomia risk (greater than 4,000 g) among a population universally screened for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS: Between 1995 and 2003, 41,540 pregnant women in two regions (Northwest/Hawaii) of a large U.S. health plan had GDM screening using the 50-g glucose challenge test; 6,397 also underwent a 3-hour, 100-g oral glucose tolerance test. We assessed the relationship between level of maternal glucose with glucose screening and fetal macrosomia risk after adjustment for potential confounders, including maternal age, parity, and ethnicity and sex of the newborn. We stratified by maternal weight gain (40 lb or fewer compared with more than 40 lb) because excessive maternal weight gain modified results. RESULTS: Among women with both normal and abnormal GDM screenings, increasing level of maternal glucose was linearly related to macrosomia risk (P<.001 for trend in all groups). Women with excessive weight gain (more than 40 lb) had nearly double the risk of fetal macrosomia for each level of maternal glucose compared with those with gestational weight gain of 40 lb or fewer. For example, among women with normal post–glucose challenge test glucose levels (less than 95 mg/dL) and excessive weight gain, 16.5% had macrosomic newborns compared with 9.3% of women who gained 40 lb or fewer. Moreover, nearly one third of women (29.3%) with GDM who gained more than 40 lb had a macrosomic newborn compared with only 13.5% of women with GDM who gained 40 lb or fewer during pregnancy (P=.018). CONCLUSION: Excessive pregnancy weight gain nearly doubles the risk of fetal macrosomia with each increasing level of maternal glucose, even among women with GDM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II

Hot flashes and estrogen therapy do not influence cognition in early menopausal women

Objective: To examine how menopausal symptoms and estrogen therapy (ET)-induced symptom relief affect cognition in early menopause. Design:: There were two components. Part 1 was a cross-sectional study of 37 healthy, recently postmenopausal women with diverse menopausal symptoms. Women were categorized as having low (n = 20) or high symptoms (n = 17) based on a validated symptom questionnaire. Women completed mood and sleep questionnaires and underwent cognitive testing, which included verbal memory, visual memory, emotional memory, and verbal fluency. Thirty-two of these women went on to part 2 of the study. Fourteen were randomly assigned to receive ET and 18 to receive placebo for 8 weeks. Before treatment and at 4 and 8 weeks, women completed the same measures as in part 1 of the study. Results: High symptom women had more negative mood (P = 0.01) and lower quality sleep (P < 0.001) than low symptom women. Despite suffering from more menopausal symptoms, worse mood, and poorer sleep, women in the high symptom group performed the same on cognitive testing as women in the low symptom group. Women receiving ET had greater improvements in menopausal symptoms and sleep compared with those receiving the placebo (P ≤ 0.05). ET did not improve mood compared with placebo. Women receiving ET did not have any improvement in cognitive performance compared with those receiving the placebo. Conclusions: Menopausal symptoms do not impair cognition. ET does not improve cognition despite alleviating symptoms and improving sleep in recently naturally menopausal women with diverse menopausal symptoms.

Screening for Vitamin D Deficiency: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

Vitamin D is obtained through food consumption and synthesis in the skin after ultraviolet (UV) B exposure (1). Researchers have reported associations between low 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25-(OH)D] levels and risk for fractures (26), falls (7, 8), cardiovascular disease (914), colorectal cancer (1320), diabetes (13, 14, 2129), depressed mood (13, 14, 30, 31), cognitive decline (13, 14), and death (13, 32). Vitamin D deficiency is determined by measuring total serum 25-(OH)D concentrations (33). Measuring 25-(OH)D levels is complicated by the presence of multiple assays (34); evidence of intermethod and interlaboratory variability in measurement (3543); and the lack of an internationally recognized, commutable vitamin D reference standard (44). Efforts to increase standardization are in progress (34, 44). There is no consensus on optimal 25-(OH)D concentrations. Although experts generally agree that levels lower than 50 nmol/L (20 ng/mL) are associated with bone health (36, 45), disagreement exists about whether optimal 25-(OH)D levels are higher than this threshold (Table 1). According to NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) data from 2001 to 2006, 33% of the U.S. population was at risk for 25-(OH)D levels below 50 nmol/L (20 ng/mL) (47) and 77% had 25-(OH)D levels below 75 nmol/L (30 ng/mL) (48). Risk factors for low vitamin D levels include darker skin pigmentation (33), low vitamin D intake (4951), little or no UVB exposure (49, 50, 5254), and obesity (4951, 55). Older age (4953), female sex (49, 51, 52), low physical activity (49, 50, 53), low education attainment (48), and low health status (51, 54) were factors also associated with vitamin D deficiency in some studies. Table 1. Summary of Current Opinions About Appropriate 25-(OH)D Level Cutoffs for Defining Vitamin D Deficiency and Associations Between These Cutoffs and Health Outcomes* Vitamin D deficiency is treated by increasing dietary intake of food fortified with vitamin D or oral vitamin D treatment. Two commonly available vitamin D treatments (vitamin D3 [cholecalciferol] and vitamin D2 [ergocalciferol]) are available in several forms (for example, tablet and gel capsule), dosages (for example, 200 to 500000 IU), and dosing regimens (for example, daily, weekly, monthly, or yearly) and can be given in combination with oral calcium (56, 57). Potential harms of vitamin D treatment include hypercalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, suppressed parathyroid hormone levels, and hypercalciuria (46, 58, 59). Although very high levels of vitamin D are associated with other potential harms, these events are rare with typical replacement doses (Table 1). Screening for vitamin D deficiency can identify persons with low levels who might benefit from treatment. This report reviews the current evidence on vitamin D screening in asymptomatic adults to help the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) develop a recommendation statement. Although the USPSTF has not previously issued recommendations on screening for vitamin D deficiency, it has made recommendations on vitamin D supplementation to prevent adverse health outcomes (for example, falls, fractures, cancer, and cardiovascular disease) in populations not necessarily vitamin Ddeficient (that is, general populations who may or may not have been deficient) (6063). Methods Scope of the Review We developed a review protocol and analytic framework (Appendix Figure 1) that included the following key questions: Appendix Figure 1. Analytic framework. Numbers on figures indicate key questions. For a list of key questions, see the Methods section or Table 2. 1. Is there direct evidence that screening for vitamin D deficiency results in improved health outcomes? 1a. Are there differences in screening efficacy between patient subgroups? 2. What are the harms of screening (for example, risk for procedure, false positives, or false negatives)? 3. Does treatment of vitamin D deficiency using vitamin D lead to improved health outcomes? 3a. Are there differences in efficacy between patient subgroups? 4. What are the adverse effects of treatment of vitamin D deficiency using vitamin D? 4a. Are there differences in adverse effects between patient subgroups? Detailed methods and data for this review are contained in the full report, including search strategies, inclusion criteria, abstraction and quality rating tables, and contextual questions (46). We developed our protocol using a standardized process after gathering input from experts and the public. The analytic framework focuses on direct evidence that screening for vitamin D deficiency improves important health outcomes (for example, death, falls, fractures, functional status, or risk for cancer) versus not screening. Further, the framework details evidence that treatment in persons found to have vitamin D deficiency is associated with improved health outcomes, harms resulting from screening or subsequent treatment, and how effects of screening and treatment vary in subgroups defined by demographic and other factors (for example, body mass index, UV exposure, and institutionalized status). We did not review the accuracy of vitamin D testing because of the lack of an accepted reference standard and studies reporting diagnostic accuracy. For the purposes of this report, the term vitamin Ddeficient refers to populations in which at least 90% of persons have 25-(OH)D levels of 75 nmol/L (30 ng/mL) or less. For studies that did not restrict enrollment to persons with 25-(OH)D levels of 75 nmol/L (30 ng/mL), we used the mean 25-(OH)D level plus the SD multiplied by 1.282 to approximate the 90th percentile to determine whether this level was at or below the 75-nmol/L (30-ng/mL) threshold. Because of uncertainty about what 25-(OH)D level constitutes deficiency, we stratified studies according to whether at least 90% of persons had levels less than 50 nmol/L (<20 ng/mL in this report) or at least 90% had levels less than 75 nmol/L (30 ng/mL) with at least 10% greater than 50 nmol/L (20 ng/mL) (75 nmol/L [30 ng/mL] in this report). Data Sources and Searches A research librarian searched Ovid MEDLINE (1946 through the third week of August 2014), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (through August 2014). We supplemented our electronic searches by reviewing reference lists of retrieved articles. Study Selection At least 2 reviewers independently evaluated each study to determine inclusion eligibility. For screening studies, we included randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of screening for vitamin D deficiency versus no screening in healthy, asymptomatic adults (aged 18 years). For studies of the effectiveness of vitamin D treatment, we included RCTs of vitamin D treatment with or without calcium versus placebo or no treatment in vitamin Ddeficient persons that reported health outcomes after at least 8 weeks of treatment. Because the Womens Health Initiative (WHI) is the largest RCT about vitamin D (64), we included data from nested casecontrol studies of WHI participants with known 25-(OH)D status. We included English-language articles only and excluded studies published only as abstracts. We included studies conducted in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, and other geographic settings generalizable to the United States. We excluded studies that specifically targeted populations with symptoms or conditions associated with vitamin D deficiency (for example, osteoporosis, history of nontraumatic fractures, or history of falls) or with medical conditions that increase a persons risk for deficiency (such as liver, kidney, or malabsorptive disease) because screening and treatment of vitamin D deficiency could be a component of medical management in these conditions. The summary of evidence search and selection is shown in Appendix Figure 2. Appendix Figure 2. Summary of evidence search and selection. 25-(OH)D = 25-hydroxyvitamin D. * Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Identified from reference lists or by hand-searching or suggested by experts. Studies that provided data and contributed to the body of evidence were considered included. Studies may have provided data for more than 1 key question or published article; 27 unique studies were included, and a total of 35 articles were included. Data Abstraction and Quality Rating One investigator abstracted details about the study design, patient population, setting, screening method, interventions, analysis, follow-up, and results. A second investigator reviewed data for accuracy. Two investigators independently applied USPSTF criteria (65) to rate the quality of each study as good, fair, or poor. We resolved discrepancies through a consensus process. We excluded from data synthesis studies rated as poor quality. Those studies had 1 or more fatal flaws, including inadequate randomization or lack of intervention fidelity combined with postrandomization exclusions, high rates of withdrawals, and unclear randomization. Data Synthesis and Analysis We assessed the aggregate internal validity (quality) of the body of evidence for each key question (good, fair, or poor) using methods developed by the USPSTF on the basis of the number, quality, and size of studies; consistency of results; and directness of evidence (65). We conducted meta-analyses to calculate risk ratios (RRs) using the DerSimonianLaird random-effects model (Review Manager, version 5.2; Cochrane Collaboration). Analyses were based on total follow-up (including time after discontinuation of vitamin D treatment). For falls per person, we calculated incidence rate ratios and assumed equal mean length of follow-up across treatment groups if these data were not reported. For analyses with between-study heterogeneity, we conducted sensitivity analyses using profile likelihood random-effects models (66). Rate ratio analysis and analyses using the profil

Genetic evidence for role of carotenoids in age-related macular degeneration in the carotenoids in age-related eye disease study (CAREDS)

PURPOSE We tested variants in genes related to lutein and zeaxanthin status for association with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the Carotenoids in Age-Related Eye Disease Study (CAREDS). METHODS Of 2005 CAREDS participants, 1663 were graded for AMD from fundus photography and genotyped for 424 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 24 candidate genes for carotenoid status. Of 337 AMD cases 91% had early or intermediate AMD. The SNPs were tested individually for association with AMD using logistic regression. A carotenoid-related genetic risk model was built using backward selection and compared to existing AMD risk factors using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS A total of 24 variants from five genes (BCMO1, BCO2, NPCL1L1, ABCG8, and FADS2) not previously related to AMD and four genes related to AMD in previous studies (SCARB1, ABCA1, APOE, and ALDH3A2) were associated independently with AMD, after adjusting for age and ancestry. Variants in all genes (not always the identical SNPs) were associated with lutein and zeaxanthin in serum and/or macula, in this or other samples, except for BCO2 and FADS2. A genetic risk score including nine variants significantly (P = 0.002) discriminated between AMD cases and controls beyond age, smoking, CFH Y402H, and ARMS2 A69S. The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for AMD among women in the highest versus lowest quintile for the risk score was 3.1 (2.0-4.9). CONCLUSIONS Variants in genes related to lutein and zeaxanthin status were associated with AMD in CAREDS, adding to the body of evidence supporting a protective role of lutein and zeaxanthin in risk of AMD.