Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Esther S. Oh is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Esther S. Oh.


JAMA Internal Medicine | 2015

Effectiveness of Multicomponent Nonpharmacological Delirium Interventions: A Meta-analysis

Tammy T. Hshieh; Jirong Yue; Esther S. Oh; Margaret R. Puelle; Sarah L. Dowal; Thomas G. Travison; Sharon K. Inouye

IMPORTANCE Delirium, an acute disorder with high morbidity and mortality, is often preventable through multicomponent nonpharmacological strategies. The efficacy of these strategies for preventing subsequent adverse outcomes has been limited to small studies to date. OBJECTIVE To evaluate available evidence on multicomponent nonpharmacological delirium interventions in reducing incident delirium and preventing poor outcomes associated with delirium. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2013. STUDY SELECTION Studies examining the following outcomes were included: delirium incidence, falls, length of stay, rate of discharge to a long-term care institution (institutionalization), and change in functional or cognitive status. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two experienced physician reviewers independently and blindly abstracted data on outcome measures using a standardized approach. The reviewers conducted quality ratings based on the Cochrane risk-of-bias criteria for each study. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES We identified 14 interventional studies. The results for outcomes of delirium incidence, falls, length of stay, and institutionalization were pooled for the meta-analysis, but heterogeneity limited our meta-analysis of the results for change in functional or cognitive status. Overall, 11 studies demonstrated significant reductions in delirium incidence (odds ratio [OR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.38-0.58). Four randomized or matched trials reduced delirium incidence by 44% (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.42-0.76). The rate of falls decreased significantly among intervention patients in 4 studies (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25-0.60); in 2 randomized or matched trials, the rate of falls was reduced by 64% (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.22-0.61). Length of stay and institutionalization also trended toward decreases in the intervention groups, with a mean difference of -0.16 (95% CI, -0.97 to 0.64) day shorter and the odds of institutionalization 5% lower (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.71-1.26). Among higher-quality randomized or matched trials, length of stay trended -0.33 (95% CI, -1.38 to 0.72) day shorter, and the odds of institutionalization trended 6% lower (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.69-1.30). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Multicomponent nonpharmacological delirium prevention interventions are effective in reducing delirium incidence and preventing falls, with a trend toward decreasing length of stay and avoiding institutionalization. Given the current focus on prevention of hospital-based complications and improved cost-effectiveness of care, this meta-analysis supports the use of these interventions to advance acute care for older persons.


American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry | 2012

The Association of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in MCI with Incident Dementia and Alzheimer Disease

Paul B. Rosenberg; Michelle M. Mielke; Brian S. Appleby; Esther S. Oh; Yonas E. Geda; Constantine G. Lyketsos

OBJECTIVES Individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are at high risk of developing dementia and/or Alzheimer disease (AD). Among persons with MCI, depression and anxiety have been associated with an increased risk of incident dementia. We examined whether neuropsychiatric symptoms in MCI increased the risk of incident dementia (all-cause) and incident AD. DESIGN Longitudinal cohort study followed annually (median: 1.58 years). SETTING National Alzheimers Coordinating Center database combining clinical data from 29 Alzheimers Disease Centers. PARTICIPANTS A total of 1,821 participants with MCI. MEASUREMENTS 1) Progression to dementia (all-cause) or AD, 2) Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q), 3) Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), 4) Clinical Dementia Rating Global Score and Sum of Boxes, and 5) Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The association of covariates with risk of incident dementia or AD was evaluated with hazard ratios (HR) determined by Cox proportional-hazards models adjusted for age, ethnicity, Clinical Dementia Rating Global Score and Sum of Boxes, and MMSE. RESULTS A total of 527 participants (28.9%) progressed to dementia and 454 (24.9%) to AD. Baseline GDS > 0 was associated with an increased risk of incident dementia (HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.17-1.84) and AD (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.14-1.83). Baseline NPI > 0 was associated with an increased risk of incident dementia (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.12-1.66) and AD (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.09-1.66). CONCLUSIONS Neuropsychiatric symptoms in MCI are associated with significantly an increased risk of incident dementia and AD. Neuropsychiatric symptoms may be among the earliest symptoms of preclinical stages of AD and targeting them therapeutically might delay transition to dementia.


International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry | 2011

Neuropsychiatric symptoms in MCI subtypes: the importance of executive dysfunction

Paul B. Rosenberg; Michelle M. Mielke; Brian S. Appleby; Esther S. Oh; Jeannie Marie S Leoutsakos; Constantine G. Lyketsos

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a syndrome thought to be a prodrome of dementia for some patients. One subtype, amnestic MCI (aMCI), may be specifically predispose patients to develop Alzheimers dementia (AD). Since dementia has been associated with a range of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS), we sought to examine the prevalence of NPS in MCI and its subtypes.


Journal of Alzheimer's Disease | 2016

A Phase II Study of Fornix Deep Brain Stimulation in Mild Alzheimer's Disease

Andres M. Lozano; Lisa Fosdick; M. Mallar Chakravarty; Jeannie Marie S Leoutsakos; Cynthia A. Munro; Esther S. Oh; Kristen E. Drake; Christopher Lyman; Paul B. Rosenberg; William S. Anderson; David F. Tang-Wai; Jo Cara Pendergrass; Stephen Salloway; Wael F. Asaad; Francisco A. Ponce; Anna Burke; Marwan N. Sabbagh; David A. Wolk; Gordon H. Baltuch; Michael S. Okun; Kelly D. Foote; Mary Pat McAndrews; Peter Giacobbe; Steven D. Targum; Constantine G. Lyketsos; Gwenn S. Smith

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used to modulate the activity of dysfunctional brain circuits. The safety and efficacy of DBS in dementia is unknown. Objective: To assess DBS of memory circuits as a treatment for patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Methods: We evaluated active “on” versus sham “off” bilateral DBS directed at the fornix-a major fiber bundle in the brain’s memory circuit-in a randomized, double-blind trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01608061) in 42 patients with mild AD. We measured cognitive function and cerebral glucose metabolism up to 12 months post-implantation. Results: Surgery and electrical stimulation were safe and well tolerated. There were no significant differences in the primary cognitive outcomes (ADAS-Cog 13, CDR-SB) in the “on” versus “off” stimulation group at 12 months for the whole cohort. Patients receiving stimulation showed increased metabolism at 6 months but this was not significant at 12 months. On post-hoc analysis, there was a significant interaction between age and treatment outcome: in contrast to patients <65 years old (n = 12) whose results trended toward being worse with DBS ON versus OFF, in patients≥65 (n = 30) DBS-f ON treatment was associated with a trend toward both benefit on clinical outcomes and a greater increase in cerebral glucose metabolism. Conclusion: DBS for AD was safe and associated with increased cerebral glucose metabolism. There were no differences in cognitive outcomes for participants as a whole, but participants aged≥65 years may have derived benefit while there was possible worsening in patients below age 65 years with stimulation.


International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry | 2015

Preoperative risk factors for postoperative delirium following hip fracture repair: a systematic review

Esther S. Oh; Meng Li; Tolulope Fafowora; Sharon K. Inouye; Cathy H. Chen; Lori Rosman; Constantine G. Lyketsos; Frederick E. Sieber; Milo A. Puhan

Systematically identify preoperative clinical risk factors for incident postoperative delirium in individuals undergoing hip fracture repair in order to guide clinicians in identifying high risk patients at admission.


Neurobiology of Aging | 2009

Amyloid precursor protein increases cortical neuron size in transgenic mice

Esther S. Oh; Alena V. Savonenko; Julie F. King; Stina Maria Tucker; Guilian Xu; David R. Borchelt; Juan C. Troncoso

The amyloid precursor protein (APP) is the source of beta-amyloid, a pivotal peptide in the pathogenesis of Alzheimers disease (AD). This study examines the possible effect of APP transgene expression on neuronal size by measuring the volumes of cortical neurons (microm(3)) in transgenic mouse models with familial AD Swedish mutation (APPswe), with or without mutated presenilin1 (PS1dE9), as well as in mice carrying wild-type APP (APPwt). Overexpression of APPswe and APPwt protein, but not of PS1dE9 alone, resulted in a greater percentage of medium-sized neurons and a proportionate decrease in the percentage of small-sized neurons. Our observations indicate that the overexpression of mutant (APPswe) or wild-type APP in transgenic mice is necessary and sufficient for hypertrophy of cortical neurons. This is highly suggestive of a neurotrophic effect and also raises the possibility that the lack of neuronal loss in transgenic mouse models of AD may be attributed to overexpression of APP.


Neuromolecular Medicine | 2008

Maximizing the Potential of Plasma Amyloid-Beta as a Diagnostic Biomarker for Alzheimer’s Disease

Esther S. Oh; Juan C. Troncoso; Stina Maria Tucker

Amyloid plaques are composed primarily of amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptides derived from proteolytic cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP) and are considered to play a pivotal role in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathogenesis. Presently, AD is diagnosed after the onset of clinical manifestations. With the arrival of novel therapeutic agents for treatment of AD, there is an urgent need for biomarkers to detect early stages of AD. Measurement of plasma Aβ has been suggested as an inexpensive and non-invasive tool to diagnose AD and to monitor Aβ modifying therapies. However, the majority of cross-sectional studies on plasma Aβ levels in humans have not shown differences between individuals with AD compared to controls. Similarly, cross-sectional studies of mouse plasma Aβ have yielded inconsistent trends in different mouse models. However, longitudinal studies appear to be more promising in humans. Recently, efforts to modify plasma Aβ levels using modulators have shown some promise. In this review, we will summarize the present data on plasma Aβ in humans and mouse models of AD. We will discuss the potential of modulators of Aβ levels in plasma, including antibodies and insulin, and the challenges associated with measuring plasma Aβ. Modulators of plasma Aβ may provide an important tool to optimize plasma Aβ levels and may improve the diagnostic potential of this approach.


International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry | 2013

Plasma neopterin level as a marker of peripheral immune activation in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease

Daniel Parker; Michelle M. Mielke; Qilu Yu; Paul B. Rosenberg; Alka Jain; Constantine G. Lyketsos; Neal S. Fedarko; Esther S. Oh

Alterations of the immune system play important roles in Alzheimers disease (AD). The primary purpose of this study was to compare the plasma levels of neopterin, a marker of cellular immune activity, in amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), early (mild to moderate) AD, and cognitively normal controls. In addition, the correlation of plasma neopterin with interferon‐gamma (IFN‐γ) and interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) was also examined.


JAMA | 2017

Delirium in older persons: Advances in diagnosis and treatment

Esther S. Oh; Tamara G. Fong; Tammy T. Hshieh; Sharon K. Inouye

Importance Delirium is defined as an acute disorder of attention and cognition. It is a common, serious, and often fatal condition among older patients. Although often underrecognized, delirium has serious adverse effects on the individual’s function and quality of life, as well as broad societal effects with substantial health care costs. Objective To summarize the current state of the art in diagnosis and treatment of delirium and to highlight critical areas for future research to advance the field. Evidence Review Search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for the past 6 years, from January 1, 2011, until March 16, 2017, using a combination of controlled vocabulary and keyword terms. Since delirium is more prevalent in older adults, the focus was on studies in elderly populations; studies based solely in the intensive care unit (ICU) and non–English-language articles were excluded. Findings Of 127 articles included, 25 were clinical trials, 42 cohort studies, 5 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and 55 were other categories. A total of 11 616 patients were represented in the treatment studies. Advances in diagnosis have included the development of brief screening tools with high sensitivity and specificity, such as the 3-Minute Diagnostic Assessment; 4 A’s Test; and proxy-based measures such as the Family Confusion Assessment Method. Measures of severity, such as the Confusion Assessment Method–Severity Score, can aid in monitoring response to treatment, risk stratification, and assessing prognosis. Nonpharmacologic approaches focused on risk factors such as immobility, functional decline, visual or hearing impairment, dehydration, and sleep deprivation are effective for delirium prevention and also are recommended for delirium treatment. Current recommendations for pharmacologic treatment of delirium, based on recent reviews of the evidence, recommend reserving use of antipsychotics and other sedating medications for treatment of severe agitation that poses risk to patient or staff safety or threatens interruption of essential medical therapies. Conclusions and Relevance Advances in diagnosis can improve recognition and risk stratification of delirium. Prevention of delirium using nonpharmacologic approaches is documented to be effective, while pharmacologic prevention and treatment of delirium remains controversial.


Journal of Neurosurgery | 2016

Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the fornix for Alzheimer's disease: surgical safety in the ADvance trial

Francisco A. Ponce; Wael F. Asaad; Kelly D. Foote; William S. Anderson; G. Rees Cosgrove; Gordon H. Baltuch; Kara D. Beasley; Donald E. Reymers; Esther S. Oh; Steven D. Targum; Gwenn S. Smith; Constantine G. Lyketsos; Andres M. Lozano

OBJECT This report describes the stereotactic technique, hospitalization, and 90-day perioperative safety of bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the fornix in patients who underwent DBS for the treatment of mild, probable Alzheimers disease (AD). METHODS The ADvance Trial is a multicenter, 12-month, double-blind, randomized, controlled feasibility study being conducted to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of DBS of the fornix in patients with mild, probable AD. Intraoperative and perioperative data were collected prospectively. All patients underwent postoperative MRI. Stereotactic analyses were performed in a blinded fashion by a single surgeon. Adverse events (AEs) were reported to an independent clinical events committee and adjudicated to determine the relationship between the AE and the study procedure. RESULTS Between June 6, 2012, and April 28, 2014, a total of 42 patients with mild, probable AD were treated with bilateral fornix DBS (mean age 68.2 ± 7.8 years; range 48.0-79.7 years; 23 men and 19 women). The mean planned target coordinates were x = 5.2 ± 1.0 mm (range 3.0-7.9 mm), y = 9.6 ± 0.9 mm (range 8.0-11.6 mm), z = -7.5 ± 1.2 mm (range -5.4 to -10.0 mm), and the mean postoperative stereotactic radial error on MRI was 1.5 ± 1.0 mm (range 0.2-4.0 mm). The mean length of hospitalization was 1.4 ± 0.8 days. Twenty-six (61.9%) patients experienced 64 AEs related to the study procedure, of which 7 were serious AEs experienced by 5 patients (11.9%). Four (9.5%) patients required return to surgery: 2 patients for explantation due to infection, 1 patient for lead repositioning, and 1 patient for chronic subdural hematoma. No patients experienced neurological deficits as a result of the study, and no deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS Accurate targeting of DBS to the fornix without direct injury to it is feasible across surgeons and treatment centers. At 90 days after surgery, bilateral fornix DBS was well tolerated by patients with mild, probable AD. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01608061 ( clinicaltrials.gov ).

Collaboration


Dive into the Esther S. Oh's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Constantine G. Lyketsos

Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul B. Rosenberg

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frederick E. Sieber

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frank R. Lin

Johns Hopkins University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sharon K. Inouye

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sara K. Mamo

Johns Hopkins University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gwenn S. Smith

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Juan C. Troncoso

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yuri Agrawal

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Francisco A. Ponce

St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge