Ethan J. Fraser

Investigating the Relationship Between Ankle Arthrodesis and Adjacent-Joint Arthritis in the Hindfoot. A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND Ankle arthrodesis traditionally has been regarded as the treatment of choice for many patients with end-stage ankle arthritis. However, a major reported risk of ankle arthrodesis is adjacent-joint degeneration. There are conflicting views in the literature as to the causative link between ankle arthrodesis and progression to adjacent-joint arthritis. Recent studies have challenged the causative link between arthrodesis and adjacent-joint arthritis, purporting that preexisting adjacent-joint arthritis is present in many patients. The aim of the present study was to systematically review the available literature to determine if there is sufficient evidence to support either hypothesis. METHODS A literature search of the EMBASE and PubMed/MEDLINE databases (1974 to present) was performed. A total of twenty-four studies were included for review. The studies were reviewed, and the relevant information was extracted, including research methodology, postoperative outcomes in the adjacent joints of the foot, and whether pre-arthrodesis radiographs and medical records were available for analysis. RESULTS The twenty-four manuscripts included eighteen clinical studies, five biomechanical studies, and one gait-analysis study. The majority of biomechanical studies showed altered biomechanics in the fused ankle; however, there was no clear consensus as to whether these findings were causes of adjacent-joint arthritis. In studies assessing clinical outcomes, the reported prevalence of subtalar joint arthritis ranged from 24% to 100% and the prevalence of talonavicular and calcaneocuboid arthritis ranged from 18% to 77%. Correlation between imaging findings of arthritis in adjacent joints and patient symptoms was not established in a number of the clinical studies reviewed. CONCLUSIONS There is no true consensus in the literature as to the effects of ankle arthrodesis on biomechanics or whether ankle arthrodesis leads to adjacent-joint arthritis. Similarly, a correlation between postoperative imaging findings and clinical presentation in this cohort of patients has not been conclusively demonstrated.

Arthroscopic Treatment for Anterior Ankle Impingement: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature

PURPOSE To provide a comprehensive overview of the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic procedures used as a treatment strategy for anterior ankle impingement. METHODS A systematic literature search of the Medline, Embase (Classic), and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases was performed. Studies that met the following inclusion criteria were reviewed: studies reporting outcomes of arthroscopic treatment for anterior ankle impingement; studies reporting on more than 20 patients; a study population with a minimum age of 18 years; and studies in the English, Dutch, German, Italian, or Spanish language. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction. Extracted data consisted of population characteristics, in addition to both primary and secondary outcome measures. The Downs and Black scale was used to assess the methodologic quality of randomized and nonrandomized studies included in this review. RESULTS Twenty articles were included in this systematic review. Overall, good results were found for arthroscopic treatment in patients with anterior ankle impingement. In the studies that reported patient satisfaction rates, high percentages of good to excellent satisfaction were described (74% to 100%). The percentages of patients who would undergo the same procedure again under the same circumstances were also high (94.3% to 97.5%). Complication rates were low (4.6%), particularly with respect to major complications (1.1%). The high heterogeneity of the included studies made it impossible to compare the results of the studies, including between anterolateral impingement and anteromedial impingement. CONCLUSIONS Arthroscopic treatment for anterior ankle impingement appears to provide good outcomes with respect to patient satisfaction and low complication rates. However, on the basis of the findings of this study, no conclusion can be made in terms of the effect of the type of impingement or additional pathology on clinical outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, systematic review of Level II and IV studies.

Trends of Concurrent Ankle Arthroscopy at the Time of Operative Treatment of Ankle Fracture A National Database Review

Background. The purpose of this study was to report trends associated with concurrent ankle arthroscopy at the time of operative treatment of ankle fracture. Method. The current procedural terminology (CPT) billing codes were used to search the PearlDiver Patient Record Database and identify all patients who were treated for acute ankle fracture in the United States. The Medicare Standard Analytic Files were searchable between 2005 and 2011 and the United Healthcare Orthopedic Dataset from 2007 to 2011. Annual trends were expressed only between 2007 and 2011, as it was the common time period among both databases. Demographic factors were identified for all procedures as well as the cost aspect using the Medicare data set. Results. In total, 32 307 patients underwent open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of an ankle fracture, of whom 313 (1.0%) had an ankle arthroscopy performed simultaneously. Of those 313 cases, 70 (22.4%) patients received microfracture treatment. Between 2005 and 2011, 85 203 patients were treated for an ankle fracture whether via ORIF or closed treatment. Of these, a total of 566 patients underwent arthroscopic treatment within 7 years. The prevalence of arthroscopy after ankle fracture decreased significantly by 45% from 2007 to 2011 (P < .0001). When ORIF and microfracture were performed concurrently, the total average charge for both procedures drops to

Football injuries of the ankle: A review of injury mechanisms, diagnosis and management

4253.00 and average reimbursement to

Clinical and MRI Donor Site Outcomes Following Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation for Talar Osteochondral Lesions

818.00 compared with approximately

Arthroscopic Surgical Technique for an Acute Talar Dome Osteochondral Lesion in a Professional Rugby League Player

4964.00 and

Tenosynovial Giant-Cell Tumors of the Foot and Ankle

1069.00, respectively, when they were performed subsequently. Conclusion. Despite good evidence in favor of arthroscopy at the time of ankle fracture treatment, it appears that only a small proportion of surgeons in the United States perform these procedures concurrently. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level IV: Retrospective

Bone marrow concentrate and platelet-rich plasma differ in cell distribution and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist protein concentration

Football is the most popular sport worldwide and is associated with a high injury rate, most of which are the result of trauma from player contact. Ankle injuries are among the most commonly diagnosed injuries in the game. The result is reduced physical activity and endurance levels, lost game time, and considerable medical cost. Sports medicine professionals must employ the correct diagnostic tools and effective treatments and rehabilitation protocols to minimize the impact of these injuries on the player. This review examines the diagnosis, treatment, and postoperative rehabilitation for common football injuries of the ankle based on the clinical evidence provided in the current literature.

Autologous osteochondral transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the talus in an athletic population

Background: Autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOT) has an inherent risk of donor site morbidity (DSM). The reported rates of DSM vary from 0% to 50%, with few studies reporting clinical or imaging outcomes at the donor site as a primary outcome and even fewer report these outcomes when a biosynthetic plug backfill is employed. Although TruFit (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA) plugs have been removed from the market for regulatory purposes, biphasic plugs (including TruFit plugs) have been used for several years and the evaluation of these is therefore pertinent. Methods: Thirty-nine patients who underwent forty AOT procedures of the talus, with the donor graft being taken from the ipsilateral knee, were included. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to assess the donor site graded with magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) scoring. Lysholm scores were collected preoperatively, at the time of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and again at 24 months and at final follow-up to assess clinical outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed to establish if there was any correlation between MRI assessment of the donor site and clinical outcomes. The mean patient age was 36.2 ± 15.7 years with a mean follow-up of 41.8 ± 16.7 months. Results: All patient donor site defects were filled with OBI TruFit biphasic plugs. DSM was encountered in 12.5% of the patient cohort at 24 months, and in these patients, the Lysholm score was a mean 87.2 ± 5.0. At final follow-up, DSM was reduced to 5%. Lysholm scores for the entire cohort were 98.4 ± 4.6 and 99.4 ± 3.1 at 24 months and final follow-up, respectively. MRI of the donor sites were taken at an average of 18.1 ± 13.5 (range, 3-48) months postoperatively and the mean MOCART score was 60.0 ± 13.5. No correlation was found between the MOCART score and Lysholm outcomes at the donor knee (P = .43, r = 0.13). Conclusion: Low incidence of DSM and good functional outcomes were achieved with AOT. Additionally, MRI findings did not predict clinical outcomes in our study. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: Does Previous Bone Marrow Stimulation Negatively Affect Clinical Outcome?

Background. Talar osteochondral lesions represent challenging clinical entities, particularly in high-demand athletes. Surgical treatment of large lesions often requires a 2-step procedure, or the use of osteotomy in the case of autologous osteochondral transfer, which can delay return to sport. Methods. A professional rugby league player underwent surgery for a complex injury to the ankle. A talar osteochondral lesion with a maximal diameter of 15 mm was treated in an arthroscopic fashion using the cartilage taken from the completely displaced osteochondral fragment. Cartilage was cut into chips and combined with bone graft product containing platelet-derived growth factor and a porous collagen scaffold. Autologous cartilage was then reimplanted arthroscopically. The patient was allowed full ankle motion from 2 weeks postoperatively, and weightbearing was commenced at 6 weeks. Follow-up imaging and functional outcomes, including return to sport, were assessed at regular intervals. Results. The patient was able to return to professional rugby league by 23 weeks postoperatively. Magnetic resonance imaging at 16 months postoperatively showed restoration of the subchondral plate and osseous infill. At final follow-up, the patient remained pain free and was playing at preinjury level. Conclusion. This report describes good outcomes using a novel, 1-step cartilage repair technique to treat a large talar osteochondral lesion in a professional athlete. Levels of Evidence: Level V: Expert opinion