Ernest B Perry
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ernest B Perry.
Transportation Research Record | 2017
Benjamin R. E. Zietlow; Ernest B Perry; Teresa M. Adams; Thirunavukkarasu Sivappha; Soren Walljasper
This research outlined and demonstrated an approach and methodology for assessing domestic truck traffic suitable for diversion to intermodal truck to rail shipping. The research was spurred by the following factors: transportation-related findings from the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporations Wisconsin Economic Future Study: Statewide and Regional Analysis; a general interest in intermodal diversion from federal, state, and local transportation agencies (to alleviate roadway congestion, reduce road deterioration, and reduce transportation emissions and pollutants); and seemingly constant commentary from the states private-sector freight stakeholders seeking increased inter-modal services. Estimates of diverted loads from trucking to truck-to-rail intermodal vary, depending on the associated cost savings, the commodity being shipped, and the distance between origin and destination. Model results suggest that nonmonetary incentives would be necessary for large volumes of freight to divert.
Transportation Research Record | 2014
Alex Marach; Teresa M. Adams; Ernest B Perry
The creation of the National Freight Network as part of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) requires states to designate critical rural freight corridors (CRFCs). The MAP-21 act lists the criteria for designating CRFCs but does not specify the method. This paper proposes mileage-based, segment-based, and weighted average approaches to determine whether a corridor meets one of the CRFC criteria: a rural principal arterial that has a minimum 25% of truck traffic. The three approaches are explained, assessed, and mapped for the reader to compare the resulting networks. The paper then uses policy analysis techniques to assess the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. The analysis compares the approaches on the basis of network connectivity of the resulting CRFCs, the mileage of non-Interstate rural principal arterials, and robustness. Results indicate that state departments of transportation should use the mileage-based approach for computing truck traffic percentages when determining whether a corridor meets the minimum threshold of 25% truck traffic. The mileage approach combines the highest network connectivity, designates the highest number of non-Interstate rural principal arterial miles, and is a robust technique that controls for variable segment lengths.
Transportation Research Board 96th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board | 2017
Benjamin R. E. Zietlow; Ernest B Perry; Teresa M. Adams; Soren Walljasper
Archive | 2017
Ernest B Perry; Teresa M. Adams; Eric Oberhart
Archive | 2016
Ben Zietlow; Ernest B Perry; Teresa M. Adams; Caitrin O’Shea; Thirunavukkarasu Sivappha; Soren Walljasper; Andrew Umentum
Archive | 2016
Ernest B Perry; Eric Oberhart; Steven Wagner; Teresa M. Adams
Archive | 2016
Ernest B Perry; Teresa M. Adams; Eric Oberhart; Ben Zietlow
Transportation Research Board 94th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board | 2015
Aaron Jermier; Ernest B Perry; Teresa M. Adams
Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board | 2014
Teresa M. Adams; Ernest B Perry; Andrew Schwartz
Archive | 2014
Ernest B Perry; Ben Zietlow; Aaron Jermier; Steve Wagner; Andrew Umentum