Esmeralci Ferreira

Análise de custo-efetividade dos stents farmacológicos e não farmacológicos na doença coronariana

BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of cost-effectiveness analyses in the national literature comparing drug-eluting stents (DES) with bare-metal stents (BMS), at late follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) between DES and BMS in uniarterial coronariopathy. METHODS: 217 patients (130 DES and 87 BMS), with 48 months of follow-up (mean = 26 months) were assessed. Primary outcome: cost per prevented restenosis, with effectiveness being defined as the decrease in major events. The analytical model of decision was based on the study by Polanczyk et al. The direct costs were those used directly in the interventions. RESULTS: The sample was homogenous for age and sex. The DES was more used in diabetic patients: 59 (45.4%) vs 16 (18.4%)(p<0.0001) and with a history of coronary artery disease (CAD): 53 (40.7%) vs 13 (14.9%)(p<0.0001). The BMS was more used in simple lesions, but with worse ventricular function. The DES were implanted preferentially in proximal lesions: (p=0.0428) and the BMS in the mid-third (p=0.0001). Event-free survival: DES = 118 (90.8%) vs BMS=74 (85.0%) (p=0.19); Angina: DES=9 (6.9%) vs BMS=9 (10.3%) (NS): Clinical restenosis: DES=3 (2.3%) vs BMS=10 (10.3%) (p=0.0253). Cardiac deaths: 2 (1.5%) in DES and 3 (3.5%) in BMS (NS). Costs: the tree of decision was modeled based on restenosis. The net benefit for the DES needed an increment of R

Uso do escore de propensão na análise de custo-efetividade com utilização seletiva de stents farmacológicos e não-farmacológicos

7,238.16. The ICER was R

Estudo multicêntrico do implante de stent intracoronário no Rio de Janeiro

131,647.84 per prevented restenosis (above the WHO threshold). CONCLUSIONS: The DES was used in more complex lesions. The clinical results were similar. The restenosis rate was higher in the BMS group. The DES was a non-cost-effective strategy.

Evaluation of endothelial function by VOP and inflammatory biomarkers in patients with arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND: Studies on the cost-effectiveness ratio of drug-eluting stents (DES) are rare. Our objective was to evaluate the results and compare costs (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio - ICER) per restenosis avoided between DES and bare metal stents (BMS) using the propensity score. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty consecutive patients were included in the study, of which 111 were treated with DES and 109 with BMS. The propensity score was used to adjust the effect of the intervention, by means of matching, stratification and weighing. RESULTS: Most patients were male (67.7% vs. 66.9%; P = 0.53), with a mean age of 65.9 years. Patients treated with the DES had a higher rate of diabetes (54% vs. 17.4%; P 72 years, diabetes and lesions with diameter 18 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Although DES were not cost-effective in the overall population, the propensity score showed that in elderly patients, diabetics and patients with long lesions or small vessels, the use of DES was cost-effective.

Microcirculation and biomarkers in patients with resistant or mild-to-moderate hypertension: a cross-sectional study

PURPOSE: To evaluate retrospectively stent implantation (SI) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) performed in 7 hospitals in Rio de Janeiro. METHODS: From June/94 to December/96 2,220 procedures were performed among which we analyzed 783 SI in 660 (29.7%) patients using coronary angiography without digital subtraction. Several types of stents were used: Palmaz-Schatz (40.9%), Gianturco-Roubin (29.1%) e NIR (22.0%). Indications for SI: 1- de novo lesion (67.9%); 2) restenotic lesion (16.0%); 3) sub-optimal results after PTCA (8.2%); 4) abrupt or threatened closure after PTCA (4.9%); 5) chronic occlusion (3.0%). All stents were implanted using high pressure balloon inflation without intracoronary ultrasound guidance. Sub-acute stent thrombosis prevention, in the majority of patients (87.8%) was done with ticlopidine and aspirin. RESULTS: Early outcome: a) the success rate of SI in 770 lesions was 98.0% in 646 (97.9%) patients; b) the clinical success rate in 634 patients was 96.0%; c) the major complications were acute myocardial infarction (1.1%); coronary artery bypass graft (1.4%) and death (0.8%); d) vascular complications with surgical correction and/or bleeding occurred in 3.0%. Late outcome: a) the clinical follow-up of 399 (60.4%) and the coronary angiographies of 121 patients (30.3%) showed in-stent lesion in 79 (19.8%); b) other event rates: myocardial infarction (1.5%); coronary bypass (2.3%); death: 1.0% and other PTCA or similar procedure (12.5%). CONCLUSION: This multicentric study showed that SI for CAD can be performed with safety, high early success rate, few complications and low rate of cardiac events during the late follow-up.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure with Amplatzer Cardiac Plug in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Safety and Long-Term Outcome

Hypertension is associated with microcirculatory impairment. Our objectives were to evaluate endothelial function and inflammatory biomarkers in patients with resistant (RH) and mild to moderate (MMH) arterial hypertension in comparison to normotensives (control group—CG). Three groups, 25 patients each, have been investigated, by anamnesis, venous occlusion plethysmography (VOP) and serum determination of adhesion molecules (VCAM, ICAM), adiponectin, endothelin and C-reactive protein (CRP). Patients not using statins and with or without blood pressure control were also analyzed. RH group showed smaller percentage increase of maximum forearm blood flow (FBF) (endothelial-dependent vasodilatation) than controls (p < 0.05), but no significant difference could be detected between MMH and CG groups on maximum FBF and minimum vascular resistance post-ischemia. RH and MMH groups showed higher resistance averages compared to controls (p < 0.05). Uncontrolled BP in hypertensive patients showed worse results for blood flow and resistance. Endothelial-independent vasodilatation was not affected. Endothelin levels were higher in RH and MMH groups (p < 0.05) not using statins. CRP was significantly higher only in RH compared to CG (p < 0.05). In conclusion patients with severe hypertension and lack of blood pressure control showed greater impairment of endothelial function with higher CRP and endothelin levels.

Percutaneous coronary intervention with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds

Microcirculation influences peripheral vascular resistance and therefore contributes to arterial blood pressure. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between serum markers of inflammation and microcirculatory parameters observed by nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) in patients with resistant (RH, 58 [50–63] years, n = 25) or mild-to-moderate hypertension (MMH, 56 [47–64] years, n = 25) compared to normotensive patients (control group (CG), 33 [27–52] years, n = 25). C-reactive protein (CRP), endothelin, adiponectin, I-CAM and V-CAM levels were obtained by laboratory analysis. Functional capillary density (FCD; the number of capillaries with flowing red blood cells by unit tissue area), capillary diameters, maximum red blood cell velocity (RBCVmax) during the reactive hyperemia response/RBCVbaseline after 1 min of arterial occlusion at the finger base and time to reach RBCVmax were determined by NVC. A sub-analysis was also conducted on hypertensive patients not taking statins, with controlled/uncontrolled blood pressure. The RH group showed lower RBCV and RBCVmax values and longer TRBCVmax compared to MMH and CG patients, with worse values in those with uncontrolled blood pressure. FCD and diameters showed no significant differences among the three groups, with higher CRP values in the RH and MMH groups. An increase in endothelin was observed only in patients not taking statins in both hypertensive groups. Patients with severe hypertension and uncontrolled blood pressure levels presented more pronounced microvascular dysfunction, as well as higher serum values for CRP and endothelin (without statin treatment), suggesting that the use of statins decreases endothelin release.

Bioresorbable Device Implantation in Left Main in Patients with Limitation For Long-Term Using of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a cardiac arrhythmia with high risk for thromboembolic events, specially stroke. Objective To assess the safety of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with nonvalvular AF. Methods This study included 15 patients with nonvalvular AF referred for LAAC, 6 older than 75 years (mean age, 69.4 ± 9.3 years; 60% of the male sex). Results The mean CHADS2 score was 3.4 ± 0.1, and mean CHA2DS2VASc , 4.8 ± 1.8, evidencing a high risk for thromboembolic events. All patients had a HAS-BLED score > 3 (mean, 4.5 ± 1.2) with a high risk for major bleeding within 1 year. The device was successfully implanted in all patients, with correct positioning in the first attempt in most of them (n = 11; 73.3%). Conclusion There was no periprocedural complication, such as device migration, pericardial tamponade, vascular complications and major bleeding. All patients had an uneventful in-hospital course, being discharged in 2 days. The echocardiographic assessments at 6 and 12 months showed neither device migration, nor thrombus formation, nor peridevice leak. On clinical assessment at 12 months, no patient had thromboembolic events or bleeding related to the device or risk factors. In this small series, LAAC with Amplatzer Cardiac Plug proved to be safe, with high procedural success rate and favorable outcome at the 12-month follow-up.

POLAR registry (Promus eluting stent registry in Latin America ):1 year follow-up results

Mailing Address: Esmeralci Ferreira Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto – Setor de Hemodinâmica Av. 28 de setembro, 77 Térreo. Postal Code: 20551-030, Vila Isabel, Rio de Janeiro, RJ – Brazil E-mail: esmeralci@gmail.com Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Márcio Macri Dias, Márcio José Montenegro da Costa, Bernardo Amorim, Esmeralci Ferreira Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro – Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto – Setor de Hemodinâmica – Rio de Janeiro, RJ – Brazil

Resultados clínicos de um ano do registro POLAR (Promus eluting stent registry in Latin America)

Male patient with unstable angina and critical calcified lesion in the left main coronary artery (LMCA). Background: coronary artery bypass grafting and anemia. The intention to treat was angioplasty with drugeluting stents (DES) in the LMCA. The patient presented gastrointestinal bleeding and worsening of anemia, which were treated. Angina was refractory to medical therapy. Because of antiplatelet therapy limitation, bioresorbable vascular support (BVS) was implanted in the LMCA. This case report discusses the use of BVS in complex lesion, enabling absorption of the device and better management of antiplatelet therapy and future follow-up of the obstruction treated using by non-invasive imaging methods.