F.A. Fontijn-Tekamp

Biting and Chewing in Overdentures, Full Dentures, and Natural Dentitions

It has been suggested that the provision of dental implants can improve the oral function of subjects with severely resorbed mandibles, possibly restoring function to the level experienced by satisfied wearers of conventional complete dentures. Nevertheless, a quantitative comparison has never been made and can be drawn from the literature only with difficulty, since studies differ greatly in methodology. To make such a comparison, we measured bite force and chewing efficiency by using identical methods in subjects with overdentures, complete full dentures, and natural dentitions. Our results indicated that bite forces achieved with overdentures on dental implants were between those achieved with artificial and natural dentitions. Chewing efficiency was significantly greater than that of subjects with full dentures (low mandible), but was still lower than that of subjects with full dentures (high mandible) and overdentures on bare roots. Differences in the height of the mandible revealed significant differences in chewing efficiency between the two full-denture groups. Furthermore, subjects with a shortened dental arch exerted bite forces similar to those of subjects with a complete-natural dentition, but their chewing efficiency was limited due to the reduced occlusal area. For all groups combined, a significant correlation was found between maximum bite force and chewing efficiency. Nearly half of the variation in chewing efficiency was explained by bite force alone.

Masticatory Function with Implant-supported Overdentures

The type of attachment that is used in implant-supported mandibular overdentures may influence the retention and stability of the prosthesis and, thus, masticatory function. In this within-subject cross-over clinical trial, we examined the hypothesis that greater retention and stability of the overdenture improve the masticatory function. Eighteen edentulous subjects received 2 oral implants, a new overdenture, and, successively, 3 different suprastructure modalities: magnet, ball, and bar-clip. Masticatory performance, masticatory efficiency, and swallowing threshold were measured. The masticatory function significantly improved after implant treatment with each of the 3 attachments. We observed small differences in masticatory function among the 3 attachment types: slightly better masticatory performance with ball and bar-clip than with magnet attachments. The number of chewing cycles until swallowing hardly decreased after implant treatment. We conclude that significantly better masticatory performance, combined with a slightly smaller number of chewing cycles after implant treatment, results in smaller food particles being swallowed.

Swallowing threshold and masticatory performance in dentate adults

A variety of both natural and artificial foods are commonly used for the evaluation of masticatory function. We compared swallowing thresholds of three natural foods (peanuts, cheese and carrots) to those of a standardized artificial test food (Optocal Plus) and examined the relationship between masticatory performance and the swallowing threshold. Eighty-seven healthy dentate subjects participated (25 men and 62 women, aged 42.0+/-12.1 years). We evaluated the dental state, registered the number of chewing strokes used before swallowing, analyzed the chewed particles and determined median particle sizes (X50) for Optocal Plus after 15 chewing strokes and at the moment of swallowing. The results show that the number of strokes used before swallowing each natural food linearly increased with volume (P<0.001), and that carrots required more strokes than peanuts and cheese (P<0.001). The number of chewing strokes used before swallowing Optocal Plus was comparable to the number used for carrots. Masticatory performance was significantly influenced by dental state, but not by age or gender. Significant correlations were observed for: (1) the number of chewing strokes used before swallowing natural foods and Optocal Plus; (2) the median particle sizes after 15 strokes and before swallowing; (3) the number of chewing strokes before swallowing and the corresponding median particle size. However, median particle sizes as obtained after 15 strokes did not correlate with the number of strokes used before swallowing (r=0.02). Thus, bad chewers did not necessarily chew longer before swallowing than good chewers. As a consequence bad chewers would, on average, swallow larger food particles.

Comparison of single and multiple sieve methods for the determination of masticatory performance

In the majority of studies on masticatory performance, the degree of food breakdown has been determined by sieving the food with one or more sieves. The aim of the present study was to compare the results obtained with a single and a multiple sieve method, as these methods have never been compared. We analysed the chewed food of 176 dentate subjects with a single and a multiple sieve method. Furthermore, we quantified the influence of age, gender, and dental status on the masticatory performance in order to compare the sensitivity of both methods. We observed a significant influence of the number of occlusal units on the masticatory performance for both methods. The single sieve method is less reliable than the multiple sieve method if the sieve diameter is not close enough to the median particle size of the chewed food. Therefore, we recommend the multiple sieve method.