Evelyne Verrouil

Chondroitin sulfate in the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: an overview.

Publisher Summary This chapter discusses the symptomatic/structural efficacy and the tolerance of the chondroitin sulfate (CS) in the treatment of knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA) through a meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials. It presents a study in which a search for any randomized, double‐blind, and placebo (PBO)‐controlled prospective trial, whose aim was to assess the symptomatic and/or structural activity of oral CS in the treatment of knee or hip OA, was performed through data sources and then through a manual search of the reference section of all articles retrieved by the primary search. This search was limited to articles published in extenso in peer‐reviewed journals between 1980 and 2005, in English or French languages, presenting sufficient data and lasting more than 4 weeks. A modest effect of the CS on the relief of pain and on the improvement of the joint function has been found. Osteoarthritis is the most common form of arthritis, affecting the knee in 30% and the hip in 4–10% of people aged 65 and over. Even if roughly 50% of them only have signs and symptoms, the number of adults clinically affected by this disease is considerable especially in the elderly and is increasing with the increasing average age in the populations.

Relationship Between Hip Dysplasia, Pain, and Osteoarthritis in a Cohort of Patients with Hip Symptoms

Objective. The relationship between acetabular dysplasia (HD) and hip osteoarthritis (OA) remains unclear, especially for mild forms of dysplasia. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of HD in a population-based sample with symptoms and to evaluate potential associations linking HD, hip OA, and hip pain. Methods. Individuals 40 to 75 years of age with symptoms in 1 or both hips were recruited during a multiregional prevalence survey. All study participants underwent examination and radiographs. Radiographs were evaluated using Kellgren-Lawrence staging (with stages ≥ 2 indicating hip OA) and HD measures [center-edge (CE) angle, acetabular inclination angle (HTE), acetabular depth (AD), and vertical center-anterior margin angle]. Results. We studied both hips of 842 individuals (1684 hips), among whom 203 had hip OA. Compared to left hips, right hips had significantly smaller CE angles and significantly greater AD and HTE values (p ≤ 0.001). Overall, the prevalence of HD ranged from 7.6% to 22.2% of the hips depending on the measure used. The prevalence of HD was higher in individuals with hip OA, with significant differences for abnormal HTE (19.1% vs 11.4%; p < 0.0001) and abnormal CE (11.3% vs 7.5%; p = 0.04). By logistic regression, only abnormal HTE remained associated with OA. Same-side hip pain was not statistically more common in individuals with HD after stratification on OA status (p = 0.12). Conclusion. Our study confirms the relationship between OA and HD, particularly as defined based on the HTE angle.

The therapeutic approach to osteoarthritis.

Ideally, treatment is based on etiology, if possible on pathophysiology, and in practice on anatomical and clinical findings. A systematic search for the etiological factors of osteoarthritis (OA) shows that the various mechanisms are frequently associated. Etiological treatments are rare. We may mention acetabular tectoplasty in hip dysplasia with minimal joint space narrowing. Valgus osteotomy would also be indicated for early medial tibiofemoral OA in genu varum if we had definite proof that, if left untreated, this deformity inevitably leads to clinically severe OA. This is not the case. One of the limitations of this etiological treatment lies in the fact that we do not know which patients are at risk of developing painful OA. Instead, certain risk factors for OA are known, so that primary and secondary prevention of the disease is possible. While age, sex and genetic predisposition are not amenable to preventive action, the same does not apply to the following factors: obesity, sports, and occupational activity. Thanks to in vitro studies of cultured normal and osteoarthritic chondrocytes and to experimental models of OA in animals, the pathophysiological mechanisms of OA are beginning to be better known. The prospect thus arises of “therapeutic manipulations” of precise pharmacological targets, even if it is still too soon to speak of true pathophysiological treatment of this disease. For instance, various interventions along the IL-1 pathway can be envisaged and have all been tested in animals. In practice, treating OA means taking into consideration its various signs: pain which appears to be mechanical and more or less chronic, joint stiffness, instability, effusion, and — the consequence of these symptoms — the professional, social and personal handicap of the patient. The treatment of OA must be approached from a global perspective, associating whenever possible symptomatic treatment, disease-modifying treatment, education and rehabilitation. In other words, the treatment of OA requires an overall approach, associating pharmacological and non-pharmacological modalities.

Femoro-tibial knee osteoarthritis: One or two X-rays? Results from a population-based study

OBJECTIVE Our objective was to compare the use of both anteroposterior (AP) extended-knee X-ray and semi-flexed X-ray (current gold standard) versus the use of semi-flexed X-ray alone to detect femoro-tibial osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS Individuals 40 to 75 years of age with symptomatic hip and/or knee OA (Kellgren/Lawrence [KL] score≥2) were recruited using a multiregional prevalence survey in France. Both AP and schuss X-rays were performed and read; two years later, the same examiner, blinded to the results of the first reading, performed a second reading of the schuss X-ray. We compared the KL stages of each knee and analyzed osteophyte detection and localization, joint space narrowing (JSN), and the relationship to obesity. RESULTS The analysis included 350 participants with OA of various stages. Comparing the two readings showed that a higher proportion of patients had KL≥2 when the two X-ray views were combined (right knee: P<0.0001; left knee: P<0.001). There were no differences when using the schuss X-ray alone versus in combination with an AP X-ray in terms of detecting JSN, osteophytes. A comparison of schuss X-ray alone versus AP X-ray alone demonstrated the superiority of the schuss view for evaluating JSN (P=0.0001 and P=0.0001) and no difference in osteophyte detection. CONCLUSION Our study shows that the schuss view alone was sufficient for detecting knee osteophytes and JSN. Using one X-ray rather than two will reduce medical costs and irradiation burden. Using two views seems preferable for epidemiological studies.

Body composition and clinical symptoms in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: results from the KHOALA cohort

OBJECTIVE To analyze the associations between body composition, notably low lean mass, and clinical symptoms [pain, physical function, quality of life (QoL)] in patients with symptomatic hip and/or knee OA. METHODS Cross-sectional study using data from the 3-year follow-up visit of the Knee and Hip OsteoArthritis Long-term assessment (KHOALA) cohort. Skeletal muscle and fat mass were measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Fat mass index (FMI) was defined as total fat mass/height2. Appendicular lean mass was adjusted on body mass index (ALM/BMI), and low lean mass was defined according to the definition of FNIH Sarcopenia Project recommendations. Pain and function were measured by the WOMAC index and QoL by the SF-36. RESULTS In total, 358 patients underwent DXA (67% women, mean [SD] age 63.4 [8.4] years, mean BMI 29.5 [5.6]kg/m2). The visual analog scale (0-100) pain score was 38.0 [24.7] and 25.4% had hip and 74.6% knee OA. Low lean mass and ALM/BMI were associated with impaired QoL and WOMAC scores on bivariate analysis (all p ≤ 0.001) but not on multivariate analysis after adjustment for FMI. For patients with normal BMI, mean [SD] WOMAC scores were higher (greater impairment) with low lean mass than normal body composition (WOMAC function 33.4 [23.3] and 24.0 [17.4], p = 0.02), and mean SF-36 physical component score was lower (greater impairment) 40.3 [10.2] and (44.3 [8.4], p = 0.04). Among patients with obesity, low lean mass had no additional effect. CONCLUSION For patients with OA and normal BMI, QoL and function were more impaired for those with than without low lean mass. Conserving muscle mass in people with OA could have functional and antalgic benefits especially for those with normal BMI.