Eva Fernebro

Evaluation of the tissue microarray technique for immunohistochemical analysis in rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND Immunohistochemical staining for tumor-associated proteins is widely used for the identification of novel prognostic markers. Recently, a tissue-conserving, high-throughput technique, tissue microarray, has been introduced. This technique uses 0.6-mm tissue core biopsy specimens, 500 to 1000 of which are brought into a new paraffin array block, which can be sectioned up to 100 times. METHODS We evaluated the tissue microarray technique for immunohistochemical analysis in 20 rectal cancers. Immunohistochemical staining was performed for the proliferation marker Ki-67 and the tumor suppressor protein p53 in whole tissue sections and in tissue core biopsy specimens. RESULTS The whole tissue sections were assessed by counting all cells in 10 high-power fields (x40), which resulted in a mean fraction of Ki-67-expressing tumor cells of 0.81 (range, 0.54-1.0). p53 expression assessed in whole tissue sections showed nuclear staining in 15 (75%) of 20 rectal carcinomas. For the tissue microarray technique, a median of 3 (range, 3-5) 0.6-mm tissue core biopsy specimens were studied from each of the 20 tumor specimens. The tissue microarray method gave a mean Ki-67 expression of 0.85 (range, 0.50-1.0) in tumor cell nuclei and showed p53 protein expression in the same 15 of 20 tumors as in the whole tissue sections. CONCLUSION We conclude that the tissue microarray technique for immunohistochemical staining in rectal cancer yields staining of good quality and expression data for Ki-67 and p53 comparable to those obtained with whole tissue staining. The feasibility of tissue microarray thus enables time- and tissue-preserving studies of multiple markers in large tumor series.

Microsatellite instability is rare in rectal carcinomas and signifies hereditary cancer.

We analysed microsatellite instability (MSI) in a consecutive series of 165 rectal carcinomas. Data on a personal and/or family history of cancer were collected from all patients and revealed metachronous cancer in 9 patients, 2 of whom had developed colorectal cancer, and a suspected familial aggregation of colorectal cancer in three families. Only three of the 165 (2%) rectal cancers showed MSI. The patients whose tumours displayed MSI had clinical histories suggesting hereditary cancer--a family history of colorectal cancer and/or synchronous colorectal cancers. Denaturing gradient gel (DGGE) analysis was used to screen the MSI+ patients for mutations in the hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes and revealed two new germline mutations; a 1 bp deletion in exon 10 of hMSH2 creating a premature stop-codon and a splice donor site mutation in intron 16 of hMLH1. Considering colorectal carcinomas as a group, MSI has been reported to occur in approximately 10-20% of the tumours and thus can not, per se be used for clinical detection of hereditary tumours. This study shows, however, that MSI is rare in rectal carcinomas and when present strongly suggests a hereditary predisposition for colorectal cancer development.

Low expression of CysLT1R and high expression of CysLT2R mediate good prognosis in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer type in the Western world. In search of new treatment possibilities, the inflammation mediators, know as cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLTs), have been shown to regulate intestinal epithelial cell survival and proliferation via the CysLT(1)R, and cell differentiation via the CysLT(2)R. These results prompted us to investigate the significance of CysLT(1)R and CysLT(2)R expression in colorectal cancer tissue for patient survival. The CysLT(1)R, CysLT(2)R, beta-catenin and Bcl-xL protein expression levels were evaluated by immunohistochemistry in a tissue microarray of 329 colorectal patients. We found that high nuclear expression of CysLT(1)R is associated with a poor prognosis, whereas high nuclear expression of CysLT(2)R is associated with a good prognosis. We also observed that patients with colorectal tumours characterised by high CysLT(1)R but low CysLT(2)R nuclear expression had the lowest survival expectancy, whereas patients with colorectal tumours characterised by low CysLT(1)R but high CysLT(2)R nuclear expression had the best survival expectancy. Interestingly, beta-catenin as a single prognostic marker did not exhibit any prognostic value. However, in patients with tumours characterised by a high CysLT(1)R nuclear expression, an elevated beta-catenin nuclear expression had a significantly prognostic value. In conclusion these data indicate that nuclear expressions of CysLTRs are potential prognostic indicators of colorectal cancer.

hMLH1, hMSH2 and hMSH6 mutations in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer families from southern Sweden

We have screened 17 Southern Sweden individuals/families with suspected hereditary non‐polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) for mutations in the DNA‐mismatch repair genes hMLH1, hMSH2 and hMSH6 using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, protein truncation test and direct DNA sequencing. The families were selected on the basis of a family history of HNPCC‐related tumors or the occurrence of metachronous colorectal cancer/endometrial cancer at young age in an individual with a weak family history of cancer. Furthermore, we required that tumor tissue from at least one individual in the family had to display microsatellite instability. We identified germ‐line mutations in 9 individuals from 8 families. Five families had mutations in hMLH1, 4 of which were splice site mutations, 2 had frameshift mutations in hMSH2 and 1 patient with metachronous endometrial and rectal cancer but with a weak family history of cancer had a nonsense mutation in hMSH6. Our results present novel germ‐line DNA‐repair gene mutations, one of these in hMSH6, and demonstrate the diversified mutation spectrum in Sweden, where no founder mutation has so far been identified. Int. J. Cancer 83:197–202, 1999.

Lack of Activating c-SRC Mutations at Codon 531 in Rectal Cancer

Cellular SRC (c-SRC), which is the human homolog of the Rous sarcoma viral oncogene, v-src, is highly activated in colorectal cancer. Recently, a subset of colon cancers have shown a nonsense mutation at codon 531, which truncates c-SRC directly C-terminal to the c-SRC kinase regulatory domain. This specific mutation has been demonstrated to be activating, transforming, and tumorigenic and to promote metastasis. We investigated 100 rectal cancers, half of which had tumor spread outside the rectum, for this mutation by using direct sequencing. None of these tumors displayed any genetic alteration at this locus, and we thus conclude that the codon 531 mutation is a rare cause of c-SRC activation in rectal cancer.

Predominance of CIN versus MSI in the development of rectal cancer at young age

BackgroundDevelopment of proximal and distal colorectal cancers involve partly different mechanisms associated with the microsatellite instability (MSI) and the chromosomal instability (CIN) pathways. Colorectal cancers in patients under 50 years of age represent about 5% of the total number of tumors and have been associated with an increased frequency of MSI tumors. However, MSI and CIN may play different roles in the development of colon cancer and rectal cancer, and we have specifically investigated their contribution to the development of rectal cancer at young age.MethodsThirty rectal cancers diagnosed before the age of 50 were characterized for DNA-ploidy, MSI, mutations of KRAS and CTNNB1 and immunohistochemical expression of p53, β-catenin and of the mismatch repair (MMR) proteins MLH1 and MSH2.ResultsDNA aneuploidy was detected in 21/30 tumors, KRAS mutations in 6 tumors, no mutations of CTNNB1 were detected but immunohistochemical staining for β-catenin showed nuclear staining in 6 tumors, and immunohistochemical expression of p53 was detected in 18 tumors. MSI was detected in 3/30 tumors, all of which showed and immunohistochemical loss of staining for the MMR protein MSH2, which strongly indicates a phenotype associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC).ConclusionsMSI occurs only in a small fraction of the tumors from young patients with rectal cancer, but when present it strongly indicates an underlying HNPCC-causing mutation, and other mechanisms than HNPCC thus cause rectal cancer in the majority of young patients.

Skin toxicity and quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer during first-line panitumumab plus FOLFIRI treatment in a single-arm phase II study

BackgroundIntegument-related toxicities are common during epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapy. Panitumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the EGFR that significantly improves progression-free survival when added to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have wild-type (WT) KRAS tumours. Primary efficacy and tolerability results from a phase II single-arm study of first-line panitumumab plus FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have been reported. Here we report additional descriptive tolerability and quality of life data from this trial.MethodsIntegument-related toxicities and quality of life were analysed; toxicities were graded using modified National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to and duration of first integument-related toxicity were prepared. Quality of life was measured using EuroQoL EQ-5D and EORTC QLQ-C30. Best overall response was analysed by skin toxicity grade and baseline quality of life. Change in quality of life was analysed by skin toxicity severity.Results154 patients were enrolled (WT KRAS n = 86; mutant KRAS n = 59); most (98%) experienced integument-related toxicities (most commonly rash [42%], dry skin [40%] and acne [36%]). Median time to first integument-related toxicity was 8 days; median duration was 334 days. Overall, proportionally more patients with grade 2+ skin toxicity responded (56%) compared with those with grade 0/1 (29%). Mean overall EQ-5D health state index scores (0.81 vs. 0.78), health rating scores (72.5 vs. 71.0) and QLQ-C30 global health status scores (65.8 vs. 66.7) were comparable at baseline vs. safety follow-up (8 weeks after completion), respectively and appeared unaffected by skin toxicity severity.ConclusionsFirst-line panitumumab plus FOLFIRI has acceptable tolerability and appears to have little impact on quality of life, despite the high incidence of integument-related toxicity.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00508404

Multicentre phase II trial of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in combination with radiotherapy for unresectable colorectal cancer: The CORGI-L study

AIMS This study assessed radiotherapy combined with capecitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with primary, inextirpable colorectal adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-nine patients entered the trial. Two cycles of XELOX (capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) bid d1-14+oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) d1, q3w) were followed by radiotherapy (50.4 Gy), combined with capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) bid every radiotherapy day and oxaliplatin 60 mg/m(2) once weekly. The primary end-point was objective response. RESULTS Forty-seven patients were evaluable. Twenty-nine (62% [95% CI: 46-75%]) achieved complete or partial response. Thirty-eight (81%) went through surgery of whom 37 (97%) had an R0 resection and five (13%) had a pathological complete response. Seventy-eight percent were alive and estimated local progression rate was 11% at 2 years. The most common grade 3+ toxicity during chemoradiotherapy was diarrhoea (24%). CONCLUSIONS XELOX-RT was feasible and showed promising efficacy when treating patients with primary inextirpable colorectal cancer, establishing high local control rate.

A randomized study of KRAS-guided maintenance therapy with bevacizumab, erlotinib or metronomic capecitabine after first-line induction treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the Nordic ACT2 trial

BACKGROUND Maintenance treatment (mt) with bevacizumab (bev) ± erlotinib (erlo) has modest effect after induction chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We hypothesized the efficacy of erlo to be dependent on KRAS mutational status and investigated this by exploring mt strategies with bev ± erlo and low-dose capecitabine (cap). PATIENTS AND METHODS Included patients had mCRC scheduled for first-line therapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-1 and no major comorbidities. Treatment with XELOX/FOLFOX or XELIRI/FOLFIRI + bev was given for 18 weeks. After induction, patients without progression were eligible for randomization to mt; KRAS wild-type (wt) patients were randomized to bev ± erlo (arms wt-BE, N = 36 versus wt-B, N = 35), KRAS mutated (mut) patients were randomized to bev or metronomic cap (arms mut-B, N = 34 versus mut-C, N = 33). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) rate (PFSr) at 3 months after start of mt. A pooled analysis of KRAS wt patients from the previous ACT study was performed. RESULTS We included 233 patients. Median age was 64 years, 62% male, 68% ECOG 0, 52% with primary tumor in situ. A total of 138 patients started mt after randomization. PFSr was 64.7% versus 63.6% in wt-B versus wt-BE, P = 1.000; and 75% versus 66.7% in mut-B versus mut-C, P = 0.579, with no significant difference in median PFS and overall survival (OS). In the pooled cohort, median PFS was 3.7 months in wt-B (N = 64) and 5.7 months in wt-BE (N = 62) (hazard ratios 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.70-1.50, P = 0.867). The frequency of any grade 3/4 toxicities during mt was: 28%/58%/18%/15% (wt-B/wt-BE/mut-B/mut-C). CONCLUSIONS Addition of erlo to bev as mt in KRAS wt mCRC did not significantly improve PFS or OS, but it did increase toxicity. KRAS status does not seem to influence the outcome of treatment with erlotinib. Metronomic cap warrants further investigation in mt strategies, given our explorative results. CLINICALTRIALSGOV NCT01229813.

Randomized phase II study of sequential docetaxel and irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (leucovorin) in patients with advanced gastric cancer: the GATAC trial

BackgroundThe optimal chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma (GC) is yet to be determined. We compared sequential administration of docetaxel and irinotecan, both in combination with infused 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-Fu/Lv), and randomly assigned patients to start with either of the two.MethodsPatients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic GC and with measurable lesions (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors; RECIST) were randomly assigned to start with docetaxel 45 mg/m2 (arm T) or irinotecan 180 mg/m2 (arm C) with bolus/44-h infusion of 5-Fu/Lv (day 1 every 2 weeks). After four courses, there was a prescheduled crossover to the alternative regimen for four additional courses.ResultsEighty-one patients were randomized and 78 started treatment. Complete and partial responses were seen in 31 (40%) patients after 8 weeks and in 32 (41%) after 16 weeks, with similar results in both study arms. The median overall survival (OS) was 11.5 and 10.6 months in arms T and C, respectively (P = 0.3). The two schedules were feasible and did not differ in the overall rate of severe adverse events (SAEs).ConclusionThis is the first randomized comparison of two of the newer cytostatic drugs in GC therapy. No differences favoring either arm T or arm C were found with respect to response rate, OS, or toxicity. The median OS of 11 months indicates that sequential administration of the two combinations is effective and is similar to triple combinations. Thus, comparable efficacy to platinum combinations appears to be obtained with newer, less toxic regimens when given sequentially.