F. Beygui

Clinical outcome following coronary angioplasty in dialysis patients: a case–control study in the era of coronary stenting

BACKGROUND Balloon coronary angioplasty has been reported to be ineffective in patients treated for end stage renal disease because of a high restenosis rate. OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical outcome following coronary angioplasty with provisional stenting in dialysis versus non-dialysis patients. DESIGN A case–control study. PATIENTS Of 1428 consecutive patients who underwent coronary angioplasty, 100 (7%) were being treated for end stage renal disease. These were compared with 100 control patients matched for age, sex, coronary lesions, presence of diabetes mellitus, and rate of coronary stenting (40%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES In-hospital and one year clinical outcome. RESULTS The rates of procedural success (90% v 93%), in-hospital mortality (1% v 0%), stent thrombosis (0%v 0%), and Q wave myocardial infarction (0% v 1%) were similar in dialysis and non-dialysis patients. One year clinical outcome after coronary angioplasty was similar in the two groups in terms of clinical restenosis (31% v 28%) and myocardial infarction (6% v 2%), but cardiac death was more common in dialysed patients (11% v2%, p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Dialysis does not increase the risk of clinical restenosis after coronary angioplasty with provisional stenting. Coronary angioplasty is a safe and effective therapeutic procedure in selected dialysis patients with culprit lesions accessible to stenting. However, the one year survival is reduced in this high risk population.

Myocardial viability, coronary flow reserve, and in-hospital predictors of late recovery of contractility following successful primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction

Objective: To assess the relation between myocardial viability, coronary flow reserve, and recovery of myocardial contractility after stenting for acute myocardial infarction. Design: Consecutive sample prospective study. Setting: University hospital. Patients: 41 patients with single vessel disease and successful primary stenting for a first acute myocardial infarction. Interventions:201Tl single photon emission computed tomography, contrast ventriculography, and intracoronary Doppler performed 7 (1) days after primary stenting. Main outcome measures: Regional contractility recovery assessed by contrast ventriculography at 6 (1) months’ follow up. Results: On univariate analysis, contractility recovery was correlated to prereperfusion anterograde and collateral flow grades (r = 0.41, p = 0.03 and r = 0.55, p = 0.0004), viability index (r = 0.55, p = 0.04), peak creatine kinase concentrations (r = −0.55, p = 0.0005), left ventricular ejection fraction (r = 0.45, p = 0.005), end diastolic pressure (r = −0.62, p < 0.0001), end systolic volume index (r = −0.47, p = 0.01), and the extent of hypokinetic area (r = −0.48, p = 0.003), but not the coronary flow reserve. On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of late contractility recovery were prereperfusion anterograde and collateral flow grades and viability index. Relative coronary flow reserve, reflecting the culprit vessel’s microvascular function, was correlated only to the extent of the infarct risk area (r = −0.45, p = 0.003). Conclusions: Independent predictors of contractility recovery between the seventh day and the sixth month after successful stenting for acute myocardial infarction are prereperfusion anterograde and collateral flows and myocardial viability. The culprit vessel’s microvascular dysfunction is independent of myocardial viability and contractility and correlated to the extent of “jeopardised microvasculature”.

Characteristics and prognosis of patients with angiographic stent thrombosis: comparison between drug-eluting and bare-metal stents.

INTRODUCTION Conflicting data exist on the risk of stent thrombosis with drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS). Little is known about the potential different characteristics and outcomes of DES versus BMS thrombosis. OBJECTIVE To compare the characteristics, timing and outcomes of patients with angiographic stent thrombosis according to type of stent implanted. METHODS The population comprised consecutive patients who underwent BMS or DES implantation (January 2003-April 2007) at Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital. Data from patients with and without a stent thrombosis were compared to identify predictors of thrombosis. Timing of thrombosis (acute,<24 hours; subacute,<30 days; late,>30 days; very late,>1 year), clinical, angiographic and procedural characteristics, and outcomes were compared between patients with a BMS or DES thrombosis. RESULTS A total of 3579 patients received a BMS (2815 lesions, 2318 patients) or a DES (1536 lesions, 1261 patients). Documented angiographic stent thrombosis occurred in 52 (1.4%) patients, 16 (1.3%) with a DES and 36 (1.6%) with a BMS. Rates of acute (0.1% versus 0.2%), subacute (1% versus 0.7%), late (both 0.2%) and very late (both 0.2%) thrombosis were similar in patients with BMS and DES thrombosis. Factors predictive of stent thrombosis were similar, including left ventricular failure (P<0.0001), initial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (P<0.0001), multivessel PCI (P<0.0001), and balloon dilatation before stenting (P<0.04). Eleven (21%) cases of BMS (n=8, 22%) or DES (n=3, 19%) thrombosis arose soon after stopping antiplatelet therapy. Thirteen of 52 (25%) patients died a few hours after the event. Twenty-seven (52%) major adverse cardiac events occurred at 18 months, 7 in patients with a DES and 20 in those with a BMS (44% versus 55%, P=NS). These included 16 deaths (31%), 7 repeat PCIs and 4 myocardial infarctions. There were no independent predictive factors of death after stent thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS BMS and DES thrombosis are similar in terms of timing of thrombosis, characteristics and outcomes, and share the same risk of late thrombosis after interruption of antiplatelet therapy.

Medium-term survival after primary angioplasty for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock after the age of 75 years.

AIMS OF THE STUDY To assess mortality in people > or =75 years of age 6 months after myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock and treated by angioplasty with complete revascularisation and optimal anti-thrombotic treatment; to compare results to those of younger patients with or without shock and to analyse predictive factors for death. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study is based on 1011 consecutive patients with myocardial infarction admitted for primary angioplasty, subdivided into four groups by age and the presence or absence of cardiogenic shock: group 1 (<75 years of age without shock, n=733), group 2 (<75 years of age with shock, n=49), group 3 (> or =75 years of age without shock, n=208) and group 4 (> or =75 years of age with shock, n=20). These four patient groups were compared for mortality rates and predictive factors for in-hospital and 6 month mortality. RESULTS In-hospital mortality in groups 1 to 4 was 1.7%, 30.6%, 9.1%, and 70% (p<0.0001) respectively and 6-month mortality was 3.1%, 40%, 16% and 78% (P<0.0001). By univariate analysis renal failure was a predictive factor for death at 6 months in patients without cardiogenic shock (groups 1 and 3), and left ventricular function in patients in group 2. No predictive factors were found in group 4 patients. The independent predictive factors for death at 6 months were: age >75 years of age (P<0.0003), cardiogenic shock (P<0.0001), triple vessel lesions (P<0.01) and creatinine clearance (P=0.004). CONCLUSION Mortality after angioplasty remains high in people > or =75 years with cardiogenic shock despite all the advances in the management of myocardial infarction. These disappointing results should encourage us to assess the role of surgical revascularisation and circulatory assistance.

Clopidogrel et thrombopénie. À propos d'un cas

We report our experience with a case of isolated profound thrombocytopenia after clopidogrel (thienopyridine) administration. No adverse event such as bleeding or thrombotic event had occurred, although clopidogrel has been discontinued two weeks after the coronary artery stenting. Despite the safety of clopidogrel, this case demonstrates that clopidogrel can be associated not only with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura but also with isolated thrombocytopenia.

The Heparin Management Test: A New Device for Monitoring Anticoagulation during Coronary Intervention

Whole blood coagulation analysers are widely used during percutaneous coronary interventions. The precise degree of anticoagulation in patients is important in this setting. The aim of this investigation was to compare the results obtained with ACT (Hemochron) and HMT, the Heparin Management Test (TAS) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Patients (n = 100) were enrolled prospectively. Each patient received 10,000 units of heparin. At the end of the procedure, the mean ACT was 284+/-31 seconds and the mean HMT was 292+/-33 seconds. The correlation between the two methods was highly significant (r = 0.64, p<0.001). The HMT correlates well with ACT values in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Its use in the management of these patients should be considered.

Comparison of activated clotting times to heparin management test for adequacy of heparin anticoagulation in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

The aim of this study was to compare the activated clotting time (ACT) obtained with the Hemochron device and the Heparin Management Test (HMT) on a new automated whole-blood coagulometer, the Thrombolytic Assessment System, in patients undergoing angioplasty. Fifty patients undergoing balloon angioplasty were prospectively enrolled. The mean ACT after a 10,000 unit bolus of heparin was 283 +/- 39 sec at the end of the procedure. The mean HMT after 10,000 units of heparin was 286 +/- 31 sec at the end of the procedure in the same patients. The correlation between the two methods was significant (r = 0.6; P < 0.01). The HMT appears to correlate well with standard values obtained with the Hemochron ACT monitor in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

032: Thirty months outcomes after PCI of unprotected left main coronary artery according to the SYNTAX score

Aims To assess middle term outcomes according to SYNTAX score and rates of delayed surgical/bleeding events after unprotected left main (LM) coronary artery (ULMCA) PCI in an unselected patients population. Methods Consecutive patients treated by PCI for ULMCA were included among a single center 3508 PCI database within 36 months. Syntax scores were calculated, post discharge extracardiac surgery or hemorrhage were recorded during follow-up as clinical outcomes (Death, TVR, MACCE=cardiovascular death+MI+stroke+TLR). Results 102 (3.6%) patients underwent PCI of the LM, including 21 protected LM. Among the 81 patients with PCI of ULMCA, mean age was 65±13, 27% had urgent PCI for AMI or cardiogenic shock, 61% had DES. SYNTAX score was 28±14 in mean and ≤22 in 30 (37%), 23 to 32 in 22 (27%) and ≥33 in 29 (36%) patients. At 30±11 months follow up (98% of the patients), death occurred in 24 patients (30%), TVR in 16 (20%) and MACCE in 35 (43%). Clinical events according to the SYNTAX score are shown in figure. No cardiovascular death occurred in patients with syntax ≤22. MACCE rates were significantly lower when DES were used (24% vs. 64%, p During follow-up, 20 (25%) and 12 (15%) patients underwent unplanned extracardiac surgery and/or hemorrhage, leading to antiplatelet withdrawal in 31% of the cases. Conclusions In unselected patients treated by PCI of ULMCA with Syntax score ≤22, outcomes were found to be excellent with no cardiovascular death observed at 30 months. DES and non-urgent PCI were associated with a better prognosis. One patient out of three underwent unplanned extracardiac surgery or hemorrhage during follow up. Download full-size image Figure: 30-months outcomes according to SYNTAX score