F. Bernasconi

The mechanisms involved in formation of deletions and duplications of 15q11-q13.

Haplotype analysis was undertaken in 20 cases of 15q11-q13 deletion associated with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) or Angelman syndrome (AS) to determine if these deletions arose through unequal meiotic crossing over between homologous chromosomes. Of these, six cases of PWS and three of AS were informative for markers on both sides of the deletion. For four of six cases of paternal 15q11-q13 deletion (PWS), markers on both sides of the deletion breakpoints were inferred to be of the same grandparental origin, implying an intrachromosomal origin of the deletion. Although the remaining two PWS cases showed evidence of crossing over between markers flanking the deletion, this was not more frequent than expected by chance given the genetic distance between proximal and distal markers. It is therefore possible that all PWS deletions were intrachromosomal in origin with the deletion event occurring after normal meiosis I recombination. Alternatively, both sister chromatid and homologous chromosome unequal exchange during meiosis may contribute to these deletions. In contrast, all three cases of maternal 15q11-q13 deletion (AS) were associated with crossing over between flanking markers, which suggests significantly more recombination than expected by chance (p = 0.002). Therefore, there appears to be more than one mechanism which may lead to PWS/AS deletions or the resolution of recombination intermediates may differ depending on the parental origin of the deletion. Furthermore, 13 of 15 cases of 15q11-q13 duplication, triplication, or inversion duplication had a distal duplication breakpoint which differed from the common distal deletion breakpoint. The presence of at least four distal breakpoint sites in duplications indicates that the mechanisms of rearrangement may be complex and multiple repeat sequences may be involved.

Intrachromosomal triplication of 15q11-q13.

A 7 year old girl with intrachromosomal triplication 46,XX,-15,+der(15)(pter-->q13::q13-->q11::q11-->qter) resulting in tetrasomy of 15q11-q13 is reported. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation confirmed that the tetrasomic region included the entire segment normally deleted in Prader-Willi and Angelman syndrome patients, and breakpoints were similar to those reported in two tandem duplications of 15q11-q13. The middle repeat was inverted, suggesting a possible origin through an inverted duplication intermediate. Microsatellite analysis showed that the rearrangement was of maternal origin and involved both maternal homologues. Clinical findings included multiple minor anomalies (a fistula over the glabella, epicanthic folds, downward slanting palpebral fissures, ptosis of the upper lids, strabismus, a broad and bulbous tip of the nose, and small hands and feet), motor and mental retardation, a seizure disorder, and limited verbal abilities. In addition, immunological examination disclosed a selective immunodeficiency. The overall phenotype did not clearly resemble that of cases with tetrasomy 15pter-q13 associated with an extra inv dup(15)(pter-->q13:q13-->pter) chromosome. The latter aberration causes more severe mental deficit and intractable seizures, but less marked phenotypic alterations, although some overlap in mild facial dysmorphic features is present. A number of features common to Angelman syndrome were also observed in the patient.

Phenotype of the Williams-Beuren syndrome associated with hemizygosity at the elastin locus

To correlate presence or absence of a 7q11 microdeletion with the clinical picture of the Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS), we investigated 29 patients with a clinical diagnosis of WBS or WBS-like features, aged 1–30 years, using molecular analysis and/or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Deletions at 7q11 were found in 75% of the patients (22 out of 29). Nine deletions occurred on a paternal, and ten on a maternal chromosome; three deletions were demonstrated by FISH only, and parental origin could thus not be determined. All deletion patients aged between 2 years and puberty displayed a distinct pattern of facial features (including periorbital fullness, short nose with flat bridge, wide mouth, and full lips and cheeks), the characteristic outgoing social behaviour, as well as moderate growth and mental retardation. Twothirds (15 out of 22) had a cardiovascular malformation, but only one third (7 of 22) had supravalvular aortic stenosis (SVAS). A stellate iris pattern was also present in one-third of the patients only. In the four adult patients with 7q11 deletions, there was prominence of the lower lip whereas fullness of cheeks and periorbital tissue was not seen.ConclusionThis study confirms that WBS has a unique clinical picture which can be diagnosed clinically, but also shows that the relative frequency of individual features may have been overemphasized in the past, and that a minority of patients may exist who are clinically indistinguishable from WBS but who appear to have no deletion at 7q11.

Isochromosome 18p results from maternal meiosis II nondisjunction.

Microsatellite analysis with 13 microsatellites spread over 18p was performed to determine the origin of the marker chromosome in 9 patients with additional metacentric marker chromosomes. Phenotypes and banding patterns suggested that the markers were isochromosomes 18p. Maternal origin was determined in all 8 cases where both parents were available for study. Six cases showed 3 alleles (one paternal, one maternal each in single and double dose) of informative markers located close to the telomere while markers close to the centromere on 18p were reduced to homozygosity (one paternal allele in single dosage and one maternal allele presumably in triple dosage). A similar result was obtained in the patient with no parents available for examination. The other 2 patients were uninformative for maternal hetero- versus homozygosity, but at some loci the maternal band was clearly stronger than the paternal one whereas the opposite was never observed. Trisomy 18 differs from trisomy 21, XXX and XXY of maternal origin through a preponderance of meiosis II versus meiosis I nondisjunction. Thus, the results of our study and the advanced mean maternal age at delivery of patients with additional i(18p) indicate that in most if not all cases the marker chromosome originates from maternal meiosis II nondisjunction immediately followed by isochromosome formation in one of the 2 maternal chromosomes 18. Possible explanations of these results include a maternally imprinted gene on 18q with a lethal effect if the paternal homologue is lost and a mechanism through which nondisjunction in some cases could be connected with isochromosome formation.

Molecular studies of translocations and trisomy involving chromosome 13

Twenty-four cases of trisomy 13 and one case with disomy 13, but a de novo dic(13,13) (p12p12) chromosome, were examined with molecular markers to determine the origin of the extra (or rearranged) chromosome. Twenty-one of 23 informative patients were consistent with a maternal origin of the extra chromosome. Lack of a third allele at any locus in both paternal origin cases indicate a somatic duplication of the paternal chromosome occurred. Five cases had translocation trisomy: one de novo rob(13q14q), one paternally derived rob(13q14q), two de novo t(13q13q), and one mosaic de novo t(13q13q)/r(13). The patient with a paternal rob(13q14q) had a maternal meiotic origin of the trisomy; thus, the paternal inheritance of the translocation chromosome was purely coincidental. Since there is not a significantly increased risk for unbalanced offspring of a t(13q14q) carrier and most trisomies are maternal in origin, this result should not be surprising; however, it illustrates that one cannot infer the origin of translocation trisomy based on parental origin of the translocation. Lack of a third allele at any locus in one of the three t(13q13q) cases indicates that it was most likely an isochromosome of postmeiotic origin, whereas the other two cases showed evidence of recombination. One balanced (nontrisomic) case with a nonmosaic 45, -13, -13, +t(13;13) karyotype was also investigated and was determined to be a somatic Robertsonian translocation between the maternal and paternal homologues, as has been found for all balanced homologous Robertsonian translocations so far investigated. Thus, it is also incorrect to assume in de novo translocation cases that the two involved chromosomes are even from the same parent. Despite a maternal origin of the trisomy, we cannot therefore infer anything about the parental origin of the chromosomes 13 and 14 involved in the translocation in the de novo t(13q14q) case nor for the two t(13;13) chromosomes showing a meiotic origin of the trisomy.