Ezra Gabbay

Temporal Trends in Health-Related Quality of Life among Hemodialysis Patients in the United States

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is a measure of the well being of hemodialysis patients and an independent prognostic predictor. Our aim was to determine whether HRQOL among hemodialysis patients has changed over time. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS We retrospectively analyzed data collected by Dialysis Clinic, Inc. from adult patients starting hemodialysis between January 1, 1997 and May 31, 2006. The primary outcome was HRQOL assessed by Short Form 36, 6 to 18 months after and closest to the 1-year anniversary of starting hemodialysis. Secular trends were analyzed by linear regression for continuous variables and logistic regression for categorical ones. Year of starting dialysis was the predictor. A five-point difference on a 0 to 100 scale was considered clinically significant. RESULTS Short Form 36 scores were available for 11,079 patients. Role physical, general health, vitality, social functioning, and physical component summary scores were unchanged among patients over the study period. Statistically significant (P < 0.05) but clinically insignificant changes were observed in physical functioning (-0.2 points/yr), bodily pain (+0.2 points/yr), mental health (+0.15 points/yr), and mental component summary scores (+0.13 points/yr). Only role emotional showed clinically significant improvement. Trends were unchanged after adjusting for age, gender, race, diabetes, hemoglobin, phosphorous, Kt/V, and albumin. CONCLUSIONS Most HRQOL domains showed either no statistically significant change or statistically but not clinically significant change over almost a decade. These results suggest that, despite important developments in hemodialysis care since 1997, little progress was made in improving HRQOL of hemodialysis patients.

The empirical basis for determinations of medical futility.

BACKGROUNDDecisions to limit treatment in critically ill patients often rely on publications that make claims of futility based on outcome data. Our objective was to systematically review the criteria for futility and the strength of empirical evidence across clinical studies that purport to support or refute claims of futility.METHODSThe MEDLINE database was searched for relevant articles published between1980 and 2008. Selected studies reported original outcome data in critically ill or cardiac arrest patients and claimed that these data can support or refute decisions to limit treatment in comparable patients. Two authors independently abstracted data on patient characteristics, intervention, outcomes, cost, and design.RESULTSForty seven studies supporting a claim of futility and 45 refuting it were reviewed. Median point estimate for adverse outcome in studies supporting claims of futility was 100% (range 75% to 100%); median lower 95% confidence limit was 91% (range 48% to 99%). Explicit thresholds for futility were missing in 88% of articles. The original criteria for quantitative futility were fulfilled by only 28% of data, and almost exclusively in studies of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for cardiac arrest. Substantial statistical overlap was observed between data brought in support of futility claims and data brought to refute them.CONCLUSIONSMost studies that purport to guide determinations of futility are based on insufficient data to provide statistical confidence for clinical decision-making. They usually lack explicit a priori thresholds for determination of futility. Many studies draw disparate conclusions based on statistically similar data. In most circumstances these problems preclude confident determinations of futility.

Weighing the evidence: obesity, metabolic syndrome, and the risk of chronic kidney disease

Evaluating effect of obesity per se and the metabolic syndrome as a whole on the risk of developing chronic kidney disease (CKD) is key factor in developing a comprehensive public health approach to reduce morbidity and healthcare resource consumption. While there is considerable evidence to support increased risk of CKD in obese individuals and those with the metabolic syndrome, this relationship may be influenced by several factors. These include confounding variables, anthropometric measures, the end-point studied (e.g. development of early stage CKD, progression to end-stage renal disease or mortality), and the complex interrelationship between the various components of the metabolic syndrome. The study by Cao et al. in the current issue of BMC nephrology examines the impact of obesity on CKD risk in people with and without co-existing metabolic syndrome. The findings of this large, prospective study illustrate a clear correlation between increased body mass index (BMI) and risk of CKD regardless of whether or not there is co-existing metabolic syndrome. While the presence of the metabolic syndrome confers some additional risk of CKD in overweight and obese individuals, its effect is relatively modest and accounts for only 26 % of the risk associated with increased BMI. We discuss the complex epidemiological and methodological context in which these important findings should be understood, and their implications for public health and for individual patients and healthcare practitioners.

Spirituality and Religion Within the Culture of Medicine: From Evidence to Practice

‘‘‘Tis God’s Will, Sir, ‘Twill come to us all’’ says Gerasim, the young servant, about his master’s illness and death in L.N. Tolstoy’s The Death of Ivan Ilyich. The ailing Ivan Ilyich is overcome by not only physical pain, but also spiritual suffering caused by what he perceives as: ‘‘other people’s cruelty, and God’s cruelty and God’s non-existence’’ (Tolstoy 2008). Through simple honesty, acceptance and non-abandonment, Gerasim raises Ivan Ilyich’s body and soul from the depths of corporeal pain and crisis of faith and spirit. This uneducated peasant lad does more for the patient than do his doctors, priest and bourgeois family. Gerasim possesses a natural gift, but for most of us doctors, understanding our patients’ spiritual and religious experience in the context of illness, healing and death is, by necessity, an acquired skill. ‘‘Spirituality and Religion Within the Culture of Medicine: From Evidence to Practice’’ edited by Michael J. Balboni and John R. Peteet is an invaluable resource for physicians, nurses and other clinicians in this quest. This volume is a tour de force of scholarship in clinical medicine, medical ethics, medical education, the social sciences, humanities, theology and the law. With contributions from 37 authors, leading experts in their respective fields, to its 22 chapters, this work has an authoritative, encyclopedic feel to it. In the introduction chapter, Balboni and Peteet outline the scholarly effort to explore the interrelationship between medicine, and religion/spirituality that is the foundation of this book. This effort includes both scientific knowledge that enhances our understanding of the significance of religion and spirituality for patients and clinicians, and a religious and/or spiritual language that provides the clinical encounter with context and meaning. The idea that empiric science has historically driven a wedge between religion and medicine, but

Identifying critically ill patients with acute kidney injury for whom renal replacement therapy is inappropriate: an exercise in futility?

Clinicians treating critically ill patients must consider the possibility that painful and expensive aggressive treatments might confer negligible benefit. Such treatments are often described as futile or inappropriate. We discuss the problem of deciding whether to initiate renal replacement therapy (RRT) for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) in the context of the debate surrounding medical futility. The main problems in deciding when such treatment would be futile are that the concept itself is controversial and eludes quantitative definition, that available outcome data do not allow confident identification of patients who will not benefit from treatment and that the decision on RRT in a critically ill patient with AKI is qualitatively different from decisions on other modalities of intensive care and resuscitation, as well as from decisions on dialysis for chronic kidney disease. Despite these difficulties, nephrologists need to identify circumstances in which continued aggressive care would be futile before proceeding to initiate RRT.

The Care of the Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Patient.

The Ultra-Orthodox Jewish community embraces a system of values and a rigorous behavioral code that are deeply rooted in religious tradition and history. Here we describe some of the unique challenges that stem from the encounter between modern medical practice and the Ultra-Orthodox world. Through examples of clinical and ethical scenarios ranging from prenatal care to end-of-life decisions, we illustrate problems related to observance of age-old practices in a modern hospital setting, balancing acceptance of Divine will with standard risk assessment, reconciliation of patient autonomy with deference to rabbinic authority and fear of stigma associated with mental illness in a traditional society. We also offer a generalizable model where inquiry precedes pre-formulated judgment to help clinicians provide enhanced care for this population.

Incentives for Caution: The In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey and Experience of Care

Dialysis treatment was heroic in the 1950s and pioneering in the 1960s; treatment for chronic kidney failure was available only to a select few deemed young, socially valuable, and otherwise healthy enough to justify the enormous investment (1). Public funding for ESRD came in the 1970s and with it, the expectation that the public’s money would be spent well. Measures of dialysis quality have evolved from case review in the 1970s and 1980s to comparison of process metrics, including measures of dialysis dose, the hemoglobin measure du jour, vascular access, mineral bone disorder treatment, and outcome metrics, including standardized mortality, hospitalization, and transplant ratios. Next is patient experience of care.

Dialysis by the book? Treatment of renal failure in a 101-year-old patient

While dialysis historically began as treatment intended for younger patients, it has, over time, increasingly been extended to treat elderly patients with a high comorbidity burden. Data on the outcomes of dialysis in these patients show that in some cases it confers no benefit and may be associated with functional decline. We describe a 101-year-old male patient with chronic kidney disease (CKD), admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with exacerbation of heart failure and sepsis. He experienced acute deterioration of renal function, with oliguria and acidosis. The patients healthcare proxy insisted that dialysis be initiated despite his extremely advanced age, citing the patients devout religious beliefs. He underwent 56 dialysis treatments over the course of ∼4 months after which he died as a result of septic and cardiogenic shock. Our case is unique, in that it may represent the oldest individual ever reported to start haemodialysis. It illustrates the ever-growing clinical and ethical challenges posed by the treatment of renal failure in the geriatric population.

Satisfaction with Care of Patients on Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Little is known about patients receiving dialysis who respond to satisfaction and experience of care surveys and those who do not respond, nor is much known about the corollaries of satisfaction. This study examined factors predicting response to Dialysis Clinic, Inc. (DCI)s patient satisfaction survey and factors associated with higher satisfaction among responders. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENT A total of 10,628 patients receiving in-center hemodialysis care at 201 DCI facilities between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2011, aged ≥18 years, treated during the survey administration window, and at the facility for ≥3 months before survey administration. Primary outcome was response to at least one of the nine survey questions; secondary outcome was overall satisfaction with care. RESULTS Response rate was 77.3%. In adjusted logistic regression (odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals), race other than black (white race, 1.23 [1.10 to 1.37]), missed treatments (1.16 [1.02 to 1.32]) or shortened treatments (≥5 treatments, 1.40 [1.22 to 1.60]), more hospital days (>3 days in the last 3 months, 1.89 [1.66 to 2.15]), and lower serum albumin (albumin level <3.5 g/dl, 1.4 [1.28 to 1.73]) all independently predicted nonresponse. In adjusted linear regression, the following were more satisfied with care: older patients (age ≥63 years, 1.84 [1.78 to 1.90]; age <63 years, 1.91 [1.86 to 1.97]; P<0.001), white patients (1.76 [1.71 to 1.81]) versus black patients (1.93 [1.88 to 1.99]) or those of other race (1.93 [1.83 to 2.03]) (P<0.001), patients with shorter duration of dialysis (≤2.5 years, 1.79 [1.73 to 1.84]; >2.5 years, 1.96 [1.91 to 2.02]; P<0.001), patients who had missed one or fewer treatments (1.83 [1.78 to 1.88]) versus those who had missed more than one treatment (1.92 [1.85 to 1.98]; P=0.002) and those who had shortened treatment (for one treatment or less, 1.84 [1.77 to 1.90]; for two to four treatments, 1.87 [1.81 to 1.93]; for five or more treatments, 1.92 [1.87 to 1.98]; P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS Survey results represent healthier and more adherent patients on hemodialysis. Shorter survey administration windows were associated with higher response rates. Older, white patients with shorter dialysis vintage were more satisfied.

Off the Charts: Medical documentation and selective redaction in the age of transparency

abstract:A growing demand for transparency in medicine has the potential to strain the doctor-patient relationship. While information can empower patients, unrestricted patient access to the electronic medical record may have unintended consequences. Medical documentation is often written in language that is inaccessible to people without medical training, and without guidance, patients have no way to interpret the constellation of acronyms, diagnoses, treatments, impressions, and arguments that appear throughout their own chart. Additionally, full transparency may not allow physicians the intellectual or clinical freedom they need to authentically express questions, problematic impressions, and concerns about the patients clinical and psychosocial issues. This article examines the ethical challenges of transparency in the digital era and suggests that selective redaction may serve as a means to maintain transparency, affirm physicians discretion, and uphold the core values of the doctor-patient relationship amidst disruptive technological change.