Eva V. E. Madsen

Prognostic value of micrometastases in sentinel lymph nodes of patients with breast carcinoma: a cohort study

BACKGROUND The prognostic meaning and thus indication for adjuvant therapy of lymphogenic micrometastases in breast cancer patients is still under debate. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 1999 to 2007, 703 patients with (c)T(1-2)N(0) breast cancer underwent surgery including sentinel lymph node biopsy. Examination of sentinel lymph nodes consisted of hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemistry staining following serial sectioning of the sentinel node. Patients were divided into four groups: (p)N(0) (n=423), (p)N(1micro) (n=81), (p)N(1a) (n=130) and (p)N(>or=1b) (n=69). Median follow-up was 40 months. RESULTS At the end of follow-up, 53 patients had died and 64 had recurrent disease. Compared with (p)N(0) and following adjustment for possible confounders, including adjuvant systemic treatment, overall survival was not significantly different for (p)N(1micro) while significantly worse for (p)N(1a) and (p)N(>or=1b) {hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.59 [0.14-2.58], 4.31 [1.85-10.01], 10.66 [4.04-28.14], respectively}. Likewise, disease-free survival was not significantly different for (p)N(1micro) and worse for (p)N(1a) and (p)N(>or=1b) (HR [95% CI]: 1.43 [0.67-3.02], 2.79 [1.37-5.66], 7.13 [3.27-15.54], respectively). Distant metastases were more commonly observed in the (p)N(1micro) than in the (p)N(0) group, but still not as common as in the (p)N(1a) or (p)N(>or=1b) group (HR [95% CI]: 4.85 [1.79-13.18], 10.34 [3.82-28.00], 23.25 [7.88-68.56], respectively). CONCLUSION Although the risk of distant metastases was higher in patients in the (p)N(1micro) than in the (p)N(0) group, no statistically significant differences were observed in overall or disease-free survival between (p)N(0) and (p)N(1micro). Micrometastatic lymph node involvement in itself should not be an indication for adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

“Axillary recurrences after sentinel lymph node biopsy: A multicentre analysis and follow-up of sentinel lymph node negative breast cancer patients”

INTRODUCTION The objective of this study was to conduct a multicentre data analysis to identify prognostic factors for developing an axillary recurrence (AR) after negative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in a large cohort of breast cancer patients with long follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS The prospective databases from different hospitals of clinically node negative breast cancer patients operated on between, 2000 and 2002 were analyzed. SLNB was performed and pathological analysis done by local pathologists according to national guidelines. Adjuvant treatment was given according to contemporary guidelines. Multivariate analysis was performed using all available variables, a p-value of <0,05 was considered to be significant. RESULTS A total of 929 patients who did not undergo axillary lymph node dissection were identified. After a median follow up of 77 (range 1-106) months, fifteen patients developed an isolated AR (AR rate 1,6%). Multivariate analysis showed that young age (p = 0.007) and the absence of radiotherapy (p = 0.010) significantly increased the risk of developing an AR. Distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) was significantly worse for patients with an AR compared to all other breast cancer patients (p < 0,0001). CONCLUSION Even after long-term follow up, the risk of developing an AR after a negative SLN in breast cancer is low. Young age and absence of radiation therapy are highly significant factors for developing an axillary recurrence. DMFS is worse for AR patients compared to patients initially diagnosed with N0 or N1 disease.

Discordance of intraoperative frozen section analysis with definitive histology of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer surgery: complementary axillary lymph node dissection is irrelevant for subsequent systemic therapy.

BackgroundIn breast cancer surgery, intraoperative frozen section (FS) analysis of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) enables axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) during the same operative procedure. In case of discordance between a “negative” FS analysis and definitive histology, an ALND as a second operation is advocated since additional lymph node metastases may be present. The clinical implications of the subsequent ALND in these patients were evaluated.Materials and MethodsBetween November 2000 and May 2008, 879 consecutive breast cancer patients underwent surgery including sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with intraoperative FS analysis of 2 central cuts from axillary SLNs. Following fixation and serial sectioning, SLNs were further examined postoperatively with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemical techniques. For patients with a discordant FS examination, the effect of the pathology findings of the subsequent ALND specimen on subsequent nonsurgical therapy were evaluated.ResultsFS analysis detected axillary metastases in the SLN(s) in 200 patients (23%), while the definitive pathology examination detected metastases in SLNs in another 151 patients (17%). A complementary ALND was performed in 108 of the 151 patients with discordant FS. Additional tumor positive axillary lymph nodes were found in 17 patients (16%), leading to “upstaging” in 7 (6%). Subsequent nonsurgical treatment was adjusted in 4 patients (4%): all 4 had more extensive locoregional radiotherapy; no patient received additional hormonal and/or chemotherapy.ConclusionDiscordance between intraoperative FS analysis and definitive histology of SLNs is common. In this selection of patients, a substantial proportion had additional lymph node metastases, but postsurgical treatment was rarely adjusted based on the findings of the complementary ALND.

Predictive factors of isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer

INTRODUCTION Since the introduction of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with breast cancer, micrometastases and isolated tumor cells are detected frequently in the SLN. As such, they offer an opportunity to study the development of regional metastases in breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between June 1999 and November 2010 1418 patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer underwent SLNB. Primary tumor characteristics and information regarding regional lymph node involvement were collected prospectively. Patients were categorized into four levels of lymph node involvement: pN0, pN0(i+), pN1mi and pN ≥ 1a. An univariate analysis and a binary logistic regression analysis were performed to assess the relation between patient- and tumor characteristics and lymph node involvement. RESULTS Increasing tumor size and younger age were associated with a higher risk of pN1mi and pN ≥ 1a and a lower chance of pN0 and pN0(i+). Triple negative molecular subtype was associated with a decreased risk of pN1mi and pN ≥ 1a. Tumor size was positively related to overall occurrence of regional lymph node metastases in a linear manner. CONCLUSION Patients with larger tumors, no triple negative disease, and younger age showed a decreased chance of both pN0 and pN0(i+) and an increased risk of both pN1mi and pN ≥ 1a. There seems to be a gradual shift in risk pattern from pN0 to pN0(i+) to pN1mi and to pN ≥ 1a-disease. The presence of the smallest metastases remained fairly constant over time when compared to macrometastases. This constant presence suggests that the risk of seeding and outgrowth of metastases remains constant over time.

Ultrasound-guided sentinel node procedure for nonpalpable breast carcinoma.

PurposePeritumoral and periareolar tracer injection techniques lead to different lymphatic drainage in sentinel lymph node biopsy procedures. In a prospective study, the visualization and identification rates of the ultrasound (US)-guided tracer injection technique for palpable and nonpalpable breast tumors were evaluated. MethodsIn 1262 consecutive patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer, sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed following peritumoral tracer injection. In the case of nonpalpable breast lesions, Tc-99m nanocolloid injections were given using a 7.5 MHz US probe. In the case of ultrasonographically nonvisible microcalcifications, the US-guided injection technique was wire guided. ResultsIn 331 patients with nonpalpable breast lesions (26.2%), the lymphoscintigraphic visualization and surgical retrieval rates of axillary sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were 98.5 and 99.4%, respectively. For internal mammary (IM) SLNs, these rates were 21.1 and 17.8%, respectively. These rates were similar in patients with palpable and nonpalpable tumors. Axillary metastases were detected in 38.7% of the patients with palpable tumors versus 16.5% of those with nonpalpable tumors (P<0.001), whereas IM metastases were found in 4.8 and 3.0% of patients, respectively (P=0.165). ConclusionIn nonpalpable breast lesions, the US-guided injection technique is an accurate technique for SLN identification and retrieval. The substantial rates of IM metastases in both palpable and nonpalpable lesions favor a peritumoral tracer injection technique.

Prognostic Value of Lymphogenic Micrometastasis of Patients with Breast Carcinoma : A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Introduction: Since the introduction of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for staging breast cancer, lymphogenic micrometastases are commonly detected. The prognostic meaning of these small lymph node metastases and the consequences regarding the indication for adjuvant systemic treatment is under debate. Currently, robust data with a long time follow up are lacking. Method: Between January 2000 and December 2002 1411 patients with a cT 1-2 N 0 breast carcinoma underwent surgery in seven hospitals in the Netherlands. Pathological examination of the sentinel node consisted of serial sectioning of SLN9s and HE 95% CI 0.58-2.39, HR 2.47; 95% CI 1.69-3.63, HR 4.36; 95% CI 2.70-7.04 respectively). Disease free survival was similar too in the pN 0 and pN 1micro group, and worse for pN 1a and pN ≥1b (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.56-1.67 vs. HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.19-2.27, HR 2.95; CI 1.98-4.42). Distant metastases were more commonly observed in the pN 1micro group than in the pN 0 group (HR 1.22; 95% CI 0.60-2.49), but not significantly and far less than in the pN 1a and pN ≥1b group (HR 2.26; 95% CI 1.49-3.40, HR 3.49; 95% CI 2.12-5.77). Conclusion: After a relative long time of follow up disease free and overall survival for patients with micrometastasis in SLNs is comparable to patients without lymphogenic metastasis and more favourable than patients with macrometastasis. The presence of micrometastatic disease in the SLN is in itself not an indication for adjuvant systemic therapy. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 307.