Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Eva Bermejo-Sánchez is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Eva Bermejo-Sánchez.


American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C-seminars in Medical Genetics | 2011

Cloacal exstrophy: an epidemiologic study from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research.

Marcia L. Feldkamp; Lorenzo D. Botto; Emmanuelle Amar; Marian K. Bakker; Eva Bermejo-Sánchez; Sebastiano Bianca; Mark A. Canfield; Eduardo E. Castilla; Maurizio Clementi; Melinda Csáky-Szunyogh; Emanuele Leoncini; Zhu Li; R. Brian Lowry; Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo; Paul Merlob; Margery Morgan; Osvaldo Mutchinick; Anke Rissmann; Annukka Ritvanen; Csaba Siffel; John C. Carey

Cloacal exstrophy presents as a complex abdominal wall defect thought to result from a mesodermal abnormality. Anatomically, its main components are Omphalocele, bladder Exstrophy and Imperforate anus. Other associated malformations include renal malformations and Spine defects (OEIS complex). Historically, the prevalence ranges from 1 in 200,000 to 400,000 births, with higher rates in females. Cloacal exstrophy is likely etiologically heterogeneous as suggested by its recurrence in families and occurrence in monozygotic twins. The defect has been described in infants with limb‐body wall, with trisomy 18, and in one pregnancy exposed to Dilantin and diazepam. Due to its rarity, the use of a nonspecific diagnostic code for case identification, and lack of validation of the clinical findings, cloacal exstrophy remains an epidemiologic challenge. The purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence, associated anomalies and maternal characteristics among infants born with cloacal exstrophy. We used data from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research submitted from 18 birth defect surveillance programs representing 24 countries. Cases were clinically evaluated locally and reviewed centrally by two authors. Cases of persistent cloaca were excluded. A total of 186 cases of cloacal exstrophy were identified. Overall prevalence was 1 in 131,579 births: ranging from 1 in 44,444 births in Wales to 1 in 269,464 births in South America. Live birth prevalence was 1 in 184,195 births. Prevalence ratios did not vary by maternal age. Forty‐two (22.6%) cases met the criteria for the OEIS complex, whereas 60 (32.3%) were classified as OEI and 18 (9.7%) as EIS (one with suspected VATER (0.5%)). Other findings included two cases with trisomy 13 (one without a karyotype confirmation), one with mosaic trisomy 12 (0.5%), one with mosaic 45,X (0.5%) and one classified as having amnion band sequence (0.5%). Twenty‐seven (14.5%) infants had other anomalies unrelated to cloacal exstrophy. Cloacal exstrophy is a rare anomaly with variability in prevalence by geographic location. The proportion of cases classified as OEIS complex was lower in this study than previously reported. Among all cases, 54.8% were reported to have an omphalocele.


American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C-seminars in Medical Genetics | 2011

Bladder exstrophy: An epidemiologic study from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and an overview of the literature†‡

Csaba Siffel; Adolfo Correa; Emmanuelle Amar; Marian K. Bakker; Eva Bermejo-Sánchez; Sebastiano Bianca; Eduardo E. Castilla; Maurizio Clementi; Guido Cocchi; Melinda Csáky-Szunyogh; Marcia L. Feldkamp; Danielle Landau; Emanuele Leoncini; Zhu Li; R. Brian Lowry; Lisa Marengo; Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo; Margery Morgan; Osvaldo Mutchinick; Anna Pierini; Anke Rissmann; Annukka Ritvanen; Gioacchino Scarano; Elena Szabova; Richard S. Olney

Bladder exstrophy (BE) is a complex congenital anomaly characterized by a defect in the closure of the lower abdominal wall and bladder. We aimed to provide an overview of the literature and conduct an epidemiologic study to describe the prevalence, and maternal and case characteristics of BE. We used data from 22 participating member programs of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research (ICBDSR). All cases were reviewed and classified as isolated, syndrome, and multiple congenital anomalies. We estimated the total prevalence of BE and calculated the frequency and odds ratios for various maternal and case characteristics. A total of 546 cases with BE were identified among 26,355,094 births. The total prevalence of BE was 2.07 per 100,000 births (95% CI: 1.90–2.25) and varied between 0.52 and 4.63 among surveillance programs participating in the study. BE was nearly twice as common among male as among female cases. The proportion of isolated cases was 71%. Prevalence appeared to increase with increasing categories of maternal age, particularly among isolated cases. The total prevalence of BE showed some variations by geographical region, which is most likely attributable to differences in registration of cases. The higher total prevalence among male cases and older mothers, especially among isolated cases, warrants further attention.


Public Health Genomics | 2014

European Recommendations for Primary Prevention of Congenital Anomalies: A Joined Effort of EUROCAT and EUROPLAN Projects to Facilitate Inclusion of This Topic in the National Rare Disease Plans

Domenica Taruscio; Larraitz Arriola; Francesca Baldi; Ingeborg Barišić; Eva Bermejo-Sánchez; Fabrizio Bianchi; Elisa Calzolari; Pietro Carbone; Rhonda Curran; Ester Garne; Miriam Gatt; Anna Latos-Bielenska; Babak Khoshnood; Lorentz M. Irgens; Alberto Mantovani; María Luisa Martínez-Frías; Amanda J. Neville; Anke Rißmann; Stefania Ruggeri; Diana Wellesley; Helen Dolk

Congenital anomalies (CA) are the paradigm example of rare diseases liable to primary prevention actions due to the multifactorial etiology of many of them, involving a number of environmental factors together with genetic predispositions. Yet despite the preventive potential, lack of attention to an integrated preventive strategy has led to the prevalence of CA remaining relatively stable in recent decades. The 2 European projects, EUROCAT and EUROPLAN, have joined efforts to provide the first science-based and comprehensive set of recommendations for the primary prevention of CA in the European Union. The resulting EUROCAT-EUROPLAN ‘Recommendations on Policies to Be Considered for the Primary Prevention of Congenital Anomalies in National Plans and Strategies on Rare Diseases were issued in 2012 and endorsed by EUCERD (European Union Committee of Experts on Rare Diseases) in 2013. The recommendations exploit interdisciplinary expertise encompassing drugs, diet, lifestyles, maternal health status, and the environment. The recommendations include evidence-based actions aimed at reducing risk factors and at increasing protective factors and behaviors at both individual and population level. Moreover, consideration is given to topics specifically related to CA (e.g. folate status, teratogens) as well as of broad public health impact (e.g. obesity, smoking) which call for specific attention to their relevance in the pre- and periconceptional period. The recommendations, reported entirely in this paper, are a comprehensive tool to implement primary prevention into national policies on rare diseases in Europe.


American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C-seminars in Medical Genetics | 2011

Amelia: A Multi-Center Descriptive Epidemiologic Study in a Large Dataset from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and Overview of the Literature

Eva Bermejo-Sánchez; Lourdes Cuevas; Emmanuelle Amar; Marian K. Bakker; Sebastiano Bianca; Fabrizio Bianchi; Mark A. Canfield; Eduardo E. Castilla; Maurizio Clementi; Guido Cocchi; Marcia L. Feldkamp; Danielle Landau; Emanuele Leoncini; Zhu Li; R. Brian Lowry; Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo; Osvaldo Mutchinick; Anke Rissmann; Annukka Ritvanen; Gioacchino Scarano; Csaba Siffel; Elena Szabova; María Luisa Martínez-Frías

This study describes the epidemiology of congenital amelia (absence of limb/s), using the largest series of cases known to date. Data were gathered by 20 surveillance programs on congenital anomalies, all International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research members, from all continents but Africa, from 1968 to 2006, depending on the program. Reported clinical information on cases was thoroughly reviewed to identify those strictly meeting the definition of amelia. Those with amniotic bands or limb‐body wall complex were excluded. The primary epidemiological analyses focused on isolated cases and those with multiple congenital anomalies (MCA). A total of 326 amelia cases were ascertained among 23,110,591 live births, stillbirths and (for some programs) elective terminations of pregnancy for fetal anomalies. The overall total prevalence was 1.41 per 100,000 (95% confidence interval: 1.26–1.57). Only China Beijing and Mexico RYVEMCE had total prevalences, which were significantly higher than this overall total prevalence. Some under‐registration could influence the total prevalence in some programs. Liveborn cases represented 54.6% of total. Among monomelic cases (representing 65.2% of nonsyndromic amelia cases), both sides were equally involved, and the upper limbs (53.9%) were slightly more frequently affected. One of the most interesting findings was a higher prevalence of amelia among offspring of mothers younger than 20 years. Sixty‐nine percent of the cases had MCA or syndromes. The most frequent defects associated with amelia were other types of musculoskeletal defects, intestinal, some renal and genital defects, oral clefts, defects of cardiac septa, and anencephaly.


American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C-seminars in Medical Genetics | 2011

Phocomelia: a worldwide descriptive epidemiologic study in a large series of cases from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and overview of the literature

Eva Bermejo-Sánchez; Lourdes Cuevas; Emmanuelle Amar; Sebastiano Bianca; Fabrizio Bianchi; Lorenzo D. Botto; Mark A. Canfield; Eduardo E. Castilla; Maurizio Clementi; Guido Cocchi; Danielle Landau; Emanuele Leoncini; Zhu Li; R. Brian Lowry; Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo; Osvaldo Mutchinick; Anke Rissmann; Annukka Ritvanen; Gioacchino Scarano; Csaba Siffel; Elena Szabova; María Luisa Martínez-Frías

Epidemiologic data on phocomelia are scarce. This study presents an epidemiologic analysis of the largest series of phocomelia cases known to date. Data were provided by 19 birth defect surveillance programs, all members of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research. Depending on the program, data corresponded to a period from 1968 through 2006. A total of 22,740,933 live births, stillbirths and, for some programs, elective terminations of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (ETOPFA) were monitored. After a detailed review of clinical data, only true phocomelia cases were included. Descriptive data are presented and additional analyses compared isolated cases with those with multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), excluding syndromes. We also briefly compared congenital anomalies associated with nonsyndromic phocomelia with those presented with amelia, another rare severe congenital limb defect. A total of 141 phocomelia cases registered gave an overall total prevalence of 0.62 per 100,000 births (95% confidence interval: 0.52–0.73). Three programs (Australia Victoria, South America ECLAMC, Italy North East) had significantly different prevalence estimates. Most cases (53.2%) had isolated phocomelia, while 9.9% had syndromes. Most nonsyndromic cases were monomelic (55.9%), with an excess of left (64.9%) and upper limb (64.9%) involvement. Most nonsyndromic cases (66.9%) were live births; most isolated cases (57.9%) weighed more than 2,499u2009g; most MCA (60.7%) weighed less than 2,500u2009g, and were more likely stillbirths (30.8%) or ETOPFA (15.4%) than isolated cases. The most common associated defects were musculoskeletal, cardiac, and intestinal. Epidemiological differences between phocomelia and amelia highlighted possible differences in their causes.


American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C-seminars in Medical Genetics | 2011

Cyclopia: An Epidemiologic Study in a Large Dataset From the International Clearinghouse of Birth Defects Surveillance and Research

Iêda M. Orioli; Emmanuelle Amar; Marian K. Bakker; Eva Bermejo-Sánchez; Fabrizio Bianchi; Mark A. Canfield; Maurizio Clementi; Adolfo Correa; Melinda Csáky-Szunyogh; Marcia L. Feldkamp; Danielle Landau; Emanuele Leoncini; Zhu Li; R. Brian Lowry; Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo; Margery Morgan; Osvaldo Mutchinick; Anke Rissmann; Annukka Ritvanen; Gioacchino Scarano; Elena Szabova; Eduardo E. Castilla

Cyclopia is characterized by the presence of a single eye, with varying degrees of doubling of the intrinsic ocular structures, located in the middle of the face. It is the severest facial expression of the holoprosencephaly (HPE) spectrum. This study describes the prevalence, associated malformations, and maternal characteristics among cases with cyclopia. Data originated in 20 Clearinghouse (ICBDSR) affiliated birth defect surveillance systems, reported according to a single pre‐established protocol. A total of 257 infants with cyclopia were identified. Overall prevalence was 1 in 100,000 births (95%CI: 0.89–1.14), with only one program being out of range. Across sites, there was no correlation between cyclopia prevalence and number of births (ru2009=u20090.08; Pu2009=u20090.75) or proportion of elective termination of pregnancy (ru2009=u2009−0.01; Pu2009=u20090.97). The higher prevalence of cyclopia among older mothers (older than 34) was not statistically significant. The majority of cases were liveborn (122/200; 61%) and females predominated (male/total: 42%). A substantial proportion of cyclopias (31%) were caused by chromosomal anomalies, mainly trisomy 13. Another 31% of the cases of cyclopias were associated with defects not typically related to HPE, with more hydrocephalus, heterotaxia defects, neural tube defects, and preaxial reduction defects than the chromosomal group, suggesting the presence of ciliopathies or other unrecognized syndromes. Cyclopia is a very rare defect without much variability in prevalence by geographic location. The heterogeneous etiology with a high prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities, and female predominance in HPE, were confirmed, but no effect of increased maternal age or association with twinning was observed.


Neuroepidemiology | 2016

Monitoring Huntington's Disease Mortality across a 30-Year Period: Geographic and Temporal Patterns

Germán Sánchez-Díaz; Greta Arias-Merino; Ana Villaverde-Hueso; Antonio Morales-Piga; Ignacio Abaitua-Borda; Manuel Hens; Eva Bermejo-Sánchez; Manuel Posada de la Paz; Verónica Alonso-Ferreira

Background: Huntingtons disease (HD) is a progressive neurodegenerative condition characterized by chorea, dystonia, behavioral disturbances and cognitive decline. The aim of this study is to assess temporal and spatial changes on mortality attributable to HD over 30 years in Spain. Methods: HD data were extracted from the nationwide mortality registry for the period 1984-2013. Annual and 5-year gender- and age-specific rates adjusted for the standard European population were calculated. Geographic analysis was performed by districts from 1999 through 2013, and then estimated standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and smoothed SMRs. Results: There were 1,556 HD-related deaths across the study period. An increasing trend in age-adjusted HD mortality was in evidence, specifically from 1994 through 1998. On a year-by-year basis, age-adjusted mortality rates increased from 0.076 per 100,000 population in 1984 to 0.157 in 2013. Geographical differences among districts were evident in specific areas and in the southwest of Spain with a significantly higher HD mortality risk. Conclusion: HD mortality rising trends in Spain might be attributable to improvements in diagnosis leading to a rise in prevalence. Geographical variability in HD mortality could be related to regional differences in disease prevalence, health-care disparities, or other factors which call for in-depth assessment in future studies.


American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2015

Deletion 1q43-44 in a Patient with Clinical Diagnosis of Warburg-Micro Syndrome

Ignacio Arroyo-Carrera; María Solo de Zaldívar Tristancho; Eva Bermejo-Sánchez; María Luisa Martínez-Fernández; Amparo López-Lafuente; Alexandra MacDonald; Ángel Zúñiga; José Luis Gómez-Skarmeta; María Luisa Martínez-Frías

Warburg–Micro syndrome (WARBM) is an autosomal recessive syndrome characterized by microcephaly, microphthalmia, microcornea, congenital cataracts, optic atrophy and central nervous system malformations. This syndrome is caused by mutations in the RAB3GAP1/2 and RAB18 genes, part of the Rab family, and in the TBC1D20 gene, which contributes to lipid droplet formation/metabolism. Here we present a patient with clinical diagnosis of WARBM syndrome, who did not have mutations in either the RAB3GAP1/2 genes, in the main exons of RAB18, nor in the TBC1D20 gene. However, the analysis with CGH‐array detected a 9.6 Mb deletion at 1q43‐qter. We performed a genotype–phenotype correlation using 20 previously published patients in whom the coordinates of the deleted regions were defined. The comparative analysis revealed that the current patient and three of the other 20 patients share the loss of six genes, four of which are related with the family of G proteins, and are strongly expressed in the brain, retina, heart and kidney. Consequently, their haploinsufficiency may result in different combinations of clinical alterations, including some of those of WARBM syndrome. In addition, the haploinsufficiency of other genes may contribute to other defects and clinical variability. Additionally, for the genotype–phenotype correlation, one must also consider molecular pathways that can result in the observed alterations. To early confirm a genetic diagnosis is essential for the patient and family. The current patient was considered as having a recessive syndrome, but since he had a “de novo” deletion, there was not an increased recurrence risk.


Archive | 2017

Congenital Anomalies: Cluster Detection and Investigation

Eva Bermejo-Sánchez; Manuel Posada de la Paz

This work summarizes the main aspects to be considered around birth defects (or congenital anomalies) clusters. Most birth defects (BD), considered individually, fall into the definition of rare diseases (RD), according to their low frequency. Likewise, many RD are congenital, because their manifestations are present at birth or can be even evident before the delivery. It has been estimated that overall 7.9 million children are born each year with serious BD of genetic or partially genetic origin, and additional hundreds of thousands more are born with serious BD of post-conception origin.A birth defect cluster can be defined as an unusual aggregation of cases (grouped in place and time) that is suspected to be greater than expected, even though the expected number may not be known. These clusters are incidents or occurrences that let us turn the challenge of identifying the causal agent(s) involved in the origin of such clusters, into an opportunity to exert primary prevention, and thus achieve the ultimate goal of enabling infants being born healthy. Therefore, any program or system involved in BD surveillance and research should devote part of its activities to detect and investigate clusters, to ensure that such opportunity for primary prevention will be conveniently leveraged. Regardless the type of cluster, there are several phases that must be undertaken sequentially for proper control and the maximum benefit for the population: cluster detection, evaluation and investigation, management, adoption of preventive measures, and communication of the results to the public or target population.


Journal of Community Genetics | 2018

Value of sharing and networking among birth defects surveillance programs: an ICBDSR perspective

Eva Bermejo-Sánchez; Lorenzo D. Botto; Marcia L. Feldkamp; Boris Groisman; Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo

Birth defects (BD), also known as congenital anomalies, are structural or functional abnormalities present at birth as a result of abnormal prenatal development. Their cause can be broadly categorized as genetic, environmental, or a combination of both. It is estimated that approximately 3–6% of newborn infants worldwide are affected by BD, many of which are associated with serious morbidity, mortality, and lifelong disabilities. The International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research (ICBDSR), founded in 1974, promotes worldwide birth defect surveillance, research, and prevention through the ongoing sharing of data, expertise, and training. In this review, we show value and contribution of BD surveillance systems in pursuing these aims. In the time of personalized medicine for many rare and common diseases, there are still massive gaps in our understanding of the causes and mechanisms of many birth defects, especially structural congenital anomalies. The main aim of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), adopted by the United Nations in 2015, is to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all children. One specific goal is to end preventable deaths of newborns and children less than 5xa0years of age by 2030. The SDGs also underscore the need to consider BD as a priority in the global child health agenda. It can be said that counting BD helps BD to count. By sharing data and expertise and joining in surveillance and research, BD surveillance programs can play a major role in increasing our understanding of the causes of BD, and promoting prevention.

Collaboration


Dive into the Eva Bermejo-Sánchez's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Emanuele Leoncini

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Osvaldo Mutchinick

National Autonomous University of Mexico

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anke Rissmann

Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Annukka Ritvanen

National Institute for Health and Welfare

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge