Ertunc Altiok

Strain rate measurement by Doppler echocardiography allows improved assessment of myocardial viability in patients with depressed left ventricular function

OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate whether objective assessment of the myocardial functional reserve, using strain rate imaging (SRI), allows accurate detection of viable myocardium. BACKGROUND Strain rate imaging is a new echocardiographic modality that allows quantitative assessment of segmental myocardial contractility. METHODS In 37 patients (age 58 +/- 9 years) with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction, myocardial viability was assessed using low-dose (10 microg/kg body weight per min) two-dimensional dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE), tissue Doppler imaging, SRI and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). The peak systolic tissue Doppler velocity and peak systolic myocardial strain rate were determined at baseline and during low-dose dobutamine stress from the apical views. RESULTS A total of 192 segments with dyssynergy at rest were classified by (18)FDG PET as viable in 94 and nonviable in 98. An increase of peak systolic strain rate from rest to dobutamine stimulation by more than -0.23 1/s allowed accurate discrimination of viable from nonviable myocardium, as determined by (18)FDG PET with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 84%. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed an area under the curve for prediction of nonviable myocardium, as determined by (18)FDG PET using SRI, of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88 to 0.90), whereas the area under the ROC curve using tissue Doppler imaging was 0.63 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.65). CONCLUSIONS The increase in the peak systolic strain rate during low-dose dobutamine stimulation allows accurate discrimination between different myocardial viability states. Strain rate imaging is superior to two-dimensional DSE and tissue Doppler imaging for the assessment of myocardial viability.

Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging techniques for measurement of aortic annulus diameters before transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Aims Different two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques are used for procedure planning and selection of prosthesis size before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. This study sought to compare different 2D and 3D imaging techniques and determine the accuracy of 3D transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for accurate analysis of aortic annulus dimensions. Methods In 49 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation angiography, 2D transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), 2D and 3D TEE, and dual-source CT (DSCT) were performed to determine aortic annulus diameters. TTE and 2D TEE provided only one diameter of the aortic annulus. Angiography, DSCT and 3D TEE allowed measurement of diameters in sagittal and coronal views. The distance between aortic annulus and left main coronary artery ostium was measured by angiography, DSCT and 3D TEE. Results Sagittal diameters determined by angiography, TTE, 2D TEE, 3D TEE and DSCT were smaller than coronal diameters determined by angiography, 3D TEE and DSCT. Coronal and sagittal diameters determined by 3D TEE were in high agreement with corresponding measurements by DSCT (23.60±1.89 vs 23.46±2.07 mm and 22.19±1.96 vs 22.27±2.01 mm, respectively; mean±SD). There was a high correlation between DSCT and 3D TEE for the definition of coronal and sagittal aortic annulus diameters (r=0.88, SEE=0.89 mm and r=0.77, SEE=1.26 mm, respectively). Correlation of 3D TEE (13.47±1.67 mm) and DSCT (13.64±1.82 mm) in the analysis of the distance between aortic annulus and left main coronary artery ostium was better (r=0.54, SEE=1.55 mm) than between angiography (14.85±3.84 mm) and DSCT (r=0.35, SEE=1.77 mm). Conclusions 3D imaging techniques should be used to evaluate aortic annulus diameters, as 2D imaging techniques, providing only a sagittal view, underestimate them. 3D TEE provides measurements of aortic annulus diameters similar to those obtained by DSCT.

Evaluation of aortic root for definition of prosthesis size by magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac computed tomography: Implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation

BACKGROUND This study sought to compare cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) with dual source computed tomography (DSCT) for analysis of aortic root dimensions prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). In addition, the potential impact of CMR and DSCT measurements on TAVI strategy defined by 2D-transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was evaluated. METHODS Aortic root dimensions were measured using CMR and DSCT in 58 patients referred for evaluation of TAVI. The TAVI strategy (choice of prosthesis size and decision to implant) was based on 2D-TEE annulus measurements. RESULTS CMR and DSCT aortic root measurements showed an overall good correlation (r=0.86, p<0.001 for coronal aortic annulus diameters). There was also a good correlation between TEE and CMR as well as between TEE and DSCT for measurement of sagittal aortic annulus diameters (r=0.69, p<0.001). However, annulus diameters assessed by TEE (22.1±2.3mm) were significantly smaller than coronal aortic annulus diameters assessed by CMR (23.4±1.8mm, p<0.001) or DSCT (23.6±1.8, p<0.001). Regarding TAVI strategy, the agreement between TEE and sagittal CMR (kappa=0.89) as well as sagittal DSCT measurements (kappa=0.87) was statistically perfect. However, decision based on coronal CMR- or MSCT measurements would have modified TAVI strategy as compared to a TEE based choice in a significant number of patients (22% to 24%). CONCLUSION In patients referred for TAVI, CMR measurements of aortic root dimensions show a good correlation with DSCT measurements and thus CMR may be an alternative 3D-imaging modality. Aortic annulus measurements using TEE, CMR and DSCT were close but not identical and the method used has important potential implications on TAVI strategy.

Impact of infarct transmurality on layer-specific impairment of myocardial function: a myocardial deformation imaging study.

AIMS To evaluate deformation parameters of an endocardial, mid-myocardial, and epicardial myocardial layer in different transmurality of myocardial infarction and assess whether layer-specific deformation analysis allows definition of infarct transmurality. METHODS AND RESULTS Fifty-six patients (mean age 55 +/- 9 years, 38 men) with chronic ischaemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction underwent two-dimensional echocardiography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (ceMRI). The extent of myocardial infarction was determined as relative amount of hyperenhancement by ceMRI in a 16-segment LV model (0%, no infarction; 1-50%, non-transmural infarction; 51-100%, transmural infarction). On the basis of two-dimensional echocardiographic parasternal short-axis views peak systolic circumferential strain was determined for the total wall thickness and for each of three myocardial layers (endocardial, mid-myocardial, and epicardial) using an automatic frame-by-frame tracking system of acoustic echocardiographic markers (EchoPAC, GE Ultrasound). In non-transmural infarction impairment of circumferential strain was greater in the endocardial than the epicardial layer, relative reduction compared with control segments, 45% vs. 28% (P < 0.001), respectively. In transmural infarction additional impairment of circumferential strain was greater in the epicardial than the endocardial layer, relative reduction compared with non-transmural infarction 29% vs. 7% (P < 0.001), respectively. Endocardial layer circumferential strain allowed distinction of non-transmural vs. no infarction with higher accuracy than total wall thickness strain [area under the curve (AUC) 0.842 vs. 0.774, respectively, P = 0.001]. Epicardial layer circumferential strain allowed distinction of transmural from non-transmural infarction with higher accuracy than total wall thickness strain (AUC 0.819 vs. 0.762, respectively, P = 0.005). CONCLUSION Non-transmural infarction results in greater functional impairment of the endocardial than of the epicardial myocardial layer. In transmural infarction both layers are affected similarly compared with controls. A layer-specific analysis of myocardial deformation allows accurate discrimination between different transmurality categories of myocardial infarction.

Incidence and predictors of left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency and predictors of left bundle branch block (LBBB) after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) using CoreValve and Edwards SAPIEN prosthesis. METHODS 154 consecutive patients (53 male, mean age 81 ± 7 years) with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis underwent TAVI. Transfemoral AVI (CoreValve) was performed in 72 patients (47%). Transapical AVI (Edwards SAPIEN valve) was done with in n=82 patients (53%). Patient characteristics, valvular and left ventricular outflow tract geometry from pre- and postprocedural imaging (computed tomography, transesophageal echocardiography and callipered angiography) and procedural characteristics were evaluated to define predictors of new LBBB after TAVI. PATIENTS Preprocedural LBBB was present in 15 patients (n=5 CoreValve, n=10 in Edwards SAPIEN). In 40 of 139 patients (29%) a new LBBB was observed after TAVI. The frequency of new LBBB was higher with CoreValve n=27 (38%) than with Edwards SAPIEN implantation n=13 (16%; p=0.006). Patients with new LBBB had larger valve implantation depth into the left ventricular outflow tract (9.0 ± 2.9 vs. 4.4 ± 2.5mm, p<0.001). In 18 of 40 patients (45%) the new LBBB was persistent at 30days. Predictors of new LBBB were prosthesis implantation depth into the left ventricular outflow tract (OR=1.185 95% CI 1.064-1.320 per additional mm implantation depth; p=0.002) and use of CoreValve prosthesis (OR=2.639 95% CI 1.314-5.813; p=0.007). CONCLUSION TAVI is frequently associated with new LBBB. There is a higher frequency of persistent LBBB with the CoreValve system. Implantation depth is a critical factor for the development of new LBBB.

Analysis of Procedural Effects of Percutaneous Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair by 2D and 3D Echocardiography

Background—Analysis of procedural effects in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) using the edge-to-edge technique is complex, and common methods to define mitral regurgitation severity based on 2-dimensional (2D) echocardiography are not validated for postprocedural double-orifice mitral valve. This study used 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to determine the functional and morphological effects of PMVR. Methods and Results—In 39 high-risk surgical patients with moderate to severe functional mitral valve regurgitation, 3D TEE with and without color Doppler as well as 2D transthoracic and TEE was performed before and after PMVR (MitraClip device). Mitral valve regurgitant volume by color Doppler 3D TEE was determined as the product of vena contracta areas defined by direct planimetry and velocity time integral using continuous-wave Doppler. Regurgitant volume was reduced from 84.1±38.3 mL preintervention to 35.6±25.6 mL postintervention. Patients in whom vena contracta area could be reduced >50% had a smaller preprocedural mitral annulus area compared with patients with ⩽50% reduction (11.9±3.9 versus 16.1±8.5 cm2, respectively; P=0.036) and tended to have a smaller mitral annulus circumference (13.0±2.0 versus 14.8±4.1 cm, respectively; P=0.112). At 6 months follow-up, left atrial and left ventricular end-diastolic volumes were significantly more reduced in patients in whom regurgitant vena contracta area was reduced by >50% compared with those with less reduction (−11.4±5.2 versus −4.8±7.7%; P=0.005, and −11.0±7.2 versus −4.5±9.3%; P=0.028). The maximum diastolic mitral valve area decreased from 6.0±2.0 to 2.9±0.9 cm2 (P<0.0001). Conclusions—Three dimensional TEE demonstrates significant reduction of regurgitant volume after PMVR. The unique visualization of the mitral valve by 3D TEE allows improved understanding of the morphological and functional changes induced by PMVR.

Comparison of Direct Planimetry of Mitral Valve Regurgitation Orifice Area by Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography to Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area Obtained by Proximal Flow Convergence Method and Vena Contracta Area Determined by Color Doppler Echocardiography

Direct measurement of anatomic regurgitant orifice area (AROA) by 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography was evaluated for analysis of mitral regurgitation (MR) severity. In 72 patients (age 70.6 ± 13.3 years, 37 men) with mild to severe MR, 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and transthoracic color Doppler echocardiography were performed to determine AROA by direct planimetry, effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) by proximal convergence method, and vena contracta area (VCA) by 2-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography. AROA was measured with commercially available software (QLAB, Philips Medical Systems, Andover, Massachusetts) after adjusting the first and second planes to reveal the smallest orifice in the third plane where planimetry could take place. AROA was classified as circular or noncircular by calculating the ratio of the medial-lateral distance above the anterior-posterior distance (≤1.5 compared to >1.5). AROA determined by direct planimetry was 0.30 ± 0.20 cm², EROA determined by proximal convergence method was 0.30 ± 0.20 cm², and VCA was 0.33 ± 0.23 cm². Correlation between AROA and EROA (r = 0.96, SEE 0.058 cm²) and between AROA and VCA (r = 0.89, SEE 0.105 cm²) was high considering all patients. In patients with a circular regurgitation orifice area (n = 14) the correlation between AROA and EROA was better (r = 0.99, SEE 0.036 cm²) compared to patients with noncircular regurgitation orifice area (n = 58, r = 0.94, SEE 0.061 cm²). Correlation between AROA and EROA was higher in an EROA ≥0.2 cm² (r = 0.95) than in an EROA <0.2 cm² (r = 0.60). In conclusion, direct measurement of MR AROA correlates well with EROA by proximal convergence method and VCA. Agreement between methods is better for patients with a circular regurgitation orifice area than in patients with a noncircular regurgitation orifice area.

Comparison of Two- and Three-Dimensional Transthoracic Echocardiography to Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Paravalvular Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

This study evaluated 2-dimensional (2D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) using Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) criteria and 3-dimensional (3D) TTE for assessment of aortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. In 71 patients, 2D TTE, 3D TTE, and CMR imaging were performed to assess AR severity after TAVI. Using 2D TTE, AR severity was graded according to VARC-2 criteria and regurgitant volume (RVol) was determined. Three-dimensional color Doppler TTE allowed direct planimetry of the vena contracta area of the paravalvular regurgitation jet and calculation of the RVol as product with the velocity-time integral. RVol by CMR imaging was measured by phase-contrast velocity mapping in the ascending aorta. After TAVI, mean RVol determined by CMR imaging was 9.2 ± 9.6 ml/beat and mean regurgitant fraction was 13.3 ± 10.3%. AR was assessed as none or mild in 58 patients (82%) by CMR imaging. Correlation of 3D TTE and CMR imaging on RVol was better than correlation of 2D TTE and CMR imaging (r = 0.895 vs 0.558, p <0.001). There was good agreement between RVol by CMR imaging and by 3D TTE (mean bias = 2.4 ml/beat). Kappa on grading of AR severity was 0.357 between VARC-2 and CMR imaging versus 0.446 between 3D TTE and CMR imaging. Intraobserver variability for analysis of RVol of AR after TAVI was 73.5 ± 52.2% by 2D TTE, 16.7 ± 21.9% by 3D TTE, and 2.2 ± 2.0% by CMR imaging. In conclusion, 2D TTE considering VARC-2 criteria has limitations in the grading of AR severity after TAVI when CMR imaging is used for comparison. Three-dimensional TTE allows quantification of AR with greater accuracy than 2D TTE. Observer variability on RVol after TAVI is considerable using 2D TTE, significantly less using 3D TTE, and very low using CMR imaging.

Dependency of cardiac resynchronization therapy on myocardial viability at the LV lead position.

OBJECTIVES This study sought to analyze the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) related to the viability in the segment of left ventricular (LV) lead position defined by myocardial deformation imaging. BACKGROUND Echocardiographic myocardial deformation analysis allows determination of LV lead position as well as extent of myocardial viability. METHODS Myocardial deformation imaging based on tracking of acoustic markers within 2-dimensional echo images (GE Ultrasound, GE Healthcare, Horton, Norway) was performed in 65 heart failure patients (54 ± 6 years of age, 41 men) before and 12 months after CRT implantation. In a 16-segment model, the LV lead position was defined based on the segmental strain curve with earliest peak strain, whereas the CRT system was programmed to pure LV pacing. Nonviability of a segment (transmural scar formation) was assumed if the peak systolic circumferential strain was >-11.1%. RESULTS In 47 patients, the LV lead was placed in a viable segment, and in 18 patients, it was placed in a nonviable segment. At 12-month follow-up there was greater decrease of LV end-diastolic volumes (58 ± 13 ml vs. 44 ± 12 ml, p = 0.0388) and greater increase of LV ejection fraction (11 ± 4% vs. 5 ± 4%, p = 0.0343) and peak oxygen consumption (2.5 ± 0.9 ml/kg/min vs. 1.7 ± 1.1 ml/kg/min, p = 0.0465) in the viable compared with the nonviable group. The change in LV ejection fraction and the reduction in LV end-diastolic volumes at follow-up correlated to an increasing peak systolic circumferential strain in the segment of the LV pacing lead (r = 0.61, p = 0.0274 and r = 0.64, p = 0.0412, respectively). Considering only patients with ischemic heart disease, differences between viable and nonviable LV lead position group were even greater. CONCLUSIONS Preserved viability in the segment of the CRT LV lead position results in greater LV reverse remodeling and functional benefit at 12-month follow-up. Deformation imaging allows analysis of viability in the LV lead segment.

Thirty-day outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with surgical valve replacement in patients with high-risk aortic stenosis: a matched comparison.

BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a therapeutic alternative to surgery for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis in high-surgical risk patients. The aim of this study was to compare 30-day mortality of high-risk patients treated by TAVI versus surgical aortic valve replacement. MethodsA total of 175 patients (60 men; mean age, 80±6 years; Euroscore 21±13%) having undergone TAVI were compared with 175 matched patients (76 men; mean age, 79±3 years; Euroscore 17±9%), which have undergone conventional aortic valve replacement and were deemed to be high-risk patients by the cardiothoracic surgeons. Thirty-day mortality and major adverse events were recorded in both groups. Patients’ characteristics were analyzed for predictors of mortality in the TAVI group. ResultsTwenty-one patients (12%) in the TAVI group and 13 patients (8%) in the surgical group died within 30 days of the procedure (P=0.165). Two patients (1%) in the TAVI group and one patient (0.5%) in the conventional surgery group had a major stroke (P=1.0). Seven patients (4%) in the TAVI group and 25 patients (14%) in the conventional surgery group required dialysis post procedure (P=0.0013). The average length of stay in the intensive care unit was lower in the TAVI group compared with the conventional surgical group (3.3±3.1 vs. 6.6±10.5 days; P<0.001). Age was the only independent predictor of mortality in the TAVI group (odds ratio=1.009; 95% confidence interval: 1.001–1.018 per additional year; P=0.0186) and in the total study population (odds ratio=1.007; 95% confidence interval: 1.001–1.013 per additional year; P=0.0186). ConclusionIn high-surgical risk patients, TAVI can be performed at a mortality risk comparable with conventional surgery with a reduced length of post interventional intensive care unit stay and less need for dialysis.