Eugen Lounkine

Large Scale Prediction and Testing of Drug Activity on Side-Effect Targets

Discovering the unintended ‘off-targets’ that predict adverse drug reactions is daunting by empirical methods alone. Drugs can act on several protein targets, some of which can be unrelated by conventional molecular metrics, and hundreds of proteins have been implicated in side effects. Here we use a computational strategy to predict the activity of 656 marketed drugs on 73 unintended ‘side-effect’ targets. Approximately half of the predictions were confirmed, either from proprietary databases unknown to the method or by new experimental assays. Affinities for these new off-targets ranged from 1 nM to 30 μM. To explore relevance, we developed an association metric to prioritize those new off-targets that explained side effects better than any known target of a given drug, creating a drug–target–adverse drug reaction network. Among these new associations was the prediction that the abdominal pain side effect of the synthetic oestrogen chlorotrianisene was mediated through its newly discovered inhibition of the enzyme cyclooxygenase-1. The clinical relevance of this inhibition was borne out in whole human blood platelet aggregation assays. This approach may have wide application to de-risking toxicological liabilities in drug discovery.

Identifying mechanism-of-action targets for drugs and probes

Notwithstanding their key roles in therapy and as biological probes, 7% of approved drugs are purported to have no known primary target, and up to 18% lack a well-defined mechanism of action. Using a chemoinformatics approach, we sought to “de-orphanize” drugs that lack primary targets. Surprisingly, targets could be easily predicted for many: Whereas these targets were not known to us nor to the common databases, most could be confirmed by literature search, leaving only 13 Food and Drug Administration—approved drugs with unknown targets; the number of drugs without molecular targets likely is far fewer than reported. The number of worldwide drugs without reasonable molecular targets similarly dropped, from 352 (25%) to 44 (4%). Nevertheless, there remained at least seven drugs for which reasonable mechanism-of-action targets were unknown but could be predicted, including the antitussives clemastine, cloperastine, and nepinalone; the antiemetic benzquinamide; the muscle relaxant cyclobenzaprine; the analgesic nefopam; and the immunomodulator lobenzarit. For each, predicted targets were confirmed experimentally, with affinities within their physiological concentration ranges. Turning this question on its head, we next asked which drugs were specific enough to act as chemical probes. Over 100 drugs met the standard criteria for probes, and 40 did so by more stringent criteria. A chemical information approach to drug-target association can guide therapeutic development and reveal applications to probe biology, a focus of much current interest.

SARANEA: a freely available program to mine structure-activity and structure-selectivity relationship information in compound data sets.

We introduce SARANEA, an open-source Java application for interactive exploration of structure-activity relationship (SAR) and structure-selectivity relationship (SSR) information in compound sets of any source. SARANEA integrates various SAR and SSR analysis functions and utilizes a network-like similarity graph data structure for visualization. The program enables the systematic detection of activity and selectivity cliffs and corresponding key compounds across multiple targets. Advanced SAR analysis functions implemented in SARANEA include, among others, layered chemical neighborhood graphs, cliff indices, selectivity trees, editing functions for molecular networks and pathways, bioactivity summaries of key compounds, and markers for bioactive compounds having potential side effects. We report the application of SARANEA to identify SAR and SSR determinants in different sets of serine protease inhibitors. It is found that key compounds can influence SARs and SSRs in rather different ways. Such compounds and their SAR/SSR characteristics can be systematically identified and explored using SARANEA. The program and source code are made freely available under the GNU General Public License.

Data structures and computational tools for the extraction of SAR information from large compound sets

Computational data mining and visualization techniques play a central part in the extraction of structure-activity relationship (SAR) information from compound sets including high-throughput screening data. Standard statistical and classification techniques can be used to organize data sets and evaluate the chemical neighborhood of potent hits; however, such methods are limited in their ability to extract complex SAR patterns from data sets and make them readily accessible to medicinal chemists. Therefore, new approaches and data structures are being developed that explicitly focus on molecular structure and its relationship to biological activity across multiple targets. Here, we review standard techniques for compound data analysis and describe new data structures and computational tools for SAR mining of large compound data sets.

Systematic Analysis of Public Domain Compound Potency Data Identifies Selective Molecular Scaffolds across Druggable Target Families

Molecular scaffolds that yield target family-selective compounds are of high interest in pharmaceutical research. There continues to be considerable debate in the field as to whether chemotypes with a priori selectivity for given target families and/or targets exist and how they might be identified. What do currently available data tell us? We present a systematic and comprehensive selectivity-centric analysis of public domain target-ligand interactions. More than 200 molecular scaffolds are identified in currently available active compounds that are selective for established target families. A subset of these scaffolds is found to produce compounds with high selectivity for individual targets among closely related ones. These scaffolds are currently underrepresented in approved drugs.

Chemotography for multi-target SAR analysis in the context of biological pathways

The increasing amount of chemogenomics data, that is, activity measurements of many compounds across a variety of biological targets, allows for better understanding of pharmacology in a broad biological context. Rather than assessing activity at individual biological targets, today understanding of compound interaction with complex biological systems and molecular pathways is often sought in phenotypic screens. This perspective poses novel challenges to structure-activity relationship (SAR) assessment. Today, the bottleneck of drug discovery lies in the understanding of SAR of rich datasets that go beyond single targets in the context of biological pathways, potential off-targets, and complex selectivity profiles. To aid in the understanding and interpretation of such complex SAR, we introduce Chemotography (chemotype chromatography), which encodes chemical space using a color spectrum by combining clustering and multidimensional scaling. Rich biological data in our approach were visualized using spatial dimensions traditionally reserved for chemical space. This allowed us to analyze SAR in the context of target hierarchies and phylogenetic trees, two-target activity scatter plots, and biological pathways. Chemotography, in combination with the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), also allowed us to extract pathway-relevant SAR from the ChEMBL database. We identified chemotypes showing polypharmacology and selectivity-conferring scaffolds, even in cases where individual compounds have not been tested against all relevant targets. In addition, we analyzed SAR in ChEMBL across the entire Kinome, going beyond individual compounds. Our method combines the strengths of chemical space visualization for SAR analysis and graphical representation of complex biological data. Chemotography is a new paradigm for chemogenomic data visualization and its versatile applications presented here may allow for improved assessment of SAR in biological context, such as phenotypic assay hit lists.

Computational methods for early predictive safety assessment from biological and chemical data

Introduction: The goal of early predictive safety assessment (PSA) is to keep compounds with detectable liabilities from progressing further in the pipeline. Such compounds jeopardize the core of pharmaceutical research and development and limit the timely delivery of innovative therapeutics to the patient. Computational methods are increasingly used to help understand observed data, generate new testable hypotheses of relevance to safety pharmacology, and supplement and replace costly and time-consuming experimental procedures. Areas covered: The authors survey methods operating on different scales of both physical extension and complexity. After discussing methods used to predict liabilities associated with structures of individual compounds, the article reviews the use of adverse event data and safety profiling panels. Finally, the authors examine the complexities of toxicology data from animal experiments and how these data can be mined. Expert opinion: A significant obstacle for data-driven safety assessment is the absence of integrated data sets due to a lack of sharing of data and of using standard ontologies for data relevant to safety assessment. Informed decisions to derive focused sets of compounds can help to avoid compound liabilities in screening campaigns, and improved hit assessment of such campaigns can benefit the early termination of undesirable compounds.

A Screening Pattern Recognition Method Finds New and Divergent Targets for Drugs and Natural Products

Computational target prediction methods using chemical descriptors have been applied exhaustively in drug discovery to elucidate the mechanisms-of-action (MOAs) of small molecules. To predict truly novel and unexpected small molecule-target interactions, compounds must be compared by means other than their chemical structure alone. Here we investigated predictions made by a method, HTS fingerprints (HTSFPs), that matches patterns of activities in experimental screens. Over 1,400 drugs and 1,300 natural products (NPs) were screened in more than 200 diverse assays, creating encodable activity patterns. The comparison of these activity patterns to an MOA-annotated reference panel led to the prediction of 5,281 and 2,798 previously unknown targets for the NP and drug sets, respectively. Intriguingly, there was limited overlap among the targets predicted; the drugs were more biased toward membrane receptors and the NPs toward soluble enzymes, consistent with the idea that they represent unexplored pharmacologies. Importantly, HTSFPs inferred targets that were beyond the prediction capabilities of standard chemical descriptors, especially for NPs but also for the more explored drug set. Of 65 drug-target predictions that we tested in vitro, 48 (73.8%) were confirmed with AC50 values ranging from 38 nM to 29 μM. Among these interactions was the inhibition of cyclooxygenases 1 and 2 by the HIV protease inhibitor Tipranavir. These newly discovered targets that are phylogenetically and phylochemically distant to the primary target provide an explanation for spontaneous bleeding events observed for patients treated with this drug, a physiological effect that was previously difficult to reconcile with the drugs known MOA.

Bioturbo Similarity Searching: Combining Chemical and Biological Similarity To Discover Structurally Diverse Bioactive Molecules

Virtual screening using bioactivity profiles has become an integral part of currently applied hit finding methods in pharmaceutical industry. However, a significant drawback of this approach is that it is only applicable to compounds that have been biologically tested in the past and have sufficient activity annotations for meaningful profile comparisons. Although bioactivity data generated in pharmaceutical institutions are growing on an unprecedented scale, the number of biologically annotated compounds still covers only a minuscule fraction of chemical space. For a newly synthesized compound or an isolated natural product to be biologically characterized across multiple assays, it may take a considerable amount of time. Consequently, this chemical matter will not be included in virtual screening campaigns based on bioactivity profiles. To overcome this problem, we herein introduce bioturbo similarity searching that uses chemical similarity to map molecules without biological annotations into bioactivity space and then searches for biologically similar compounds in this reference system. In benchmark calculations on primary screening data, we demonstrate that our approach generally achieves higher hit rates and identifies structurally more diverse compounds than approaches using chemical information only. Furthermore, our method is able to discover hits with novel modes of inhibition that traditional 2D and 3D similarity approaches are unlikely to discover. Test calculations on a set of natural products reveal the practical utility of the approach for identifying novel and synthetically more accessible chemical matter.

The opportunities of mining historical and collective data in drug discovery.

Vast amounts of bioactivity data have been generated for small molecules across public and corporate domains. Biological signatures, either derived from systematic profiling efforts or from existing historical assay data, have been successfully employed for small molecule mechanism-of-action elucidation, drug repositioning, hit expansion and screening subset design. This article reviews different types of biological descriptors and applications, and we demonstrate how biological data can outlive the original purpose or project for which it was generated. By comparing 150 HTS campaigns run at Novartis over the past decade on the basis of their active and inactive chemical matter, we highlight the opportunities and challenges associated with cross-project learning in drug discovery.