Evelyne Barbin
University of Nantes
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Evelyne Barbin.
Archive | 2002
Evelyne Barbin; Giorgio T. Bagni; Lucia Grugnetti; Manfred Kronfellner; Ewa Lakoma; Marta Menghini
The question of judging the effectiveness of integrating historical resources into mathematics teaching may not be susceptible to the research techniques of the quantitative experimental scientist. It is better handled through qualitative research paradigms such as those developed by anthropologists.
Archive | 2014
Evelyne Barbin; Marta Menghini
Since the beginning of the transmission of geometric knowledge, two aspects of geometry have been present: the abstract “speculative” and the practical. These two aspects correspond to an essential dialectic in geometry teaching, between a deductive/rational science and a practical/intuitive one. In the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the stress on the second aspect led to experimental geometry. After the work of Descartes, another tension concerned the solution of problems: between “pure” methods and methods coming from algebra or analysis. Attempts to find a new language for school geometry reached their apex when geometry was substituted by linear algebra in the 1960s.
Archive | 2013
Evelyne Barbin; René Guitart
The Treatise of Mathematical Physics of Emile Mathieu, published from 1873 to 1890, provided an exposition of the specific French “Mathematical Physics” inherited from Lame, himself an heir of Poisson, Fourier, and Laplace. The works of all these authors had significant differences, but they were pursuing the same goal, described here with its relation to Theoretical Physics.
Archive | 2010
Evelyne Barbin
My purpose is to understand what “arithmetization of geometry” meant in the seventeenth century. I compare five proofs of the main proposition on geometrical proportion: two proofs in Euclid’s Elements (one for magnitudes, one for numbers), one proof in Antoine Arnauld’s New Elements of Geometry (1667) and two proofs in Bernard Lamy’s Elements of Geometry (2nd edn, 1695, 5th edn 1731). For each of these proofs, I examine the signs used both for magnitudes and for reasoning, using Peirce’s classification of signs. This examination clearly shows that in the seventeenth century geometry had undergone a process of arithmetization through the use of symbolization, and that the outcome of this process of arithmetization had a strong influence on proofs in mathematics.
Educational Studies in Mathematics | 2007
Evelyne Barbin
Archive | 2006
Evelyne Barbin
Tréma | 2006
Evelyne Barbin
Archive | 2013
Evelyne Barbin; Marc Moyon
Archive | 2013
Evelyne Barbin; Marc Moyon; Odile Kouteynikoff; Thomas Préveraud; Marta Menghini; Amirouche Moktefi; Sandra Bella; Thierry Joffredo; André Stoll; Jean-Pierre Lubet; Mahdi Abdeljaouad; André-Jean Glière; François Plantade; Valérie Legros; Rudolf Bkouche; Hervé Renaud; Arnaud Carsalade; Sophie Couteaud; Frédéric Métin; Patrick Guyot; Pierre Ageron; Anne-Marie Aebischer; Hombeline Languereau; Dominique Tournès
Archive | 2007
Evelyne Barbin