Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Evelien Gielen is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Evelien Gielen.


The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism | 2013

Optimal vitamin D status: a critical analysis on the basis of evidence-based medicine.

Roger Bouillon; Natasja M. van Schoor; Evelien Gielen; Steven Boonen; Chantal Mathieu; Dirk Vanderschueren; Paul Lips

CONTEXT Public health authorities around the world recommend widely variable supplementation strategies for adults, whereas several professional organizations, including The Endocrine Society, recommend higher supplementation. METHODS We analyzed published randomized controlled clinical trials to define the optimal intake or vitamin D status for bone and extraskeletal health. CONCLUSIONS The extraskeletal effects of vitamin D are plausible as based on preclinical data and observational studies. However, apart from the beneficial effects of 800 IU/d of vitamin D3 for reduction of falls in the elderly, causality remains yet unproven in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The greatest risk for cancer, infections, cardiovascular and metabolic diseases is associated with 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels below 20 ng/mL. There is ample evidence from RCTs that calcium and bone homeostasis, estimated from serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and PTH, calcium absorption, or bone mass, can be normalized by 25OHD levels above 20 ng/mL. Moreover, vitamin D supplementation (800 IU/d) in combination with calcium can reduce fracture incidence by about 20%. Such a dose will bring serum levels of 25OHD above 20 ng/mL in nearly all postmenopausal women. Based on calculations of the metabolic clearance of 25OHD, a daily intake of 500-700 IU of vitamin D3 is sufficient to maintain serum 25OHD levels of 20 ng/mL. Therefore, the recommendations for a daily intake of 1500-2000 IU/d or serum 25OHD levels of 30 ng or higher for all adults or elderly subjects, as suggested by The Endocrine Society Task Force, are premature. Fortunately, ongoing RCTs will help to guide us to solve this important public health question.


Endocrine Reviews | 2014

Sex Steroid Actions in Male Bone

Dirk Vanderschueren; Michaël Laurent; Frank Claessens; Evelien Gielen; Marie K. Lagerquist; Liesbeth Vandenput; Anna E. Börjesson; Claes Ohlsson

Sex steroids are chief regulators of gender differences in the skeleton, and male gender is one of the strongest protective factors against osteoporotic fractures. This advantage in bone strength relies mainly on greater cortical bone expansion during pubertal peak bone mass acquisition and superior skeletal maintenance during aging. During both these phases, estrogens acting via estrogen receptor-α in osteoblast lineage cells are crucial for male cortical and trabecular bone, as evident from conditional genetic mouse models, epidemiological studies, rare genetic conditions, genome-wide meta-analyses, and recent interventional trials. Genetic mouse models have also demonstrated a direct role for androgens independent of aromatization on trabecular bone via the androgen receptor in osteoblasts and osteocytes, although the target cell for their key effects on periosteal bone formation remains elusive. Low serum estradiol predicts incident fractures, but the highest risk occurs in men with additionally low T and high SHBG. Still, the possible clinical utility of serum sex steroids for fracture prediction is unknown. It is likely that sex steroid actions on male bone metabolism rely also on extraskeletal mechanisms and cross talk with other signaling pathways. We propose that estrogens influence fracture risk in aging men via direct effects on bone, whereas androgens exert an additional antifracture effect mainly via extraskeletal parameters such as muscle mass and propensity to fall. Given the demographic trends of increased longevity and consequent rise of osteoporosis, an increased understanding of how sex steroids influence male bone health remains a high research priority.


Journal of Endocrinology | 2010

Skeletal sexual dimorphism: relative contribution of sex steroids, GH–IGF1, and mechanical loading

Filip Callewaert; Mieke Sinnesael; Evelien Gielen; Steven Boonen; Dirk Vanderschueren

Structural gender differences in bone mass - characterized by wider but not thicker bones - are generally attributed to opposing sex steroid actions in men and women. Recent findings have redefined the traditional concept of sex hormones as the main regulators of skeletal sexual dimorphism. GH-IGF1 action is likely to be the most important determinant of sex differences in bone mass. Estrogens limit periosteal bone expansion but stimulate endosteal bone apposition in females, whereas androgens stimulate radial bone expansion in males. Androgens not only act directly on bone through the androgen receptor (AR) but also activate estrogen receptor-α or -β (ERα or ERβ) following aromatization into estrogens. Both the AR and ERα pathways are needed to optimize radial cortical bone expansion, whereas AR signaling alone is the dominant pathway for normal male trabecular bone development. Estrogen/ERα-mediated effects in males may - at least partly - depend on interaction with IGF1. In addition, sex hormones and their receptors have an impact on the mechanical sensitivity of the growing skeleton. AR and ERβ signaling may limit the osteogenic response to loading in males and females respectively, while ERα may stimulate the response of bone to mechanical stimulation in the female skeleton. Overall, current evidence suggests that skeletal sexual dimorphism is not just the end result of differences in sex steroid secretion between the sexes, but depends on gender differences in GH-IGF1 and mechanical sensitivity to loading as well.


Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics | 2013

The ability of three different models of frailty to predict all-cause mortality: Results from the European Male Aging Study (EMAS)

Rathi Ravindrarajah; David M. Lee; Stephen R. Pye; Evelien Gielen; Steven Boonen; Dirk Vanderschueren; Neil Pendleton; Joseph D. Finn; Abdelouahid Tajar; Matthew D.L. O’Connell; Kenneth Rockwood; Gyorgy Bartfai; Felipe F. Casanueva; Gianni Forti; Aleksander Giwercman; Thang S. Han; Ilpo Huhtaniemi; Krzysztof Kula; Michael E. J. Lean; Margus Punab; Frederick C. W. Wu; Terence W. O’Neill

Few studies have directly compared the ability of the most commonly used models of frailty to predict mortality among community-dwelling individuals. Here, we used a frailty index (FI), frailty phenotype (FP), and FRAIL scale (FS) to predict mortality in the EMAS. Participants were aged 40-79 years (n=2929) at baseline and 6.6% (n=193) died over a median 4.3 years of follow-up. The FI was generated from 39 deficits, including self-reported health, morbidities, functional performance and psychological assessments. The FP and FS consisted of five phenotypic criteria and both categorized individuals as robust when they had 0 criteria, prefrail as 1-2 criteria and frail as 3+ criteria. The mean FI increased linearly with age (r(2)=0.21) and in Cox regression models adjusted for age, center, smoking and partner status the hazard ratio (HR) for death for each unit increase of the FI was 1.49. Men who were prefrail or frail by either the FP or FS definitions, had a significantly increased risk of death compared to their robust counterparts. Compared to robust men, those who were FP frail at baseline had a HR for death of 3.84, while those who were FS frail had a HR of 3.87. All three frailty models significantly predicted future mortality among community-dwelling, middle-aged and older European men after adjusting for potential confounders. Our data suggest that the choice of frailty model may not be of paramount importance when predicting future risk of death, enabling flexibility in the approach used.


Osteoporosis International | 2012

Extraskeletal benefits and risks of calcium, vitamin D and anti-osteoporosis medications

Jean-Jacques Body; Pierre Bergmann; Steven Boonen; Jean-Pierre Devogelaer; Evelien Gielen; Stefan Goemaere; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Serge Rozenberg; Jean-Yves Reginster

SummaryDrugs used for the prevention and the treatment of osteoporosis exert various favourable and unfavourable extra-skeletal effects whose importance is increasingly recognized notably for treatment selection.IntroductionThe therapeutic armamentarium for the prevention and the treatment of osteoporosis is increasingly large, and possible extra-skeletal effects of available drugs could influence the choice of a particular compound.MethodsThe present document is the result of a national consensus, based on a systematic and critical review of the literature.ResultsObservational research has suggested an inverse relationship between calcium intake and cardiovascular diseases, notably through an effect on blood pressure, but recent data suggest a possible deleterious effect of calcium supplements on cardiovascular risk. Many diverse studies have implicated vitamin D in the pathogenesis of clinically important non-skeletal functions or diseases, especially muscle function, cardiovascular disease, autoimmune diseases and common cancers. The possible effects of oral or intravenous bisphosphonates are well-known. They have been associated with an increased risk of oesophageal cancer or atrial fibrillation, but large-scale studies have not found any association with bisphosphonate use. Selective oestrogen receptor modulators have demonstrated favourable or unfavourable extra-skeletal effects that vary between compounds. Strontium ranelate has a limited number of non-skeletal effects. A reported increase in the risk of venous thromboembolism is not found in observational studies, and very rare cases of cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions have been reported. Denosumab has been introduced recently, and its extra-skeletal effects still have to be assessed.ConclusionSeveral non-skeletal effects of bone drugs are well demonstrated and influence treatment choices.


Age and Ageing | 2013

The association of frailty with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and parathyroid hormone levels in older European men

Abdelouahid Tajar; David M. Lee; Stephen R. Pye; Matthew D. L. O'Connell; Rathi Ravindrarajah; Evelien Gielen; Steven Boonen; Dirk Vanderschueren; Neil Pendleton; Joseph D. Finn; Gyoergy Bartfai; Felipe F. Casanueva; Gianni Forti; Aleksander Giwercman; Thang S. Han; Ilpo Huhtaniemi; Krzysztof Kula; Michael E. J. Lean; Margus Punab; Frederick C. W. Wu; Terence W. O'Neill

BACKGROUND the link between the vitamin D endocrine axis and frailty remains undefined, with few studies examining the joint effect of vitamin D and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. Our objective was to determine the association of frailty with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and PTH. SETTING cross-sectional analysis within the European Male Ageing Study (EMAS). PARTICIPANTS a total of 1,504 community-dwelling men aged 60-79 years. METHODS frailty was classified using a frailty phenotype (FP) and frailty index (FI). The association of frailty with 25(OH)D and PTH was examined using multinomial logistic regression; individual FP criteria with 25(OH)D and PTH using binary logistic regression. Results were expressed as relative odds ratios (ROR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for multinomial; odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs for binary models. RESULTS using the FP, 5.0% of subjects were classified as frail and 36.6% as prefrail. Lower levels of 25(OH)D were associated with being prefrail (per 1 SD decrease: ROR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.26-1.67) and frail (ROR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.30-2.76), after adjusting for age, centre and health and lifestyle confounders (robust group = base category). Higher levels of PTH were associated with being frail after adjustment for confounders (per 1 SD increase: ROR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.01-1.52). Comparable results were found using the FI. Among the five FP criteria only sarcopenia was not associated with 25(OH)D levels, while only weakness was associated with PTH. CONCLUSION lower 25(OH)D and higher PTH levels were positively associated with frailty in older men. Prospective data would enable the temporal nature of this relationship to be explored further.


Calcified Tissue International | 2012

Musculoskeletal frailty: A geriatric syndrome at the core of fracture occurrence in older age

Evelien Gielen; Sabine Verschueren; T. W. O'Neill; Stephen R. Pye; Matthew D. L. O'Connell; David M. Lee; Rathi Ravindrarajah; Frank Claessens; Michaël Laurent; Koen Milisen; Jos Tournoy; Marian Dejaeger; F. C Wu; Dirk Vanderschueren; Steven Boonen

A progressive decline in physiologic reserves inevitably occurs with ageing. Frailty results from reaching a threshold of decline across multiple organ systems. By consequence, frail elderly experience an excess vulnerability to stressors and are at high risk for functional deficits and comorbid disorders, possibly leading to institutionalization, hospitalization and death. The phenotype of frailty is referred to as the frailty syndrome and is widely recognized in geriatric medical practice. Although frailty affects both musculoskeletal and nonmusculoskeletal systems, sarcopenia, which is defined as age-related loss of muscle mass and strength, constitutes one of the main determinants of fracture risk in older age and one of the main components of the clinical frailty syndrome. As a result, operational definitions of frailty and therapeutic strategies in older patients tend to focus on the consequences of sarcopenia.


Calcified Tissue International | 2016

Effects of Dairy Products Consumption on Health: Benefits and Beliefs--A Commentary from the Belgian Bone Club and the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases.

Serge Rozenberg; Jean-Jacques Body; Olivier Bruyère; Pierre Bergmann; Maria Luisa Brandi; C Cooper; Jean-Pierre Devogelaer; Evelien Gielen; Stefan Goemaere; Jean-Marc Kaufman; René Rizzoli; Jean-Yves Reginster

Abstract Dairy products provide a package of essential nutrients that is difficult to obtain in low-dairy or dairy-free diets, and for many people it is not possible to achieve recommended daily calcium intakes with a dairy-free diet. Despite the established benefits for bone health, some people avoid dairy in their diet due to beliefs that dairy may be detrimental to health, especially in those with weight management issues, lactose intolerance, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or trying to avoid cardiovascular disease. This review provides information for health professionals to enable them to help their patients make informed decisions about consuming dairy products as part of a balanced diet. There may be a weak association between dairy consumption and a possible small weight reduction, with decreases in fat mass and waist circumference and increases in lean body mass. Lactose intolerant individuals may not need to completely eliminate dairy products from their diet, as both yogurt and hard cheese are well tolerated. Among people with arthritis, there is no evidence for a benefit to avoid dairy consumption. Dairy products do not increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, particularly if low fat. Intake of up to three servings of dairy products per day appears to be safe and may confer a favourable benefit with regard to bone health.


BMC Geriatrics | 2016

Sarcopenia in daily practice: assessment and management

Charlotte Beaudart; Eugene McCloskey; Olivier Bruyère; Matteo Cesari; Yves Rolland; René Rizzoli; Islene Araujo de Carvalho; Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan; Ivan Bautmans; Marie Claude Bertière; Maria Luisa Brandi; Nasser M. Al-Daghri; Nansa Burlet; Etienne Cavalier; Francesca Cerreta; Antonio Cherubini; Roger A. Fielding; Evelien Gielen; Francesco Landi; Jean Petermans; Jean-Yves Reginster; Marjolein Visser; John A. Kanis; C Cooper

BackgroundSarcopenia is increasingly recognized as a correlate of ageing and is associated with increased likelihood of adverse outcomes including falls, fractures, frailty and mortality. Several tools have been recommended to assess muscle mass, muscle strength and physical performance in clinical trials. Whilst these tools have proven to be accurate and reliable in investigational settings, many are not easily applied to daily practice.MethodsThis paper is based on literature reviews performed by members of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) working group on frailty and sarcopenia. Face-to-face meetings were afterwards organized for the whole group to make amendments and discuss further recommendations.ResultsThis paper proposes some user-friendly and inexpensive methods that can be used to assess sarcopenia in real-life settings. Healthcare providers, particularly in primary care, should consider an assessment of sarcopenia in individuals at increased risk; suggested tools for assessing risk include the Red Flag Method, the SARC-F questionnaire, the SMI method or different prediction equations. Management of sarcopenia should primarily be patient centered and involve the combination of both resistance and endurance based activity programmes with or without dietary interventions. Development of a number of pharmacological interventions is also in progress.ConclusionsAssessment of sarcopenia in individuals with risk factors, symptoms and/or conditions exposing them to the risk of disability will become particularly important in the near future.


The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism | 2013

Active vitamin D (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D) and bone health in middle-aged and elderly men: The European Male Aging Study (EMAS)

Dirk Vanderschueren; Stephen R. Pye; Terence W. O'Neill; David M. Lee; Ivo Jans; Jaak Billen; Evelien Gielen; Michaël Laurent; Frank Claessens; Judith E. Adams; Kate Ward; Gyorgy Bartfai; Felipe F. Casanueva; Joseph D. Finn; Gianni Forti; Aleksander Giwercman; Thang S. Han; Ilpo Huhtaniemi; Krzysztof Kula; Michael E. J. Lean; Neil Pendleton; Margus Punab; Frederick C. W. Wu; Steven Boonen

CONTEXT There is little information on the potential impact of serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D] on bone health including turnover. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to determine the influence of 1,25(OH)2D and 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] on bone health in middle-aged and older European men. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Men aged 40-79 years were recruited from population registers in 8 European centers. Subjects completed questionnaires that included questions concerning lifestyle and were invited to attend for quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel, assessment of height and weight, and a fasting blood sample from which 1,25(OH)2D, 25(OH)D, and PTH were measured. 1,25(OH)2D was measured using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Bone markers serum N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen (P1NP) and crosslinks (β-cTX) were also measured. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the hip and lumbar spine was performed in 2 centers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) QUS of the heel, bone markers P1NP and β-cTX, and DXA of the hip and lumbar spine were measured. RESULTS A total of 2783 men, mean age 60.0 years (SD 11.0) were included in the analysis. After adjustment for age and center, 1,25(OH)2D was positively associated with 25(OH)D but not with PTH. 25(OH)D was negatively associated with PTH. After adjustment for age, center, height, weight, lifestyle factors, and season, 1,25(OH)2D was associated negatively with QUS and DXA parameters and associated positively with β-cTX. 1,25(OH)2D was not correlated with P1NP. 25(OH)D was positively associated with the QUS and DXA parameters but not related to either bone turnover marker. Subjects with both high 1,25(OH)2D (upper tertile) and low 25(OH)D (lower tertile) had the lowest QUS and DXA parameters and the highest β-cTX levels. CONCLUSIONS Serum 1,25(OH)2D is associated with higher bone turnover and poorer bone health despite being positively related to 25(OH)D. A combination of high 1,25(OH)2D and low 25(OH)D is associated with the poorest bone health.

Collaboration


Dive into the Evelien Gielen's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dirk Vanderschueren

The Catholic University of America

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steven Boonen

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michaël Laurent

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frank Claessens

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephen R. Pye

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Krzysztof Kula

Medical University of Łódź

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Margus Punab

Tartu University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neil Pendleton

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge