Eva Micheler
London School of Economics and Political Science
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Eva Micheler.
European Business Organization Law Review | 2013
Eva Micheler
This article puts forward the idea that the creation of an online review facility where all market participants are able to review and rate all companies listed in a particular market would solve a number of problems that currently prevent shareholders, in particular institutional investors and the ultimate beneficiaries of investment vehicles such as pension funds, from engaging with companies. It would also allow shareholders and stakeholders with a long-term focus to engage with companies. It is suggested that all listed companies should be required to have a link to this review and rating facility on their website. Listed companies should have the ability to respond to the reviews and ratings on the site. Furthermore, the review facility should be regulated. The arrangement currently used for appointing and overseeing the operator of the UK securities settlement system could serve as a model.
Archive | 2016
Eva Micheler; Luke von der Heyde
The paper analyses the current system of holding and transferring securities. It argues that the current model makes transactions safe by next to eliminating counter-party risk. This is done at the price of exposing the holding of securities to custody risk. Investors nowadays hold securities through chains of custodians and are exposed to risk of any of these failing. Custody chains also prevent them from exercising and enforcing rights against issuers. The paper explains why somewhat counter intuitively the introduction of electronic settlement has led to an intermediated holding system which has significantly increased custody risk particularly in the UK. The paper then argues that blockchain technology would make it possible to create a system that has the same level of transactional safety as the current system and that at the same time eliminates custody risk. Existing custodians however are unlikely to bring about change that creates a system that is overall efficient. They are limited by their current business model. They are unable to fund the elimination of inefficiencies of the system as a whole when the elements that cause system-inefficiencies are factors that underpin their business model from their individual perspective. The paper recommends empowering asset owners by requiring custodians to disclose that they have outsourced custody. Custodians should also make available to their customers details about the sub-custodians they have delegated custody to enabling investors to evaluate the chain that operates between them and the issuer. This will enable asset owners to evaluate the risk associated with the custody arrangements that are on offer. The paper also encourages asset owners with market power to ask questions about the way in which the assets they look after are held. In addition to engaging with custodians, regulators should actively involve asset owners in their work on blockchain technology.
International and Comparative Law Quarterly | 2003
Eva Micheler
Archive | 2000
Eva Micheler
LSE Research Online Documents on Economics | 2014
Eva Micheler
Archive | 2007
Eva Micheler
Journal of Financial Economics | 2017
Jason Roderick Donaldson; Eva Micheler
LSE Research Online Documents on Economics | 2016
Eva Micheler; Luke von der Heyde
Cambridge Law Journal | 2015
Eva Micheler
Archive | 2014
Eva Micheler