Erwin H. Fleischmann

Additional Antiproteinuric Effect of Ultrahigh Dose Candesartan: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Prospective Study

Proteinuria indicates future renal and cardiovascular morbidity, and, conversely, its reduction is associated with improved outcome. In a randomized, double-blind trial with parallel group design, the antiproteinuric effect of candesartan at high doses was analyzed. Patients with normal or mildly impaired renal function, protein excretion rate of 1 to 10 g/d, and treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker for 3 mo were eligible. After a 4-wk treatment with 16 mg/d candesartan, patients (n = 32) were allocated to double-blind therapy with either 32 or 64 mg/d candesartan for 12 wk (including 4 wk of uptitration), followed again by 4 wk of candesartan 16 mg/d. Proteinuria at study entry was similar in both groups (geometric mean [95% confidence interval (CI)]; 32 mg/d candesartan 2.14 g/d [95% CI, 1.45 to 3.17]; 64 mg/d candesartan 2.54 g/d [95% CI, 1.91 to 3.40]; NS). After the double-blind treatment phase, proteinuria was reduced to 1.42 g/d (0.85 to 2.37) in the 64-mg/d group (P = 0.017), without any change in the 32-mg/d group (2.02 g/d [95% CI, 1.26 to 3.26]). The change in proteinuria differed between the two groups in absolute (P = 0.025) and relative terms (-29 +/- 50 versus -0 +/- 26%; P = 0.012). After downtitration to 16 mg/d candesartan, proteinuria increased again to 2.38 g/d (1.57 to 3.62) in the 64-mg/d group (P = 0.001) but remained unchanged in the 32-mg/d group (2.04 g/d [95% CI, 1.17 to 3.57]; NS). No change in BP was noticed in response to the different doses of candesartan. These data indicate an additive antiproteinuric effect of ultrahigh dose of the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan compared with standard dose.

Rapid Nongenomic Effects of Aldosterone on Human Forearm Vasculature

Abstract—The impact of aldosterone in cardiovascular disease and hypertension has recently gained new interest. Aldosterone is now suggested to be a more common cause of hypertension than previously believed and has been linked to myocardial fibrosis, independent of its hypertensive effects. Finally, rapid nongenomic aldosterone effects have been proposed to be important in hypertension, in addition to its genomic effects. Forty-eight healthy male volunteers were examined in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover trial to elucidate the rapid nongenomic, vascular effects of aldosterone in humans. Forearm blood flow was measured by venous occlusion plethysmography. First, aldosterone (500 ng/min) and placebo were infused into the brachial artery for 8 minutes. The volunteers then received ascending doses of acetylcholine, NG-monomethyl-l-arginine (L-NMMA), sodium nitroprusside, or phenylephrine. Aldosterone increased forearm blood flow (P <0.001, ANOVA). The maximum effect was an increase in forearm blood flow with aldosterone of 7.9±2.6% compared with 0.1±1.9% with placebo treatment after 8 minutes. With aldosterone, L-NMMA induced a greater vasoconstriction (P <0.05, ANOVA), sodium nitroprusside induced an attenuated vasoconstriction (P <0.01, ANOVA), and phenylephrine induced an exaggerated vasoconstriction (P <0.01, ANOVA) within minutes as compared with placebo. These data suggest that aldosterone acts through rapid nongenomic effects at the endothelium by increasing NO release and at the vascular smooth muscle cells by promoting vasoconstriction. This is consistent with in vitro data showing an increase in intracellular calcium in both cell types. Disturbances of these aldosterone effects on both levels might be important in promoting hypertension.

Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy by at1 receptor blockade in renal transplant recipients

AT1 receptor antagonists control blood pressure (BP) effectively and reduce left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with essential hypertension. Because left ventricular hypertrophy is very common in renal transplant recipients, we examined the cardiovascular effects and the safety profile of the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan in hypertensive renal transplant recipients. In 20 renal transplant recipients with stable renal graft function 50 mg of losartan was added to the preexisting antihypertensive treatment (no angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) at least 6 months after renal transplantation. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory BP, two-dimensional-guided M-mode echocardiography, and duplex sonography, as well as renal function, red blood cell count, cyclosporine A and FK 506 levels, erythropoetin, and angiotensin II concentration were determined at baseline and after 6 months of therapy. With 24-h ambulatory BP measurement, systolic blood pressure (SBP) was reduced by 7.5 +/- 2.4 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by 4.5 +/- 1.8 mm Hg (P < .01 and P < .05, respectively). Posterior, septal, and relative wall thickness decreased by 0.95 +/- 0.2 mm, 0.91 +/- 0.2 mm and 0.04 +/- 0.01 mm, respectively (all P < .001). Left ventricular mass index decreased by 18.1 +/- 4.7 g/m2 (P < .01). Ejection fraction and midwall fractional fiber shortening as systolic parameters and the relation of passive-to-active diastolic filling of the left ventricle were unaltered. Serum creatinine and cyclosporine A concentration remained stable in all patients. Hemoglobin and hematocrit decreased by 1.0 +/- 0.3 g/dL and 3.6% +/- 0.9%, respectively (P < .002 and P < .001) without a change in serum erythropoetin level. In renal transplant recipients the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan reduces left ventricular hypertrophy without altering systolic or diastolic function. It is safe with regard to renal function and immunosuppression, but slightly decreases hemoglobin level.

Nitric oxide and reactive hyperemia: role of location and duration of ischemia.

BACKGROUND Ischemia-induced reactive hyperemia (RH) is mediated by various factors including release of nitric oxide (NO). The contribution of NO to RH equals the extent of L-NMMA-dependent reduction of forearm blood flow (FBF). Because the optimal duration and location of ischemia that provokes maximum NO activation is unknown, we analyzed which duration and location stimulates most NO release, aiming at developing a noninvasive tool to measure endothelial integrity by NO synthase activity in humans. METHODS FBF was measured by strain gauge plethysmography after ischemia applied at the upper arm and wrist during intra-arterial infusion of L-NMMA or saline. To obtain similar FBF before RH, clamping with sodium nitroprissude was performed. Twenty-eight healthy male volunteers were randomly assigned to two groups (N = 15) undergoing ischemia of 1 and 5 min or 2 and 5 min (N = 13) at both locations. RESULTS Peak FBF was not affected by L-NMMA infusion. The change of FBF during L-NMMA expressed as area under the curve (AUC) of the first minute was significantly reduced after 1 (-0.70 +/- 1.63 ml, P < 0.001) and 2 min (1.67 +/- 2.65 ml, P < 0.01) of ischemia applied at wrist level compared to 5 min (7.49 +/- 7.92 ml). Ischemia applied to the upper arm showed no significant differences of FBF after L-NMMA or saline infusion, irrespective of the duration of ischemia. CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that only immediately after ischemia the vasodilatatory response is most NO-dependent. RH as a test of NO activity in the forearm microcirculation should be applied at the wrist and last 1 min.