Eva Martínez

Lopinavir/ritonavir plus nevirapine as a nucleoside-sparing approach in antiretroviral-experienced patients (NEKA study).

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of a nucleoside-sparing approach with a conventional highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen in antiretroviral-experienced patients with prolonged viral suppression. Methods: Pilot study including 31 antiretroviral-experienced patients with HIV RNA <80 copies/mL. Subjects were randomly assigned to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/rtv) 400/100 mg BID plus nevirapine (NVP) 200 mg BID (NVP group, n = 16) or LPV/rtv plus the 2 previous NRTIs (NRTI group, n = 15). The primary endpoint was the percentage of subjects who maintained viral suppression at week 48. Changes in lipid metabolism, mitochondrial parameters, and LPV trough levels were also assessed. Results: All patients maintained viral suppression after 48 weeks. No subject discontinued therapy because of adverse events. HDL cholesterol increased by 28% at week 24 (P < 0.0001) and 10% after 48 weeks of follow-up (P = 0.319) in the NVP group. In the NRTI group, LDL cholesterol increased by 14% at week 48 (P = 0.076). Mitochondrial DNA/nuclear DNA ratio and mitochondrial respiratory chain complex IV activity showed a trend toward increasing in the NVP group. Mean (SD) LPV trough levels were 6340 (2129) ng/mL in the NRTI group and 5161 (2703) ng/mL in the NVP group (P = 0.140). Conclusions: In antiretroviral-experienced subjects with sustained viral suppression, dual therapy with NVP plus LPV/rtv at standard dosage was as potent and safe as standard-of-care HAART at 48 weeks of follow-up. This approach may reduce mitochondrial toxicity and improve LPV/rtv-associated lipid abnormalities. The results of this pilot study support the study of this approach in a larger, randomized trial.

Antiretroviral treatment simplification with 3 NRTIs or 2 NRTIs plus nevirapine in HIV-1-infected patients treated with successful first-line HAART.

Objectives:To assess the virologic noninferiority of an antiretroviral treatment simplification with coformulated zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir (group 1) vs. coformulated zidovudine/lamivudine plus nevirapine (group 2) in HIV-1-infected patients receiving successful first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy. Methods:This is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, comparative, randomized, noninferiority study. A delta of 15% for differences in virologic suppression <200 copies/mL between groups was prespecified with a 1-sided 0.025 significance level. Results:A total of 134 patients were included into this study: 68 were allocated to group 1 and 66 to group 2. By intention-to-treat analysis (switch equals failure), the percentage of virologic suppression <200 copies/mL (<50 copies/mL) at week 48 was 71.0% (65.1%) and 73.0% (63.3%) in groups 1 and 2, respectively (estimate for differences [<200 copies/mL]: −2.1, 95% CI: −17.4-13.1, P = 0.783). Thirteen and 14 patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively, discontinued therapy due to adverse events. Dyslipidemia improved in both groups, with a higher improvement in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P = 0.049) in group 1. Conclusions:Group 1 is not inferior to group 2 regarding virologic suppression <200 copies/mL. Both strategies improve lipid profile.

Therapeutic management of bone demineralization in the Hiv-infected population

Bone demineralization is a common metabolic problem in patients infected with HIV [1–7] and the incidence of this problem is actually greater in the HIV-infected population than in the general population [8,9]. The widespread utilization of highly active antiretroviral therapy has notably increased the survival of the HIV-infected population, prolonging the time that patients live with the HIV infection. The increasing age of these individuals, the virus itself, and the presence of other concomitant factors that accelerate the loss of bone mineral density (BMD), are all factors that could explain the high prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in this group, and particularly in the female population as many HIV-infected women reach menopause and experience its typical manifestations, such as osteoporosis.

IGF1 modifications after bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients: potential implications of nutritional status according to specific surgical technique.

OBJECTIVES IGF1 is decreased in morbidly obese (MO) patients and its changes after bariatric surgery weight loss (WL) are not well known. The aim of this study was to analyse IGF1 modifications in MO patients after WL and its relationship to ghrelin and to different types of surgeries. DESIGN Retrospective follow-up study at the University Medical Center. METHODS One hundred and nine MO patients (age 44.19.3, BMI 51.748.75KG/M(2)) were evaluated at baseline and 1 year after surgery: 28 sleeve gastrectomy (SG), 31 distal modified (m), and 50 ringed (r) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) surgery. Changes in IGF1, IGFBP3, ratio IGF1:IGFBP3, and ghrelin were evaluated 1 year after surgery. RESULTS Baseline prevalence of low IGF1 (defined by s.d. IGF1<-2) was 22%, and %WL 1 year after surgery was 34.9±8.9%. There was a significant decrease in IGFBP3 in all the procedures, an increase in IGF1:IGFBP3 ratio in rRYGBP and SG, but total IGF1 only increased significantly in SG. Albumin concentrations decreased in mRYGBP, did not change in rRYGBP, but increased in SG after surgery. Total ghrelin concentrations increased after both RYGBPs and decreased after SG (P<0.05 in all cases). The prevalence of low IGF1 decreased in SG (28.6 vs 10.1%, P=0.03) and did not change in RYGPBP techniques. The %albumin change was the only dependent variable associated with the % total IGF1 change. CONCLUSIONS Recovery of low IGF1 after bariatric surgery was specifically related to the albumin modifications induced by surgery and was not related to ghrelin modifications.