Erin M. Sullivan
George Washington University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Erin M. Sullivan.
Urology | 2000
Michael L. Blute; Stacey J. Ackerman; Alisoh L Rein; Kathleen M. Beusterien; Erin M. Sullivan; Craig P. Tanio; Michael J. Strauss; Michael J. Manyak
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the cost effectiveness of transurethral microwave thermotherapy relative to medical therapy (alpha-blocking agents) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for patients with moderate-to-severe benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) symptoms. METHODS A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from the societal perspective for a hypothetical cohort of 65-year-old men with moderate-to-severe BPH symptoms. We calculated the incremental cost effectiveness of thermotherapy relative to medical therapy and TURP during 5 years after treatment initiation. Event probabilities were obtained from published reports, a consensus panel, and the Targis System (Urologix) randomized clinical trial. Costs were estimated using the national Medicare reimbursement schedules. Costs are reported in 1999 U.S. dollars. Total thermotherapy procedure costs were estimated at
Journal of Endourology | 2002
Michael J. Manyak; Stacey J. Ackerman; Michael L. Blute; Alison L. Rein; Kathleen Buesterien; Erin M. Sullivan; Craig P. Tanio; Michael J. Strauss
2629. Quality-of-life and utility estimates were obtained by interviewing 13 patients with moderate-to-severe BPH symptoms. On the basis of their risk attitudes, patients were classified into risk-averse or non-risk-averse groups. The costs and health effects were discounted at 3% annually. RESULTS In a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 non-risk-averse patients who were candidates for all three modalities, the 5-year costs were highest for patients undergoing TURP and lowest for those receiving medical therapy (
PharmacoEconomics | 1999
Stacey J. Ackerman; Erin M. Sullivan; Kathleen M. Beusterien; Howard M. Natter; Deborah F. Gelinas; Donald L. Patrick
7334 and
PharmacoEconomics | 1999
Robert I. Griffiths; Erin M. Sullivan; Richard G. Frank; Michael J. Strauss; Robert J. Herbert; Jon Clouse; Howard H. Goldman
6294, respectively). The thermotherapy group exhibited the highest 5-year utility value (53.52 quality-adjusted life-months). Compared with medical therapy, thermotherapy resulted in an additional 0.23 quality-adjusted life-months, with an incremental cost of
Arthritis Care and Research | 2000
Robert I. Griffiths; Miriam Bar-Din; Catherine H. MacLean; Erin M. Sullivan; Robert J. Herbert; Edward H. Yelin
741. This yielded an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained of
Value in Health | 1998
Robert I. Griffiths; Erin M. Sullivan; Rg Frank; Rj Herbert; Mj Strauss; Howard H. Goldman
38,664 for thermotherapy compared with medical therapy. Thermotherapy had a higher utility (difference of 1.71 quality-adjusted life-months) and lower cost (difference of
Value in Health | 2006
Nancy Kline Leidy; Kathleen M. Beusterien; Erin M. Sullivan; Randel Richner; Neal I. Muni
299) compared with TURP and thus was dominant over TURP. The results were similar for a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 risk-averse patients. CONCLUSIONS From a societal perspective, thermotherapy appears to be a reasonable and cost-effective alternative to both medical and surgical treatment. However, the actual treatment decision should be based on multiple factors, only one of which is cost effectiveness.
Therapeutic Apheresis | 2001
Robert I. Griffiths; Miriam Bar-Din; Catherine H. MacLean; Erin M. Sullivan; Robert J. Herbert; Edward H. Yelin
PURPOSE To evaluate the cost effectiveness of minimally invasive therapy relative to medical (alpha-blocker) therapy and transurethral resection (TURP) for patients with moderate to severe symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS We constructed a decision-analytic Markov model for a hypothetical cohort of 65-year-old men with moderate to severe BPH symptoms. Microwave thermotherapy was selected to represent minimally invasive treatment. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed with 25 health states using the 3 treatments, 5 short-term clinical events, and 17 possible long-term outcomes. Each health state had an associated cost and utility. Quality of life (QoL) and utility estimates were obtained by interviewing 13 men with BPH symptoms using the standard gamble reference methods. Patients were classified as risk averse (RA) or non-risk averse (NRA) on the basis of their attitudes to risk. We calculated the incremental cost effectiveness of microwave thermotherapy relative to medical therapy and TURP over 5 years after treatment initiation. Event probabilities were obtained from the literature, a consensus panel, and published randomized clinical trials. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The utility values generated were internally consistent and externally valid for a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 RA patients. Microwave thermotherapy was preferred by the NRA group, while medical therapy was preferred by the RA group. Surgery was least preferred by both groups. Microwave thermotherapy had a small incremental cost but improved QoL in comparison with medical therapy. Microwave thermotherapy had a higher utility and lower cost than TURP and thus was dominant over TURP. This analytical method can be applied to evaluate the cost effectiveness of any BPH therapy.
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry | 2000
Erin M. Sullivan; Robert I. Griffiths; Richard G. Frank; Michael J. Strauss; Robert J. Herbert; Jon Clouse; Howard H. Goldman
AbstractObjective: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal, degenerative neuromuscular disease characterised by a progressive loss of voluntary motor activity. Recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I (rhIGF-I) has been shown to be useful in treating ALS. The purpose of this study was to examine the cost effectiveness of rhIGF-I therapy in patients who have ALS. Design: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis from the societal perspective on 177 patients who received treatment with rhIGF-I or placebo in a North American randomised clinical trial. We estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of rhIGF-I using resource utilisation and functional status measurements from the clinical trial. Costs were estimated from 1996 US Medicare reimbursement schedules. Utility weights were elicited from ALS healthcare providers using the standard gamble technique. Main outcome measures and results: The overall cost per quality-adjusted lifeyear (QALY) gained for rhIGF-I therapy compared with placebo was
Academic Radiology | 1998
Stacey J. Ackerman; Erin M. Sullivan; Margaret N. Walls
US67 440. For the subgroups of patients who were progressing rapidly or were in earlier stages of disease at enrolment, rhIGF-I cost