Ernest A. Kopecky

Considerations for improving assay sensitivity in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations

A number of pharmacologic treatments examined in recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have failed to show statistically significant superiority to placebo in conditions in which their efficacy had previously been demonstrated. Assuming the validity of previous evidence of efficacy and the comparability of the patients and outcome measures in these studies, such results may be a consequence of limitations in the ability of these RCTs to demonstrate the benefits of efficacious analgesic treatments vs placebo (“assay sensitivity”). Efforts to improve the assay sensitivity of analgesic trials could reduce the rate of falsely negative trials of efficacious medications and improve the efficiency of analgesic drug development. Therefore, an Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials consensus meeting was convened in which the assay sensitivity of chronic pain trials was reviewed and discussed. On the basis of this meeting and subsequent discussions, the authors recommend consideration of a number of patient, study design, study site, and outcome measurement factors that have the potential to affect the assay sensitivity of RCTs of chronic pain treatments. Increased attention to and research on methodological aspects of clinical trials and their relationships with assay sensitivity have the potential to provide the foundation for an evidence‐based approach to the design of analgesic clinical trials and expedite the identification of analgesic treatments with improved efficacy and safety.

Pregnancy outcome following maternal organic solvent exposure: A meta‐analysis of epidemiologic studies

BACKGROUND Evidence of fetal damage or demise from occupational organic solvent levels that are not toxic to the pregnant woman is inconsistent in the medical literature. The risk for major malformations and spontaneous abortion from maternal inhalation of organic solvent exposure during pregnancy was summarized using meta-analysis. METHODS Medline, Toxline, and Dissertation Abstracts databases were searched to locate all research papers published in any language from 1996 to 1994. Included were studies that were case-control or cohort in design and indicated first trimester (or up to 20 weeks gestation for spontaneous abortion) maternal solvent exposure. A summary odds ratio (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated from research results combined by the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS In total, 559 studies were obtained from the literature search. Five studies for each outcome of interest qualified for inclusion in the analysis. The ORs for major malformations from five studies (n = 7,036 patients) was 1.64 (CI 1.16-2.30) and for spontaneous abortion from five studies (n = 2,899 patients) was 1.25 (CI 0.99-1.58). CONCLUSIONS Maternal occupational exposure to organic solvents is associated with a tendency toward an increased risk for spontaneous abortion and additional studies may affect the trend. There is a statistically significant association with major malformations which warrants further investigation.

Classification and definition of misuse, abuse, and related events in clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations

Abstract Terminology related to prescription drug misuse and abuse is inconsistently defined. An expert panel developed consensus classifications and definitions for use in clinical trials. Abstract As the nontherapeutic use of prescription medications escalates, serious associated consequences have also increased. This makes it essential to estimate misuse, abuse, and related events (MAREs) in the development and postmarketing adverse event surveillance and monitoring of prescription drugs accurately. However, classifications and definitions to describe prescription drug MAREs differ depending on the purpose of the classification system, may apply to single events or ongoing patterns of inappropriate use, and are not standardized or systematically employed, thereby complicating the ability to assess MARE occurrence adequately. In a systematic review of existing prescription drug MARE terminology and definitions from consensus efforts, review articles, and major institutions and agencies, MARE terms were often defined inconsistently or idiosyncratically, or had definitions that overlapped with other MARE terms. The Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trials, Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks (ACTTION) public–private partnership convened an expert panel to develop mutually exclusive and exhaustive consensus classifications and definitions of MAREs occurring in clinical trials of analgesic medications to increase accuracy and consistency in characterizing their occurrence and prevalence in clinical trials. The proposed ACTTION classifications and definitions are designed as a first step in a system to adjudicate MAREs that occur in analgesic clinical trials and postmarketing adverse event surveillance and monitoring, which can be used in conjunction with other methods of assessing a treatment’s abuse potential.

Randomised trial of oral morphine for painful episodes of sickle-cell disease in children

BACKGROUND Oral controlled-release morphine can provide effective analgesia through a non-invasive route and may facilitate outpatient management of severe episodes of sickle-cell pain. We compared the clinical efficacy and safety of oral morphine with continuous intravenous morphine in children with severe episodes of sickle-cell pain, by a double-blind, randomised, parallel-group design. METHODS 56 children aged 5-17 years received loading doses of intravenous morphine of up to 0.15 mg/kg, followed by randomly assigned oral morphine 1.9 mg/kg every 12 h plus intravenous placebo (saline), or intravenous morphine 0.04 mg kg-1 h-1, plus placebo tablet. Breakthrough pain was treated with oral, immediate-release morphine 0.4 mg/kg every 2-3 h as required. Pain was assessed daily at 0900 h, 1300 h, 1700 h, and 2100 h with a picture face scale, a pictorial scale (Oucher), a behavioural-observational scale (CHEOPS), and by an investigator. FINDINGS 50 children completed the study (28 boys, 22 girls; mean age 11.2 years [SD 3.5]; mean oral morphine dose 2.99 mg/kg daily [0.75]; mean intravenous morphine dose, 0.81 mg/kg daily [0.30]). Mean overall pain scores were similar for oral and intravenous morphine (CHEOPS, 6.3 [1.5] vs 6.4 [1.4], p = 0.8; Oucher, 31.5 [25.4] vs 39.2 [21.7], p = 0.3; Faces, 2.2 [1.4] vs 2.4 [1.3], p = 0.6; clinical rating, 1.7 [0.7] vs 1.9 [0.5], p = 0.3). Opioid analgesia was required for a mean of 4.2 days (1.7) and 5.4 days (2.6), respectively (p = 0.0591). Pain scores from all scales correlated significantly (r = 0.5865-0.8980, p = 0.0001). Frequency of rescue analgesia did not differ significantly between the oral and intravenous morphine groups (0.7 [0.8] vs 0.9 [0.7] doses daily, p = 0.2). Frequency and severity of adverse events did not differ significantly. INTERPRETATION Oral, controlled-release morphine is a reliable, non-invasive alternative to continuous intravenous morphine for the management of painful episodes of sickle-cell disease in children.

Systemic Exposure to Morphine and the Risk of Acute Chest Syndrome in Sickle Cell Disease

The etiology of acute chest syndrome, the most severe complication of the sickle cell crisis, is unknown.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of EMLA in the treatment of postburn pruritus in pediatric patients: a pilot study.

The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) used to ameliorate postburn pruritus after application onto newly formed, intact skin in children. EMLA was applied once to an itchy site where healed skin had formed. Serial blood samples were collected to measure lidocaine, prilocaine, o-toluidine, and methemoglobin. Maximal plasma concentration, minimal plasma concentration, time to achieve the maximal plasma concentration, elimination half-life, and area under the concentration-time curve were calculated. Vital signs, oxygen saturation, clinical signs of hypoxia, and itch intensity were measured. Five children had 15.7 +/- 2.54 g (+/- SD) of EMLA applied to a skin surface area of 93.0 +/- 37.0 cm2. Lidocaine and prilocaine concentrations were below toxic levels; o-toluidine was not detected. Methemoglobin remained between 1 and 3%; patients did not exhibit any clinical signs of hypoxia. Mean oxygen saturation was 98.9 +/- 0.01%. The mean number of pruritic episodes and antihistamine breakthrough doses were greater in the 2 prestudy control days compared with study day 3 (P = 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively). Skin at the site of EMLA application remained anesthetized for 12 to 13 hours. In this small pilot study, EMLA seems to be a safe, novel treatment for postburn pruritus in burned children when applied to newly healed, intact skin.

Transfer of morphine across the human placenta and its interaction with naloxone

The purpose of this investigation was to measure the transfer rate and clearance of morphine across the placenta with and without naloxone. Term human placental cotyledons were perfused in vitro. The placenta was perfused with 50 ng/mL of morphine in the absence (n=4) and presence (n=5) of 100 ng/mL of naloxone. Maternal and fetal samples were collected. Students t-test or one-way repeated measures ANOVA were used for all comparisons. The maternal-to-fetal morphine transfer rate was 0.73+/-0.44 ng/mL/min in the morphine and 0.69+/-0.26 ng/mL/min in the morphine-naloxone experiments (p=0.89). The clearance of morphine was 0.89+/-0.39 mL/min without naloxone and 0.87+/-0.27 mL/min with naloxone (p=0.92). Final morphine concentrations in the morphine experiments were 9.78+/-6.17 ng/mL (maternal) and 3.43+/-2.14 ng/mL (fetal) and 10.04+/-3.89 ng/mL (maternal) and 4.16+/-1.64 ng/mL (fetal) in the morphine-naloxone experiments. Morphine readily crosses the term human placenta. Naloxone does not alter placental transfer or clearance of morphine, suggesting that transfer across the placental barrier is not altered by changes in vascular resistance. Placental retention of morphine prolongs fetal exposure to morphine.

Patient phenotyping in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations.

Abstract There is tremendous interpatient variability in the response to analgesic therapy (even for efficacious treatments), which can be the source of great frustration in clinical practice. This has led to calls for “precision medicine” or personalized pain therapeutics (ie, empirically based algorithms that determine the optimal treatments, or treatment combinations, for individual patients) that would presumably improve both the clinical care of patients with pain and the success rates for putative analgesic drugs in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. However, before implementing this approach, the characteristics of individual patients or subgroups of patients that increase or decrease the response to a specific treatment need to be identified. The challenge is to identify the measurable phenotypic characteristics of patients that are most predictive of individual variation in analgesic treatment outcomes, and the measurement tools that are best suited to evaluate these characteristics. In this article, we present evidence on the most promising of these phenotypic characteristics for use in future research, including psychosocial factors, symptom characteristics, sleep patterns, responses to noxious stimulation, endogenous pain-modulatory processes, and response to pharmacologic challenge. We provide evidence-based recommendations for core phenotyping domains and recommend measures of each domain.

Abuse liability measures for use in analgesic clinical trials in patients with pain: IMMPACT recommendations

Summary Assessing and mitigating the abuse liability (AL) of analgesics is an urgent clinical and societal problem. Recommendations for improved assessment include: (1) performing trials that include individuals with diverse risks of abuse; (2) improving the assessment of AL in clinical trials (eg, training study personnel in the principles of abuse and addiction behaviors, designing the trial to assess AL outcomes as primary or secondary outcome measures depending on the trial objectives); (3) performing standardized assessment of outcomes, including targeted observations by study personnel and using structured adverse events query forms that ask all subjects specifically for certain symptoms (such as euphoria and craving); and (4) collecting detailed information about events of potential concern (eg, unexpected urine drug testing results, loss of study medication, and dropping out the trial). Abstract Assessing and mitigating the abuse liability (AL) of analgesics is an urgent clinical and societal problem. Analgesics have traditionally been assessed in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) designed to demonstrate analgesic efficacy relative to placebo or an active comparator. In these trials, rigorous, prospectively designed assessment for AL is generally not performed. The Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) convened a consensus meeting to review the available evidence and discuss methods for improving the assessment of the AL of analgesics in clinical trials in patients with pain. Recommendations for improved assessment include: (1) performing trials that include individuals with diverse risks of abuse; (2) improving the assessment of AL in clinical trials (eg, training study personnel in the principles of abuse and addiction behaviors, designing the trial to assess AL outcomes as primary or secondary outcome measures depending on the trial objectives); (3) performing standardized assessment of outcomes, including targeted observations by study personnel and using structured adverse events query forms that ask all subjects specifically for certain symptoms (such as euphoria and craving); and (4) collecting detailed information about events of potential concern (eg, unexpected urine drug testing results, loss of study medication, and dropping out of the trial). The authors also propose a research agenda for improving the assessment of AL in future trials.

Core outcome measures for opioid abuse liability laboratory assessment studies in humans: IMMPACT recommendations.

A critical component in development of opioid analgesics is assessment of their abuse liability (AL). Standardization of approaches and measures used in assessing AL have the potential to facilitate comparisons across studies, research laboratories, and drugs. The goal of this report is to provide consensus recommendations regarding core outcome measures for assessing the abuse potential of opioid medications in humans in a controlled laboratory setting. Although many of the recommended measures are appropriate for assessing the AL of medications from other drug classes, the focus here is on opioid medications because they present unique risks from both physiological (e.g., respiratory depression, physical dependence) and public health (e.g., individuals in pain) perspectives. A brief historical perspective on AL testing is provided, and those measures that can be considered primary and secondary outcomes and possible additional outcomes in AL assessment are then discussed. These outcome measures include the following: subjective effects (some of which comprise the primary outcome measures, including drug liking; physiological responses; drug self-administration behavior; and cognitive and psychomotor performance. Before presenting recommendations for standardized approaches and measures to be used in AL assessments, the appropriateness of using these measures in clinical trials with patients in pain is discussed.