Eugene Declercq

Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care

In this first paper in a series of four papers on midwifery, we aimed to examine, comprehensively and systematically, the contribution midwifery can make to the quality of care of women and infants globally, and the role of midwives and others in providing midwifery care. Drawing on international definitions and current practice, we mapped the scope of midwifery. We then developed a framework for quality maternal and newborn care using a mixed-methods approach including synthesis of findings from systematic reviews of womens views and experiences, effective practices, and maternal and newborn care providers. The framework differentiates between what care is provided and how and by whom it is provided, and describes the care and services that childbearing women and newborn infants need in all settings. We identified more than 50 short-term, medium-term, and long-term outcomes that could be improved by care within the scope of midwifery; reduced maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity, reduced stillbirth and preterm birth, decreased number of unnecessary interventions, and improved psychosocial and public health outcomes. Midwifery was associated with more efficient use of resources and improved outcomes when provided by midwives who were educated, trained, licensed, and regulated. Our findings support a system-level shift from maternal and newborn care focused on identification and treatment of pathology for the minority to skilled care for all. This change includes preventive and supportive care that works to strengthen womens capabilities in the context of respectful relationships, is tailored to their needs, focuses on promotion of normal reproductive processes, and in which first-line management of complications and accessible emergency treatment are provided when needed. Midwifery is pivotal to this approach, which requires effective interdisciplinary teamwork and integration across facility and community settings. Future planning for maternal and newborn care systems can benefit from using the quality framework in planning workforce development and resource allocation.

Listening to Mothers II: Report of the Second National U.S. Survey of Women's Childbearing Experiences: Conducted January-February 2006 for Childbirth Connection by Harris Interactive(R) in partnership with Lamaze International.

With permission from Childbirth Connection, the “Executive Summary” for the Listening to Mothers II survey is reprinted, here. The landmark Listening to Mothers I report, published in 2002, described the first national U.S. survey of women’s maternity experiences. It offered an unprecedented opportunity to understand attitudes, feelings, knowledge, use of obstetric practices, outcomes, and other dimensions of the maternity experience. Listening to Mothers II, a national survey of U.S. women who gave birth in 2005 that was published in 2006, continues to break new ground. Although continuing to document many core items measured in the first survey, the second survey includes much new content, exploring earlier topics in greater depth, as well as some new and timely topics.

Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes and costs associated with primary cesarean births with no labor (planned cesareans) to vaginal and cesarean births with labor (planned vaginal). METHODS: Analysis was based on a Massachusetts data system linking 470,857 birth certificates, fetal death records, and birth-related hospital discharge records from 1998 and 2003. We examined a subset of 244,088 mothers with no prior cesarean and no documented prenatal risk. We then divided mothers into two groups: those with no labor and a primary cesarean (planned primary cesarean deliveries—3,334 women) and those with labor and either a vaginal birth or a cesarean delivery (planned vaginal—240,754 women). We compared maternal rehospitalization rates and analyzed costs and length of stay. RESULTS: Rehospitalizations in the first 30 days after giving birth were more likely in planned cesarean (19.2 in 1,000) when compared with planned vaginal births (7.5 in 1,000). After controlling for age, parity, and race or ethnicity, mothers with a planned primary cesarean were 2.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.74–2.9) times more likely to require a rehospitalization in the first 30 days postpartum. The leading causes of rehospitalization after a planned cesarean were wound complications (6.6 in 1,000) (P<.001) and infection (3.3 in 1,000). The average initial hospital cost of a planned primary cesarean of

Hospital practices and women's likelihood of fulfilling their intention to exclusively breastfeed.

4,372 (95% C.I.

Is a Rising Cesarean Delivery Rate Inevitable? Trends in Industrialized Countries, 1987 to 2007

4,293–4,451) was 76% higher than the average for planned vaginal births of

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in New Mothers: Results from a Two-Stage U.S. National Survey

2,487 (95% C.I.

Recent Trends and Patterns in Cesarean and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean (VBAC) Deliveries in the United States

2,481–2,493), and length of stay was 77% longer (4.3 days to 2.4 days). CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware of the increased risk for maternal rehospitalization after cesarean deliveries to low-risk mothers when counseling women about their choices. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II

Obstetrical intervention and the singleton preterm birth rate in the United States from 1991-2006.

OBJECTIVES We sought to assess whether breastfeeding-related hospital practices reported by mothers were associated with achievement of their intentions to exclusively breastfeed. METHODS We used data from Listening to Mothers II, a nationally representative survey of 1573 mothers who had given birth in a hospital to a singleton in 2005. Mothers were asked retrospectively about their breastfeeding intention, infant feeding at 1 week, and 7 hospital practices. RESULTS Primiparas reported a substantial difference between their intention to exclusively breastfeed (70%) and this practice at 1 week (50%). They also reported hospital practices that conflicted with the Baby-Friendly Ten Steps, including supplementation (49%) and pacifier use (45%). Primiparas who delivered in hospitals that practiced 6 or 7 of the steps were 6 times more likely to achieve their intention to exclusively breastfeed than were those in hospitals that practiced none or 1 of the steps. Mothers who reported supplemental feedings to their infant were less likely to achieve their intention to exclusively breastfeed: primiparas (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 4.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.1, 9.3); multiparas (AOR = 8.8; 95% CI = 4.4, 17.6). CONCLUSIONS Hospitals should implement policies that support breastfeeding with particular attention to eliminating supplementation of healthy newborns.

Recent Increases in the U.s. Maternal Mortality Rate: Disentangling Trends From Measurement Issues

BACKGROUND  Cesarean delivery rates have been rising rapidly in many countries in the last decade. The objective of this research is to examine cesarean rates in industrialized countries and assess patterns in the trends toward increasing rates. METHODS We examined cesarean delivery rates per 1,000 live births from 1987 to 2007 in 22 industrialized countries. To enhance comparability, the inclusion criteria were at least 50,000 births annually and a per capita gross domestic product of at least U.S.

Perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART)

10,000 in 2007. Poisson regression was selected to model the cesarean delivery rates of countries across time. RESULTS  We examined overall cesarean delivery rates, absolute changes in these rates, and changes in trend lines for cesarean rates for the period from 1987 to 2007. In 2007, 11 of the 21 countries reported overall cesarean rates of more than 25 percent, led by Italy (39%), Portugal (35%), the United States (32%), and Switzerland (32%). Five countries, the Slovak Republic, Czech Republic, Ireland, Austria, and Hungary more than doubled their cesarean delivery rate between 1992 and 2007. Comparing changes in rates across time periods, 14 countries experienced a greater increase in rates in the period between 1998 and 2002 compared with the period between 1993 and 1997. Comparing trends from 2003-2007 to 1998-2002, eighteen countries experienced a slowing down of rate increases across these two periods. CONCLUSION  Although cesarean delivery rates continue to rise, the rate of increase appears to be slowing down in most industrialized countries.