Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Eugenia Morselli is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Eugenia Morselli.


Nature Cell Biology | 2008

Regulation of autophagy by cytoplasmic p53

Ezgi Tasdemir; M. Chiara Maiuri; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Ilio Vitale; Mojgan Djavaheri-Mergny; Marcello D'Amelio; Alfredo Criollo; Eugenia Morselli; Changlian Zhu; Francis Harper; Ulf Nannmark; Chrysanthi Samara; Paolo Pinton; Jose Miguel Vicencio; Rosa Carnuccio; Ute M. Moll; Frank Madeo; Patrizia Paterlini-Bréchot; Rosario Rizzuto; Gérard Pierron; Klas Blomgren; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Patrice Codogno; Francesco Cecconi; Guido Kroemer

Multiple cellular stressors, including activation of the tumour suppressor p53, can stimulate autophagy. Here we show that deletion, depletion or inhibition of p53 can induce autophagy in human, mouse and nematode cells subjected to knockout, knockdown or pharmacological inhibition of p53. Enhanced autophagy improved the survival of p53-deficient cancer cells under conditions of hypoxia and nutrient depletion, allowing them to maintain high ATP levels. Inhibition of p53 led to autophagy in enucleated cells, and cytoplasmic, not nuclear, p53 was able to repress the enhanced autophagy of p53−/− cells. Many different inducers of autophagy (for example, starvation, rapamycin and toxins affecting the endoplasmic reticulum) stimulated proteasome-mediated degradation of p53 through a pathway relying on the E3 ubiquitin ligase HDM2. Inhibition of p53 degradation prevented the activation of autophagy in several cell lines, in response to several distinct stimuli. These results provide evidence of a key signalling pathway that links autophagy to the cancer-associated dysregulation of p53.


Cell Death & Differentiation | 2009

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring cell death in higher eukaryotes

Lorenzo Galluzzi; Stuart A. Aaronson; John M. Abrams; Emad S. Alnemri; David W. Andrews; Eric H. Baehrecke; Nicolas G. Bazan; Mikhail V. Blagosklonny; Klas Blomgren; Christoph Borner; Dale E. Bredesen; Catherine Brenner; Maria Castedo; John A. Cidlowski; Aaron Ciechanover; Gerald M. Cohen; V De Laurenzi; R De Maria; Mohanish Deshmukh; Brian David Dynlacht; Wafik S. El-Deiry; Richard A. Flavell; Simone Fulda; Carmen Garrido; Pierre Golstein; Marie Lise Gougeon; Douglas R. Green; Hinrich Gronemeyer; György Hajnóczky; J. M. Hardwick

Cell death is essential for a plethora of physiological processes, and its deregulation characterizes numerous human diseases. Thus, the in-depth investigation of cell death and its mechanisms constitutes a formidable challenge for fundamental and applied biomedical research, and has tremendous implications for the development of novel therapeutic strategies. It is, therefore, of utmost importance to standardize the experimental procedures that identify dying and dead cells in cell cultures and/or in tissues, from model organisms and/or humans, in healthy and/or pathological scenarios. Thus far, dozens of methods have been proposed to quantify cell death-related parameters. However, no guidelines exist regarding their use and interpretation, and nobody has thoroughly annotated the experimental settings for which each of these techniques is most appropriate. Here, we provide a nonexhaustive comparison of methods to detect cell death with apoptotic or nonapoptotic morphologies, their advantages and pitfalls. These guidelines are intended for investigators who study cell death, as well as for reviewers who need to constructively critique scientific reports that deal with cellular demise. Given the difficulties in determining the exact number of cells that have passed the point-of-no-return of the signaling cascades leading to cell death, we emphasize the importance of performing multiple, methodologically unrelated assays to quantify dying and dead cells.


Cell Death and Disease | 2010

Caloric restriction and resveratrol promote longevity through the Sirtuin-1-dependent induction of autophagy

Eugenia Morselli; Maria Chiara Maiuri; Maria Markaki; Evgenia Megalou; Angela Pasparaki; Konstantinos Palikaras; Alfredo Criollo; Luca Galluzzi; Shoaib Ahmad Malik; Ilio Vitale; Mickaël Michaud; Frank Madeo; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Guido Kroemer

Caloric restriction and autophagy-inducing pharmacological agents can prolong lifespan in model organisms including mice, flies, and nematodes. In this study, we show that transgenic expression of Sirtuin-1 induces autophagy in human cells in vitro and in Caenorhabditis elegans in vivo. The knockdown or knockout of Sirtuin-1 prevented the induction of autophagy by resveratrol and by nutrient deprivation in human cells as well as by dietary restriction in C. elegans. Conversely, Sirtuin-1 was not required for the induction of autophagy by rapamycin or p53 inhibition, neither in human cells nor in C. elegans. The knockdown or pharmacological inhibition of Sirtuin-1 enhanced the vulnerability of human cells to metabolic stress, unless they were stimulated to undergo autophagy by treatment with rapamycin or p53 inhibition. Along similar lines, resveratrol and dietary restriction only prolonged the lifespan of autophagy-proficient nematodes, whereas these beneficial effects on longevity were abolished by the knockdown of the essential autophagic modulator Beclin-1. We conclude that autophagy is universally required for the lifespan-prolonging effects of caloric restriction and pharmacological Sirtuin-1 activators.


Current Opinion in Cell Biology | 2010

Autophagy regulation by p53.

Maria Chiara Maiuri; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Eugenia Morselli; Oliver Kepp; Shoaib Ahmad Malik; Guido Kroemer

Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved catabolic pathway that is involved in numerous physiological processes and in multiple pathological conditions including cancer. Autophagy is regulated by an intricate network of signaling cascades that have not yet been entirely disentangled. Accumulating evidence indicates that p53, the best-characterized human tumor suppressor protein, can modulate autophagy in a dual fashion, depending on its subcellular localization. On the one hand, p53 functions as a nuclear transcription factor and transactivates proapoptotic, cell cycle-arresting and proautophagic genes. On the other hand, cytoplasmic p53 can operate at mitochondria to promote cell death and can repress autophagy via poorly characterized mechanisms. This review focuses on the recently discovered function of p53 as a master regulator of autophagy.


Cell Death & Differentiation | 2009

Control of autophagy by oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes

Maria Chiara Maiuri; Ezgi Tasdemir; Alfredo Criollo; Eugenia Morselli; Jose Miguel Vicencio; Rosa Carnuccio; Guido Kroemer

Multiple oncogenes (in particular phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, PI3K; activated Akt1; antiapoptotic proteins from the Bcl-2 family) inhibit autophagy. Similarly, several tumor suppressor proteins (such as BH3-only proteins; death-associated protein kinase-1, DAPK1; the phosphatase that antagonizes PI3K, PTEN; tuberous sclerosic complex 1 and 2, TSC1 and TSC2; as well as LKB1/STK11) induce autophagy, meaning that their loss reduces autophagy. Beclin-1, which is required for autophagy induction acts as a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor protein, and other essential autophagy mediators (such as Atg4c, UVRAG and Bif-1) are bona fide oncosuppressors. One of the central tumor suppressor proteins, p53 exerts an ambiguous function in the regulation of autophagy. Within the nucleus, p53 can act as an autophagy-inducing transcription factor. Within the cytoplasm, p53 exerts a tonic autophagy-inhibitory function, and its degradation is actually required for the induction of autophagy. The role of autophagy in oncogenesis and anticancer therapy is contradictory. Chronic suppression of autophagy may stimulate oncogenesis. However, once a tumor is formed, autophagy inhibition may be a therapeutic goal for radiosensitization and chemosensitization. Altogether, the current state-of-the art suggests a complex relationship between cancer and deregulated autophagy that must be disentangled by further in-depth investigation.


PLOS Pathogens | 2008

Viral Control of Mitochondrial Apoptosis

Lorenzo Galluzzi; Catherine Brenner; Eugenia Morselli; Zahia Touat; Guido Kroemer

Throughout the process of pathogen–host co-evolution, viruses have developed a battery of distinct strategies to overcome biochemical and immunological defenses of the host. Thus, viruses have acquired the capacity to subvert host cell apoptosis, control inflammatory responses, and evade immune reactions. Since the elimination of infected cells via programmed cell death is one of the most ancestral defense mechanisms against infection, disabling host cell apoptosis might represent an almost obligate step in the viral life cycle. Conversely, viruses may take advantage of stimulating apoptosis, either to kill uninfected cells from the immune system, or to induce the breakdown of infected cells, thereby favoring viral dissemination. Several viral polypeptides are homologs of host-derived apoptosis-regulatory proteins, such as members of the Bcl-2 family. Moreover, viral factors with no homology to host proteins specifically target key components of the apoptotic machinery. Here, we summarize the current knowledge on the viral modulation of mitochondrial apoptosis, by focusing in particular on the mechanisms by which viral proteins control the host cell death apparatus.


Biochimica et Biophysica Acta | 2009

Anti- and pro-tumor functions of autophagy

Eugenia Morselli; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Oliver Kepp; José-Miguel Vicencio; Alfredo Criollo; Maria Chiara Maiuri; Guido Kroemer

Autophagy constitutes one of the major responses to stress in eukaryotic cells, and is regulated by a complex network of signaling cascades. Not surprisingly, autophagy is implicated in multiple pathological processes, including infection by pathogens, inflammatory bowel disease, neurodegeneration and cancer. Both oncogenesis and tumor survival are influenced by perturbations of the molecular machinery that controls autophagy. Numerous oncoproteins, including phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, Akt1 and anti-apoptotic members of the Bcl-2 family suppress autophagy. Conversely, several tumor suppressor proteins (e.g., Atg4c; beclin 1; Bif-1; BH3-only proteins; death-associated protein kinase 1; LKB1/STK11; PTEN; UVRAG) promote the autophagic pathway. This does not entirely apply to p53, one of the most important tumor suppressor proteins, which regulates autophagy in an ambiguous fashion, depending on its subcellular localization. Irrespective of the controversial role of p53, basal levels of autophagy appear to inhibit tumor development. On the contrary, chemotherapy- and metabolic stress-induced activation of the autophagic pathway reportedly contribute to the survival of formed tumors, thereby favoring resistance. In this context, autophagy inhibition would represent a major therapeutic target for chemosensitization. Here, we will review the current knowledge on the dual role of autophagy as an anti- and pro-tumor mechanism.


Journal of Cell Biology | 2011

Spermidine and resveratrol induce autophagy by distinct pathways converging on the acetylproteome

Eugenia Morselli; Guillermo Mariño; Martin V. Bennetzen; Tobias Eisenberg; Evgenia Megalou; Sabrina Schroeder; Sandra Cabrera; Paule Bénit; Pierre Rustin; Alfredo Criollo; Oliver Kepp; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Shensi Shen; Shoaib Ahmad Malik; Maria Chiara Maiuri; Yoshiyuki Horio; Carlos López-Otín; Jens S. Andersen; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Frank Madeo; Guido Kroemer

The acetylase inhibitor spermidine and the sirtuin-1 activator resveratrol disrupt the antagonistic network of acetylases and deacetylases that regulate autophagy.


Cancer Research | 2010

miR-181a and miR-630 regulate cisplatin-induced cancer cell death.

Lorenzo Galluzzi; Eugenia Morselli; Ilio Vitale; Oliver Kepp; Laura Senovilla; Alfredo Criollo; Nicolas Servant; Philippe Hupé; Thomas Robert; Hugues Ripoche; Vladimir Lazar; Annick Harel-Bellan; Philippe Dessen; Emmanuel Barillot; Guido Kroemer

MicroRNAs (miRNA) are noncoding RNAs that regulate multiple cellular processes, including proliferation and apoptosis. We used microarray technology to identify miRNAs that were upregulated by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) A549 cells in response to cisplatin (CDDP). The corresponding synthetic miRNA precursors (pre-miRNAs) per se were not lethal when transfected into A549 cells yet affected cell death induction by CDDP, C2-ceramide, cadmium, etoposide, and mitoxantrone in an inducer-specific fashion. Whereas synthetic miRNA inhibitors (anti-miRNAs) targeting miR-181a and miR-630 failed to modulate the response of A549 to CDDP, pre-miR-181a and pre-miR-630 enhanced and reduced CDDP-triggered cell death, respectively. Pre-miR-181a and pre-miR-630 consistently modulated mitochondrial/postmitochondrial steps of the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis, including Bax oligomerization, mitochondrial transmembrane potential dissipation, and the proteolytic maturation of caspase-9 and caspase-3. In addition, pre-miR-630 blocked early manifestations of the DNA damage response, including the phosphorylation of the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase and of two ATM substrates, histone H2AX and p53. Pharmacologic and genetic inhibition of p53 corroborated the hypothesis that pre-miR-630 (but not pre-miR-181a) blocks the upstream signaling pathways that are ignited by DNA damage and converge on p53 activation. Pre-miR-630 arrested A549 cells in the G0-G1 phase of the cell cycle, correlating with increased levels of the cell cycle inhibitor p27(Kip1) as well as with reduced proliferation rates and resulting in greatly diminished sensitivity of A549 cells to the late S-G2-M cell cycle arrest mediated by CDDP. Altogether, these results identify miR-181a and miR-630 as novel modulators of the CDDP response in NSCLC.


The EMBO Journal | 2010

The IKK complex contributes to the induction of autophagy

Alfredo Criollo; Laura Senovilla; Hélène Authier; Maria Chiara Maiuri; Eugenia Morselli; Ilio Vitale; Oliver Kepp; Ezgi Tasdemir; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Shensi Shen; Nicolas F. Delahaye; Antoine Tesniere; Daniela De Stefano; Amena Ben Younes; Francis Harper; Gérard Pierron; Sergio Lavandero; Laurence Zitvogel; Alain Israël; Véronique Baud; Guido Kroemer

In response to stress, cells start transcriptional and transcription‐independent programs that can lead to adaptation or death. Here, we show that multiple inducers of autophagy, including nutrient depletion, trigger the activation of the IKK (IκB kinase) complex that is best known for its essential role in the activation of the transcription factor NF‐κB by stress. Constitutively active IKK subunits stimulated autophagy and transduced multiple signals that operate in starvation‐induced autophagy, including the phosphorylation of AMPK and JNK1. Genetic inhibition of the nuclear translocation of NF‐κB or ablation of the p65/RelA NF‐κB subunit failed to suppress IKK‐induced autophagy, indicating that IKK can promote the autophagic pathway in an NF‐κB‐independent manner. In murine and human cells, knockout and/or knockdown of IKK subunits (but not that of p65) prevented the induction of autophagy in response to multiple stimuli. Moreover, the knockout of IKK‐β suppressed the activation of autophagy by food deprivation or rapamycin injections in vivo, in mice. Altogether, these results indicate that IKK has a cardinal role in the stimulation of autophagy by physiological and pharmacological stimuli.

Collaboration


Dive into the Eugenia Morselli's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ilio Vitale

University of Rome Tor Vergata

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Deborah J. Clegg

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shensi Shen

Institut Gustave Roussy

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge