Etienne Danchin

High similarity between flanking regions of different microsatellites detected within each of two species of Lepidoptera: Parnassius apollo and Euphydryas aurinia.

Microsatellite flanking regions have been compared in two butterfly species. Several microsatellite flanking regions showed high similarity to one another among different microsatellites within a same species, but very few similarities were found between species. This can be the consequence of either duplication/multiplication events involving large regions containing microsatellites or of microsatellites imbedded in minisatellite regions. The multiplication of microsatellites might also be linked to mobile elements. Furthermore, crossing over between nonhomologous microsatellites can lead to the exchange of the flanking regions between microsatellites. The same phenomenon was observed in both studied butterfly species but not in Aphis fabae (Hemiptera), which was screened at the same time using the same protocol. These findings might explain, at least partially, why microsatellite isolation in Lepidoptera has been relatively unsuccessful so far.

The major histocompatibility complex origin

Summary:  The present review focuses on the history of genes involved in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), with a special emphasis on class I function in peptide presentation. The MHC class II story is covered in less detail, as it does not have a major impact on the general understanding of the MHC evolution. We first redefine the MHC as the definition evolved over time. We then use phylogenetic analysis to investigate the history of genes involved in the MHC class I process. As not all the genes involved in this process have been phylogenetically analyzed and because new sequences have been recently released in biological databases, we have re‐investigated this matter. In the light of the phylogenetic analysis, the functions of the orthologs of the genes involved in MHC processes are examined in species not having an MHC system. We then demonstrate that the emergence of this new function is due to various levels of co‐option.

Statistical evidence for a more than 800-million-year-old evolutionarily conserved genomic region in our genome

Identification of conserved genomic regions between different species is crucial for the reconstruction of their last common ancestor. Indeed, such regions of conservation in today’s species (if not due to chance) may either constitute stigmata of an ancestrally conserved region or result from a series of independent convergent events. The more phylogenetically distant the compared species are, the more we expect rearrangements and thus difficulties in finding regions of conservation. Here we decipher with strong evidence conserved genomic regions between vertebrates (human and zebrafish) and arthropods (Drosophila and Anopheles). This work includes a robust phylogenetic analysis in conjunction with a stringent statistical testing that allowed the significant rejection of a “by chance” conservation hypothesis. The conservation of gene clusters across four different species from two phylogenetically distant groups makes the hypothesis of an ancestral conservation more likely and parsimonious than the hypothesis of individual convergent events. This result shows that, in spite of more than 800 million years of divergence and evolution from their last common ancestor, we can still reveal stigmata of conservation between all these species. The last common ancestor of zebrafish, human, Drosophila, and Anopheles is the common ancestor of all protostomes and deuterostomes known as “Urbilateria.” This study reveals clusters of probably ancestrally conserved genes and constitutes an advance toward the reconstruction of the genome of Urbilateria. Thus this work allows a better understanding of the evolutionary history of metazoan genomes, including our genome.

Evolution of major histocompatibility complex by “en bloc” duplication before mammalian radiation

Duplications are an important mechanism for the emergence of genetic novelties. Reports on duplicated genes are numerous, and mechanisms for polyploidization or local gene duplication are beginning to be understood. When a local duplication is studied, searches are usually done gene-by-gene, and the size of duplicated segments is not often investigated. Therefore, we do not know if the gene in question has duplicated alone or with other genes, implying that “en bloc” duplications are poorly studied. We propose a method for identification of “en bloc” duplication using mapping, phylogenetic and statistical analyses. We show that two segments present in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) region of human chromosome 6 have resulted from an “en bloc” duplication that took place between divergence of amniotes and methaterian/eutherian separation. These segments contain members of the same multigenic families, namely olfactory receptors genes, genes encoding proteins containing B30.2 domain, genes encoding proteins containing immunoglobulin V domain and MHC class I genes. We will discuss the fact that olfactory receptors and MHC genes have undergone positive selection, which could have helped in fixation of the surrounding genes.