Ethan F. Kuperman

Impact of adding additional providers to resident workload and the resident experience on a medical consultation rotation

BackgroundExcellence in Graduate Medical Education requires the right clinical environment with an appropriate workload where residents have enough patients to gain proficiency in medicine with optimal time for reflection. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has focused more on work hours rather than workload; however, high resident workload has been associated with lower resident participation in education and fatigue-related errors. Recognizing the potential risks associated with high resident workload and being mindful of the costs of reducing resident workload, we sought to reduce residents’ workload by adding an advanced practice provider (APP) to the surgical comanagement service (SCM) and study its effect on resident satisfaction and perceived educational value of the rotation.MethodsIn Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 and 2015, an additional faculty member was added to the SCM rotation. In FY 2014, the faculty member was a staff physician, and in FY 2015, the faculty member was an APP.. Resident workload was assessed using billing data. We measured residents’ perceptions of the rotation using an anonymous electronic survey tool. We compared FY2014-2015 data to the baseline FY2013.ResultsThe number of patients seen per resident per day decreased from 8.0(SD 3.3) in FY2013 to 5.0(SD 1.9) in FY2014 (p < 0.001) and 5.7(SD 2.0) in FY2015 (p < 0.001). A higher proportion of residents reported “just right” patient volume (64.4%, 91.7%, 96.7% in FY2013, 2014, 2015 respectively p < 0.001), meeting curricular goals (79.9%, 95.0%, 97.2%, in FY2013, 2014 and 2015 respectively p < 0.001), and overall educational value of the rotation (40.0%, 72.2%, 72.6% in FY2013, 2014, 2015 respectively, p < 0.001).ConclusionsDecreasing resident workload through adding clinical faculty (both staff physician and APPs) was associated with improvements on resident perceived educational value and clinical experience of a medical consultation rotation.

Role of D-dimer Assays in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism

Abstract:The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) remains challenging despite the evolution of well-validated clinical algorithms over the past few decades, largely because of nonspecific clinical features altering clinician suspicion. D-dimer is a simple noninvasive test that is an essential part of the diagnostic algorithm but is often deemed to be of little value in patients who are elderly or have other comorbidities. We describe a case of an elderly man who presented with clinical features and initial imaging consistent with pneumonia and a positive D-dimer test. Adherence to the suggested diagnostic algorithm and obtaining chest imaging, however, prevented what could have been a catastrophic missed diagnosis of PE. We review existing evidence on the importance of suspecting PE in the presence of alternative diagnosis and explore the literature on the association between the magnitude of D-dimer and the diagnosis of PE.

The Virtual Hospitalist: A Single-Site Implementation Bringing Hospitalist Coverage to Critical Access Hospitals

BACKGROUND On-site hospitalist care can improve patient care, but it is economically infeasible for small critical access hospitals (CAHs). A telemedicine “virtual hospitalist” may expand CAH capabilities at a fractional cost of an on-site provider. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of a virtual hospitalist on transfers from a CAH to outside hospitals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A six-month pilot program providing “virtual hospitalist” coverage to patients at a CAH in rural Iowa. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was the rate of outside transfers from the CAH Emergency Department (ED). The secondary outcomes included transfer from either the ED or the inpatient wards, daily census, length of stay, transfers after admission, virtual hospitalist time commitment, and patient and staff satisfaction. The preceding 24-week baseline was compared with 24 weeks after implementation, excluding a two-week transition period. RESULTS At baseline, there were 947 ED visits and 176 combined inpatient and observation encounters, compared to 930 and 176 after implementation, respectively. Outside transfers from the ED decreased from 16.6% to 10.5% (157/947 to 98/930, P < .001), and transfers at any time decreased from 17.3% to 11.9% (164/947 to 111/930, P < .001). Daily census, length of stay, and transfers after admission were unchanged. Time commitment for a virtual hospitalist was 35 minutes per patient per day. The intervention was well received by the CAH staff and patients. CONCLUSIONS The virtual hospitalist model increased the percentage of ED patients who could safely receive their care locally. A single virtual hospitalist may be able to cover multiple CAHs simultaneously.

The Development and Evaluation of a Novel Instrument Assessing Residents' Discharge Summaries.

Purpose To develop and determine the reliability of a novel measurement instrument assessing the quality of residents’ discharge summaries. Method In 2014, the authors created a discharge summary evaluation instrument based on consensus recommendations from national regulatory bodies and input from primary care providers at their institution. After a brief pilot, they used the instrument to evaluate discharge summaries written by first-year internal medicine residents (n = 24) at a single U.S. teaching hospital during the 2013–2014 academic year. They conducted a generalizability study to determine the reliability of the instrument and a series of decision studies to determine the number of discharge summaries and raters needed to achieve a reliable evaluation score. Results The generalizability study demonstrated that 37% of the variance reflected residents’ ability to generate an adequate discharge summary (true score variance). The decision studies estimated that the mean score from six discharge summary reviews completed by a unique rater for each review would yield a reliability coefficient of 0.75. Because of high interrater reliability, multiple raters per discharge summary would not significantly enhance the reliability of the mean rating. Conclusions This evaluation instrument reliably measured residents’ performance writing discharge summaries. A single rating of six discharge summaries can achieve a reliable mean evaluation score. Using this instrument is feasible even for programs with a limited number of inpatient encounters and a small pool of faculty preceptors.