Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Eugene K. Cha is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Eugene K. Cha.


World Journal of Urology | 2011

Impact of gender on bladder cancer incidence, staging, and prognosis

Harun Fajkovic; Joshua A. Halpern; Eugene K. Cha; Atessa Bahadori; Thomas F. Chromecki; Pierre I. Karakiewicz; Eckart Breinl; Axel S. Merseburger; Shahrokh F. Shariat

IntroductionWhile patient gender is an important factor in the clinical decision-making for the management of bladder cancer, there are minimal evidence-based recommendations to guide health care professionals. Recent epidemiologic and translational research has shed some light on the complex relationship between gender and bladder cancer. Our aim was to review the literature on the effect of gender on bladder cancer incidence, biology, mortality, and treatment.MethodsUsing MEDLINE, we performed a search of the literature between January 1975 and April 2011.ResultsAlthough men are nearly 3–4 times more likely to develop bladder cancer than women, women present with more advanced disease and have worse survival. Recently, a number of population-based and multicenter collaborative studies have shown that female gender is associated with a significantly higher rate of cancer-specific recurrence and mortality after radical cystectomy. The disparity between genders is proposed to be the result of a differences exposure to carcinogens (i.e., tobacco and chemicals) as well as reflective of genetic, anatomic, hormonal, societal, and environmental factors. Explanations for the differential behavior of bladder cancer between genders include sex steroids and their receptors as well as inferior quality of care for women (inpatient length of stay, referral patterns, and surgical outcomes).ConclusionsIt is imperative that health care practitioners and researchers from disparate disciplines collectively focus efforts to appropriately develop gender-specific evidence-based guidelines for bladder cancer patients. We must strive to develop multidisciplinary collaborative efforts to provide tailored gender-specific care for bladder cancer patients.


European Urology | 2012

Death certificates are valid for the determination of cause of death in patients with upper and lower tract urothelial carcinoma.

Michael Rink; Harun Fajkovic; Eugene K. Cha; Amit Gupta; Pierre I. Karakiewicz; Felix K.-H. Chun; Yair Lotan; Shahrokh F. Shariat

Accurate appraisal of cause of death (COD) is critically important for determining correct cause-specific survival in cancer patients. Death certificates are used for assessment of COD in case control [1], cohort outcomes [2], and occupational mortality studies [3]. Likewise, large data sets, such as the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results program, and tumor registries rely on death certificates to assign COD [4,5]. However, this method may become inaccurate (1) when patients get older, (2) when patients have serious comorbidities associated with a risk of dying of other causes [6,7], or (3) when cancer patients are long-term survivors. Urothelial cancer (UC) is the second most common genitourinary cancer in the United States and represents an important cause of morbidity and mortality [8]. UC is generally a disease of the elderly, who have considerable comorbidities [9,10]. Although meticulous review of medical records has been shown to reliably ascertain COD in other urologic diseases such as prostate cancer (PCa) [5,11], the validity of death certificates for UC patients remains mainly uninvestigated. Therefore, we assessed whether the underlying COD on death certificates for men with UC agreed with an independent review of medical records for UC patients. This was an institutional review board–approved study. In our institutional database, we identified a sample of 137 patients with UC of the urinary bladder (UCB) treated with radical cystectomy and 62 patients with upper tract UC (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy who died at one tertiary care center during follow-up. Two trained urologists who were blinded to the COD assigned by the death certificate used a standardized data extraction form to independently review medical records and evaluate clinical course before death and effect of comorbidities. COD was assigned to one of three prospectively defined categories: (1) related to UCB or UTUC, (2) unrelated to UCB or UTUC, or (3) uncertain. Cohen’s k test was used to evaluate the agreement between both raters. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 17 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Death certificates were available for 119 UCB patients (86.9%) and 54 UTUC patients (87.1%). Median age was 67 yr (interquartile range [IQR]: 13) for UCB patients and 69 yr (IQR: 15) for UTUC patients. Both urologists agreed on the underlying COD in 166 of 173 UC patients (96%); consensus was reached on the COD of the remaining 7 patients. The comparison of underlying COD when assigned by death certificate and clinician assessment of medical records is shown in Table 1. Overall agreement was 96.1% for UCB patients who died of their disease and 92.5% for those patients who died of causes other than UCB (k = 0.89; p < 0.001). In UTUC patients, agreement was 93.9% and 85.0% in patients dying of disease and those patients dying of other causes, respectively (k = 0.80; p < 0.001). The agreement between the death certificate COD and the medical record review consensus assessment of COD was higher for UCB (92.4%) than for UTUC (88.9%). The UCB patients who died of their disease but were misclassified as dead from other cause by death certificate died of metastatic complications of UCB: One patient was misclassified as having a brain tumor, whereas he had brain metastasis of UCB; one patient had a pulmonary embolism due to tumor-induced coagulopathy; and one patient had


European Urology | 2012

Predicting Clinical Outcomes After Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Eugene K. Cha; Shahrokh F. Shariat; Matthias Kormaksson; Giacomo Novara; Thomas F. Chromecki; Douglas S. Scherr; Yair Lotan; Jay D. Raman; Wassim Kassouf; Richard Zigeuner; Mesut Remzi; Karim Bensalah; Alon Z. Weizer; Eiji Kikuchi; Christian Bolenz; Marco Roscigno; Theresa M. Koppie; Casey K. Ng; Hans Martin Fritsche; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Thomas J. Walton; Behfar Ehdaie; Stefan Tritschler; Harun Fajkovic; Juan I. Martínez-Salamanca; Armin Pycha; Cord Langner; Vincenzo Ficarra; Jean Jacques Patard; Francesco Montorsi

BACKGROUND Novel prognostic factors for patients after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) have recently been described. OBJECTIVE We tested the prognostic value of pathologic characteristics and developed models to predict the individual probabilities of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) after RNU. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Our study included 2244 patients treated with RNU without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy at 23 international institutions. Tumor characteristics included T classification, grade, lymph node status, lymphovascular invasion, tumor architecture, location, and concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS). The cohort was randomly split for development (12 centers, n=1273) and external validation (11 centers, n=971). INTERVENTIONS All patients underwent RNU. MEASUREMENTS Univariable and multivariable models addressed RFS, CSS, and comparison of discrimination and calibration with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage grouping. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS At a median follow-up of 45 mo, 501 patients (22.3%) experienced disease recurrence and 418 patients (18.6%) died of UTUC. On multivariable analysis, T classification (p for trend <0.001), lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.98; p=0.002), lymphovascular invasion (HR: 1.66; p<0.001), sessile tumor architecture (HR: 1.76; p<0.001), and concomitant CIS (HR: 1.33; p=0.035) were associated with disease recurrence. Similarly, T classification (p for trend<0.001), lymph node metastasis (HR: 2.23; p=0.001), lymphovascular invasion (HR: 1.81; p<0.001), and sessile tumor architecture (HR: 1.72; p=0.001) were independently associated with cancer-specific mortality. Our models achieved 76.8% and 81.5% accuracy for predicting RFS and CSS, respectively. In contrast to these well-calibrated models, stratification based upon AJCC stage grouping resulted in a large degree of heterogeneity and did not improve discrimination. CONCLUSIONS Using standard pathologic features, we developed highly accurate prognostic models for the prediction of RFS and CSS after RNU for UTUC. These models offer improvements in calibration over AJCC stage grouping and can be used for individualized patient counseling, follow-up scheduling, risk stratification for adjuvant therapies, and inclusion criteria for clinical trials.


European Urology | 2012

The Impact of Tumor Multifocality on Outcomes in Patients Treated With Radical Nephroureterectomy

Thomas F. Chromecki; Eugene K. Cha; Harun Fajkovic; Vitaly Margulis; Giacomo Novara; Douglas S. Scherr; Yair Lotan; Jay D. Raman; Wassim Kassouf; Karim Bensalah; Alon Z. Weizer; Eiji Kikuchi; Marco Roscigno; Mesut Remzi; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Thomas J. Walton; Armin Pycha; Vincenzo Ficarra; Pierre I. Karakiewicz; Richard Zigeuner; Karl Pummer; Shahrokh F. Shariat

BACKGROUND The prognostic impact of multifocal upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between tumor multifocality and clinicopathologic features and outcomes of UTUC in patients managed by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The study included 2492 patients treated with either open or laparoscopic RNU. Tumor and patient characteristics included tumor stage, tumor grade, lymph node status, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), tumor architecture, tumor location, unifocal or multifocal disease, gender, age, history of bladder cancer (BCa), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), and adjuvant chemotherapy. tumor multifocality of UTUC was defined as the synchronous presence of multiple tumors in the renal pelvis or ureter. INTERVENTION All patients were treated with either open or laparoscopic RNU. MEASUREMENTS Univariable and multivariable models tested the effect of tumor multifocality on disease progression and cancer-specific mortality. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Five hundred ninety patients (23.7%) had tumor multifocality at the time of RNU. The median follow-up was 45 mo (interquartile range [IQR]: 0-101). Tumor multifocality was significantly associated with a history of previous BCa (p=0.032), lymph node involvement (p=0.036), tumor location in the ureter (p=0.003), higher tumor stage (p<0.001), higher tumor grade (p<0.001), sessile tumor architecture (p=0.003), and LVI (p=0.001). In organ-confined patients, tumor multifocality was an independent predictor of both disease progression (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.43; p=0.019) and cancer-specific mortality (HR: 1.46; p=0.027). When assessed in all patients, tumor multifocality was associated with both disease progression and cancer-specific mortality in univariable (p=0.005 and p=0.006, respectively) but not in multivariable analyses (p=0.468 and p=0.798, respectively). The main limitation is the retrospective design of the study. CONCLUSIONS Tumor multifocality is an independent prognosticator of disease progression and cancer-specific mortality in patients with organ-confined UTUC treated with RNU. Multifocal organ-confined patients with UTUC may need closer follow-up. Integration of tumor multifocality with other factors may help identify those patients who would benefit from multimodal therapy.


European Urology | 2014

Impact of Distal Ureter Management on Oncologic Outcomes Following Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Evanguelos Xylinas; Michael Rink; Eugene K. Cha; Thomas Clozel; Richard K. Lee; Harun Fajkovic; Evi Comploj; Giacomo Novara; Vitaly Margulis; Jay D. Raman; Yair Lotan; Wassim Kassouf; Hans Martin Fritsche; Alon Z. Weizer; Juan I. Martínez-Salamanca; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Richard Zigeuner; Armin Pycha; Douglas S. Scherr; Christian Seitz; Thomas J. Walton; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Pierre I. Karakiewicz; Surena F. Matin; Francesco Montorsi; M. Zerbib; Shahrokh F. Shariat

BACKGROUND There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal approach to the bladder cuff during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). OBJECTIVES To compare the oncologic outcomes following RNU using three different methods of bladder cuff management. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective analysis of 2681 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at 24 international institutions from 1987 to 2007. INTERVENTION Three methods of bladder cuff excision were performed: transvesical, extravesical, and endoscopic. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Univariable and multivariable models tested the effect of distal ureter management on intravesical recurrence, recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of the 2681 patients, 1811 (67.5%) underwent the transvesical approach; 785 (29.3%), the extravesical approach; and 85 (3.2%), the endoscopic approach. There was no difference in terms of RFS, CSS, and OS among the three distal ureteral management approaches. Patients who underwent the endoscopic approach were at significantly higher risk of intravesical recurrence compared with those who underwent the transvesical (p=0.02) or extravesical approaches (p=0.02); the latter two groups did not differ from each other (p=0.40). Actuarial intravesical RFS estimates at 2 and 5 yr after RNU were 69% and 58%, 69% and 51%, and 61% and 42% for the transvesical, extravesical, and endoscopic approaches, respectively. In multivariate analyses, distal ureteral management (p=0.01), surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic; p=0.02), previous bladder cancer (p<0.001), higher tumor stage (trend; p=0.01), concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) (p<0.001), and lymph node involvement (trend; p<0.001) were all associated with intravesical recurrence. Excluding patients with history of previous bladder cancer, all variables remained independent predictors of intravesical recurrence. CONCLUSIONS The endoscopic approach was associated with higher intravesical recurrence rates. Interestingly, concomitant CIS in the upper tract is a strong predictor of intravesical recurrence after RNU. The association of laparoscopic RNU with intravesical recurrence needs to be further investigated.


Nature Reviews Urology | 2011

Prognostic factors for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

Thomas F. Chromecki; Karim Bensalah; Mesut Remzi; G. Verhoest; Eugene K. Cha; Douglas S. Scherr; Giacomo Novara; Pierre I. Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F. Shariat

Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare disease, which means there are little evidence-based data available to guide clinical decision-making. Although diagnosis and treatment of UTUC have improved significantly over the last 5 years, accurate risk stratification remains a challenge owing to the difficulty of clinical staging. A number of potential prognostic factors have been identified, encompassing clinical characteristics, pathological factors and molecular markers. Tumor stage and lymph node status are the most important predictors of survival in patients with UTUC. Preoperative evaluation for hydronephrosis can identify patients at risk of non-organ-confined disease. In the subgroup of patients with stage ≥pT2 disease, a longer interval between diagnosis and radical nephroureterectomy is associated with a higher risk of disease recurrence and cancer-specific mortality. Extensive tumor necrosis, sessile tumor architecture and lymphovascular invasion are independent predictors of clinical outcomes for patients with UTUC treated with radical nephroureterectomy. The incorporation of such prognosticators into clinical prediction models might help to guide decision-making with regard to timing of surveillance, type of treatment, performance of lymphadenectomy, and consideration of neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic therapies.


European Urology | 2015

Genomic Predictors of Survival in Patients with High-grade Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder

Philip H. Kim; Eugene K. Cha; John P. Sfakianos; Gopa Iyer; Emily C. Zabor; Sasinya N. Scott; Irina Ostrovnaya; Ricardo Ramirez; Arony Sun; Ronak Shah; Alyssa Yee; Victor E. Reuter; Dean F. Bajorin; Jonathan E. Rosenberg; Nikolaus Schultz; Michael F. Berger; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; David B. Solit; Bernard H. Bochner

UNLABELLED Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) is genomically heterogeneous, with frequent alterations in genes regulating chromatin state, cell cycle control, and receptor kinase signaling. To identify prognostic genomic markers in high-grade UCB, we used capture-based massively parallel sequencing to analyze 109 tumors. Mutations were detected in 240 genes, with 23 genes mutated in ≥5% of cases. The presence of a recurrent phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) mutation was associated with improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.35; p=0.014) and improved cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR: 0.35; p=0.040) in patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC). In multivariable analyses controlling for pT and pN stages, PIK3CA mutation remained associated with RFS (HR: 0.39; p=0.032). The most frequent alteration, TP53 mutation (57%), was more common in extravesical disease (69% vs 32%, p=0.005) and lymph node-positive disease (77% vs 56%, p=0.025). Patients with cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A)-altered tumors experienced worse RFS (HR: 5.76; p<0.001) and worse CSS (HR: 2.94; p=0.029) in multivariable analyses. Mutations in chromatin-modifying genes were highly prevalent but not associated with outcomes. In UCB patients treated with RC, PIK3CA mutations are associated with favorable outcomes, whereas TP53 and CDKN2A alterations are associated with poor outcomes. Genomic profiling may aid in the identification of UCB patients at highest risk following RC. PATIENT SUMMARY Using next-generation sequencing, we identified genomic subsets of high-grade urothelial bladder cancer associated with favorable and unfavorable outcomes. These findings may aid in the selection of patients most likely to benefit from novel combined modality approaches.


European Urology | 2014

Prognostic factors and risk groups in T1G3 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients initially treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin: results of a retrospective multicenter study of 2451 patients

Paolo Gontero; Richard Sylvester; Francesca Pisano; Steven Joniau; Kathy Vander Eeckt; Vincenzo Serretta; S. Larré; Savino M. Di Stasi; Bas W.G. van Rhijn; Alfred Witjes; Anne J. Grotenhuis; Lambertus A. Kiemeney; Renzo Colombo; Alberto Briganti; M. Babjuk; Per Malmström; Marco Oderda; Jacques Irani; Núria Malats; Jack Baniel; Roy Mano; Tommaso Cai; Eugene K. Cha; P. Ardelt; J. Varkarakis; Riccardo Bartoletti; Martin Spahn; Robert Johansson; Bruno Frea; Viktor Soukup

BACKGROUND The impact of prognostic factors in T1G3 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BCa) patients is critical for proper treatment decision making. OBJECTIVE To assess prognostic factors in patients who received bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) as initial intravesical treatment of T1G3 tumors and to identify a subgroup of high-risk patients who should be considered for more aggressive treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Individual patient data were collected for 2451 T1G3 patients from 23 centers who received BCG between 1990 and 2011. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Using Cox multivariable regression, the prognostic importance of several clinical variables was assessed for time to recurrence, progression, BCa-specific survival, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS With a median follow-up of 5.2 yr, 465 patients (19%) progressed, 509 (21%) underwent cystectomy, and 221 (9%) died because of BCa. In multivariable analyses, the most important prognostic factors for progression were age, tumor size, and concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS); the most important prognostic factors for BCa-specific survival and OS were age and tumor size. Patients were divided into four risk groups for progression according to the number of adverse factors among age ≥ 70 yr, size ≥ 3 cm, and presence of CIS. Progression rates at 10 yr ranged from 17% to 52%. BCa-specific death rates at 10 yr were 32% in patients ≥ 70 yr with tumor size ≥ 3 cm and 13% otherwise. CONCLUSIONS T1G3 patients ≥ 70 yr with tumors ≥ 3 cm and concomitant CIS should be treated more aggressively because of the high risk of progression. PATIENT SUMMARY Although the majority of T1G3 patients can be safely treated with intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin, there is a subgroup of T1G3 patients with age ≥ 70 yr, tumor size ≥ 3 cm, and concomitant CIS who have a high risk of progression and thus require aggressive treatment.


European Urology | 2012

Clinical nodal staging scores for bladder cancer: A proposal for preoperative risk assessment

Shahrokh F. Shariat; Behfar Ehdaie; Michael Rink; Eugene K. Cha; Robert S. Svatek; Thomas F. Chromecki; Harun Fajkovic; Giacomo Novara; Scott G. David; Siamak Daneshmand; Yves Fradet; Yair Lotan; Arthur I. Sagalowsky; Thomas Clozel; Patrick J. Bastian; Wassim Kassouf; Hans Martin Fritsche; Maximilian Burger; Jonathan I. Izawa; Derya Tilki; Firas Abdollah; Felix K.-H. Chun; Guru Sonpavde; Pierre I. Karakiewicz; Douglas S. Scherr; Mithat Gonen

BACKGROUND Radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymph node dissection (LND) is the standard of care for refractory non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Although consensus exists on the need for LND, its extent is still debated. OBJECTIVE To develop a model that allows preoperative determination of the minimum number of lymph nodes (LNs) needed to be removed at RC to ensure true nodal status. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We analyzed data from 4335 patients treated with RC and pelvic LND without neoadjuvant chemotherapy at 12 academic centers located in the United States, Canada, and Europe. MEASUREMENTS We estimated the sensitivity of pathologic nodal staging using a beta-binomial model and developed clinical (preoperative) nodal staging scores (cNSS), which represent the probability that a patient has LN metastasis as a function of the number of examined nodes. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The probability of missing a positive LN decreased with an increasing number of nodes examined (52% if 3 nodes were examined, 40% if 5 were examined, and 26% if 10 were examined). A cNSS of 90% was achieved by examining 6 nodes for clinical Ta-Tis tumors, 9 nodes for cT1 tumors, and 25 nodes for cT2 tumors. In contrast, examination of 25 nodes provided only 77% cNSS for cT3-T4 tumors. The study is limited due to its retrospective design, its multicenter nature, and a lack of preoperative staging parameters. CONCLUSIONS Every patient treated with RC for bladder cancer needs an LND to ensure accurate nodal staging. The minimum number of examined LNs for adequate staging depends preoperatively on the clinical T stage. Predictive tools can give a preoperative estimation of the likelihood of nodal metastasis and thereby allow tailored decision-making regarding the extent of LND at RC.


European Urology | 2015

Genomic Characterization of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

John P. Sfakianos; Eugene K. Cha; Gopa Iyer; Sasinya N. Scott; Emily C. Zabor; Ronak Shah; Qinghu Ren; Aditya Bagrodia; Philip H. Kim; A. Ari Hakimi; Irina Ostrovnaya; Ricardo Ramirez; Aphrothiti J. Hanrahan; Neil Desai; Arony Sun; Patrizia Pinciroli; Jonathan E. Rosenberg; Guido Dalbagni; Nikolaus Schultz; Dean F. Bajorin; Victor E. Reuter; Michael F. Berger; Bernard H. Bochner; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; David B. Solit; Jonathan A. Coleman

BACKGROUND Despite a similar histologic appearance, upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) tumors have distinct epidemiologic and clinicopathologic differences. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether the differences between UTUC and UCB result from intrinsic biological diversity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Tumor and germline DNA from patients with UTUC (n=83) and UCB (n=102) were analyzed using a custom next-generation sequencing assay to identify somatic mutations and copy number alterations in 300 cancer-associated genes. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We described co-mutation patterns and copy number alterations in UTUC. We also compared mutation frequencies in high-grade UTUC (n=59) and high-grade UCB (n=102). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Comparison of high-grade UTUC and UCB revealed significant differences in the prevalence of somatic alterations. Genes altered more commonly in high-grade UTUC included FGFR3 (35.6% vs 21.6%; p=0.065), HRAS (13.6% vs 1.0%; p=0.001), and CDKN2B (15.3% vs 3.9%; p=0.016). Genes less frequently mutated in high-grade UTUC included TP53 (25.4% vs 57.8%; p<0.001), RB1 (0.0% vs 18.6%; p<0.001), and ARID1A (13.6% vs 27.5%; p=0.050). Because our assay was restricted to genomic alterations in a targeted panel, rare mutations and epigenetic changes were not analyzed. CONCLUSIONS High-grade UTUC tumors display a spectrum of genetic alterations similar to high-grade UCB. However, there were significant differences in the prevalence of several recurrently mutated genes including HRAS, TP53, and RB1. As relevant targeted inhibitors are being developed and tested, these results may have important implications for the site-specific management of patients with urothelial carcinoma. PATIENT SUMMARY Comparison of next-generation sequencing of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) with urothelial bladder cancer identified that similar mutations were present in both cancer types but at different frequencies, indicating a potential need for unique management strategies. UTUC tumors were found to have a high rate of mutations that could be targeted with novel therapies.

Collaboration


Dive into the Eugene K. Cha's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shahrokh F. Shariat

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bernard H. Bochner

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David B. Solit

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hikmat Al-Ahmadie

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael F. Berger

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dean F. Bajorin

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yair Lotan

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gopa Iyer

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge