Evangelos Paraskevaidis

Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Conservative methods to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and microinvasive cervical cancer are commonly used in young women because of the advent of effective screening programmes. In a meta-analysis, we investigated the effect of these procedures on subsequent fertility and pregnancy outcomes. METHODS We searched for studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE and classified them by the conservative method used and the outcome measure studied regarding both fertility and pregnancy. Pooled relative risks and 95% CIs were calculated with a random-effects model and interstudy heterogeneity was assessed with Cochranes Q test. FINDINGS We identified 27 studies. Cold knife conisation was significantly associated with preterm delivery (<37 weeks; relative risk 2.59, 95% CI 1.80-3.72, 100/704 [14%] vs 1494/27 674 [5%]), low birthweight (<2500 g; 2.53, 1.19-5.36, 32/261 [12%] vs 905/13 229 [7%]), and caesarean section (3.17, 1.07-9.40, 31/350 [9%] vs 22/670 [3%]). Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) was also significantly associated with preterm delivery (1.70, 1.24-2.35, 156/1402 [11%] vs 120/1739 [7%]), low birthweight (1.82, 1.09-3.06, 77/996 [8%] vs 49/1192 [4%]), and premature rupture of the membranes (2.69, 1.62-4.46, 48/905 [5%] vs 22/1038 [2%]). Similar but marginally non-significant adverse effects were recorded for laser conisation (preterm delivery 1.71, 0.93-3.14). We did not detect significantly increased risks for obstetric outcomes after laser ablation. Although severe outcomes such as admission to a neonatal intensive care unit or perinatal mortality showed adverse trends, these changes were not significant. INTERPRETATION All the excisional procedures to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia present similar pregnancy-related morbidity without apparent neonatal morbidity. Caution in the treatment of young women with mild cervical abnormalities should be recommended. Clinicians now have the evidence base to counsel women appropriately.

Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis

Objective To assess the relative risk of perinatal mortality, severe preterm delivery, and low birth weight associated with previous treatment for precursors of cervical cancer. Data sources Medline and Embase citation tracking from January 1960 to December 2007. Selection criteria Eligible studies had data on severe pregnancy outcomes for women with and without previous treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Considered outcomes were perinatal mortality, severe preterm delivery (<32/34 weeks), extreme preterm delivery (<28/30 weeks), and low birth weight (<2000 g, <1500 g, and <1000 g). Excisional and ablative treatment procedures were distinguished. Results One prospective cohort and 19 retrospective studies were retrieved. Cold knife conisation was associated with a significantly increased risk of perinatal mortality (relative risk 2.87, 95% confidence interval 1.42 to 5.81) and a significantly higher risk of severe preterm delivery (2.78, 1.72 to 4.51), extreme preterm delivery (5.33, 1.63 to 17.40), and low birth weight of <2000 g (2.86, 1.37 to 5.97). Laser conisation, described in only one study, was also followed by a significantly increased chance of low birth weight of <2000 g and <1500 g. Large loop excision of the transformation zone and ablative treatment with cryotherapy or laser were not associated with a significantly increased risk of serious adverse pregnancy outcomes. Ablation by radical diathermy was associated with a significantly higher frequency of perinatal mortality, severe and extreme preterm delivery, and low birth weight below 2000 g or 1500 g. Conclusions In the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, cold knife conisation and probably both laser conisation and radical diathermy are associated with an increased risk of subsequent perinatal mortality and other serious pregnancy outcomes, unlike laser ablation and cryotherapy. Large loop excision of the transformation zone cannot be considered as completely free of adverse outcomes.

p16INK4a immunostaining in cytological and histological specimens from the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND P16(INK4a) is a biomarker for transforming HPV infections that could act as an adjunct to current cytological and histological assessment of cervical smears and biopsies, allowing the identification of those women with ambiguous results that require referral to colposcopy and potentially treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a systematic review of all studies that evaluated the use of p16(INK4a) in cytological or histological specimens from the uterine cervix. We also estimated the mean proportion of samples that were positive for p16(INK4a) in cytology and histology, stratified by the grade of the lesion. RESULTS Sixty-one studies were included. The proportion of cervical smears overexpressing p16(INK4a) increased with the severity of cytological abnormality. Among normal smears, only 12% (95% CI: 7-17%) were positive for the biomarker compared to 45% of ASCUS and LSIL (95% CI: 35-54% and 37-57%, respectively) and 89% of HSIL smears (95% CI: 84-95%). Similarly, in histology only 2% of normal biopsies (95% CI: 0.4-30%) and 38% of CIN1 (95% CI: 23-53%) showed diffuse staining for p16(INK4a) compared to 68% of CIN2 (95% CI: 44-92%) and 82% of CIN3 (95% CI: 72-92%). CONCLUSION Although there is good evidence that p16(INK4a) immunostaining correlates with the severity of cytological/histological abnormalities, the reproducibility is limited due to insufficiently standardized interpretation of the immunostaining. Therefore, a consensus needs to be reached regarding the evaluation of p16(INK4a) staining and the biomarker needs to be assessed in various clinical settings addressing specific clinical questions.

Triage of women with equivocal or low-grade cervical cytology results: a meta-analysis of the HPV test positivity rate

•  Introduction •  Methods •  Results •  Discussion •  Conclusion

Factors increasing local recurrence in breast-conserving surgery.

From 20-year follow-up results of two pioneering randomized controlled trials demonstrating equal survival after mastectomy and breast-conservation therapy, recent high-quality, evidence-based clinical practice recommendations have been made. Breast-conservation therapy undoubtedly represents substantial progress for a better quality of life for women with early-stage breast cancer. However, lumpectomy is associated with a substantial proportion, approximately 10–20%, of local recurrence in long-term follow-up studies even after accounting for postoperative radiotherapy. Risk factors for local failure include margin status, young age and an extensive intraductal component. Young age and family history strongly suggest the need for genetic testing before initiation of treatment. Women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations should be informed about the increased risk of contralateral breast cancer and ipsilateral failure after breast-conservation therapy. Bilateral mastectomy should also be offered as a treatment option. There is controversy over whether current effective adjuvant treatment, including chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, beyond appropriate local treatment as surgery and radiotherapy, can improve local control. Instead of debate over whether an ipsilateral tumor after breast-conservation therapy is local recurrence or a new primary cancer by analyzing conflicting data lacking strong evidence, efforts should be focused on reducing this risk irrespective of origin. Selecting women for breast-conservation therapy and achieving margin control can reduce ipsilateral failures.

Preventing Breast, Ovarian Cancer in BRCA Carriers: Rational of Prophylactic Surgery and Promises of Surveillance

Women with inherited mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) genes face a high lifetime risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer. Breast cancer is the most common female malignancy in the Western world; 275,000 women will receive a new diagnosis of breast cancer this year in the United States.1 Given that BRCA carriers make up 5 to 10% (13,750-27,500 women in the USA) of all breast cancer cases, increasing is the interest for the management of these women. As genetic test, with the power to identify these high-risk women, has been widely available and preventive surgical and nonsurgical choices abound, there is growing controversy and uncertainty about prevention choice. Ideally, prevention strategy should provide the best combination of cancer protection, survival and quality of life (QoL). Goal of prophylactic surgery is to eliminate risk of cancer, by removing the organ(s) targeted by the BRCA mutated genes, namely breasts and ovaries, before the disease clinically occurs. By contrast, preservation or surgical resection of these target organs only when screening-detected early-stage cancer occurs represents the principal aim of close surveillance. In the absence of data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for apparent reasons, prevention management should be guided by other nonrandomized reports.2 The evident high risk of cancer for BRCA carriers urgently suggests the need for intervention. But for which prevention option are there the most convincing data? Wide variation in risk estimates, diverse impacts of surgical and nonsurgical prevention measures on survival and QoL and insufficient data, make decision for prevention of BRCA mutation carriers too complicated and challenging. As new data become available over the last year regarding lifetime risk,3 the efficacy and limitations of surgical and nonsurgical procedures,4–6 and decision analysis,7 critical analysis on the light of these new findings may help women and their physician to deal with this dilemma. Ten years after the discovery of BRCA genes an explosion of research on understanding the molecular mechanisms of BRCA pathway has been noted. But the expectation that this elucidation could lead to effective chemoprevention of the most common noninherited (sporadic) cancer has been proven elusive. Although the BRCA genes themselves appear unconnected to common, nonhereditary cancers, advances in understanding BRCA genes’ biological function,8–10 suggest that defects in other parts of the BRCA pathway might be critical not only driving breast cancer but other cancers as well.9,10 Uncertainty about risk magnitude is a major obstacle in making decision. Most, but not all, women with inherited mutations that affect one allele of either BRCA1 or BRCA2, will develop breast and/or ovarian cancer. This risk varies considerably between 40% to 85% for breast cancer and 11% to 65% for ovarian cancer.3,8,11,12 This variation is depended on mutated gene (BRCA1 or BRCA2 and different mutations in the same gene), family history (strong or weak), as well as genetic and external factors that modify genetic risk.8 Data available suggest that among women with BRCA mutations, those with a strong family history have a higher risk13 than those without such a family history.14,15 However, a recent study published in Science3 may overturn this widely accepted status.16 In the New York Breast Cancer Study (NYBCS) on 1,008 New York-area Ashkenazi Jewish women diagnosed with incident, breast cancer, 104 (10.3%) female probands carried an Received August 24, 2004; accepted October 11, 2004. From the Departments of Pathology (NJA), Gynecology and Obstetrics (EP) and Surgery (DR), at the Ioannina University School of Medicine, GR – 45110, Ioannina, Greece. Address correspondence to: Dimitrios H. Roukos, MD, Department of Surgery, Ioannina University School of Medicine, GR – 45110, Ioannina, Greece; Fax: 3

Adiposity and cancer at major anatomical sites: umbrella review of the literature

Objective To evaluate the strength and validity of the evidence for the association between adiposity and risk of developing or dying from cancer. Design Umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Data sources PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and manual screening of retrieved references. Eligibility criteria Systematic reviews or meta-analyses of observational studies that evaluated the association between indices of adiposity and risk of developing or dying from cancer. Data synthesis Primary analysis focused on cohort studies exploring associations for continuous measures of adiposity. The evidence was graded into strong, highly suggestive, suggestive, or weak after applying criteria that included the statistical significance of the random effects summary estimate and of the largest study in a meta-analysis, the number of cancer cases, heterogeneity between studies, 95% prediction intervals, small study effects, excess significance bias, and sensitivity analysis with credibility ceilings. Results 204 meta-analyses investigated associations between seven indices of adiposity and developing or dying from 36 primary cancers and their subtypes. Of the 95 meta-analyses that included cohort studies and used a continuous scale to measure adiposity, only 12 (13%) associations for nine cancers were supported by strong evidence. An increase in body mass index was associated with a higher risk of developing oesophageal adenocarcinoma; colon and rectal cancer in men; biliary tract system and pancreatic cancer; endometrial cancer in premenopausal women; kidney cancer; and multiple myeloma. Weight gain and waist to hip circumference ratio were associated with higher risks of postmenopausal breast cancer in women who have never used hormone replacement therapy and endometrial cancer, respectively. The increase in the risk of developing cancer for every 5 kg/m2 increase in body mass index ranged from 9% (relative risk 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.13) for rectal cancer among men to 56% (1.56, 1.34 to 1.81) for biliary tract system cancer. The risk of postmenopausal breast cancer among women who have never used HRT increased by 11% for each 5 kg of weight gain in adulthood (1.11, 1.09 to 1.13), and the risk of endometrial cancer increased by 21% for each 0.1 increase in waist to hip ratio (1.21, 1.13 to 1.29). Five additional associations were supported by strong evidence when categorical measures of adiposity were included: weight gain with colorectal cancer; body mass index with gallbladder, gastric cardia, and ovarian cancer; and multiple myeloma mortality. Conclusions Although the association of adiposity with cancer risk has been extensively studied, associations for only 11 cancers (oesophageal adenocarcinoma, multiple myeloma, and cancers of the gastric cardia, colon, rectum, biliary tract system, pancreas, breast, endometrium, ovary, and kidney) were supported by strong evidence. Other associations could be genuine, but substantial uncertainty remains. Obesity is becoming one of the biggest problems in public health; evidence on the strength of the associated risks may allow finer selection of those at higher risk of cancer, who could be targeted for personalised prevention strategies.

Approaching the dilemma between prophylactic bilateral mastectomy or oophorectomy for breast and ovarian cancer prevention in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Despite advances in the genetics of familial breast and ovarian cancer, the clinical management of women with established mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes remains controversial. For women who decide for prophylactic surgery and not for a conservative approach, it is highly debated whether they are benefited more by a prophylactic mastectomy rather than a prophylactic oophorectomy. Although BRCA mutation carriers are at a substantially higher risk for developing breast cancer rather than ovarian cancer, medical decision-making is a major challenge. Penetrance estimates of breast and ovarian cancer considerably vary and substantially differ between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. This variation is important in decision-making. Here we balance risks and benefits of these two surgical procedures regarding cancer risk estimates, effectiveness, morbidity, and quality of life. Since the first description of breast cancer susceptibility in women carrying mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes 8 years ago, important advances have been made in cancer genetics and several clinical studies with surgical or conservative preventive approaches have been published. But the clinical management of these women has not yet been established. Surgical prophylaxis in BRCA mutation carriers seems to offer higher protection against cancer than conservative approach, but it is associated with a series of limitations and risks.~ Clinicians

Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective To determine the impact of cervical excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on fertility and early pregnancy outcomes. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Data sources Medline and Embase. Eligibility criteria Studies assessing fertility and early pregnancy outcomes in women with a history of treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia versus untreated women. We classified the included studies according to treatment type and fertility or early pregnancy endpoint. Analysis Pooled relative risks and 95% confidence intervals using a random effect model, and interstudy heterogeneity with I2 statistics. Results 15 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included. The meta-analysis did not provide any evidence that treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia adversely affected the chances of conception. The overall pregnancy rate was higher for treated women than for untreated women (four studies; 43% v 38%, pooled relative risk 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.64), although the heterogeneity between studies was high (P<0.0001). Pregnancy rates did not differ between women with an intention to conceive (two studies; 88% v 95%, 0.93, 0.80 to 1.08) and the number requiring more than 12 months to conceive (three studies, 15% v 9%, 1.45, 0.89 to 2.37). Although the rates for total miscarriages (10 studies; 4.6% v 2.8%, 1.04, 0.90 to 1.21) and miscarriage in the first trimester (four studies; 9.8% v 8.4%, 1.16, 0.80 to 1.69) was similar for treated and untreated women, cervical treatment was associated with a significantly increased risk of miscarriage in the second trimester. The rate was higher for treated women than for untreated women (eight studies; 1.6% v 0.4%, 16 558 women; 2.60, 1.45 to 4.67). The number of ectopic pregnancies (1.6% v 0.8%; 1.89, 1.50 to 2.39) and terminations (12.2% v 7.4%; 1.71, 1.31 to 2.22) was also higher for treated women. Conclusion There is no evidence suggesting that treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia adversely affects fertility, although treatment was associated with a significantly increased risk of miscarriages in the second trimester. Research should explore mechanisms that may explain this increase in risk and stratify the impact that treatment may have on fertility and early pregnancy outcomes by the size of excision and treatment method used.

Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective To assess the effect of treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on obstetric outcomes and to correlate this with cone depth and comparison group used. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources CENTRAL, Medline, Embase from 1948 to April 2016 were searched for studies assessing obstetric outcomes in women with or without previous local cervical treatment. Data extraction and synthesis Independent reviewers extracted the data and performed quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa criteria. Studies were classified according to method and obstetric endpoint. Pooled risk ratios were calculated with a random effect model and inverse variance. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed with I2 statistics. Main outcome measures Obstetric outcomes comprised preterm birth (including spontaneous and threatened), premature rupture of the membranes, chorioamnionitis, mode of delivery, length of labour, induction of delivery, oxytocin use, haemorrhage, analgesia, cervical cerclage, and cervical stenosis. Neonatal outcomes comprised low birth weight, admission to neonatal intensive care, stillbirth, APGAR scores, and perinatal mortality. Results 71 studies were included (6 338 982 participants: 65 082 treated/6 292 563 untreated). Treatment significantly increased the risk of overall (<37 weeks; 10.7% v 5.4%; relative risk 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.60 to 1.98), severe (<32-34 weeks; 3.5% v 1.4%; 2.40, 1.92 to 2.99), and extreme (<28-30 weeks; 1.0% v 0.3%; 2.54, 1.77 to 3.63) preterm birth. Techniques removing or ablating more tissue were associated with worse outcomes. Relative risks for delivery at <37 weeks were 2.70 (2.14 to 3.40) for cold knife conisation, 2.11 (1.26 to 3.54) for laser conisation, 2.02 (1.60 to 2.55) for excision not otherwise specified, 1.56 (1.36 to 1.79) for large loop excision of the transformation zone, and 1.46 (1.27 to 1.66) for ablation not otherwise specified. Compared with no treatment, the risk of preterm birth was higher in women who had undergone more than one treatment (13.2% v 4.1%; 3.78, 2.65 to 5.39) and with increasing cone depth (≤10-12 mm; 7.1% v 3.4%; 1.54, 1.09 to 2.18; ≥10-12 mm: 9.8% v 3.4%, 1.93, 1.62 to 2.31; ≥15-17 mm: 10.1% v 3.4%; 2.77, 1.95 to 3.93; ≥20 mm: 10.2% v 3.4%; 4.91, 2.06 to 11.68). The choice of comparison group affected the magnitude of effect. This was higher for external comparators, followed by internal comparators, and ultimately women with disease who did not undergo treatment. In women with untreated CIN and in pregnancies before treatment, the risk of preterm birth was higher than the risk in the general population (5.9% v 5.6%; 1.24, 1.14 to 1.35). Spontaneous preterm birth, premature rupture of the membranes, chorioamnionitis, low birth weight, admission to neonatal intensive care, and perinatal mortality were also significantly increased after treatment. Conclusions Women with CIN have a higher baseline risk for prematurity. Excisional and ablative treatment further increases that risk. The frequency and severity of adverse sequelae increases with increasing cone depth and is higher for excision than for ablation.