Evgenij Thorstensen
University of Oslo
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Evgenij Thorstensen.
international semantic web conference | 2015
Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz; Evgeny Kharlamov; Dmitriy Zheleznyakov; Ian Horrocks; Christoph Pinkel; Martin G. Skjæveland; Evgenij Thorstensen; Jose Mora
Ontologies have recently became a popular mechanism to expose relational database RDBs due to their ability to describe the domain of data in terms of classes and properties that are clear to domain experts. Ontological terms are related to the schema of the underlying databases with the help of mappings, i.e., declarative specifications associating SQL queries to ontological terms. Developing appropriate ontologies and mappings for given RDBs is a challenging and time consuming task. In this work we present BootOX, a system that aims at facilitating ontology and mapping development by their automatic extraction i.e., bootstrapping from RDBs, and our experience with the use of BootOX in industrial and research contexts. BootOX has a number of advantages: it allows to control the OWL 2 profile of the output ontologies, bootstrap complex and provenance mappings, which are beyond the W3C direct mapping specification. Moreover, BootOX allows to import pre-existing ontologies via alignment.
international semantic web conference | 2015
Domenico Lembo; Jose Mora; Riccardo Rosati; Domenico Fabio Savo; Evgenij Thorstensen
Ontology-based data access OBDA is a recent paradigm for accessing data sources through an ontology that acts as a conceptual, integrated view of the data, and declarative mappings that connect the ontology to the data sources. We study the formal analysis of mappings in OBDA. Specifically, we focus on the problem of identifying mapping inconsistency and redundancy, two of the most important anomalies for mappings in OBDA. We consider a wide range of ontology languages that comprises OWL 2 and all its profiles, and examine mapping languages of different expressiveness over relational databases. We provide algorithms and establish tight complexity bounds for the decision problems associated with mapping inconsistency and redundancy. Our results prove that, in our general framework, such forms of mapping analysis enjoy nice computational properties, in the sense that they are not harder than standard reasoning tasks over the ontology or over the relational database schema.
international joint conference on artificial intelligence | 2017
Domenico Lembo; Riccardo Rosati; Valerio Santarelli; Domenico Fabio Savo; Evgenij Thorstensen
In this paper we study the evolution of ontology based data access (OBDA) specifications, and focus on the case in which the ontology and/or the data source schema change, which may require a modification to the mapping between them to preserve both consistency and knowledge. Our approach is based on the idea of repairing the mapping according to the usual principle of minimal change and on a recent, mapping-based notion of consistency of the specification. We define and analyze two notions of mapping repair under ontology and source schema update. We then present a set of results on the complexity of query answering in the above framework, when the ontology is expressed in DL-LiteR.
Constraints - An International Journal | 2016
Evgenij Thorstensen
A wide range of problems can be modelled as constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs), that is, a set of constraints that must be satisfied simultaneously. Constraints can either be represented extensionally, by explicitly listing allowed combinations of values, or implicitly, by special-purpose algorithms provided by a solver. Such implicitly represented constraints, known as global constraints, are widely used; indeed, they are one of the key reasons for the success of constraint programming in solving real-world problems. In recent years, a variety of restrictions on the structure of CSP instances have been shown to yield tractable classes of CSPs. However, most such restrictions fail to guarantee tractability for CSPs with global constraints. We therefore study the applicability of structural restrictions to instances with such constraints. We show that when the number of solutions to a CSP instance is bounded in key parts of the problem, structural restrictions can be used to derive new tractable classes. Furthermore, we show that this result extends to combinations of instances drawn from known tractable classes, as well as to CSP instances where constraints assign costs to satisfying assignments.
international semantic web conference | 2015
Evgeny Kharlamov; Dag Hovland; Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz; Davide Lanti; Hallstein Lie; Christoph Pinkel; Martin Rezk; Martin G. Skjæveland; Evgenij Thorstensen; Guohui Xiao; Dmitriy Zheleznyakov; Ian Horrocks
international semantic web conference | 2013
Evgeny Kharlamov; Martin Giese; Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz; Martin G. Skjæveland; Ahmet Soylu; Dmitriy Zheleznyakov; Timea Bagosi; Marco Console; Peter Haase; Ian Horrocks; Sarunas Marciuska; Christoph Pinkel; Mariano Rodriguez-Muro; Marco Ruzzi; Valerio Santarelli; Domenico Fabio Savo; Kunal Sengupta; Michael Schmidt; Evgenij Thorstensen; Johannes Trame; Arild Waaler
international workshop description logics | 2015
Riccardo Rosati; Domenico Lembo; Domenico Fabio Savo; Jose Mora; Evgenij Thorstensen
international semantic web conference | 2015
Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz; Evgeny Kharlamov; Dmitriy Zheleznyakov; Ian Horrocks; Christoph Pinkel; Martin G. Skjæveland; Evgenij Thorstensen; Jose Mora
Description Logics | 2017
Henrik Forssell; Daniel P. Lupp; Martin G. Skjæveland; Evgenij Thorstensen
WOP@ISWC | 2017
Martin G. Skjæveland; Henrik Forssell; Johan W. Klüwer; Daniel P. Lupp; Evgenij Thorstensen; Arild Waaler