Esther M. Sternberg

Neural regulation of innate immunity: a coordinated nonspecific host response to pathogens

The central nervous system (CNS) regulates innate immune responses through hormonal and neuronal routes. The neuroendocrine stress response and the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems generally inhibit innate immune responses at systemic and regional levels, whereas the peripheral nervous system tends to amplify local innate immune responses. These systems work together to first activate and amplify local inflammatory responses that contain or eliminate invading pathogens, and subsequently to terminate inflammation and restore host homeostasis. Here, I review these regulatory mechanisms and discuss the evidence indicating that the CNS can be considered as integral to acute-phase inflammatory responses to pathogens as the innate immune system.

The Stress Response and the Regulation of Inflammatory Disease

The molecular and biochemical bases for interactions between the immune and central nervous systems are described. Immune cytokines not only activate immune function but also recruit central stress-responsive neurotransmitter systems in the modulation of the immune response and in the activation of behaviors that may be adaptive during injury or inflammation. Peripherally generated cytokines, such as interleukin-1, signal hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) neurons to activate pituitary-adrenal counter-regulation of inflammation through the potent antiinflammatory effects of glucocorticoids. Corticotropin-releasing hormone not only activates the pituitary-adrenal axis but also sets in motion a coordinated series of behavioral and physiologic responses, suggesting that the central nervous system may coordinate both behavioral and immunologic adaptation during stressful situations. The pathophysiologic perturbation of this feedback loop, through various mechanisms, results in the development of inflammatory syndromes, such as rheumatoid arthritis, and behavioral syndromes, such as depression. Thus, diseases characterized by both inflammatory and emotional disturbances may derive from common alterations in specific central nervous system pathways (for example, the CRH system). In addition, disruptions of this communication by genetic, infectious, toxic, or pharmacologic means can influence the susceptibility to disorders associated with both behavioral and inflammatory components and potentially alter their natural history. These concepts suggest that neuropharmacologic agents that stimulate hypothalamic CRH might potentially be adjunctive therapy for illnesses traditionally viewed as inflammatory or autoimmune.

Beyond heart rate variability: vagal regulation of allostatic systems.

Abstract:  The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a role in a wide range of somatic and mental diseases. Whereas the role of the ANS in the regulation of the cardiovascular system seems evident, its role in the regulation of other systems associated with allostasis is less clear. Using a model of neurovisceral integration we describe how the ANS and parasympathetic tone in particular may be associated with the regulation of allostatic systems associated with glucose regulation, hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal (HPA) axis function, and inflammatory processes. Decreased vagal function and heart rate variability (HRV) were shown to be associated with increased fasting glucose and hemoglobin A1c levels, increased overnight urinary cortisol, and increased proinflammatory cytokines and acute‐phase proteins. All of these factors have been associated with increased allostatic load and poor health. Thus, vagal activity appears to play an inhibitory function in the regulation of allostatic systems. The prefrontal cortex and the amygdala are important central nervous system structures linked to the regulation of these allostatic systems via the vagus nerve. Finally, the identification of this neurovisceral regulatory system may help to illuminate the pathway via which psychosocial factors may influence health and disease.

Neural-immune interactions in health and disease.

Many lines of research have established the numerous routes by which the immune and central nervous systems (CNS) communicate. The CNS signals the immune system via hormonal and neuronal pathways and the immune system signals the CNS through similar routes via immune mediators and cytokines. The primary hormonal pathway by which the CNS regulates the immune system is the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, through the hormones of the neuroendocrine stress response. The sympathetic nervous system regulates immune system function primarily via adrenergic neurotransmitters released through neuronal routes. Neuroendocrine regulation of immune function is essential for survival during stress or infection and to modulate immune responses in inflammatory disease. Glucocorticoids are the main effector endpoint of the neuroendocrine response system.

Corticotropin releasing hormone related behavioral and neuroendocrine responses to stress in Lewis and Fischer rats

We have recently shown that susceptibility to streptococcal cell wall (SCW)-induced arthritis in Lewis (LEW/N) rats is related to a lack of glucocorticoid restraint of inflammation while the relative SCW arthritis resistance in histocompatible Fischer (F344/N) rats is related to their greater hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis response. The difference in pituitary-adrenal responsiveness results from decreased inflammatory mediator-induced hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) biosynthesis and secretion in LEW/N rats. Because CRH not only activates the pituitary-adrenal axis, but also is associated with behavioral responses that are adaptive during stressful situations, we wished to determine if the differential LEW/N and F344/N CRH responsiveness to inflammatory mediators could also be associated with differences in neuroendocrine and behavioral responses to physical and emotional stressors. In this study, LEW/N rats exhibited significant differences compared to F344/N rats, in plasma adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) and corticosterone responses during exposure to an open field, swim stress, restraint or ether. Furthermore, hypothalamic paraventricular CRH mRNA expression was also significantly lower in LEW/N compared to F344/N rats after restraint. These differences in neuroendocrine responses were associated with differences in behavioral responses in LEW/N compared to F344/N rats in the open field. Outbred HSD rats, which have intermediate and overlapping arthritis susceptibility compared to LEW/N and F344/N rats, exhibited intermediate and overlapping plasma corticosterone and behavioral responses to stressful stimuli compared to the two inbred strains. These data suggest that the differences in CRH responses in these strains may contribute to the behavioral and neuroendocrine differences we have observed. Therefore these strains may provide a useful animal model for studying the relationship between behavior, neuroendocrine and inflammatory responses.

Behavioral and neuroendocrine responses in shy children

Previous research has shown that infants who display a high frequency of motor activity and negative affect at 4 months of age are likely to be behaviorally inhibited toddlers. We examined social behaviors, maternal report of temperament, salivary cortisol, and baseline startle responses at age 4 in a sample of children, some of whom displayed a high frequency of motor activity and negative affect at 4 months of age. Infants who displayed this temperamental profile were reported by their mothers as more shy at age 4 compared with other children. We also found that 4-year-olds who displayed a high frequency of wary behavior during peer play exhibited relatively high morning salivary cortisol, were reported as contemporaneously shy by their mothers, and were behaviorally inhibited at 14 months of age. There were no significant relations found between baseline startle and morning salivary cortisol and measures of shyness at age 4. We speculate that high levels of cortisol in shy children may induce changes in the amygdala, exacerbating their fearfulness.

Caregiving Burden, Stress, and Health Effects Among Family Caregivers of Adult Cancer Patients

Unlike professional caregivers such as physicians and nurses, informal caregivers, typically family members or friends, provide care to individuals with a variety of conditions including advanced age, dementia, and cancer. This experience is commonly perceived as a chronic stressor, and caregivers often experience negative psychological, behavioral, and physiological effects on their daily lives and health. In this report, we describe the experience of a 53-year-old woman who is the sole caregiver for her husband, who has acute myelogenous leukemia and was undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. During his intense and unpredictable course, the caregivers burden is complex and complicated by multiple competing priorities. Because caregivers are often faced with multiple concurrent stressful events and extended, unrelenting stress, they may experience negative health effects, mediated in part by immune and autonomic dysregulation. Physicians and their interdisciplinary teams are presented daily with individuals providing such care and have opportunity to intervene. This report describes a case that exemplifies caregiving burden and discusses the importance of identifying caregivers at risk of negative health outcomes and intervening to attenuate the stress associated with the caregiving experience.

Scleroderma, fasciitis, and eosinophilia associated with the ingestion of tryptophan

An association between the ingestion tryptophan and a syndrome characterized by scleroderma-like skin abnormalities, fasciitis, and eosinophilia has recently been recognized in the United States. We report the clinical and histopathological findings in nine patients and the results of biochemical analyses of tryptophan metabolism in seven patients with this syndrome. Edema of the extremities, frequently accompanied by pruritus, paresthesia, and myalgia, developed in the nine patients (six women and three men; age range, 30 to 66 years) 1 to 18 months after the start of therapy with tryptophan (1.5 to 3.0 g daily) for insomnia, depression, or obesity. Five patients were taking drugs (benzodiazepines) known to inhibit hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function, and one had adrenal insufficiency. All had blood eosinophilia in the acute phase of their illness (mean eosinophil count [+/- SD], 3.62 +/- 2.87 X 10(9) cells per liter). All had histopathological changes in the dermis and subcutaneous tissue typical of scleroderma, and seven patients had eosinophils. The fascia was inflamed and fibrotic, and adjacent skeletal muscle often showed perifascicular inflammation. Tryptophan was discontinued in all patients, and eight received prednisone. The cutaneous symptoms improved, but only two patients had complete resolution of their illness. The patients had plasma levels of tryptophan before and after an oral dose of tryptophan that were similar to those in normal subjects. Plasma levels of L-kynurenine and quinolinic acid, which are metabolites of tryptophan, were significantly higher in four patients with active disease than in three patients studied after eosinophilia had resolved or in five normal subjects (P less than 0.001)--findings consistent with the activation of the enzyme indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase. This illness resembles eosinophilic fasciitis and probably represents one aspect of the recently reported eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome. The development of the syndrome may result from a confluence of several factors, including the ingestion of tryptophan, exposure to agents that activate indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase, and possibly, impaired function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.

Neural immune pathways and their connection to inflammatory diseases

Inflammation and inflammatory responses are modulated by a bidirectional communication between the neuroendocrine and immune system. Many lines of research have established the numerous routes by which the immune system and the central nervous system (CNS) communicate. The CNS signals the immune system through hormonal pathways, including the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis and the hormones of the neuroendocrine stress response, and through neuronal pathways, including the autonomic nervous system. The hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis and sex hormones also have an important immunoregulatory role. The immune system signals the CNS through immune mediators and cytokines that can cross the blood–brain barrier, or signal indirectly through the vagus nerve or second messengers. Neuroendocrine regulation of immune function is essential for survival during stress or infection and to modulate immune responses in inflammatory disease. This review discusses neuroimmune interactions and evidence for the role of such neural immune regulation of inflammation, rather than a discussion of the individual inflammatory mediators, in rheumatoid arthritis.

Neural‐Immune Interactions in Health and Disease

Abstract: Many lines of research have established the numerous routes by which the immune and central nervous systems (CNS) communicate. The CNS signals the immune system via hormonal and neuronal pathways and the immune system signals the CNS through similar routes via immune mediators and cytokines. The primary hormonal pathway by which the CNS regulates the immune system is the hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal (HPA) axis, through the hormones of the neuroendocrine stress response. The sympathetic nervous system regulates immune system function primarily via adrenergic neurotransmitters released through neuronal routes. Neuroendocrine regulation of immune function is essential for survival during stress or infection and to modulate immune responses in inflammatory disease. Glucocorticoids are the main effector endpoint of the neuroendocrine response system.