Eugene McSorley
Royal Holloway, University of London
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Eugene McSorley.
Journal of Vision | 2003
Eugene McSorley; John M. Findlay
We report four experiments with search displays of Gabor patches. Our aim was to study the accuracy of gaze control in search tasks. In Experiment 1, a target was presented with a single distractor Gabor of a different spatial frequency on the same axis. Subjects could locate the target with the first saccade if the distractor was more distant, but when the distractor was between the fixation point and the target, the first saccade landed much closer to the distractor. In Experiment 2, the number of display items was increased to 16 in a double ring configuration. With this configuration, first saccades were accurately directed to the target, even when there was an intervening distractor in exactly the same configuration as in Experiment 1. Experiment 3 suggested that the improvement in accuracy was not due to distractor homogeneity but rather may be attributable to the increased first saccade latency with the ring configuration. In the final experiment, latency was shown to covary with saccade accuracy. The results are related to a general framework whereby the presence of distractors operates to hold fixation for a longer period of time, thus allowing a greater period of visual processing and more accurate eye movements.
Vision Research | 2004
Casimir J. H. Ludwig; Iain D. Gilchrist; Eugene McSorley
We characterised the impact of spatial frequency and contrast on saccade latencies to single Gabor patches. Saccade latencies decreased as a function of contrast, and increased with spatial frequency. The observed latency variations are qualitatively similar to those observed for manual reaction times. For single target detection, our findings highlight the similarity in the visual processes that support both saccadic and manual responses.
Vision Research | 2001
Eugene McSorley; John M. Findlay
The accuracy of saccade localisation during visual search was examined for a search target defined by the single features of orientation or depth or by a conjunction of the two features. Subjects were required to move their eyes to the target which appeared in one of eight possible locations, arranged circularly around fixation, with non-targets filling the remaining seven positions. Search for a target defined by a single feature resulted in approximately 70% correct first saccades in both cases, while search for the conjunction target resulted in only 40% correct first saccades. Furthermore, averaged latency for conjunction search was longer than for simple search. Nevertheless, some subjects showed a remarkably good ability to locate a conjunction target with a single saccade of short latency. An analysis of first saccades in terms of their speed and accuracy indicates that the target selection is not preceded by a covert scanning of the display but rather is a result of parallel processing of the visual information provided. We also relate our study to the study of conjunction search reported by Nakayama and Siverman [Nakayama, K., & Silverman, G.H. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature, 320, 264-265.].
Perception | 1999
Eugene McSorley; John M. Findlay
Three pairs of experiments were conducted to investigate the importance of spatial-frequency-processing delays imposed by the visual system on the efficacy of their subsequent integration. In the first pair of experiments filtered versions of a natural image were found to be easily discriminable from the full-bandwidth image. These images were then placed into triplets and presented sequentially. Subjects were required to detect the presence of a full-bandwidth target image within the sequence. As with previous results a low-to-high progression of spatial-frequency information did increase the number of errors of full-bandwidth-image detection within the triplets where it was not present. However, this was not found across all conditions and was suggested to be due to the increased discriminability of the constituent images which form the image triplets. The second experiment was a repetition of the first with more confusable component images. Again the weak order effect on target detection was found. It was suggested that this may be due to the nature of the stimulus used. The third pair of experiments repeated the design of the first pair of experiments but with Gabor patches which provide localised spatial-frequency information. It was found that a low-to-high progression of spatial frequencies resulted in more false detections of the target. The results are interpreted as supporting an integration mechanism which operates with greater efficacy when the presentation of spatial-frequency information mirrors that naturally imposed by the neural delays involved in the processing of spatial frequencies.
Perception | 2002
Eugene McSorley; John M. Findlay
The existence of a temporal anisotropy in the integration of spatial frequencies, such that spatial frequencies are integrated more effectively if they are available from low to high through time, has been examined in a series of experiments. In the first experiment, the first three harmonics of a square wave were presented in a low-to-high or a high-to-low sequence in a temporal two-interval forced-choice experiment. Subjects were asked to indicate which sequence appeared to resemble a square wave more. A high-to-low sequence of spatial frequencies was judged to more resemble the target than the low-to-high sequence. These results support a temporal anisotropy in the integration of spatial frequencies of exactly the opposite form to that suggested from previous results. Further experiments established that this was not due to task differences or to subjects basing their decision on the final spatial frequency shown. An interpretation is offered in which an isotropic mechanism for spatial-frequency integration is combined with a recency bias.
Journal of Vision | 2004
Eugene McSorley; Robin Walker; Patrick Haggard
Perception | 2010
Sarah R. Allred; Eugene McSorley
Journal of Vision | 2010
Eugene McSorley; John M. Findlay
Journal of Vision | 2010
Eugene McSorley; John M. Findlay
Spatial Vision | 2005
Eugene McSorley; Robin Walker; Patrick Haggard